Analysis of biomass pyrolysis liquids: separation and characterization of phenols

1991 ◽  
Vol 542 ◽  
pp. 263-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
George E. Achladas
1992 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. V. Bridgwater ◽  
M. L. Cottam

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 1650-1664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filip Stankovikj ◽  
Armando G. McDonald ◽  
Gregory L. Helms ◽  
Mariefel V. Olarte ◽  
Manuel Garcia-Perez

2011 ◽  
Vol 392 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 248-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Wang ◽  
Dalin Li ◽  
Mitsuru Koike ◽  
Shuichi Koso ◽  
Yoshinao Nakagawa ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 243 ◽  
pp. 941-948 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lihle D. Mafu ◽  
Hein W.J.P. Neomagus ◽  
Raymond C. Everson ◽  
Christien A. Strydom ◽  
Marion Carrier ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 61 ◽  
pp. 00018
Author(s):  
Murlidhar Gupta ◽  
Jacques Monnier ◽  
Eric Turriff ◽  
Mark Boyd

Biomass pyrolysis liquids (also known as bio-oil), are derived from renewable lignocellulosic biomass residues by fast pyrolysis process. These second-generation oxygenated hydrocarbon resources have the potential to partially substitute for petroleum-derived feedstocks and thus enhance the economic and environmental sustainability of our natural resources. However, in contrast to petroleum fuels, biomass-derived pyrolysis liquids contain a large amount of oxygen, usually 40-50% wt% (wet basis). This undesirable high oxygen content in pyrolysis liquids is considered as the primary reason for its high polarity, high acidity, lower stability, lower energy density and very low miscibility with conventional crude refining feedstocks. There are two major pathways for upgrading the pyrolysis liquids. While hydrodeoxygenation route is one of the most explored options, it requires production and supply of large amounts of expensive hydrogen at high pressures, mandating large and centralized upgrading plants, and thus large capital investment. In this paper, we discuss an alternative method of pyrolysis liquid upgrading, using cheap and affordable hydrogen donor additives and catalysts to promote partial deoxygenation at near atmospheric pressure. This approach is preferably to be used as a pre-treatment and stabilizing method for pyrolysis liquids in the close vicinity of remote biomass pyrolysis plants. The pre-treated oil, then can be shipped for further hydrocracking process in a centralized co-processing facility. Preliminary results from the initial proof of concept experiments involving a 200 g/h gas-phase continuous fast catalytic cracking system with continuous coke removal to enhance deoxygenation performance are presented. These results indicate positive impact of catalyst bed on quality and yield of the upgraded bio-oil product in terms of pH, viscosity, degree of deoxygenation, oil yield and concentration of hydrogen in the off gases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document