OR42: Is there any Effect of Dietary Glycemic Index and Load During Pregnancy on Birth Weight of Infant in Women with and without Gestational Diabetes Mellitus?

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. S17
Author(s):  
G. Ede ◽  
G. Samur
2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 516-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farah Yasmin Hasbullah ◽  
Barakatun Nisak Mohd Yusof ◽  
Zalilah Mohd Shariff ◽  
Zulida Rejali ◽  
Heng Yaw Yong ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Manisha R. Gandhewar ◽  
Binti R. Bhatiyani ◽  
Priyanka Singh ◽  
Pradip R. Gaikwad

Background: The aim of this study was to study the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) using Diabetes in Pregnancy Study group India (DIPSI) criteria to diagnose patients with GDM and to study the maternal and neonatal outcomes.Methods: 500 patients attending the antenatal clinic between January 2013 to September 2014 with singleton pregnancies between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation were evaluated by administering 75g glucose in a nonfasting state and diagnosing GDM if the 2-hour plasma glucose was more than 140 mg/ dl. Women with multiple pregnancies, pre-existing diabetes mellitus, cardiac or renal disease were excluded from the study.Results: 31 women were diagnosed with GDM (prevalence 6.2%). The prevalence of risk factors such as age more than 25, obesity, family history of Diabetes Mellitus, history of GDM or birth weight more than 4.5kg in previous pregnancy and history of perinatal loss were associated with a statistically significant risk of developing GDM. Though the incidence of Gestational hypertension, polyhydramnios and postpartum haemorrhage was higher in the GDM group, it did not reach statistical significance. More women in the GDM group were delivered by LSCS. There was no significant difference in the incidence of SGA or preterm delivery in the groups. The mean birth weight in GDM group was higher than in the non GDM group.Conclusions: Early detection helps in preventing both maternal and fetal complications. This method of screening is convenient to women as it does not require them to be fasting.


2018 ◽  
Vol 626 ◽  
pp. 451-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fengxiu Ouyang ◽  
Ning Tang ◽  
Hui-Juan Zhang ◽  
Xia Wang ◽  
Shasha Zhao ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Gulsum Uysal ◽  
Mehmet Serdar Kutuk

Background: We aimed to compare fetal outcomes, fetal hypoxia, acidemia and maternal chracteristics including hemoglobin A1c, doppler indices between gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and pregestational diabetes mellitus (DM) among pregnant women treated with insulin.Methods: Data of pregnant patients with diagnosis of pregestational diabetes (type 1 and 2) and GDM who were treated with insulin (GDM A2 in White classification) was retrospectively collected and compared. Patients with active chronic systemic disease, multiple pregnancies, lost to follow up and detected fetal malformations were exluded. Maternal characteristics, umbilical doppler indices and amnion fluid index, gestational age at delivery, delivery characteristics (including vaginal delivery, or cesarean section) and newborn characteristics such as birth weight, Apgar score and umblical cord pH were all recorded.Results: A total of 130 patients (67 patients with GDM and 63 pregestational DM) were recruited to the study. There were no significant difference regarding type of delivery, fetal birth weight, umbilical cord Hb and gestational birth age. No other significant difference in frequency of low Apgar scores and fetal acidosis or metabolic acidosis were reported. HbA1c and blood glucose levels and insulin dosage were significantly statistically higher in pregestational group.Conclusions: The frequency of fetal distress parameters and poor fetal outcome were similar between groups although pregestaional diabetic patients had higher HbA1c rates. Therefore, patients with GDM (A2) should be followed up as closely as pregestational (overt) diabetic patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document