151 Safety and survival of high dose palliative radiotherapy for locally advanced lung cancer

Lung Cancer ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 83 ◽  
pp. S55-S56
Author(s):  
S.M. O'Cathail ◽  
F.M. Buffa ◽  
G.S. Higgins ◽  
N. Panakis
Brachytherapy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 829-834
Author(s):  
Georgios Chatzikonstantinou ◽  
Nikolaos Zamboglou ◽  
Dimos Baltas ◽  
Konstantinos Ferentinos ◽  
Dimitra Bon ◽  
...  

JAMA Oncology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophia C. Kamran ◽  
Beow Y. Yeap ◽  
Christine A. Ulysse ◽  
Catherine Cronin ◽  
Cynthia L. Bowes ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. S78
Author(s):  
B. Taboada Valladares ◽  
P. Calvo Crespo ◽  
P. Peleteiro Higuero ◽  
I. Formoso García ◽  
A. Varela Pazos ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keisuke Tamari ◽  
Hiroshi Doi ◽  
Hiroya Shiomi ◽  
Ryoongjin Oh ◽  
Kazuhiko Ogawa

Abstract Background: Re-irradiation is one of the treatment options for recurrence after initial radiotherapy for locally advanced lung cancer. However, the safety and efficacy of high-dose re-irradiation for recurrent lung cancer has yet to be completely understood. This study investigated the outcomes of high-dose re-irradiation for patients with recurrent lung cancer at our clinic.Methods: Data were collected from 36 patients with lung cancer (median age, 68 years) who received high-dose re-irradiation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locoregional recurrence after initial radiotherapy in the locally advanced stage. Histology findings showed that 11 (30.6%), 14 (38.9%), and 11 (30.6%) patients had adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and small cell carcinoma, respectively. The interval from initial radiotherapy to re-irradiation was 23.4 months. Local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors, while late toxicities ≥grade3 were evaluated according to the CTCAE ver. 3.0.Results: The median follow-up was 14.6 months. The 1-year LC, PFS, and OS were 74.1%, 45.2%, and 78.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that histology was a significant prognostic factor for LC (p = 0.02), while histology (p = 0.04) and distant metastasis (p = 0.01) were significant prognostic factors for PFS. Grade 5 late toxicities occurred in 2 patients (5.6%) who exhibited esophageal perforation and bronchial perforation. No other ≥grade3 late toxicities occurred.Conclusion: High-dose re-irradiation for recurrent locally advanced lung cancer was effective and feasible. Lung adenocarcinoma might therefore be a good indication for re-irradiation.


2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 224-230
Author(s):  
Scott R. Silva ◽  
Murat Surucu ◽  
Jennifer Steber ◽  
Matthew M. Harkenrider ◽  
Mehee Choi

Objective: Radiation treatment planning for locally advanced lung cancer can be technically challenging, as delivery of ≥60 Gy to large volumes with concurrent chemotherapy is often associated with significant risk of normal tissue toxicity. We clinically implemented a novel hybrid RapidArc technique in patients with lung cancer and compared these plans with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and RapidArc-only plans. Materials/Methods: Hybrid RapidArc was used to treat 11 patients with locally advanced lung cancer having bulky mediastinal adenopathy. All 11 patients received concurrent chemotherapy. All underwent a 4-dimensional computed tomography planning scan. Hybrid RapidArc plans concurrently combined static (60%) and RapidArc (40%) beams. All cases were replanned using 3- to 5-field 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and RapidArc technique as controls. Results: Significant reductions in dose were observed in hybrid RapidArc plans compared to 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy plans for total lung V20 and mean (−2% and −0.6 Gy); contralateral lung mean (−2.92 Gy); and esophagus V60 and mean (−16.0% and −2.2 Gy; all P < .05). Contralateral lung doses were significantly lower for hybrid RapidArc plans compared to RapidArc-only plans (all P < .05). Compared to 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, heart V60 and mean dose were significantly improved with hybrid RapidArc (3% vs 5%, P = .04 and 16.32 Gy vs 16.65 Gy, P = .03). However, heart V40 and V45 and maximum spinal cord dose were significantly lower with RapidArc plans compared to hybrid RapidArc plans. Conformity and homogeneity were significantly better with hybrid RapidArc plans compared to 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy plans ( P < .05). Treatment was well tolerated, with no grade 3+ toxicities. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first report on the clinical application of hybrid RapidArc in patients with locally advanced lung cancer. Hybrid RapidArc permitted safe delivery of 60 to 66 Gy to large lung tumors with concurrent chemotherapy and demonstrated advantages for reduction in low-dose lung volumes, esophageal dose, and mean heart dose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document