Östergötland mammographic screening programme: Compliance, referral rate, and risk of interval breast cancer after a negative screen

1998 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. S92
Author(s):  
Bedrich Vitak ◽  
John Carstensen ◽  
Olle Stål
2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 138-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophia Zackrisson ◽  
Lars Janzon ◽  
Jonas Manjer ◽  
Ingvar Andersson

Objective: Breast cancers detected between screening examinations can influence the sensitivity of a screening programme. Studies of the prognosis of these so-called interval breast cancers show diverging results. We investigated the course of interval breast cancer over time in the Malmö Mammographic Screening Trial (MMST) 1976–86 and the Malmö Mammographic Service Screening Programme (MMSSP) 1990–99. Material and methods: Stage distribution and survival of interval cancers in MMSSP were compared with screen-detected and non-attender cancer cases in MMSSP, with interval cancers in MMST and with breast cancer cases in a non-screened population five years before the start of MMSSP (pre-screening cancer cases). Results: In MMSSP 1990–99, the interval cancers did not differ in stage distribution or survival compared with cancer cases in non-attenders, while screen-detected cancer cases had more favourable stage distribution and rate of survival than had the interval cancer cases. The MMST interval cancer cases, 1976–1986, had more favourable stage distribution but higher overall case fatality rate, relative risks (RR) 1.78 (1.00–3.20), and breast cancer case fatality rate, RR 2.05 (1.05–4.00), compared with the more recent MMSSP interval cancer cases. No significant difference in five-year survival was seen in the MMSSP interval cancer cases compared with pre-screening cancer cases not exposed to screening. Conclusion: In this urban population invited to mammographic screening, the survival rate for women with interval cancer has improved over a period of 20 years. Further studies are needed to assess what factors might explain changes in the course of interval breast cancer.


2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 155-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sameer Bhargava ◽  
Kaitlyn Tsuruda ◽  
Kåre Moen ◽  
Ida Bukholm ◽  
Solveig Hofvind

Objective The Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Programme invites women aged 50–69 to biennial mammographic screening. Although 84% of invited women have attended at least once, attendance rates vary across the country. We investigated attendance rates among various immigrant groups compared with non-immigrants in the programme. Methods There were 4,053,691 invitations sent to 885,979 women between 1996 and 2015. Using individual level population-based data from the Cancer Registry and Statistics Norway, we examined percent attendance and calculated incidence rate ratios, comparing immigrants with non-immigrants, using Poisson regression, following women's first invitation to the programme and for ever having attended. Results Immigrant women had lower attendance rates than the rest of the population, both following the first invitation (53.1% versus 76.1%) and for ever having attended (66.9% versus 86.4%). Differences in attendance rates between non-immigrant and immigrant women were less pronounced, but still present, when adjusted for sociodemographic factors. We also identified differences in attendance between immigrant groups. Attendance increased with duration of residency in Norway. A subgroup analysis of migrants' daughters showed that 70.0% attended following the first invitation, while 82.3% had ever attended. Conclusions Immigrant women had lower breast cancer screening attendance rates. The rationale for immigrant women's non-attendance needs to be explored through further studies targeting women from various birth countries and regions.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 21029-21029
Author(s):  
E. I. Palmero ◽  
M. Caleffi ◽  
M. I. Waddington Achatz ◽  
G. Martel-Planche ◽  
V. Marcel ◽  
...  

21029 Background: A specific germline mutation at codon 337 in TP53 (R337H) has been detected in a number of unrelated subjects with familial cancer risk in South Brazil, suggesting that this mutation may be relatively common in this population. Methods: To assess the TP53 R337H prevalence in a group of asymptomatic individuals unselected for family history of cancer, we studied 750 women aged 40–69 ys participating in a mammographic screening programme in Porto Alegre, Brazil`s southernmost capital. DNA was extracted from peripheral blood using standard procedures and PCR-amplified to generate a 238-base product encompassing TP53 exon 10, which was analyzed by RFLP using the restriction enzyme HhaI. The mutant, uncleaved allele was identified in agarose gels and positive RFLP findings were further confirmed by an independent PCR amplification and bi-directional, automated sequencing. Results and Discussion: The R337H mutant was detected in two of the 750 participants (0.15%), suggesting a much higher prevalence for this than for other TP53 germline mutations causing the LFS/LFL syndromes in the general population. Interestingly, these two subjects reported a familial history of cancer, and were found to be 2nd degree relatives. Three additional family members were also positive: one woman affected with breast cancer at the age of 36 years and two asymptomatic 62- and 80-year-old women. The presence of four R337H-positive cancer- unaffected individuals in this family, two of them well above the age of 50, indicates that this is a low-penetrance allele. In addition, the pedigree does not fulfill any of the currently recognized clinical criteria for the diagnosis of LFS/LFLS syndrome. This is the first study to report detection of a germline TP53 mutation in a population-based screening programme. Conclusions: The TP53 R337H mutant appears to be relatively common and may occur in families that do not fulfill the known clinical criteria for LFS/LFLS, the family described here contains asymptomatic carriers suggesting partial penetrance. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 163-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.J.M. Broeders ◽  
A.L.M. Verbeek ◽  
H. Straatman ◽  
P.G.M. Peer ◽  
P.C.M. Pasker-de Jong ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE: The optimal age boundaries for breast cancer screening are still under debate. A case-referent design was used to describe the effect of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality along the continuum of age, based on a 20 year follow up period. SETTING: The population based breast cancer screening programme in Nijmegen, The Netherlands, which has biennially invited women over 35 years since 1975. METHODS: Cases, defined as women who died from primary breast cancer between 1987 and 1997, were selected from the group of women who received at least one invitation to the screening programme. For 157 cases, 785 women from the same group were selected as referents. Information on the index screening (the screening examination preceding diagnosis of the case) was collected for both cases and referents. The risk of dying from breast cancer was calculated per 10 year moving age group for women who had attended the index screening versus those who had not. RESULTS: The youngest 10 year age group showing an effect in our study were women aged 45–54 at their index screening. Breast cancer mortality for women in this group who attended the index screening was 32% lower, although not significant, than for women who did not (odds ratio (OR) 0.68, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.33 to 1.41). This reduction in risk was not explained solely by an effect in women over 50 because the OR in women aged 45–49 was 0.56 (95% CI 0.20 to 1.61). Reductions in mortality became smaller with increasing age. Nevertheless, for women over 60 at index screening, participation in screening over a maximum 4 year period before diagnosis of the case yielded protective effects at least up to an age around 80. CONCLUSIONS: Although our results are based on a relatively small number of cases, they suggest that even in a programme with a 2 year screening interval there may be a benefit of starting screening around age 45. Also older women who participate at least once every 4 years still have much to gain from screening.


1995 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 1830-1835 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.T. Brekelmans ◽  
P.H. Peeters ◽  
J.J. Deurenberg ◽  
H.J. Collette

2001 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 213-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Meystre-Agustoni ◽  
F. Paccaud ◽  
A. Jeannin ◽  
F. Dubois-Arber

OBJECTIVES:To follow up anxiety in a cohort of women screened for breast cancer. METHODS:Within the framework of a pilot screening programme for breast cancer in the Canton of Vaud (Switzerland), a cohort of 924 participants aged 50–70 years were invited to answer questions on anxiety related to mammography screening. Anxiety was measured using a specific tool, the psychological consequences questionnaire (PCQ), and a new single item, direct question, breast cancer anxiety indicator (BCA). Participants were asked to fill in the questionnaire at four different phases: at screening, before the result, and 2 and 8 weeks after the result. The final response rate was 93.7%. Predictors of anxiety at each phase were assessed using multiple regression. RESULTS:Among those screening negative (94.7%), anxiety at screening was very low and remained so during the screening process. Among those screening false positive, anxiety was significantly higher 8 weeks after having received a negative diagnosis. Predictors of anxiety before screening were lower education and higher age, with a strong exogenous anxiety component. For subsequent phases, the initial anxiety score and education were the main determinants. Furthermore, a false positive result at screening was the most important predictor of anxiety 2 months after negative diagnosis. Anxiety measured with the BCA was strongly correlated with the PCQ. CONCLUSION:Anxiety was very low at screening and remained so during the process for negative women. Initial anxiety level was a strong predictor of anxiety during the entire process, up to 8 weeks after a negative result, and could be easily assessed using the BCA. The sustained higher anxiety level among those screening false positive is an undesirable side effect of the programme.


Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 726
Author(s):  
Lívia Večeřová ◽  
Marek Petráš ◽  
Alexander M. Čelko ◽  
Jolana Rambousková

The aim of the present study was to evaluate breast cancer risk in women aged 40–45 years not included in the routine mammographic screening programme in the Czech Republic and to assess the suitability of the screening interval. Our cohort study was conducted using registry data of one mammography centre (Bulovka Hospital in Prague) between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2017. The risk of breast cancer was evaluated using a positive predictive finding (PPF) corresponding to the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) scores of 4 and 5. The annual PPF incidence rate achieved 2.25 per 1000 women aged 40–45 years and was not significantly different from that (3.31) of women of 45–50 years of age as demonstrated by an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.75 (95% confidence interval: 0.42–1.33). It was found that a screening interval longer than 3 years increased the chance of PPF occurrence 1.7 times independently of the women’s age, signalling a risk of failure of early detection of breast cancer. The same PPF incidence rates both in women aged 40–45 years and in older ones indicates that even younger women should be eligible for enrolment in the routine mammographic screening programme in the Czech Republic.


2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-39
Author(s):  
Åsne Holen ◽  
Sofie Sebuødegård ◽  
Gunvor G Waade ◽  
Hildegunn Aase ◽  
Nina-Merete Hopland ◽  
...  

Objective To compare breast characteristics, compression parameters, and early performance measures (rates of recall, screen-detected and interval breast cancer, and histopathologic tumour characteristics) for mammographic screening at a stationary versus mobile screening unit. Methods Results from 92,408 mammographic screening examinations performed as part of BreastScreen Norway during 2008–2017 at either a stationary ( n = 52,620) or mobile ( n = 39,788) unit in Hordaland county were compared using descriptive statistics and generalized estimating equations. A generalized estimating equation for a binary outcome was used to estimate crude and adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals for the outcomes of interest. Adjusted generalized estimating equation models included age, breast volume, and density grade as covariates. Results Screening at the stationary unit was performed on smaller breasts with higher mammographic density, using lower compression force but higher pressure than at the mobile unit. Using the stationary screening unit as reference, for women screened at the mobile unit, the adjusted odds ratio was: for recall 0.94 (95% CI: 0.87--1.01), screen-detected breast cancer 0.92 (95% CI: 0.78--1.10), and interval breast cancer 1.17 (95% CI: 0.83–1.64). Conclusions The quality of care did not differ for women screened at the stationary versus the mobile unit, but there were differences between the women who attended the two units. Sociodemographic factors should be included in future analyses to fully understand the risk of breast cancer among women residing in urban versus rural areas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document