2921 Low-dose Fotemustine in elderly patients with recurrent glioblastoma: A phase II prospective study

2015 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
pp. S591
Author(s):  
L. Bellu ◽  
G. Lombardi ◽  
A. Pambuku ◽  
E. Bergo ◽  
V. Zagonel
2015 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. vi145
Author(s):  
L. Bellu ◽  
G. Lombardi ◽  
A. Pambuku ◽  
E. Bergo ◽  
Z. Vittorina

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5574-5574
Author(s):  
Abdul Aziz Siddiqui ◽  
Kazi Najamus-saqib Khan ◽  
Arafat Ali Farooqui ◽  
Muhammad Saad Farooqi ◽  
Muhammad Junaid Tariq ◽  
...  

Introduction: Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) tend to have comorbidities and/or advanced age that make this subset of patients difficult to manage with current drug regimens. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, Clinicaltrials.gov and Web of Science was performed from inception and completed on 07/17/2019. Studies focusing on efficacy and tolerability of 3-drug regimens in patients with NDMM were included for the review. Results: Out of 3579 studies, a total of 10 (08 phase II and 03 phase III) clinical trials in last ten years (2010-2019) using 3-drug regimens in NDMM elderly pts (893M/807F) ineligible for ASCT (determined by investigators) were selected. A total of 1703/1740 NDMM pts were evaluated. Proteasome inhibitors (PIs) such as carfilzomib (C), bortezomib (V) and ixazomib (I) showed promising results in elderly transplant-ineligible NDMM pts. CLARION trial (phase III, n=955) compared two PIs (C and V) with melphalan (M) and prednisone. There was no statistically significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between two groups (median: 22.3 vs 22.1 months; HR: 0.91; 95% CI, 0.75-1.10, p = 0.159) as well as overall survival (OS) (HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.82-1.43). Difference in the least square means of the HR-QoL (Health related- quality of life) was 4.99 (p<.0001) favoring C-group. M may not be an ideal drug to combine with carfilzomib in this setting given more AEs.(Facon et al 2019). V as 3-drug regimen in combination with lenalidomide (L) in 242 pts achieved statistically significant prolonged PFS (median 43 mo) and OS (median 75 mo) with great efficacy and acceptable risk-benefit profile. (Durie et al 2017; phase III). Multinational phase II trial (n=70) by Dimopoulos et al (2019) evaluated I, with different fixed doses of cyclophosphamide (Cy). Median duration was 19 cycles, indicating the long-term tolerability of regimen. With favorable toxicity profile and maintained QoL scores, trial concluded that this therapy is tolerable in elderly transplant-ineligible NDMM pts. Tuchman et al (2017) in phase II trial (n=14) investigated (V-Cy-d) and achieved ORR of 64%, with ≥VGPR of 57%. Low dose V showed great efficacy with M yielding ORR of 86% and VGPR or better of 49% in phase II trial (n=101) that also evaluated Cy as 3-drug combination but results were more productive with M with longer PFS and OS which reduced when impact of frailty was examined on outcomes. Since toxicity was higher with M, trial suggested that 2-drug combination should be preferred in elderly frail patients. (Larocca et al 2015). Efficacy was quite promising when Bringhen et al (2014) trialed C with Cy-d; 87% OS and 76% PFS at 1 y in phase II trial (n=58) with much favorable safety profile. Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) such as elotuzumab (E) and pembrolizumab (Pe) are also tested in elderly. First study conducted on NDMM pts using humanized mAb; E, in phase II trial (n=40) by Takezako et al (2017) attained primary endpoint of the study (ORR) of (88%) and VGPR or better of 45% in Japanese pts with tolerable toxicities in elderly. No subjects on this study experienced severe peripheral neuropathy. KEYNOTE-185; a phase III multinational trial by Usmani et al (2019) evaluated Pe with Ld in 151 pts. FDA halted this study due to unfavorable benefit-risk profile; 19 deaths, 6 due to disease progression (PD), and 13 due to treatment-related AEs. Median PFS and median OS were not reached in either group. Immunomodulators such as L achieved one of the longest PFS reported in a trial of transplant ineligible patients (35 mo) by using LVd regimen in phase II multicenter trial (n=50). (O'Donnell et al 2018) Alkylating agents like bendamustine (ben) and M have been tested in different novel regimens. Decreasing intensity and increasing duration of ben resulted in better outcomes in phase II trial (n=59) by Berdeja et al (2016) and can be given as first line treatment. Ben yielded great results with low dose dexa as compared to high dose achieving 92% ORR. Original regimen was effective but relatively more toxic. Incidence of herpes and neuropathy decreased dramatically with the treatment modifications. Conclusion: Three-drug regimens having PIs, mABs, immunomodulators and alkylating agents have shown desirable results in NDMM transplant (ASCT)-ineligible elderly patients and are likely the emerging standard of care for NDMM. Disclosures Anwer: In-Cyte: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabella Palumbo ◽  
Alessia Farneti ◽  
Elisabetta Perrucci ◽  
Francesco Barberini ◽  
Antonio Rulli ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 289-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.-S. Kong ◽  
J.-I. Lee ◽  
J. H. Kim ◽  
S. T. Kim ◽  
W. S. Kim ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1013-1013
Author(s):  
Akmal Safwat ◽  
Lena Specht ◽  
Flemming Hansen ◽  
Mads Hansen ◽  
Jesper Jurlander ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: To further improve the results achieved by adding Rituximab (R) and shortening chemotherapy interval in elderly patients, an effective but relatively non-toxic treatment modality is needed. We tested therefore the addition of low dose total body irradiation (LTBI) of 1,6 Gy given after chemo-immunotherapy. Methods: A multicenter, phase II trial including patients &gt;60 yrs with stage II-IV, CD20-positive DLBCL was performed between 2003 and 2007. Patients received 6x R-CHOP-14 + 2x R alone followed by LTBI given as 2 courses of 4 daily fractions of 0,2 Gy separated by 2 weeks of rest. Radiotherapy to sites of bulky (&gt;7.5 cm) disease was given according to the local guidelines of the participating centres. Results: Forty two patients were included. Observation time ranged from 3 to 47 months with median follow up of 24 months. The median age was 67 years; 62% had stage III or IV; 48% had B symptoms and 36% had bulky (&gt; 7.5 cm) disease; 50% had ECOG score ≥ 1; 76% had elevated LDH and 57% had IPI of &gt;2. Twenty four patients (57%) achieved a CR or CRu at the end of chemotherapy, while 12 (28.5%) were in PR. One of the 12 PR patients refused LTBI. Of the remaining 11 PR patients who received LTBI, 8 (82%) achieved CR in the first follow up after LTBI while the remaining 3 patients had initially stable disease but progressed shortly after. One patient (2%) progressed under chemotherapy while seven patients (17%) relapsed after achieving CR. Six of these refractory/relapsed cases presented with IPI ≥ 3. The 3-yr event-free and progression-free survival values were 64.8% (SE: 8.7%) and 73.5% (SE: 8.9%), respectively, while the 3-yr overall survival was 85.4% (SE: 5.5%). There were 3 toxic deaths (7.1%) due to sepsis occurring during chemotherapy. Ninteen of 235 cycles of CHOP (8%) were given at reduced dose levels in 3 patients (7%), while 3 cycles (1.3%) were delayed but given at 100% dose level. None of the 305 injections of Rituximab were dose reduced. Only one of 31 patients (3%) got his second LTBI cycle at 75% of the planned dose because of thrombocytopenia. CTC Gr 3–4 neutropenia occurred following 50 of 250 R-CHOP-14 cycles (20%). CTC Gr. 3–4 thrombocytopenia was seen in 8 pts (22%) following LTBI. Conclusions: Despite the high risk profile of the patient cohort enrolled in this trial, the 3-yr outcome values match the results of the best performing recent phase III clinical trials designed for elderly patients with DLBCL. Adding LTBI to 6 cycles of R-CHOP-14 was well tolerated and effective in converting the majority of PRs into CRs. Therefore, it may provide survival benefit and should be tested in a randomised setting.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20658-e20658
Author(s):  
Hideki Kusagaya ◽  
Naoki Inui ◽  
Masato Karayama ◽  
Yuichi Ozawa ◽  
Yutaro Nakamura ◽  
...  

e20658 Background: Chemotherapy regimens for the elderly with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are still controversial, especially for patients over 80 years. We previously reported that biweekly combination therapy with gemcitabine and low-dose carboplatin was well tolerated and active in elderly patients aged ≥76 years with NSCLC (Lung Cancer 77, 2012). Here we present a subanalysis of more elder patients aged ≥80 years. Methods: We conducted a phase II trial comparing biweekly combination therapy with gemcitabine (1000mg/m2) plus carboplatin (AUC 3) and monotherapy with weekly gemcitabine (1000mg/m2) in chemotherapy-naïve NSCLC patients aged ≥76 years. We performed a retrospective subgroup analysis comparing patients aged < 80 and those ≥ 80 years. We focused on patients treated with combination therapy. The primary endpoint was overall response rate and secondary endpoints were safety and progression free survival (PFS). Results: Sixteen patients were aged < 80 years (median 77.5, range, 76-79 years) and 15 patients were aged ≥80 years (median 83, range 81-88 years). Overall response rates were 25% (95% CI: 7.3-52.4%) for patients aged <80 years and 20% (95% CI: 4.3-48.1%) for patients aged ≥80 years. The median PFS in patients aged <80 years was 3.5 months (95% CI: 3.2-5.6), compared with 3.6 months (95% CI: 2.8-5.0) in patients aged ≥80 years. Additionally, the prevalence of grade 3 or 4 hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity, the completion of four cycles chemotherapy, and the need for withdrawing treatment were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: In elderly patients with NSCLC, even aged ≥80 years, combination therapy with biweekly gemcitabine and low-dose carboplatin may be an efficacious treatment with a favorable toxicity profile. Clinical trial information: NCT00881296.


2013 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Martínez-Cuadrón ◽  
Pau Montesinos ◽  
Albert Oriol ◽  
Olga Salamero ◽  
Belén Vidriales ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document