Calibration of anisotropic yield function by introducing plane strain test instead of equi-biaxial tensile test

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 2307-2313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie ZHU ◽  
Shang-yu HUANG ◽  
Wei LIU ◽  
Jian-hua HU ◽  
Xi-fan ZOU
Author(s):  
Luis Fernando Puente Medellín ◽  
Víctor Alfonso Ramírez Elías ◽  
Antonio de Jesús Balvantín García ◽  
Perla Iris Vázquez Gómez ◽  
José Angel Diosdado De la Peña

2016 ◽  
Vol 725 ◽  
pp. 255-260
Author(s):  
Shohei Ochiai ◽  
Akinori Yamanaka ◽  
Toshihiko Kuwabara

To improve the accuracy of forming simulations for sheet metal, the use of material models calibrated by multiaxial material tests is essential. Adequate material models can be calibrated on the basis of the contours of equal plastic work obtained by multiaxial material tests. However, because the tests often require special experimental equipment, they are not widely used by the industry. This paper proposes a methodology for a numerical biaxial tensile test that uses ABAQUS, a popular commercial software package for finite element analysis. In numerical tests, an open-source user-defined material model (UMAT) is used to implement crystal plasticity models. In order to validate our methodology, we performed a numerical biaxial tensile test on a 6000-series aluminum alloy sheet, and the results were compared with those of biaxial tensile tests with a cruciform specimen. The results demonstrated that the proposed numerical biaxial tensile test provides a reasonable prediction of stress-strain curves and the contours of equal plastic work.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012.18 (0) ◽  
pp. 203-204
Author(s):  
Shohei IMANO ◽  
Susumu TAKAHASHI ◽  
Toshihiko KUWABARA

2014 ◽  
Vol 611-612 ◽  
pp. 1710-1717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shun Ying Zhang ◽  
Lionel Leotoing ◽  
Dominique Guines ◽  
Sandrine Thuillier

The present work deals with the calibration strategy of yield functions used to describe the plastic anisotropic behavior of metallic sheets. In this paper, Bron and Besson yield criterion is used to model the plastic anisotropic behavior of AA5086 sheets. This yield model is flexible enough since the anisotropy is represented by 12 parameters (4 isotropic parameters and 8 anisotropic parameters in plane stress condition) in the form of two linear fourth order transformation tensors. The parameters of this anisotropic yield model have been identified from a single dedicated cross biaxial tensile test. It is shown, from finite element simulations, that the strain distribution in the center of the cruciform specimen is significantly dependent on the yield criterion. Moreover, this cross biaxial test involves a large range of strain paths in the center of the specimen. The calibration stage is performed by means of an optimization procedure minimizing the gap between experimental and numerical values of the principal strains along a specified path in the gauge area of the cruciform specimen. It is shown that the material parameters of Bron and Besson anisotropic yield model can be determined accurately by a unique biaxial tensile test.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document