Appendix D. Literature Review: Contrast Sensitivity Testing

Ophthalmology ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 100 ◽  
pp. 119S-133S
2021 ◽  
Vol Special issue (2) ◽  
pp. 61-67
Author(s):  
Azamat Yusupov ◽  
◽  
Mukhiddin Ziyoviddinov ◽  
Shavkat Mukhanov ◽  
O.O. Sobirov

This article provides an unsystematic literature review devoted to analyzing the currently existing methods of functional diagnostics for age-related macular degeneration.The essence, advantages and disadvantages, and literature data on the use of such methods asphotostresstest, electrooculography, dark adaptation study, contrast sensitivity function assessment, light and color sensitivity study,electroretinographyand critical flicker fusion frequencyare described.Based on the analysis of literature data, itis shownthat currently, there is a need to searchfor informative and accessible methods of functional diagnostics in age-related macular degeneration, especially for its early diagnosis. The analysis has shown that the existing methods are mainly aimed either at fixing secondary morphological changes in the layer of pigment epithelial cells, at identifying the pathology of the pigment epithelium in conjunction with determining the function of photoreceptor elements, or at a comprehensive assessment of the structures of several layers of the retina. Keywords:age-related macular degeneration; methods of functional diagnostics; photostress test; electrooculography; contrast sensitivity


Author(s):  
Mark J. Kupersmith ◽  
Karen Holopigian ◽  
William H. Seiple

2003 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 1776-1779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyung Kuen Lee ◽  
Il Hwan Koh ◽  
Chul Myong Choe ◽  
Chan Yoon Kim ◽  
Young Jae Hong ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 29
Author(s):  
Shubhendu Mishra ◽  
Nenita Maganti ◽  
Natalie Squires ◽  
Prithvi Bomdica ◽  
Divya Nigam ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia Owsley ◽  
Thomas Swain ◽  
Rong Liu ◽  
Gerald McGwin ◽  
Mi Young Kwon

Abstract Background Older drivers have a crash rate nearly equal to that of young drivers whose crash rate is the highest among all age groups. Contrast sensitivity impairment is common in older adults. The purpose of this study is to examine whether parameters from the photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity functions (CSF) are associated with incident motor vehicle crash involvement by older drivers. Methods This study utilized data from older drivers (ages ≥60 years) who participated in the Strategic Highway Research Program Naturalistic Driving Study, a prospective, population-based study. At baseline participants underwent photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity testing for targets from 1.5–18 cycles per degree. Model fitting generated area under the log CSF (AULCSF) and peak log sensitivity. Participant vehicles were instrumented with sensors that captured continuous driving data when the vehicle was operating (accelerometers, global positioning system, forward radar, 4-channel video). They participated for 1–2 years. Crashes were coded from the video and other data streams by trained analysts. Results The photopic analysis was based on 844 drivers, and the mesopic on 854 drivers. Photopic AULCSF and peak log contrast sensitivity were not associated with crash rate, whether defined as all crashes or at-fault crashes only (all p > 0.05). Mesopic AULCSF and peak log sensitivity were associated with an increased crash rate when considered for all crashes (rate ratio (RR): 1.36, 95% CI: 1.06–1.72; RR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.01–1.63, respectively) and at-fault crashes only (RR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.16–1.93; RR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.07–1.78, respectively). Conclusions Results suggest that photopic contrast sensitivity testing may not help us understand future crash risk at the older-driver population level. Results highlight a previously unappreciated association between older adults’ mesopic contrast sensitivity deficits and crash involvement regardless of the time of day. Given the wide variability of light levels encountered in both day and night driving, mesopic vision tests, with their reliance on both cone and rod vision, may be a more comprehensive assessment of the visual system’s ability to process the roadway environment.


1996 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Tabandeh ◽  
L. Ranganath ◽  
V. Marks

Hypoglycaemia symptoms are of particular interest in view of the importance of hypoglycaemia unawareness. Visual symptoms arising during acute hypoglycaemia may be the result of metabolic disturbances in the visual pathways within the central nervous system or impairment of the refractive apparatus of the eye and binocular function. This study investigated the effect of hypoglycaemia upon visual acuity, binocular interaction and contrast sensitivity. Various aspects of visual function were examined in ten normal subjects before, during and after acute insulin-induced hypoglycaemia. A simultaneous study of hypoglycaemic symptoms enabled us to relate the objective findings to the symptoms as reported by the subjects. Snellen visual acuity, fusion and stereopsis were not affected by hypoglycaemia. Five subjects noted visual disturbance. Eight developed significant impairment of contrast sensitivity, which closely matched the lowered blood glucose concentration. These observations suggest that hypoglycaemic visual symptoms are due to neuroglycopenia of central visual pathways rather than changes within the refractive apparatus or abnormality of binocular function. Although these symptoms are not a constant feature of the hypoglycaemic state, subtle impairment of visual function occurs in most cases. Contrast sensitivity testing can be useful for assessment of fine changes in visual function.


1982 ◽  
Vol 100 (6) ◽  
pp. 947-950 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. L. Stamper ◽  
C. Hsu-Winges ◽  
M. Sopher

Eye ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 753-761 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Gupta ◽  
V Cvintal ◽  
R Delvadia ◽  
Y Sun ◽  
E Erdem ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anusha Y. Sukha ◽  
Alan Rubin

This paper reviews the psychophysical aspects of contrast sensitivity which concerns components of visual stimuli and the behavioural responses and methods used in contrast sensitivity testing. Some discussion is included of the different types of contrast sensitivity charts available as well as a brief background on the different types of graphical representations of contrast sensitivity and contrast visual acuities. Two illustrations alsodemonstrate stereo-pair representation of contrast visual acuities in the context of diabetic eyes. The doctoral research of the first author (AYS) that applies similar idea to understanding both inter- and intra-ocular variation of contrast visual acuities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document