Impact of Discontinuing Contact Precautions for MRSA and ESBLE in an Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Noninferiority Before and After Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 1342-1350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurie Renaudin ◽  
Mathieu Llorens ◽  
Christophe Goetz ◽  
Sébastien Gette ◽  
Vincente Citro ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVETo compare incidence densities of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBLE) acquisition in the intensive care unit (ICU) before and after discontinuation of contact precautions (CP) and application of standard precautions (SP).DESIGNProspective noninferiority before-and-after study comparing 2 periods: January 1, 2012, to January 31, 2014 (the CP period) and February 1, 2014, to February 29, 2016 (the SP period).SETTINGA 16-bed polyvalent ICU in France with only single-bed rooms with dedicated equipment and reusable medical devices.PATIENTSAll patients admitted to the ICU during the CP and SP periods were included: 1,547 and 1,577 patients, respectively.METHODSIncidence densities of ICU-acquired MRSA or ESBLE were determined per 1,000 patient days. Other studied factors included (1) patient characteristics, (2) incidence densities of MRSA or ESBLE carried at admission, (3) compliance with hand hygiene protocols, and (4) antibiotic consumption.RESULTSIncidence densities of ICU-acquired MRSA were 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31–1.33) and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.30–1.29) per 1,000 patient days during the CP and SP periods, respectively. For ESBLE, values were 2.7 (95% CI, 1.78–3.62) and 2.06 (95% CI, 1.27–2.86) per 1,000 patient days. These rates were significantly nonsuperior during the SP period compared to CP period, with a margin of 1 per 1,000 patient days for both MRSA (P=.002) and ESBLE (P=.004). Other factors were comparable during the 2 periods. Only ESBLE carried at admission was inferior during the SP period. We observed a high level of compliance to hand hygiene protocols.CONCLUSIONSDiscontinuing CP did not increase acquired MRSA and ESBLE in our ICU with single rooms with dedicated equipment, strict application of hand hygiene, medical and paramedical leadership, and good antibiotic stewardship.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:1342–1350

2021 ◽  
pp. 097321792110512
Author(s):  
Suryaprakash Hedda ◽  
Shashidhar A. ◽  
Saudamini Nesargi ◽  
Kalyan Chakravarthy Balla ◽  
Prashantha Y. N. ◽  
...  

Background: Monitoring in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) largely relies on equipment which have a number of alarms that are often quite loud. This creates a noisy environment, and moreover leads to desensitization of health-care personnel, whereby potentially important alarms may also be ignored. The objective was to evaluate the effect of an educational package on alarm management (the number of alarms, response to alarms, and appropriateness of settings). Methods: A before and after study was conducted at a tertiary neonatal care center in a teaching hospital in India involving all health-care professionals (HCP) working in the high dependency unit. The intervention consisted of demo lectures about working of alarms and bedside demonstrations of customizing alarm limits. A pre- and postintervention questionnaire was also administered to assess knowledge and attitude toward alarms. The outcomes were the number and type of alarms, response time, appropriateness of HCP response, and appropriateness of alarm limits as observed across a 24-h period which were compared before and after the intervention. Findings: The intervention resulted in a significant decrease in the number of alarms (11.6-9.6/h). The number of times where appropriate alarm settings were used improved from 24.3% to 67.1% ( P < .001). The response time to alarm did not change significantly (225 s vs 200 s); however, the appropriate response to alarms improved significantly from 15.6% to 68.8%. Conclusion: A simple structured intervention can improve the appropriate management of alarms. Application to Practice: Customizing alarm limits and nursing education reduce the alarm burden in NICUs


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianhua Sun ◽  
Na Cui ◽  
Wen Han ◽  
Qi Li ◽  
Hao Wang ◽  
...  

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the effect of nurse-led, goal-directed lung physiotherapy (GDLPT) on the prognosis of older patients with sepsis caused by pneumonia in the intensive care unit.Methods: We conducted a prospective, two-phase (before-and-after) study over 3 years called the GDLPT study. All patients received standard lung therapy for sepsis caused by pneumonia and patients in phase 2 also received GDLPT. In this study, 253 older patients (age ≥ 65 years) with sepsis and pneumonia were retrospectively analyzed. The main outcome was 28 day mortality.Results: Among 742 patients with sepsis, 253 older patients with pneumonia were divided into the control group and the treatment group. Patients in the treatment group had a significantly shorter duration of mechanical ventilation [5 (4, 6) vs. 5 (4, 8) days; P = 0.045], and a lower risk of intensive care unit (ICU) mortality [14.5% (24/166) vs. 28.7% (25/87); P = 0.008] and 28 day mortality [15.1% (25/166) vs. 31% (27/87); P = 0.005] compared with those in the control group. GDLPT was an independent risk factor for 28 day mortality [odds ratio (OR), 0.379; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.187–0.766; P = 0.007].Conclusions: Nurse-led GDLPT shortens the duration of mechanical ventilation, decreases ICU and 28-day mortality, and improves the prognosis of older patients with sepsis and pneumonia in the ICU.


2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (11) ◽  
pp. 1507-1514
Author(s):  
Anish R. Mitra ◽  
Donald E. G. Griesdale ◽  
Gregory Haljan ◽  
Ashley O’Donoghue ◽  
Jennifer P. Stevens

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 256-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Damico ◽  
Flavio Cazzaniga ◽  
Liana Murano ◽  
Rita Ciceri ◽  
Giuseppe Nattino ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Padar ◽  
Gerli Uusvel ◽  
Liis Starkopf ◽  
Joel Starkopf ◽  
Annika Reintam Blaser

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document