A Convenient Fluorescent-labeled Assay for in vitro Measurement of DNA Mismatch Repair Activity

2010 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 496-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shi-Ying LI ◽  
Xiang-Yu ZHANG ◽  
Xin ZHANG ◽  
Yan LAN ◽  
Zi-Chun HUA
1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 3851-3857 ◽  
Author(s):  
H S Friedman ◽  
R E McLendon ◽  
T Kerby ◽  
M Dugan ◽  
S H Bigner ◽  
...  

PURPOSE We evaluated the response to Temodal (Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth, NJ) of patients with newly diagnosed malignant glioma, as well as the predictive value of quantifying tumor DNA mismatch repair activity and O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGT). PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-three patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and five patients with newly diagnosed anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) were treated with Temodal at a starting dose of 200 mg/m2 daily for 5 consecutive days with repeat dosing every 28 days after the first daily dose. Immunochemistry for the detection of the human DNA mismatch repair proteins MSH2 and MLH1 and the DNA repair protein AGT was performed with monoclonal antibodies and characterized with respect to percent positive staining. RESULTS Of the 33 patients with GBM, complete responses (CRs) occurred in three patients, partial responses (PRs) occurred in 14 patients, stable disease (SD) was seen in four patients, and 12 patients developed progressive disease (PD). Toxicity included infrequent grades 3 and 4 myelosuppression, constipation, nausea, and headache. Thirty tumors showed greater than 60% cells that stained for MSH2 and MLH1, with three CRs, 12 PRs, three SDs, and 12 PDs. Eight tumors showed 60% or less cells that stained with antibodies to MSH2 and/or MLH1, with 3 PRs, 3 SDs, and 2 PDs. Eleven tumors showed 20% or greater cells that stained with an antibody to AGT, with 1 PR, 2 SDs, and 8 PDs. Twenty-five tumors showed less than 20% cells that stained for AGT, with 3 CRs, 12 PRs, 4 SDs, and 6 PDs. CONCLUSION These results suggest that Temodal has activity against newly diagnosed GBM and AA and warrants continued evaluation of this agent. Furthermore, pretherapy analysis of tumor DNA mismatch repair and, particularly, AGT protein expression may identify patients in whom tumors are resistant to Temodal.


2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (16) ◽  
pp. 9427-9440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dekang Liu ◽  
Jane H. Frederiksen ◽  
Sascha E. Liberti ◽  
Anne Lützen ◽  
Guido Keijzers ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 413 (2) ◽  
pp. 179-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Geng ◽  
Chunwei Du ◽  
Siying Chen ◽  
Vincenzo Salerno ◽  
Candela Manfredi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe A. Calil ◽  
Bin-Zhong Li ◽  
Kendall A. Torres ◽  
Katarina Nguyen ◽  
Nikki Bowen ◽  
...  

AbstractEukaryotic DNA Mismatch Repair (MMR) involves redundant exonuclease 1 (Exo1)-dependent and Exo1-independent pathways, of which the Exo1-independent pathway(s) is not well understood. The exo1Δ440-702 mutation, which deletes the MutS Homolog 2 (Msh2) and MutL Homolog 1 (Mlh1) interacting peptides (SHIP and MIP boxes, respectively), eliminates the Exo1 MMR functions but is not lethal in combination with rad27Δ mutations. Analyzing the effect of different combinations of the exo1Δ440-702 mutation, a rad27Δ mutation and the pms1-A99V mutation, which inactivates an Exo1-independent MMR pathway, demonstrated that each of these mutations inactivates a different MMR pathway. Furthermore, it was possible to reconstitute a Rad27- and Msh2-Msh6-dependent MMR reaction in vitro using a mispaired DNA substrate and other MMR proteins. Our results demonstrate Rad27 defines an Exo1-independent eukaryotic MMR pathway that is redundant with at least two other MMR pathways.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hu Fang ◽  
Xiaoqiang Zhu ◽  
Jieun Oh ◽  
Jayne A. Barbour ◽  
Jason W. H. Wong

AbstractDNA mismatch repair (MMR) is essential for maintaining genome integrity with its deficiency predisposing to cancer1. MMR is well known for its role in the post-replicative repair of mismatched base pairs that escape proofreading by DNA polymerases following cell division2. Yet, cancer genome sequencing has revealed that MMR deficient cancers not only have high mutation burden but also harbour multiple mutational signatures3, suggesting that MMR has pleotropic effects on DNA repair. The mechanisms underlying these mutational signatures have remained unclear despite studies using a range of in vitro4,5 and in vivo6 models of MMR deficiency. Here, using mutation data from cancer genomes, we identify a previously unknown function of MMR, showing that the loss of non-canonical replication-independent MMR activity is a major mutational process in human cancers. MMR is comprised of the MutSα (MSH2/MSH6) and MutLα (MLH1/PMS2) complexes7. Cancers with deficiency of MutSα exhibit mutational signature contributions distinct from those deficient of MutLα. This disparity is attributed to mutations arising from the unrepaired deamination of 5-methylcytosine (5mC), i.e. methylation damage, as opposed to replicative errors by DNA polymerases induced mismatches. Repair of methylation damage is strongly associated with H3K36me3 chromatin but independent of binding of MBD4, a DNA glycosylase that recognise 5mC and can repair methylation damage. As H3K36me3 recruits MutSα, our results suggest that MutSα is the essential factor in mediating the repair of methylation damage. Cell line models of MMR deficiency display little evidence of 5mC deamination-induced mutations as their rapid rate of proliferation limits for the opportunity for methylation damage. We thus uncover a non-canonical role of MMR in the protection against methylation damage in non-dividing cells.


1989 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 4432-4440
Author(s):  
B Kramer ◽  
W Kramer ◽  
M S Williamson ◽  
S Fogel

In vitro-constructed heteroduplex DNAs with defined mismatches were corrected in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells with efficiencies that were dependent on the mismatch. Single-nucleotide loops were repaired very efficiently; the base/base mismatches G/T, A/C, G/G, A/G, G/A, A/A, T/T, T/C, and C/T were repaired with a high to intermediate efficiency. The mismatch C/C and a 38-nucleotide loop were corrected with low efficiency. This substrate specificity pattern resembles that found in Escherichia coli and Streptococcus pneumoniae, suggesting an evolutionary relationship of DNA mismatch repair in pro- and eucaryotes. Repair of the listed mismatches was severely impaired in the putative S. cerevisiae DNA mismatch repair mutants pms1 and pms2. Low-efficiency repair also characterized pms3 strains, except that correction of single-nucleotide loops occurred with an efficiency close to that of PMS wild-type strains. A close correlation was found between the repair efficiencies determined in this study and the observed postmeiotic segregation frequencies of alleles with known DNA sequence. This suggests an involvement of DNA mismatch repair in recombination and gene conversion in S. cerevisiae.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document