A 6-year nationwide cohort study of glycaemic control in young people with Type 1 diabetes

2000 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 295-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birthe Sussane Olsen ◽  
Anne-Katrin Sjølie ◽  
Philip Hougaard ◽  
Jesper Johannesen ◽  
Knut Borch-Johnsen ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hood Thabit ◽  
Joshi Navis Prabhu ◽  
Womba Mubita ◽  
Catherine Fullwood ◽  
Shazli Azmi ◽  
...  

<b>Objective: </b>International type 1 diabetes registries have shown that HbA1c levels are highest in young people with type 1 diabetes, however improving their glycaemic control remains a challenge. We propose that use of factory-calibrated Dexcom G6 CGM system would improve glycaemic control in this cohort. <p><b>Research Design and Methods: </b>We conducted a randomized crossover trial in young people with type 1 diabetes (16 – 24 years old), comparing the Dexcom G6 CGM system and self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). Participants were assigned to the interventions in random order during two 8-week study periods. During SMBG, blinded CGM was worn by each participant for 10 days at the start, week-4 and week-7 of the control period. HbA1c measurements were drawn after enrolment, before and after each treatment period. The primary outcome was time in range 70–180mg/dl.</p> <p><b>Results: </b>Time in range was significantly higher during CGM compared to control [35.7±13.5% vs. 24.6±9.3%, mean difference 11.1% (95% CI 7.0 to 15.2, p<0.001)]. CGM use reduced mean sensor glucose [219.7±37.6mg/dl vs. 251.9±36.3mg/dl, mean difference -32.2mg/dl (95% CI -44.5 to -20.0, p<0.001)] and time above range [61.7±15.1% vs. 73.6±10.4%, mean difference 11.9% (95% CI -16.4 to -7.4, p<0.001)]. HbA1c level was reduced by 0.76% (95% CI -1.1 to -0.4) [-8.5mmol/mol (95% CI -12.4 to -4.6, p<0.001)]. Times spent below range (<70mg/dl and <54mg/dl) were low and comparable during both study periods. Sensor wear was 84% during the CGM period.</p> <p><b>Conclusion: </b>CGM use in young people with type 1 diabetes improves time in target and HbA1c levels compared to SMBG.<b> </b></p>


2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (11) ◽  
pp. 1508-1515 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Khanolkar ◽  
R. Amin ◽  
D. Taylor-Robinson ◽  
R. M. Viner ◽  
J. T. Warner ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Shengxin Liu ◽  
Ralf Kuja-Halkola ◽  
Henrik Larsson ◽  
Paul Lichtenstein ◽  
Jonas F  Ludvigsson ◽  
...  

Abstract Context Neurodevelopmental disorders are more prevalent in childhood-onset type 1 diabetes than in the general population, and the symptoms may limit the individual’s ability of diabetes management. It remains unknown whether comorbid neurodevelopmental disorders are associated with long-term glycaemic control and risk of diabetic complications. Methods This population-based cohort study used longitudinally collected data from Swedish registers. We identified 11,326 individuals born 1973-2013, diagnosed with type 1 diabetes 1990-2013 (median onset age: 9.6 years). Out of them, 764 had a comorbid neurodevelopmental disorder, including attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder, and intellectual disability. We used multinomial logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs) of having poor glycaemic control (assessed by mean of glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c]) and Cox regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) of nephropathy and retinopathy. Results The median of follow-up was 7.5 (IQR 3.9, 11.2) years. Having any neurodevelopmental disorder (ORadjusted 1.51 [95%CI 1.13, 2.03]), or ADHD (ORadjusted 2.31 [95%CI 1.54, 3.45]) was associated with poor glycaemic control (mean HbA1c &gt;8.5%). Increased risk of diabetic complications was observed in patients with comorbid neurodevelopmental disorders (HRadjusted 1.72 [95%CI 1.21, 2.44] for nephropathy, HRadjusted 1.18 [95%CI 1.00, 1.40] for retinopathy) and patients with ADHD (HRadjusted 1.90 [95%CI 1.20, 3.00] for nephropathy, HRadjusted 1.33 [95%CI 1.07, 1.66] for retinopathy). Patients with intellectual disability have a particularly higher risk of nephropathy (HRadjusted 2.64 [95%CI 1.30, 5.37]). Conclusions Comorbid neurodevelopmental disorders, primarily ADHD and intellectual disability, were associated with poor glycaemic control and a higher risk of diabetic complications in childhood-onset type 1 diabetes.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 668-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Semenkovich ◽  
P. P. Patel ◽  
A. B. Pollock ◽  
K. A. Beach ◽  
S. Nelson ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 643-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Howells ◽  
A. C. Wilson ◽  
T. C. Skinner ◽  
R. Newton ◽  
A. D. Morris ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hood Thabit ◽  
Joshi Navis Prabhu ◽  
Womba Mubita ◽  
Catherine Fullwood ◽  
Shazli Azmi ◽  
...  

<b>Objective: </b>International type 1 diabetes registries have shown that HbA1c levels are highest in young people with type 1 diabetes, however improving their glycaemic control remains a challenge. We propose that use of factory-calibrated Dexcom G6 CGM system would improve glycaemic control in this cohort. <p><b>Research Design and Methods: </b>We conducted a randomized crossover trial in young people with type 1 diabetes (16 – 24 years old), comparing the Dexcom G6 CGM system and self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). Participants were assigned to the interventions in random order during two 8-week study periods. During SMBG, blinded CGM was worn by each participant for 10 days at the start, week-4 and week-7 of the control period. HbA1c measurements were drawn after enrolment, before and after each treatment period. The primary outcome was time in range 70–180mg/dl.</p> <p><b>Results: </b>Time in range was significantly higher during CGM compared to control [35.7±13.5% vs. 24.6±9.3%, mean difference 11.1% (95% CI 7.0 to 15.2, p<0.001)]. CGM use reduced mean sensor glucose [219.7±37.6mg/dl vs. 251.9±36.3mg/dl, mean difference -32.2mg/dl (95% CI -44.5 to -20.0, p<0.001)] and time above range [61.7±15.1% vs. 73.6±10.4%, mean difference 11.9% (95% CI -16.4 to -7.4, p<0.001)]. HbA1c level was reduced by 0.76% (95% CI -1.1 to -0.4) [-8.5mmol/mol (95% CI -12.4 to -4.6, p<0.001)]. Times spent below range (<70mg/dl and <54mg/dl) were low and comparable during both study periods. Sensor wear was 84% during the CGM period.</p> <p><b>Conclusion: </b>CGM use in young people with type 1 diabetes improves time in target and HbA1c levels compared to SMBG.<b> </b></p>


Diabetes Care ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 1622-1627 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Benitez-Aguirre ◽  
M. E. Craig ◽  
M. B. Sasongko ◽  
A. J. Jenkins ◽  
T. Y. Wong ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. e369-e376 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Cuenca-García ◽  
R. Jago ◽  
J. P. H. Shield ◽  
C. P. Burren

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document