scholarly journals Clinical Features of Fatalities in Patients With COVID-19

Author(s):  
Ya-Jun Sun ◽  
Yi-Jin Feng ◽  
Jing Chen ◽  
Bo Li ◽  
Zhong-Cheng Luo ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objectives: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has spread to over 213 countries and territories. We sought to describe the clinical features of fatalities in patients with severe COVID-19. Methods: We conducted an Internet-based retrospective cohort study through retrieving the clinical information of 100 COVID-19 deaths from nonduplicating incidental reports in Chinese provincial and other governmental websites between January 23 and March 10, 2020. Results: Approximately 6 of 10 COVID-19 deaths were males (64.0%). The average age was 70.7 ± 13.5 y, and 84% of patients were elderly (over age 60 y). The mean duration from admission to diagnosis was 2.2 ± 3.8 d (median: 1 d). The mean duration from diagnosis to death was 9.9 ± 7.0 d (median: 9 d). Approximately 3 of 4 cases (76.0%) were complicated by 1 or more chronic diseases, including hypertension (41.0%), diabetes (29.0%) and coronary heart disease (27.0%), respiratory disorders (23.0%), and cerebrovascular disease (12.0%). Fever (46.0%), cough (33.0%), and shortness of breath (9.0%) were the most common first symptoms. Multiple organ failure (67.9%), circulatory failure (20.2%), and respiratory failure (11.9%) are the top 3 direct causes of death. Conclusions: COVID-19 deaths are mainly elderly and patients with chronic diseases especially cardiovascular disorders and diabetes. Multiple organ failure is the most common direct cause of death.

Author(s):  
S. SEREDA ◽  
S. DUBROV ◽  
M. DENYSIUK ◽  
O KOTLIAR ◽  
S. CHERNIAIEV ◽  
...  

In Ukraine, more than 3.5 million cases of COVID-19 have been registered during the pandemic, and the death toll is almost 90,000. Ukraine is a leader in Europe in the growth of new cases of COVID-19 and mortality from this disease. The search for effective treatment regimens and new approaches to the management of patients with coronavirus disease in order to reduce the severity of coronavirus disease, reduce mortality, the number of complications and improve the rehabilitation period is very important nowadays. The aim of the work. To determine the main causes of mortality in patients with severe COVID-19 by analyzing the frequency and structure of complications in deceased patients. Materials and methods. The study conducted a retrospective analysis of 122 medical charts of deceased patients with COVID-19 who were hospitalized in a communal non-profit enterprise “Kyiv city clinical hospital №17” for the period from September 2020 to November 2021. Results and discussion. The overall mortality among patients with COVID-19 was 9.3%, in the intensive care unit (ICU) – 48.4%. The most common causes of death in patients with COVID-19 were: respiratory failure (RF) – 100% of cases, pulmonary embolism (PE) and acute heart failure (AHF) - about 60%. The average length of stay of patients in inpatient treatment was 11.67 ± 8.05 days, and in the intensive care unit – 7.94 ± 6.24 days. The mean age of patients hospitalized in the ICU was 63.5 ± 12.9 years and the mean age of patients who died was 71.2 ± 10.29 years. Prognostically significant criteria for lethal consequences were the presence of comorbidity: cardiovascular diseases- 92.3%, endocrine system diseases – 28.4%, nervous system diseases – 23.07%, kidney diseases – 9.6%, cancer – 9,6%, autoimmune conditions – 7.69%, varicose veins – 5.7%, respiratory system diseases – 5.7%. In patients with fatal outcome lymphopenia (84.6%) was observed in patients on admission to the ICU. Vasopressor and inotropic support was performed in 50 % of patients with COVID-19. In 25 % of those who died during long-term treatment and long-term respiratory support, there was the development of multiple organ failure, which in most cases was the point of no return. Conclusions. The most common causes of death were: respiratory failure, thrombosis, acute cardiovascular failure, sepsis and multiple organ failure. The main nature of the complications is common, but the cohort may be affected by different factors and the percentage of complications may differ in other hospitals.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 3021-3021
Author(s):  
James N. Frame ◽  
Elaine A. Davis ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
Mary S. Emmett ◽  
Ashna R. Malapur

Abstract Background: To date, multiple organ failure complicating HIT has been reviewed in a limited patient (pt.) numbers in the medical literature. Objectives: (1) To describe the clinical features of pts. with HIT who developed the failure of ≥ 2 organs termed multiple organ failure syndrome (MOFS); (2) to determine the prevalence/incidence of MOFS HIT in a cohort of CAMC HIT Registry/open heart surgery (OHS) pts. Design: Retrospective case series identified from an IRB-approved HIT Registry. Setting: Tertiary-care medical center. Patients: 19 patients ≥ 18 yrs who presented from 1.1.00 to 12.31.04 with HIT ± thrombo-embolic complications (TEC) confirmed by serological (HPF4 ELISA, GTI) or functional (HIPA) HIT assays during (n=18) or after (n=1) a recent hospitalization with UFH exposure. Mean age: 71 yrs. (range, 49–84); women: 47%. UFH exposure settings (n): CABG alone (6) or with valve replacement (4), valve replacement alone or RV repair (1 each), aortic dissection repair (1), embolectomy or SBO (2 each), Whipple procedure (1; non-CA), atrial fibrillation (1). Measurements: Classification of MOFS: failure of ≥ 2 organs [e.g., brain, GI tract, liver, kidney, heart, lung (due to PE)] as modifications of the methods of Lefering R. et al (2002) and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Adult Cardiac Surgery Database, Version 2.52.1; platelet counts, clinical outcomes. Results: The prevalence of MOFS in HIT Registry pts. was 4.7% (19/404). During this time, the incidence of MOFS complicating OHS HIT pts. in the total OHS pts. was 0.12% (13/11,018). HIT was first suspected a mean of 10d (range, 1–38) from initial UFH exposure and a mean of 4.7d (range, <1d-25) after UFH was D/C’d where overall platelet counts [mean, 74x109/L, (range, 22- to 125-)] showed a 66% decrease from baseline [mean, 218 x 109/L, range (95- to 498-)]. At this time, 12 (63%) pts. had thrombocytopenia alone, 7 (37%) pts. had both thrombocytopenia and TEC, and 13 (68%) pts. had a total 19 organ failures (OF).: 1 OF: 8 pts.; 2 OF’s: 4 pts.; and 3 OF’s: 1 pt. At the time HIT was first suspected, the kidney (47%) and brain (32%) were the most frequent sites of organ failure. After the time HIT was first suspected and diagnosed, 17 (89%) pts. had developed ≥ 1 additional new OF: 1 OF: 7 pts.; 2 OF’s: 5 pts.; 3 OF’s: 5 pts. The liver (39%), kidney (23%) and GI tract (19%) were the most frequent sites of new OF’s. The mean/median overall number of organ failures/pt. were 2.6/2.0 (range, 2 to 4). Direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) therapy was initiated in 17 (90%) at a mean of 2.5d (SD: 4.0) (range, 0–13) from the date HIT was first suspected: lepirudin (9) or Argatroban (8); (2 were not treated due to family wishes or late recognition). Lepirudin was switched to Argatroban in 2 pts. due to worsening renal failure and Argatroban was switched to lepirudin in 2 pts. due to worsening liver failure. The mean length of DTI therapy was 8.8 d (range, 1–20). Compared with non-MOFS HIT Registry pts. (n=395), MOFS HIT pts. had more fatal outcomes [95% (18/19) vs. 11% (45/395); p = 3.2x 10−15], major bleeding events [26% (5/19) vs. 6.3% (25/395); p = 0.008], and amputations [11% (2/19) vs. 1.5% (6/395); p = 0.047]. Conclusions: Although uncommon, MOFS may be the initial manifestation of HIT and is associated with catastrophic outcomes. Compared to non-MOFS HIT pts., MOFS HIT pts. had an increased rate of fatal outcomes, major bleeding events, and rates of amputation. In a subset of HIT pts., MOFS hampered the delivery of utilized DTI’s. Our data also suggest the need for earlier HIT recognition and DTI interventions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (SPL1) ◽  
pp. 1918-1924
Author(s):  
Damini Raut ◽  
Pooja Shrivastav ◽  
Shweta Parwe

Currently, we are facing a very dangerous outburst of the epidemic all over the world called COVID-19, i.e. Coronavirus disease-2019 which were found in Wuhan city of China in December 2019. It is becoming pandemic throughout the world day by day, hence knowing the different causes of death in COVID-19 patient. Since the outbreak of COVID-19 in china, in which most of the deaths occurs due to severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CO-2-2019), there is progress in the total number of positive cases and corresponding deaths occur worldwide. The main cause of death is respiratory distress and failure; other complications include multiple organ failure, kidney injury, sepsis and also include providence of other medical resources to COVID-19 patient. To know the causes of death in COVID-19 patient. Various research articles were studied from various websites related to causes of death in COVID19. Many literatures were studied, such as Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, European Heart Journal, etc. The literature of causes of death in COVID-19 patient explores the idea regarding deaths- like respiratory distress, sepsis, and related kidney disorder, underlying diseases such as hypertensive disorders, diabetic conditions, shock, and multiple organ failure, etc. patients who are not able to survive in this pandemic even not after hospitalization are likely to be older by age, some patients have some secondary underlying diseases in the body or elevated D-dimer. Some peoples do not have sufficient ventilation, which also one of the causes of death of the patients due to novel COVID-19.


2020 ◽  
pp. 61-63
Author(s):  
S. Sh. Kakvaeva ◽  
M. A. Magomedova ◽  
A. N. Dzhalilova

One of the most serious problems of modern medicine is sepsis. The number of patients undergoing this complication is 20–30 million (WHO) annually and has no tendency to decrease. Sepsis is characterized by severe multiple organ failure due to a violation of the response of the macroorganism to an infectious agent. Moreover, it is dangerous with high mortality. Sepsis often develops in patients with immunodeficiency conditions, which primarily include pregnant women. The article presents a clinical observation of a case of periostitis in a pregnant woman complicated by a septic state.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S296-S297
Author(s):  
Trini A Mathew ◽  
Jonathan Hopkins ◽  
Diane Kamerer ◽  
Shagufta N Ali ◽  
Daniel Ortiz ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The novel Coronavirus SARS CoV-2 (COVID-19) outbreak was complicated by the lack of diagnostic testing kits. In early March 2020, leadership at Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak Michigan (Beaumont) identified the need to develop high capacity testing modalities with appropriate sensitivity and specificity and rapid turnaround time. We describe the molecular diagnostic testing experience since initial rollout on March 16, 2020 at Beaumont, and results of repeat testing during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in MI. Methods Beaumont is an 1100 bed hospital in Southeast MI. In March, testing was initially performed with the EUA Luminex NxTAG CoV Extended Panel until March 28, 2020 when testing was converted to the EUA Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 for quicker turnaround times. Each assay was validated with a combination of patient samples and contrived specimens. Results During the initial week of testing there was > 20 % specimen positivity. As the prevalence grew the positivity rate reached 68% by the end of March (Figure 1). Many state and hospital initiatives were implemented during the outbreak, including social distancing and screening of asymptomatic patients to increase case-finding and prevent transmission. We also adopted a process for clinical review of symptomatic patients who initially tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 by a group of infectious disease physicians (Figure 2). This process was expanded to include other trained clinicians who were redeployed from other departments in the hospital. Repeat testing was performed to allow consideration of discontinuation of isolation precautions. During the surge of community cases from March 16 to April 30, 2020, we identified patients with negative PCR tests who subsequently had repeat testing based on clinical evaluation, with 7.1% (39/551) returning positive for SARS- CoV2. Of the patients who expired due to COVID-19 during this period, 4.3% (9/206) initially tested negative before ultimately testing positive. Figure 1 BH RO testing Epicurve Figure 2: Screening tool for repeat COVID19 testing and precautions Conclusion Many state and hospital initiatives helped us flatten the curve for COVID-19. Our hospital testing experience indicate that repeat testing may be warranted for those patients with clinical features suggestive of COVID-19. We will further analyze these cases and clinical features that prompted repeat testing. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document