scholarly journals Antibiotic Stewardship Implementation at Hospitals Without On-Site Infectious Disease Specialists: A Mixed-Methods Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
pp. s65-s65
Author(s):  
Daniel Livorsi ◽  
Eli Perencevich ◽  
Kenda Stewart Steffensmeier ◽  
Matthew Goetz ◽  
Heather Reisinger
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Disease ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Days Of Therapy

Background: Hospitals are required to have antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs), but there are few models for implementing ASPs without the support of an infectious disease (ID) specialist, defined as an ID physician and/or ID pharmacist. In this study, we sought to understand ASP implementation at hospitals within the Veterans’ Health Administration (VHA) that lack on-site ID support. Methods: Using a mandatory 2016 VHA survey, we identified acute-care hospitals that lacked an on-site ID specialist. For each hospital, antibiotic use (2018–2019) was quantified as days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 days present, based on NHSN methodology for tracking all antibacterial agents. From July 2019 through April 2020, we conducted semistructured interviews with personnel involved in or affected by ASP activities at 7 qualifying hospitals. All interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic content analysis. Results: Of the 7 acute-care hospitals, 6 (86%) had a long-term care unit; 3 (43%) had an intensive care unit; and 2 (29%) had full-time employment equivalents dedicated to stewardship. Sites averaged 1,075 (SD, ±654) and 148 (SD, ±96) admissions per year in acute-care and long-term care, respectively. At the site-level, mean antibiotic use was 486 DOT (SD, ±98) per 1,000 days-present in acute-care and 207 DOT (SD, ±74) per 1,000 days present in long-term care. We interviewed 42 personnel across the 7 sites. Although sites reported using similar interventions to promote antibiotic stewardship, the shape of these interventions varied. The following 4 common themes were identified: (1) The primary responsibility for ASPs fell on the pharmacist champions, who were typically assigned multiple other non-ASP responsibilities. (2) The pharmacist champions were more successful at gaining buy-in for stewardship initiatives when they had established rapport with clinicians, but at some sites, the use of contract physicians and frequent staff turnover were potential barriers. (3) Some sites felt that having access to an off-site ID specialist was important for overcoming institutional barriers to stewardship and improving the acceptance of their stewardship interventions. (4) In general, stewardship champions struggled to mobilize institutional resources, which made it difficult to advance their programmatic goals. Conclusions: In this study of 7 hospitals without local ID support, we found that ASPs are largely a pharmacy-driven process. Remote ID support, if available, was seen as helpful for implementing stewardship interventions. These findings may inform the future implementation of ASPs in settings lacking local ID expertise.Funding: NoDisclosures: None

Changes in antibiotic use following implementation of a telehealth stewardship pilot program

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 810-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brigid M. Wilson ◽  
Richard E. Banks ◽  
Christopher J. Crnich ◽  
Emma Ide ◽  
Roberto A. Viau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Veterans Affairs ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Veterans Affairs Medical Centers

AbstractStarting in 2016, we initiated a pilot tele-antibiotic stewardship program at 2 rural Veterans Affairs medical centers (VAMCs). Antibiotic days of therapy decreased significantly (P < .05) in the acute and long-term care units at both intervention sites, suggesting that tele-stewardship can effectively support antibiotic stewardship practices in rural VAMCs.

scholarly journals 857. A Tele-Antibiotic Stewardship Program Influences Antibiotic Use at 2 Rural Veterans Affairs Medical Centers

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S19-S19
Author(s):  
Brigid Wilson ◽  
Richard Banks ◽  
Christopher Crnich ◽  
Emma Ide ◽  
Roberto Viau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Veterans Affairs ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Limited Access ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Length Of Therapy

Abstract Background Telehealth offers the possibility of supporting antibiotic stewardship in settings with limited access to people with infectious diseases (ID) expertise. Previously, we described preliminary results from a pilot project that used the Veterans Affairs (VA) telehealth system to facilitate a Videoconference Antimicrobial Stewardship Team (VAST) which connected a multidisciplinary team from a rural VA medical center (VAMC) with ID physicians at a remote site to support antibiotic stewardship. Here, we present 3 distinct metrics to assess the influence of the VAST on antibiotic use at 2 intervention sites. Methods Outcomes assessed antibiotic use in the hospital and long-term care units of 2 rural VAMCs in the year before and after VAST implementation, allowing for a 1-month wash-in period in the first month of the VAST. Using VA databases, we determined 3 metrics: the rate of antibiotic use (days of therapy per 1,000 bed days of care); the mean length of therapy (days); and the mean patient antibiotic spectrum index (ASI), a measure of antibiotic spectrum increasing from narrow to broad. Using segmented regression on monthly measures of each metric with a knot at the wash-in month (gray square), we calculated predicted values (solid lines), and confidence intervals (dashed lines) to examine trends before (black squares) and after (white squares) implementing the VAST. Results The rate of antibiotic use, mean length of therapy, and ASI decreased at Site A. As indicated in the figure, the effect was more pronounced in long-term care compared with the hospital, where the VAST sustained but did not accelerate downward trends. At Site B, the most notable influence of the VAST was on the ASI for the hospital and long-term care units. Conclusion The VAST is a feasible, sustainable program that is effective at inducing change in antibiotic use at 2 VAMCs. The influence of the VAST differed between the 2 sites and, at Site A had a more pronounced effect on the long-term care compared with hospital units. These distinct metrics capture changes in overall antibiotic use, length of therapy, and agent selection. Tele-antibiotic stewardship programs hold potential to improve antibiotic use at facilities with limited access to people with antibiotic stewardship expertise. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals 92. Successful Scale-up of an Intervention to Decrease Unnecessary Urine Cultures Led to Improvements in Antibiotic Use

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S177-S177
Author(s):  
Larissa Grigoryan ◽  
John Van ◽  
David J Ramsey ◽  
Melanie Goebel ◽  
Annette Walder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Urine Culture ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Bed Days ◽  
And Control

Abstract Background We previously conducted a successful single-site intervention to improve compliance with antibiotic stewardship guidelines for asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB). In this dissemination project we explored whether we could facilitate antibiotic stewardship for ASB at a distance, in four distant VA medical centers. Methods Each site champion received a decision-aid algorithm, interactive teaching based on actual cases, and support with data collection. The focus of the intervention was on teaching providers in acute and long-term care to avoid ordering unnecessary urine cultures. We measured DOT (days of antibiotic therapy), LOT (length of antibiotic therapy) and urine cultures ordered per 1,000 bed-days monthly in the intervention sites and four matched control sites. Both DOT and LOT captured all systemic antibiotics initiated on day -1 to +2 of a urine culture order. We conducted segmented regression analyses for the three outcomes for the intervention and control sites separately, and difference in differences analysis for urine cultures. Results Over the baseline and intervention years, 12,260 urine cultures were ordered in 6823 unique patients in the acute and long-term care wards at the 8 sites. During the baseline year, the average urine-culture related DOT was 45.1 and LOT was 34.7, per 1000 bed-days. Both DOT and LOT decreased significantly over the intervention period in the intervention sites (p &lt; 0.05 for both); a significant decrease was not seen in the control sites (Figures 1 and 2). For urine cultures, at baseline the average number of cultures ordered per month per 1000 bed-days was 13.6. Both intervention and control sites saw a significant decrease in urine cultures over the baseline year. In the intervention year, urine cultures continued to decrease in the intervention sites (p=0.001) but increased in the control sites (Figure 3). Figure 1. Days of Therapy (DOT) per 1,000 bed-days, for antibiotics started within -1 to +2 days of a urine culture Figure 2. Length of Therapy (LOT) per 1,000 bed-days, for antibiotics started within -1 to +2 days of a urine culture Figure 3. Urine Cultures per 1,000 bed-days Conclusion Our externally-facilitated intervention significantly decreased local antibiotic use (both DOT and LOT) and urine cultures. Unnecessary urine cultures are a major driver of unnecessary antibiotic use for ASB, and our focus on diagnostic stewardship for urine cultures led to antibiotic stewardship. Our next step will be to further disseminate our intervention to other VA facilities. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Characterization and evolution of infection control practices among SARS-CoV-2 infected healthcare workers of acute care hospitals and long-term care facilities in Quebec, Canada, Spring 2020

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-37
Author(s):  
Sara Carazo ◽  
Denis Laliberté ◽  
Jasmin Villeneuve ◽  
Richard Martin ◽  
Pierre Deshaies ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Attack Rate ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Exposure Period ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities

ABSTRACT Objectives: To estimate the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate and the secondary attack rate among healthcare workers (HCWs) in Quebec, the most affected province of Canada during the first wave; to describe the evolution of work-related exposures and infection prevention and control (IPC) practices in infected HCWs; and to compare the exposures and practices between acute care hospitals (ACHs) and long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Design: Survey of cases Participants: Quebec HCWs from private and public institutions with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosed between 1st March and 14th June 2020. HCWs ≥18 years old, having worked during the exposure period and survived their illness were eligible for the survey. Methods: After obtaining consent, 4542 HCWs completed a standardized questionnaire. COVID-19 rates and proportions of exposures and practices were estimated and compared between ACHs and LTCFs. Results: HCWs represented 25% (13,726/54,005) of all reported COVID-19 cases in Quebec and had an 11-times greater rate than non-HCWs. Their secondary household attack rate was 30%. Most affected occupations were healthcare support workers, nurses and nurse assistants, working in LTCFs (45%) and ACHs (30%). Compared to ACHs, HCWs of LTCFs had less training, higher staff mobility between working sites, similar PPE use but better self-reported compliance with at-work physical distancing. Sub-optimal IPC practices declined over time but were still present at the end of the first wave. Conclusion: Quebec HCWs and their families were severely affected during the first wave of COVID-19. Insufficient pandemic preparedness and suboptimal IPC practices likely contributed to high transmission in both LTCFs and ACHs.

scholarly journals Health problems and violence experiences of nurses working in acute care hospitals, long-term care facilities, and home-based long-term care in Germany: A systematic review

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. e0260050
Author(s):  
Andrea Schaller ◽  
Teresa Klas ◽  
Madeleine Gernert ◽  
Kathrin Steinbeißer
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Mental Health Problems ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Health Problems ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Home Based ◽  
Care Facilities

Background Working in the nursing sector is accompanied by great physical and mental health burdens. Consequently, it is necessary to develop target-oriented, sustainable profession-specific support and health promotion measures for nurses. Objectives The present review aims to give an overview of existing major health problems and violence experiences of nurses in different settings (acute care hospitals, long-term care facilities, and home-based long-term care) in Germany. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and PubPsych and completed by a manual search upon included studies’ references and health insurance reports. Articles were included if they had been published after 2010 and provided data on health problems or violence experiences of nurses in at least one care setting. Results A total of 29 studies providing data on nurses health problems and/or violence experience were included. Of these, five studies allowed for direct comparison of nurses in the settings. In addition, 14 studies provided data on nursing working in acute care hospitals, ten on nurses working in long-term care facilities, and four studies on home-based long-term care. The studies either conducted a setting-specific approach or provided subgroup data from setting-unspecific studies. The remaining studies did not allow setting-related differentiation of the results. The available results indicate that mental health problems are the highest for nurses in acute care hospitals. Regarding violence experience, nurses working in long-term care facilities appear to be most frequently affected. Conclusion The state of research on setting-specific differences of nurses’ health problems and violence experiences is insufficient. Setting-specific data are necessesary to develop target-group specific and feasible interventions to support the nurses’ health and prevention of violence, as well as dealing with violence experiences of nurses.

scholarly journals Impact of an Antibiotic Stewardship Program in Long-term Care Facilities: A Nursing Home Network Experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S63-S63
Author(s):  
Fabian Andres Romero ◽  
Evette Mathews ◽  
Ara Flores ◽  
Susan Seo
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) implementation is paramount across the healthcare spectrum. Nursing homes represent a challenge due to limited resources, complexity of medical conditions, and less controlled environments. National statistics on ASP for long-term care facilities (LTCF) are sparse. Methods A pilot ASP was launched in August 2016 at a 270-bed nursing home with a 50-bed chronic ventilator-dependent unit. The program entailed a bundle of interventions including leadership engagement, a tracking and reporting system for intravenous antibiotics, education for caregivers, Infectious Disease (ID) consultant availability, and implementation of nursing protocols. Data were collected from pharmacy and medical records between January 2016 and March 2017, establishing pre-intervention and post-intervention periods. Collected data included days of therapy (DOT), antibiotic costs, resident-days, hospital transfers, and Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) rates. Variables were adjusted to 1,000 resident-days (RD) and findings between periods were compared by Mann–Whitney U test. Results A total of 47,423 resident-days and 1,959 DOT were analyzed for this study. Antibiotic use decreased from 54.5 DOT/1000 RD pre-intervention to 27.6 DOT/1000 RD post-intervention (P = 0.017). Antibiotic costs were reduced from a monthly median of US $17,113 to US $7,073 but was not statistically significant (P = 0.39). Analysis stratified by individual antibiotic was done for the five most commonly used antibiotics and found statistically significant reduction in vancomycin use (14.4 vs. 6.5; P = 0.023). Reduction was also found for cefepime/ceftazidime (6.9 vs. 1.3; P = 0.07), ertapenem (6.8 vs. 3.6; P = 0.45), and piperacillin/tazobactam (1.8 vs. 0.6; P = 0.38). Meropenem use increased (1.3 vs. 3.2; P = 0.042). Hospital transfers slightly trended up (6.73 vs. 7.77; P = 0.065), and there was no change in CDI (1.1 s 0.94; P = 0.32). Conclusion A bundle of standardized interventions tailored for LTCF can achieve successful reduction of antibiotic utilization and costs. Subsequent studies are needed to further determine the impact on clinical outcomes such as transfers to hospitals and CDI in these settings. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Impact and Management of COVID-19 Among Healthcare Workers in two Acute Care Hospitals and two Associated Long-term Care Centres in Barcelona, Spain

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Maria Montero-Moraga ◽  
Andrea Buron ◽  
Maria Sala ◽  
Paula Santia ◽  
Martina Lupia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Term Care

scholarly journals Prevalence of healthcare-associated infections, estimated incidence and composite antimicrobial resistance index in acute care hospitals and long-term care facilities: results from two European point prevalence surveys, 2016 to 2017

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (46) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl Suetens ◽  
Katrien Latour ◽  
Tommi Kärki ◽  
Enrico Ricchizzi ◽  
Pete Kinross ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Resistance ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Point Prevalence ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infections ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Point prevalence surveys of healthcare-associated infections (HAI) and antimicrobial use in the European Union and European Economic Area (EU/EEA) from 2016 to 2017 included 310,755 patients from 1,209 acute care hospitals (ACH) in 28 countries and 117,138 residents from 2,221 long-term care facilities (LTCF) in 23 countries. After national validation, we estimated that 6.5% (cumulative 95% confidence interval (cCI): 5.4–7.8%) patients in ACH and 3.9% (95% cCI: 2.4–6.0%) residents in LTCF had at least one HAI (country-weighted prevalence). On any given day, 98,166 patients (95% cCI: 81,022–117,484) in ACH and 129,940 (95% cCI: 79,570–197,625) residents in LTCF had an HAI. HAI episodes per year were estimated at 8.9 million (95% cCI: 4.6–15.6 million), including 4.5 million (95% cCI: 2.6–7.6 million) in ACH and 4.4 million (95% cCI: 2.0–8.0 million) in LTCF; 3.8 million (95% cCI: 3.1–4.5 million) patients acquired an HAI each year in ACH. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) to selected AMR markers was 31.6% in ACH and 28.0% in LTCF. Our study confirmed a high annual number of HAI in healthcare facilities in the EU/EEA and indicated that AMR in HAI in LTCF may have reached the same level as in ACH.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document