scholarly journals UR1 THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF EPOETIN ALFA (EPO) THERAPY ON DELAYING TIME TO DIALYSIS IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE (CKD)

2006 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. A16-A17
Author(s):  
P Lefebvre ◽  
M Duh ◽  
S Mody ◽  
B Bookhart ◽  
CT Piech
2007 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Lefebvre ◽  
Mei Sheng Duh ◽  
Samir H. Mody ◽  
Brahim Bookhart ◽  
Catherine Tak Piech

2008 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Érick Moyneur ◽  
Brahim K. Bookhart ◽  
Samir H. Mody ◽  
Andrée-Anne Fournier ◽  
David Mallett ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Cihan Heybeli ◽  
Rumeyza Kazancioglu ◽  
Lee Smith ◽  
Nicola Veronese ◽  
Pinar Soysal

Author(s):  
О. Н. Курочкина

Изучены особенности течения хронической болезни почек (ХБП) у пожилых пациентов на основании анализа регистра ХБП за 2015-2018 гг. В регистре 484 пациента, из них 231 (47,7%) мужчина, 253 (52,3%) женщины, средний возраст - 58,8±15,8 года. Пациенты были разделены на три группы: 1-я - 218 человек до 59 лет; 2-я - 207 человек 60-74 лет; 3-я - 59 человек 75 лет и старше. В 1-й группе ведущей причиной ХБП явился хронический гломерулонефрит -27,1%, во 2-й - хронический тубулоинтерстициальный нефрит (ТИН) - 21,7%, диабетическая нефропатия (ДН) - 20,8% и гипертоническая нефропатия - 15,9%; в 3-й - ТИН (27,1%), хронический пиелонефрит (ПН) - 15,9% и ДН (13,6%). С возрастом увеличивалась частота встречаемости ТИН ( р <0,1), ПН ( р <0,05), ишемической болезни почек ( р <0,05), подагрической нефропатии ( р <0,1). Среднее снижение СКФ - 3,99 мл/мин на 1,73 мза год наблюдения. Темп снижения СКФ в 1-й группе - 3,36±1,8 мл/мин на 1,73 мза год, во 2-й - 2,43±1,2 ( р <0,001 между 1-йи 2-й группой), в 3-й - 1,82±1,1 мл/мин на 1,73 мза год. Наблюдали отрицательную корреляцию с возрастом ( р <0,05). Формирование регистра больных с ХБП позволяет знать количество больных и причины ХБП у пациентов пожилого и старческого возраста, оценивать клиническую ситуацию, темпы снижения СКФ и выбирать лечебную тактику у этих пациентов. The purpose of the work is to study the characteristics of the course of chronic kidney disease in elderly patients based on the analysis of the register of chronic kidney disease (CKD) for 2015-2018. in the Department of Nephrology, the Komi Republican Clinical Hospital. There are 484 patients in the register, of whom 231 are men (47,7%), 253 women (52,3%). The average age is 58,8±15,8 years old. The patients were divided into 3 groups: persons under the age of 59 years old - 218 people (group 1); from 60 to 74 years old - 207 people (group 2); and over 75 years old - 59 people (group 3). Most patients are between the ages of 60 and 69 years old. In the 1 group, the chronic glomerulonephritis is the leading cause of CKD - 27,1%; in the 2 group - the chronic tubulo-interstitial nephritis (TIN) - 21,7%, the diabetic nephropathy (DN) - 20,8% and the hypertensive nephropathy - 15,9%; in the 3 group - TIN (27,1%), the chronic pyelonephritis (PN) (15,9%) and DN (13,6%). With increasing age, the incidence of TIN ( p <0,1), MO ( p <0,05), coronary kidney disease (IBP) ( p <0,05), gouty nephropathy ( p <0,1) were raised. The average reduction in GFR is 3,99 ml/min/1,73 m per year of observation. The rate of decline in GFR in the 1st group is 3,36±1,8 ml/min/1,73 m per year, in the 2 - 2,43±1,2 ( p <0,001 between group 1 and 2), in the 3 group - 1,82±1,1; with aging the negative correlation was observed ( p <0,05). 39 patients received hemodialysis, including: in the 1 group - 20 people (9%), in the 2 group - 18 (8,7%), in the 3 group - 1 patient (1,7%). Making the register of the patients with CKD allows us to know the number of patients and the causes of CKD among the patients of elderly and senile ages, to assess the clinical situation, the rate of decline in GFR and treatment tactics in these patients.


2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 2182-2191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Moranne ◽  
Coraline Fafin ◽  
Sophie Roche ◽  
Maud Francois ◽  
Vincent Allot ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clarisse Roux-Marson ◽  
Jean-Baptiste Baranski ◽  
Coraline Fafin ◽  
Guillaume Extermann ◽  
Cecile Vigneau ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Elderly patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) frequently present comorbidities that put them at risk of polypharmacy and medication-related problems. This study aims to describe the overall medication profile of patients aged ≥ 75 years with advanced CKD from a multicenter French study and specifically the renally (RIMs) and potentially inappropriate-for-the-elderly medications (PIMs) that they take. Methods This is a cross-sectional analysis of medication profiles of individuals aged ≥ 75 years with eGFR < 20 ml/min/1.73m2 followed by a nephrologist, who collected their active prescriptions at the study inclusion visit. Medication profiles were analyzed according to route of administration, therapeutic classification, and their potential inappropriateness for these patients, according to Beers' criteria. Results We collected 5196 individual medication prescriptions for 556 patients, for a median of 9 daily medications [7-11]. Antihypertensive agents, antithrombotics, and antianemics were the classes most frequently prescribed. Moreover, 88% of patients had at least 1 medication classified as a RIM, and 21% of those were contraindicated drugs. At least 1 PIM was taken by 68.9%. The prescriptions most frequently requiring reassessment due to potential adverse effects were for proton pump inhibitors and allopurinol. The PIMs for which deprescription is especially important in this population are rilmenidine, long-term benzodiazepines, and anticholinergic drugs such as hydroxyzine. Conclusion We showed potential drug-related problems in elderly patients with advanced CKD. Healthcare providers must reassess each medication prescribed for this population, particularly the specific medications identified here.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaowei Lou ◽  
Shizhu Yuan ◽  
Wei Shen ◽  
Yueming Liu ◽  
Juan Jin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The effect of renal biopsy on the prognosis of elderly patients with chronic kidney disease remains unclear. Thus, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between renal biopsy and renal survival in this population.Methods In this multi-centre retrospective study, the baseline characteristics among three groups were balanced by propensity matching. All patients were divided into three groups according to age and renal biopsy. The clinicopathological features at biopsy and renal outcomes during the follow-up were collected and analysed. Renal outcomes were defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2, dialysis, renal transplantation, or death. The prognostic effects of renal biopsy were evaluated using Cox regression models. Results A total of 1313 patients were identified. After propensity matching, 390 patients were selected and divided into three groups. After a total follow-up period of 55 months, 20 (13.3%) patients (47.6% group 1 vs 7.41% group 2 vs 39.1% group 3) reached renal outcomes. No significant differences were found in renal outcomes among aged patients whether they underwent renal biopsy or not. Cox regression analysis revealed risk factors in aged patients including low albumin and high levels of proteinuria and serum creatinine (P < 0.05). Platelet count was significant only in aged patients who underwent renal biopsy (hazard ratio: 0.642, P < 0.05). Conclusion In conclusion, renal biopsy in the elderly has not shown benefits in terms of renal survival, conservative treatment appears to be a viable therapeutic option in the management of those people.


Author(s):  
Qiyan Zheng ◽  
Huisheng Yang ◽  
Xinwen Fu ◽  
Yishan Huang ◽  
Ruojun Wei ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an increasing public health issue. Anemia, which is a complication of CKD, is associated with reduced quality of life and increased morbidity and mortality. Currently quite a few clinical studies have been conducted to compare roxadustat with epoetin alfa [all for dialysis-dependent (DD) patients] or placebo [all for nondialysis-dependent (NDD) patients]. Our meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of roxadustat for anemia in patients with CKD. Methods We thoroughly searched eight electronic resource databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety between roxadustat versus epoetin alfa or placebo for the treatment of anemia in patients with CKD. Results Four Phase 2 and two Phase 3 studies with 1010 participants were included. Hemoglobin (Hb) and transferrin levels were increased significantly in the roxadustat group versus those in the placebo {standard mean difference [SMD] 1.57 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17–1.98]; SMD 1.81 [95% CI 1.53–2.08]; respectively, both low-quality evidence} or epoetin alfa group [SMD 0.47 (95% CI 0.02–0.93), very low-quality evidence; SMD 1.05 (95% CI 0.81–1.29), low-quality evidence; respectively]. Hepcidin levels were reduced significantly in the roxadustat group versus those in the placebo [SMD −1.72 (95% CI −3.03 to −0.41), very low-quality evidence] or epoetin alfa group [SMD −0.23 (95% CI −0.43 to −0.02), low-quality evidence]. Ferritin and serum transferrin saturation (TSAT) levels were reduced significantly in the roxadustat group versus those in the placebo group [SMD −0.82 (95% CI −1.31 to −0.33); SMD −0.54 (95% CI −0.76 to −0.32), respectively; both low-quality evidence] and ferritin and TSAT levels in the roxadustat group were comparable to those in the epoetin alfa group [SMD 0.02 (95% CI −0.18–0.21); SMD 0.15 (95% CI −0.04–0.35), respectively, both low-quality evidence]. As for safety, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) in the roxadustat group was insignificantly different from that of the placebo group [risk ratio (RR) 0.99 (95% CI 0.83–1.18); P = 0.89, very low-quality evidence]. But the incidence of AEs in the roxadustat group was significantly higher than that in the epoetin alfa group [RR 1.25 (95% CI 1.01–1.54); P = 0.04, low-quality evidence]. There was no significant association between roxadustat and the incidence of serious AEs (SAEs) for both NDD and DD patients [RR 1.08 (95% CI 0.51–2.28) and RR 1.43 (95% CI 0.85–2.40), respectively, both very low-quality evidence]. Conclusion In this meta-analysis of RCTs, we found evidence that after the oral administration of roxadustat, NDD patients’ Hb levels were increased effectively and DD patients’ Hb levels were maintained effectively. The risk of SAEs was not observed with the short-term use of roxadustat. These findings support roxadustat for the treatment of anemia in patients with CKD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document