scholarly journals EP-1300 Beware of IMRT axillary dose reduction in non­axillary-dissected breast cancer patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 133 ◽  
pp. S712
Author(s):  
J. Gadea ◽  
I. Ortiz ◽  
D. Morera ◽  
F. Sansaloni ◽  
R. Roncero ◽  
...  
1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1127-1127 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Salminen ◽  
M. Bergman ◽  
S. Huhtala ◽  
E. Ekholm

PURPOSE: Patients with metastatic breast cancer, especially those with progression after several prior chemotherapy treatments, need efficient chemotherapy. This study investigates the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer patients with previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one women (median age, 52 years; range, 40 to 65 years) treated for metastatic breast cancer with docetaxel were included. Eleven patients had one metastatic site, 10 patients had two, and 10 patients had three or more. The planned dose of docetaxel per course was the standard treatment of 100 mg/m2 (or 75 mg/m2 if liver enzyme levels were abnormal) every 3 weeks, given for six or eight cycles. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 48% (three complete responses [CR] and 11 partial responses [PR] ), and the median duration of response was 7 months (range, 2 to 16 months). Twenty patients (65%) experienced fatigue, and 27 patients (87%) had alopecia. Fifteen cases (48%) of grade 4 leukopenia were observed. Edema with a weight gain of 2 to 15 kg was seen in 12 patients (39%), and mucositis occurred in 20 patients (65%). Twenty-three patients (74%) interrupted treatment before reaching the planned number of courses, nine patients owing to progression of cancer and 14 owing to toxicity. Dose reduction was required in 18 (61%) of the patients. Only two patients were able to receive the planned eight courses without dose reduction. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel is highly active in metastatic breast cancer, even as a third-line treatment, and can be considered as an efficient standard option in second-line treatment. The standard recommended dose level of 100 mg/m2 is not feasible in heavily pretreated patients; therefore, for such patients, an initial dose level not exceeding 75 mg/m2 is recommended.


2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 20636-20636 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Paba ◽  
J. Sachdev ◽  
L. Kronish ◽  
M. Jahanzeb ◽  
S. Waheed

1996 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack Webster ◽  
Nicole Kuderer ◽  
Gary H. Lyman

Background Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer is frequently accompanied by neutropenia requiring dose reduction or treatment delay that can potentially compromise therapeutic effectiveness. Recombinant granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) reduces the duration and severity of neutropenia. Methods Nineteen patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer receiving adjuvant systemic chemotherapy met criteria for dose reduction or treatment delay due to neutropenia. All were treated with G-CSF. The mean duration of G-CSF therapy was five days. Results An increase in mean absolute neutrophil count was seen in cycles with G-CSF. Chemotherapy treatment was delayed less often following the use of G-CSF. Conclusions Breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy who face treatment delays or dose reductions can continue on full-dose intensity therapy using supportive G-CSF. Prospective trials are needed to accurately measure the impact of G-CSF on dose intensity and long-term disease control.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11606-e11606
Author(s):  
Y. Suh ◽  
S. Oh ◽  
B. Song ◽  
S. Jung

e11606 Background: For node-positive breast cancer, TAC (Docetaxel-Doxorubicin-Cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy is preferred as an adjuvant treatment. However, due to its high toxicity profiles such as severe neutropenia, TAC is a lot beyond enthusiasm. G-CSF support or even prophylaxis has been recommended to help patients recover from nadir, along with some dose-reduction schedule. We tried to evaluate whether TAC with G-CSF support from day 5 can be sustained without dose reduction in women under 69-years old. Methods: After getting IRB approval, between Mar. 2005 and Oct. 2008, 61 node-positive breast cancer patients (33 - 69 years old) had underwent TAC chemotherapy as an adjuvant treatment after curative resection after getting informed consent. Total of 366 cycles (6 cycles per patient, 75–50–500 mg/m2)were completed, G-CSF support was initiated from day 5 to full neutrophil recovery. In case of neutropenia, prophylactic antibiotics (cefoperazone 2 g and tobramycin 200 mg iv) were given. Results: Among 366 cycles, not a single cycle should be delayed to recover from any hematologic shortcomings such as neutropenia, anemia or thrombocytopenia. Interval of three weeks between each cycle could be maintained. No other problem happened for any patient to stop or postpone scheduled chemotherapy. None of antibiotics except prophylaxis with cefoperazone and tobramycin was needed. Conclusions: Maximum tolerable dose of chemotherapeutic agents should be given to patients to get the best oncologic outcome to fight against cancer. It is evident that huge scale prospective clinical trials can answer this question, but we presume that node-positive breast cancer patients between in her fourth and seventh decade can stand TAC chemotherapy with G-CSF support without dose reduction as routine. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 2492
Author(s):  
Christoph Suppan ◽  
Florian Posch ◽  
Hannah Deborah Mueller ◽  
Nina Mischitz ◽  
Daniel Steiner ◽  
...  

Background: The prognostic performance of the residual cancer burden (RCB) score is a promising tool for breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy. We independently evaluated the prognostic value of RCB scores in an extended validation cohort. Additionally, we analyzed the association between chemotherapy dose reduction and RCB scores. Methods: In this extended validation study, 367 breast cancer patients with available RCB scores were followed up for recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS). We also computed standardized cumulative doses of anthracyclines and taxanes (A/Ts) to investigate a potential interaction between neoadjuvant chemotherapy dose reduction and RCB scores. Results: Higher RCB scores were consistently associated with adverse clinical outcomes across different molecular subtypes (HR for RFS = 1.60, 95% CI 1.33–1.93, p < 0.0001; HR for DDFS = 1.70, 95% CI 1.39–2.05, p < 0.0001; HR for OS = 1.67, 95% CI 1.34–2.08, p < 0.0001). The adverse impact prevailed throughout 5 years of follow-up, with a peak for relapse risk between 1–2 years after surgery. Clinical outcomes of patients with RCB class 1 did not differ substantially at 5 years compared to RCB class 0. A total of 180 patients (49.1%) underwent dose reduction of neoadjuvant A/T chemotherapy. We observed a statistically significant interaction between dose reduction and higher RCB scores (interaction p-value = 0.042). Conclusion: Our results confirm RCB score as a prognostic marker for RFS, DDFS, and OS independent of the molecular subtype. Importantly, we show that lower doses of cumulative neoadjuvant A/T were associated with higher RCB scores in patients who required a dose reduction.


2016 ◽  
Vol 115 (11) ◽  
pp. 1335-1342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siu W Lam ◽  
Charlotte N Frederiks ◽  
Tahar van der Straaten ◽  
Aafke H Honkoop ◽  
Henk-Jan Guchelaar ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document