scholarly journals Young people with Type 1 diabetes of non-white ethnicity and lower socio-economic status have poorer glycaemic control in England and Wales

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (11) ◽  
pp. 1508-1515 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Khanolkar ◽  
R. Amin ◽  
D. Taylor-Robinson ◽  
R. M. Viner ◽  
J. T. Warner ◽  
...  
2004 ◽  
Vol 46 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Joachim Rosenbauer ◽  
Jean Baptiste du Prel ◽  
Andrea Icks ◽  
Reinhard W. Holl ◽  
G. Giani

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (12) ◽  
pp. 2081-2088 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. S. Campbell ◽  
H. M. Colhoun ◽  
B. Kennon ◽  
R. J. McCrimmon ◽  
N. Sattar ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hood Thabit ◽  
Joshi Navis Prabhu ◽  
Womba Mubita ◽  
Catherine Fullwood ◽  
Shazli Azmi ◽  
...  

<b>Objective: </b>International type 1 diabetes registries have shown that HbA1c levels are highest in young people with type 1 diabetes, however improving their glycaemic control remains a challenge. We propose that use of factory-calibrated Dexcom G6 CGM system would improve glycaemic control in this cohort. <p><b>Research Design and Methods: </b>We conducted a randomized crossover trial in young people with type 1 diabetes (16 – 24 years old), comparing the Dexcom G6 CGM system and self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). Participants were assigned to the interventions in random order during two 8-week study periods. During SMBG, blinded CGM was worn by each participant for 10 days at the start, week-4 and week-7 of the control period. HbA1c measurements were drawn after enrolment, before and after each treatment period. The primary outcome was time in range 70–180mg/dl.</p> <p><b>Results: </b>Time in range was significantly higher during CGM compared to control [35.7±13.5% vs. 24.6±9.3%, mean difference 11.1% (95% CI 7.0 to 15.2, p<0.001)]. CGM use reduced mean sensor glucose [219.7±37.6mg/dl vs. 251.9±36.3mg/dl, mean difference -32.2mg/dl (95% CI -44.5 to -20.0, p<0.001)] and time above range [61.7±15.1% vs. 73.6±10.4%, mean difference 11.9% (95% CI -16.4 to -7.4, p<0.001)]. HbA1c level was reduced by 0.76% (95% CI -1.1 to -0.4) [-8.5mmol/mol (95% CI -12.4 to -4.6, p<0.001)]. Times spent below range (<70mg/dl and <54mg/dl) were low and comparable during both study periods. Sensor wear was 84% during the CGM period.</p> <p><b>Conclusion: </b>CGM use in young people with type 1 diabetes improves time in target and HbA1c levels compared to SMBG.<b> </b></p>


2000 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 295-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birthe Sussane Olsen ◽  
Anne-Katrin Sjølie ◽  
Philip Hougaard ◽  
Jesper Johannesen ◽  
Knut Borch-Johnsen ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 668-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Semenkovich ◽  
P. P. Patel ◽  
A. B. Pollock ◽  
K. A. Beach ◽  
S. Nelson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document