scholarly journals P087: Cellulitis and erysipelas management at an academic emergency department: current practice vs the literature

CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (S1) ◽  
pp. S107-S108
Author(s):  
J. Martin ◽  
C.R. Wilson ◽  
T. Chaplin

Introduction: Cellulitis and erysipelas are common presentations for the general practitioner. Antibiotic therapy targeting beta-hemolytic streptococci and Staphylococcus aureus is the mainstay of treatment for children and adults with these infections. Although evidence-based Canadian guidelines for appropriate management exist, inconsistent practices persist. Our objective was to determine the level of adherence to current evidence by emergency physicians at two academic hospitals in Kingston, Ontario. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 200 randomly selected electronic medical records. Records belonged to patients with a discharge diagnosis of cellulitis or erysipelas who were seen in the emergency departments of Kingston General Hospital or Hotel Dieu Hospital between January 1 and June 30, 2015. We manually collected data describing patient demographics, medical history, and medical management. Results: There were 707 total visits to the emergency departments in the study period for cellulitis or erysipelas. In our random sample, for those diagnosed with cellulitis, 44% received oral cephalexin alone, which was the most common form of therapy for uncomplicated infection. Of all the patients who received any antibiotics, 36% received at least one dose of parenteral antibiotics, despite only 6.7% showing systemic signs of illness. Emergency physicians chose ceftriaxone for 88% of the patients who received parenteral antibiotics. Conclusion: There was wide variation in antibiotic selection and route of administration for patients with cellulitis or erysipelas. Ceftriaxone was chosen for most patients receiving parenteral antibiotics, but it may not have been the most effective antibiotic in some cases. Overuse of antibiotics is common, and we believe medication choice should be justified based on disease severity, spectrum of activity, and regional antibiotic resistance patterns, among other factors. In conclusion, we found that emergency physicians could more closely align management plans with current guidelines to improve management of uncomplicated infection and reduce unnecessary administration of parenteral antibiotics.

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 675-679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olindi Wijesekera ◽  
Amanda Reed ◽  
Parker S. Chastain ◽  
Shauna Biggs ◽  
Elizabeth G. Clark ◽  
...  

AbstractIntroductionWithout a universal Emergency Medical Services (EMS) system in India, data on the epidemiology of patients who utilize EMS are limited. This retrospective chart review aimed to quantify and describe the burden of disease and patient demographics of patients who arrived by EMS to four Indian emergency departments (EDs) in order to inform a national EMS curriculum.MethodsA retrospective chart review was performed on patients transported by EMS over a three-month period in 2014 to four private EDs in India. A total of 17,541 patient records were sampled from the four sites over the study period. Of these records, 1,723 arrived by EMS and so were included for further review.ResultsA range of 1.4%-19.4% of ED patients utilized EMS to get to the ED. The majority of EMS patients were male (59%-64%) and adult or geriatric (93%-99%). The most common chief complaints and ED diagnoses were neurological, pulmonary, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, trauma, and infectious disease.ConclusionsNeurological, pulmonary, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, trauma, and infectious disease are the most common problems found in patients transported by EMS in India. Adult and geriatric male patients are the most common EMS utilizers. Emergency Medical Services curricula should emphasize these knowledge areas and skills.WijesekeraO, ReedA, ChastainPS, BiggsS, ClarkEG, KoleT, ChakrapaniAT, AshishN, RajhansP, BreaudAH, JacquetGA. Epidemiology of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) utilization in four Indian emergency departments. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31(6):675–679.


2007 ◽  
Vol 56 (7) ◽  
pp. 921-929 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esvet Mutlu ◽  
Allison J. Wroe ◽  
Karla Sanchez-Hurtado ◽  
Jon S. Brazier ◽  
Ian R. Poxton

Clostridium difficile isolates (n=149) collected in south-east Scotland between August and October 2005 were typed by four different methods and their susceptibility to seven different antibiotics was determined. The aims were to define the types of strain occurring in this region and to determine whether there were any clonal relationships among them with respect to genotype and antibiotic resistance pattern. Ribotyping revealed that 001 was the most common type (n=113, 75.8 %), followed by ribotype 106 (12 isolates, 8.1 %). The majority of the isolates (96.6 %, n=144) were of toxinotype 0, with two toxinotype V isolates and single isolates of toxinotypes I, IV and XIII. PCR and restriction analysis of the fliC gene from 147 isolates gave two restriction patterns: 145 of pattern VII and two of pattern I. Binary toxin genes were detected in only three isolates: two isolates of ribotype 126, toxinotype V, and one isolate of ribotype 023, toxinotype IV. S-types showed more variation, with 64.5 % (n=40) of the common S-type (4939) and 21 % (n=13) of S-type 4741, with six other S-types (one to three isolates each). All ribotype 001 isolates were of the same S-type (4939), with three isolates of other ribotypes being this S-type. No resistance was found to metronidazole or vancomycin, with resistance to tetracycline only found in 4.3 % of the isolates. A high proportion of isolates were resistant to clindamycin (62.9 %), moxifloxacin, ceftriaxone (both 87.1 %) and erythromycin (94.8 %). Resistance to three antibiotics (erythromycin, clindamycin and ceftriaxone) was seen in 66 isolates, with erythromycin, ceftriaxone and moxifloxacin resistance seen in 96 isolates. Resistance to all four of these antibiotics was found in 62 isolates and resistance to five (the above plus tetracycline) in one isolate: a ribotype 001, toxinotype 0 strain. Whilst ribotype 001 was the most commonly encountered type, there was no evidence of clonal relationships when all other typing and antibiotic resistance patterns were taken into account.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 142-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Teresa Reguero ◽  
Olga Esther Medina ◽  
María Andrea Hernández ◽  
Diana Vanessa Flórez ◽  
Emilia María Valenzuela ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document