Comparative study of different thermospray interfaces with carbamate pesticides: Influence of the ion source geometry

1995 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. 656-667 ◽  
Author(s):  
D VOLMER ◽  
K LEVSEN ◽  
M HONING ◽  
D BARCELO ◽  
J ABIAN ◽  
...  
1995 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. 656-667 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dietrich Volmer ◽  
Karsten Levsen ◽  
Maarten Honing ◽  
Damia Barceló ◽  
Joaquín Abian ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Víctor Cutillas ◽  
Carmen Ferrer ◽  
Amadeo R. Fernández-Alba

AbstractAbundant studies have been published evaluating different parameters of reverse-phase liquid chromatography (LC) and supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC), both coupled to electrospray (ESI)/mass spectrometry (MS) for pesticide residue analysis. However, there is a lack of a comprehensive comparative study that facilitates deep knowledge about the benefits of using each technique. In the present study, the same mass spectrometer was used coupled to both liquid and supercritical fluid chromatographies with a multiresidue method of 215 compounds, for the analysis of pesticide residues in food samples. Through the injection of the spiked extracts, separate experiments were conducted. A study of the optimum ion source temperature using the different chromatography modes was performed. The results were evaluated in terms of sensitivity with tomato, leek, onion, and orange as representative fruit and vegetable matrices. The compounds which reported the highest area values in each chromatography were evaluated through their substance groups and polarity values. The impact of matrix effects obtained in tomato matrix was similar for both cases; however, SFC clearly showed better results in analyzing matrices with a higher number of natural co-extracted compounds. This can be explained by the combination of two effects: (i) chromatography separation and (ii) ion source efficiency. The chromatographic elution presented different profiles of matrix components, which had diverse impact on the coelution with the analytes, being more beneficial when SFC was used in the matrices studied. The data showed that the best results obtained in SFC are also related to a higher ionization efficiency even when the ESI emitter tip was not optimized for SFC flow. In the present study a comprehensive evaluation of the benefits and drawbacks of these chromatography modes for routine pesticide residue analysis related to target compounds/commodities is provided. Graphical abstract


Crystals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 796
Author(s):  
Saif Ullah Awan ◽  
Danish Hussain ◽  
Syed Rizwan

The understanding of the growth and morphological evolution of nanoclusters with process parameters such as ion source geometry, voltage, current, time, and gas pressure are highly important to achieve their desired sizes, morphology, and concentration. Carbon nanoclusters (0-dimensional) were synthesized using the DC glow discharge technique at different process parameters (such as Ne-gas pressures, current, voltage, etc.) using custom fabricated graphite ion sources of cylindrical and U-shaped geometries. The morphology and density of carbon nanoclusters were studied with an atomic force microscope (AFM) to understand their evolution at different process parameters. The study suggests that the U-shaped hollow cathode ion source produces tiny carbon nanoclusters at greater concentration as compared to the cylindrical cathode. Similarly, the density of tiny nanoclusters enhances greatly with the increasing pressures (e.g., 75 mbar). In addition, the AFM morphology of the nanoclusters shows that they are more agglomerated at relatively lower pressure (e.g., 25 mbar). This may be due to the higher fragmentation of carbon soot with the increasing pressure because of more collisions among gas molecules and carbonaceous species. At controlled and optimized Ne-gas pressures and source geometry, carbon nanoclusters of the desired sizes can be fabricated, which may become promising candidates for nanoscale electronics, optoelectronic, and spintronic devices.


2012 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 02A307 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Delferrière ◽  
R. Gobin ◽  
F. Harrault ◽  
S. Nyckees ◽  
Y. Sauce ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document