Improved Quality of Life Following Radical Radiation Therapy for Early Stage Carcinoma of the Prostate

1980 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 593-604
Author(s):  
Steven A. Leibel ◽  
Jose L. Pino y Torres ◽  
Stanley E. Order
1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 1022-1029 ◽  
Author(s):  
J A Hayman ◽  
B E Hillner ◽  
J R Harris ◽  
J C Weeks

PURPOSE To examine the cost-effectiveness of radiation therapy following conservative surgery for early-stage breast cancer. METHODS Using a Markov model, a cost-utility analysis was performed to compare a strategy of radiation therapy versus no radiation therapy in a hypothetical cohort of 60-year-old women following conservative surgery. Local recurrence, distant recurrence, and survival rates used in the model were derived from randomized trial data. Utilities for the nonmetastatic health states were collected from actual patients. Direct medical costs were estimated using data from a single institution. Transportation and time costs were also estimated. Years of life, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs, and incremental cost/QALY over a 10-year time horizon were calculated by the model for each strategy. RESULTS The addition of radiation therapy results in a cost increase of $9,800 per patient, no change in life expectancy, and an increase of 0.35 QALYs per patient, which leads to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $28,000/QALY, which is well below $50,000/QALY, a commonly cited threshold for cost-effective care. Sensitivity analysis shows the ratio to be heavily influenced by the cost of radiation therapy and the quality-of-life benefit that results from decreased risk of local recurrence. CONCLUSION Radiation therapy following conservative surgery is cost-effective compared with other accepted medical interventions. This study illustrates the importance of considering an intervention's effect on quality of life, as well as survival in defining cost-effectiveness.


2019 ◽  
pp. 102-112
Author(s):  
Mahdi Aghili ◽  
Marzieh Lashkari ◽  
Mohammad Babaei ◽  
Sepideh Mansouri

Background: Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is defined as applying high doses of radiation with a shorter interval to the lumpectomy cavity in the setting of breast-conserving therapy for early-stage breast cancer. This treatment strategy is attractive to patients, and its utilization has increased during recent years because of the shorter treatment schedule, better cosmetic outcomes, and acceptable local control rates in selected patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy. Here we provide an overview of various APBI techniques in terms of clinical and cosmetic outcomes, quality of life, and cost of treatment. We also review the current guidelines for selecting suitable breast cancer patients for APBI strategy.Methods: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed between 1996 -2019 that was made was made for case series and randomized studies with at least 2 years of follow-up in term of clinical and cosmetic outcomes, quality of life, and treatment costs. Results: Technological advances have made various APBI modalities, including intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy, intraoperative radiation therapy, and external-beam radiation therapy, more accessible in the community. Mature data from several randomized and prospective nonrandomized trials have contributed to the development of consensus guidelines for selecting the most appropriate candidates ABPI.Conclusion: APBI represent an attractive treatment option for appropriately selected patients with early breast cancer. Irrespective to various techniques used for APBI it is very important to select the most appropriate patient population according to reliable guidelines for this treatment strategy that could be non-inferiority to whole breast irradiation especially in high-volume radiation centers with long waiting lists and for patients who live far away from the radiotherapy centers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document