scholarly journals Methods of estimating vancomycin use in an inpatient setting: days of therapy versus therapeutic drug monitoring–based exposure days

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 375-379
Author(s):  
Shutaro Murakami ◽  
Junko Hiroi ◽  
Yasuharu Tokuda ◽  
Ed Casabar ◽  
Hitoshi Honda

AbstractUnderestimating antimicrobial use based on days of therapy (DOT) is recognized for certain antimicrobial agents. We investigated the difference between DOT and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)–based exposure days in estimating vancomycin use and demonstrated that DOT may underestimate vancomycin exposure by ∼10%.

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S40-S41
Author(s):  
Mohammad H Al-Shaer ◽  
Eric Rubido ◽  
Daniel Lee ◽  
Kenneth Klinker ◽  
Charles Peloquin

Abstract Background Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a powerful tool to optimize antibiotic exposure. It seldom has been used for β-lactams (BLs). We present our BL data in patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (SICU). Methods This retrospective study included SICU patients at UF Health (2016 and 2018) who received BL therapy and had TDM. Data collected included demographics, APACHE scores, platelet count, serum creatinine (Scr), infection source, cultures/susceptibilities, BL regimens, and plasma concentrations. Clinical cure was defined as resolution of infection-related symptoms at the end of therapy. Microbiologic eradication was defined as eradication of causative organism from the primary source out to 30 days after therapy. Pharmacokinetic and statistical analyses were performed on Phoenix v8.0 and JMP Pro v14. Results A total of 127 patients were included. Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics. The median age was 55 years, and weight was 83 kg. Eighty-three (65%) were male. P. aeruginosa was the most common isolated bacteria (n = 38). Lung was the most common source of infection (n = 50). Table 2 summarizes the median (IQR) doses, infusion times, calculated free trough concentrations (fCmin) of common BLs, and the reported minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). Calculated median time above the MIC (fT > MIC) for 66 (52%) patients was 100%. A total of 99 (79%) patients had clinical cure and 67 (61%) patients had microbiologic eradication. For efficacy, the Cmin/MIC ratio predicted the microbiologic eradication in wound infections only (n = 15, OR 1.09 [95% CI 1.01–1.24]). Using stepwise regression, 1-unit increase fT > MIC and APACHE score was associated with 0.84 decrease (P = 0.03) and 0.62 increase (P = 0.004) in days of therapy, respectively. For safety, Figure 2 shows the increase in Scr vs. BL free area under the concentration–time curve from time zero to end of the dosing interval (fAUC0-tau). Cefepime fAUC0-tau predicted neurotoxicity (OR per 20 unit increase 1.08 [95% CI: 1.01–1.18]). Conclusion In SICU patients, increase in fT > MIC was associated with shorter treatment duration, and fAUC0-tau increase was associated with an increase in Scr and incidence of neurotoxicity. TDM is warranted in this population to optimize therapy. Disclosures All Authors: No reported Disclosures.


1998 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 401-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
David W Bates ◽  
Steven J Soldin ◽  
Petrie M Rainey ◽  
Joseph N Micelli

Abstract Although therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is probably very useful overall, studies suggest that it could be used better. Many drug concentrations appear to have inappropriate indications or suboptimal timing, particularly in the inpatient setting. Undermonitoring is also a concern. Thus, it may be possible to both improve the quality of TDM and reduce the overall costs of care. Here we review approaches for improving the use of TDM and present some illustrative experiences. Specific approaches discussed include use of traditional approaches such as lectures and newsletters, multidisciplinary quality improvement efforts, formal TDM services, and use of the computer as a tool for education and behavior change. Computerized methods appear to hold substantial potential, particularly as more organizations develop better information systems, but other approaches are also effective and are complementary. To be most successful, interventions should consider all stages of the process.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Lanckohr ◽  
Christian Boeing ◽  
Jan J. De Waele ◽  
Dylan W. de Lange ◽  
Jeroen Schouten ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Severe infections and multidrug-resistant pathogens are common in critically ill patients. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) are contemporary tools to optimize the use of antimicrobials. The A-TEAMICU survey was initiated to gain contemporary insights into dissemination and structure of AMS programs and TDM practices in intensive care units. Methods This study involved online survey of members of ESICM and six national professional intensive care societies. Results Data of 812 respondents from mostly European high- and middle-income countries were available for analysis. 63% had AMS rounds available in their ICU, where 78% performed rounds weekly or more often. While 82% had local guidelines for treatment of infections, only 70% had cumulative antimicrobial susceptibility reports and 56% monitored the quantity of antimicrobials administered. A restriction of antimicrobials was reported by 62%. TDM of antimicrobial agents was used in 61% of ICUs, mostly glycopeptides (89%), aminoglycosides (77%), carbapenems (32%), penicillins (30%), azole antifungals (27%), cephalosporins (17%), and linezolid (16%). 76% of respondents used prolonged/continuous infusion of antimicrobials. The availability of an AMS had a significant association with the use of TDM. Conclusions Many respondents of the survey have AMS in their ICUs. TDM of antimicrobials and optimized administration of antibiotics are broadly used among respondents. The availability of antimicrobial susceptibility reports and a surveillance of antimicrobial use should be actively sought by intensivists where unavailable. Results of this survey may inform further research and educational activities.


2018 ◽  
Vol 75 (5) ◽  
pp. 316-328
Author(s):  
Christian Ansprenger ◽  
Emanuel Burri

Zusammenfassung. Die Diagnose und auch die Überwachung von chronisch entzündlichen Darmerkrankungen ruht auf mehreren Säulen: Anamnese, körperliche Untersuchung, Laborwerte (im Blut und Stuhl), Endoskopie, Histologie und Bildgebung. Die Diagnose kann nicht anhand eines einzelnen Befundes gestellt werden. In den letzten Jahren hat sich das Therapieziel weg von klinischen Endpunkten hin zu endoskopischen und sogar histologischen Endpunkten entwickelt. Für einige dieser neuen Therapieziele existiert allerdings noch keine allgemein gültige Definition. Regelmässige Endoskopien werden von Patienten schlecht toleriert, weshalb Surrogat-Marker wie Calprotectin untersucht wurden und eine gute Korrelation mit der mukosalen Entzündungsaktivität nachgewiesen werden konnte. Entsprechend zeigte sich bei Morbus Crohn eine Algorithmus-basierte Therapiesteuerung – unter anderem basierend auf Calprotectin – einer konventionellen Therapiesteuerung überlegen. Die Überwachung der medikamentösen Therapie («Therapeutic Drug Monitoring» [TDM]) ist ein zweites Standbein des Monitoring von chronisch entzündlichen Darmerkrankungen. Mit zunehmendem Einsatz vor allem der Biologika-Therapien wurden sowohl reaktives TDM (in Patienten mit klinischem Rezidiv) als auch proaktives TDM (in Patienten in Remission / stabiler Erkrankung) untersucht und haben (teilweise) Eingang in aktuelle Richtlinien gefunden. Zukünftige Studien werden die vorgeschlagenen Therapieziele besser definieren und den Nutzen der medikamentösen Therapieüberwachung auf den Krankheitsverlauf weiter untersuchen müssen.


2011 ◽  
Vol 44 (06) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Mercolini ◽  
G Fulgenzi ◽  
M Melis ◽  
G Boncompagni ◽  
LJ Albers ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document