An in vitro histological comparison of the step-back, sonic, and ultrasonic instrumentation techniques in small, curved root canals

1987 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 307-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele A. Reynolds ◽  
Sandra Madison ◽  
Richard E. Walton ◽  
Keith V. Krell ◽  
Barry R.J. Rittman
Author(s):  
P Castelo-Baz ◽  
P Varela-Patino ◽  
G Cantatore ◽  
A Dominguez-Perez ◽  
M Ruiz-Pinon ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ying Song ◽  
Jing-zhi Ma ◽  
Ru-yan Wang ◽  
Xue-dong Zhou ◽  
Ling Zou ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 04 (02) ◽  
pp. 088-093
Author(s):  
Veerendra Uppin ◽  
Vinaya Varghese ◽  
Madhu Pujar ◽  
Nirmal Kurian ◽  
Hemant Vagarali

Abstract Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the canal transportation and centering ability of Rotary ProTaper Next, Hyflex CM and Wave One primary systems using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in curved root canals. Materials and Methods: Total 30 freshly extracted maxillary first molars having root canals with curvature between 10°- 20° were divided into three groups of 10 teeth each. All teeth were scanned by CBCT to determine the root canal shape before instrumentation. In Group 1, the canals were prepared with ProTaper Next files, in Group 2 with Hyflex CM files and in Group 3 with Wave One files. After preparation, post-instrumentation scan was performed. Pre-instrumentation and post-instrumentation images were obtained at 3 mm and 6 mm above the apical foramen and were compared using CBCT software. The amount of canal transportation and centering ability were assessed and statistically compared with one way analysis of variance and Tukey honestly significant test. (p<0.05). Results: All instrumentation systems used resulted in some amount of canal transportation. Data obtained suggested that Wave One files caused significantly lesser transportation and remained better centered in the canal than Hyflex CM and Rotary ProTaper Next files. Conclusion: The canal preparation with Wave One files results in lesser transportation and better centering ability than Hyflex CM and ProTaper Next rotary files in curved root canals.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 1051
Author(s):  
Tomasz Olek ◽  
Władysław P. Węglarz ◽  
Agata Trzcionka ◽  
Arkadiusz Dziedzic ◽  
Marta Tanasiewicz

The purpose of the mechanical root canal preparation is to clean it and give it the right shape. The preparation should be carried out in a way that maintains the original curvature and initial orientation of the apical end. Insufficient root canal preparation may prevent effective chemical decontamination and obturation to the full working length. The study aims to evaluate the shaping ability and effectiveness of the NiTi rotary and reciprocating endodontic instruments, compared to standard hand files using magnetic resonance imaging based on spin echo. Material and methods: A comparative study of severely curved root canals’ shaping abilities using three NiTi systems and K-type hand files was performed, with 40 training “endo-blocks” presenting with “L-shaped” canal. The root canal topography and geometry “before” and “after” mechanical preparation obtained by the magnetic resonance imaging based on the spin echo was used. The main measurement was made using the RARE sequence, with slice thickness reduced to 100 micrometers. In order to improve the signal-to-noise ratio, NA = 25 was used. To minimize the measurement time, the field of view was limited to a cuboid 17 × 16 × 3 mm, with a resolution of 33 × 31 × 100 micrometers. Each 3D image consisted of 512 × 512 × 30 voxels. The imaging plane has been selected in such a way as to fully illustrate the course of curvature of the model root canal. For TR = 5 s and effective TE = 36 ms, TA was 1.5 h. Measurements were performed twice, before and after the preparation of endo-blocs with a selected type of endodontic tools. Results: The use of rotary NiTi instruments caused a substantial alteration in the curvature topography and angle of the canals and change in the curvature length. The substantial discrepancy was observed during the preparation of simulated root canals with the reciprocating instruments and the use of WaveOne files led to the largest volume variation. No dependence between the amount of material removed and the measured intracanal side was observed when NiTi instruments were used. Preparation with hand K-type files revealed a relationship between the measuring side and the amount of material removed, with the lower values obtained for the canals’ internal curvatures. Conclusions: All the studied endodontic instruments allow a safe preparation of curved root canals in simulating in vivo conditions. The abbreviation of original root canals topography does not seem to be significantly altered following mechanical preparation of simulated, severely curved root canals. The spin echo-based magnetic resonance imaging technique can be utilized for visualization of the internal topography of the root’s canals in vitro before and after their mechanical preparation in in vitro conditions. In the future, magnetic resonance microscopy may become a diagnostic tool supporting the work of a clinician.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (34) ◽  
pp. 2920-2923
Author(s):  
Baljeet Singh Hora ◽  
Yadnesh Arun Dondulkar ◽  
Vaibhav Suresh Jain ◽  
Shailendra Kumar Sahu ◽  
Nitin Prakash Chand Jogad ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Extrusion of debris, bacteria, and irrigant effect the inter-appointment flare ups and post-operative outcome of the endodontic treatment. So, it is necessary to make every effort to minimize such extrusion during cleaning and shaping of the canals. The present study was done to compare and evaluate debris and irrigant extrusion from curved root canals using different Ni-Ti systems. METHODS 30 mesial roots of mandibular molars were used in this study. Crown were decoronated, working length and initial apical diameter was established. 1.5 % agar gel model was used in this study. Samples were assigned randomly into 3 groups (n = 10 teeth per group). ProTaper Next, One Shape, FANTA AF BLUE F ONE files were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions for canal instrumentation. Apically extruded debris and irrigant was computed after the biomechanical preparation and their comparative analysis for each of the instruments and experimental models was performed. RESULTS Statistically significant difference was found between the three experimental groups. (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS All the instruments produced apically extruded debris and irrigant, but least was seen with FANTA AF BLUE F ONE and maximum with One Shape among the experimental groups. KEY WORDS Apical Debris, Irrigant, NiTi Files


2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (10) ◽  
pp. 1545-1549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastasios Retsas ◽  
Anastasios Koursoumis ◽  
Nestor Tzimpoulas ◽  
Christos Boutsioukis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document