scholarly journals Developing a Public Health Model for Regional Infection Prevention Collaboration Among Healthcare Facility Networks

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s187-s187
Author(s):  
Erin P. Garcia ◽  
Erin Epson
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Skilled Nursing Facility ◽  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Professional Organization ◽  
Healthcare Organizations ◽  
California Department ◽  
Local Public Health ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AR), including Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), can spread across the healthcare continuum when patients move between facilities. In 2015, the CDC recommended that healthcare facilities (HCFs) and local public health departments (LPH) coordinate their efforts to prevent the spread of AR and CDI. Accordingly, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI) Program developed a model for implementing regionally based AR/CDI prevention collaboratives within HCF networks. Methods: The CDPH HAI Program began identifying regions in California with high AR/CDI incidence or risk for AR/CDI emergence using NHSN data. During 2015–2019, we organized AR/CDI prevention collaboratives in these regions. We recruited HCFs for participation by presenting at local professional organization meetings and engaging skilled nursing facility corporate leadership. HAI Program infection preventionists conducted onsite infection prevention assessments at each participating HCF. HAI Program and LPH staff convened quarterly in-person learning and discussion sessions focused on infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship best practices. Participating HCFs committed to facility-tailored process improvement plans and conducted self-assessments to evaluate infection prevention practice changes at the conclusion of the collaborative. For CDI-focused collaboratives, we used data reported to CDPH via NHSN to assess changes in hospital- and community-onset CDI incidence among participating hospitals before and after the collaboratives. Results: Since 2015, 205 HCFs in 15 LPH jurisdictions have participated in 6 regional AR/CDI prevention collaboratives. Participating HCFs reported improved implementation of AR/CDI prevention strategies. For CDI-focused collaboratives, hospital-onset CDI incidence decreased by ~3% per month among participating hospitals. The collaboratives created forums for communication and relationship building, which previously did not exist among LPH and the HCF networks. We used our experience and feedback from partners to develop an HAI Program AR Prevention Collaborative Tool Kit to help LPHs and healthcare organizations develop and implement regional AR/CDI prevention collaboratives in other at-risk or high AR/CDI prevalence areas in California. The tool kit includes materials developed for each of our collaboratives, which may be adapted to meet local needs. Conclusions: Regionally coordinated AR/CDI prevention initiatives among LPHs and HCFs can contribute to increased AR awareness, improved AR prevention practices, and decreased AR/CDI incidence. The effectiveness of regional AR/CDI prevention collaboratives may be the result of concurrent efforts to improve AR prevention practices both within individual HCFs and across patient sharing networks.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals How Medical Studies in Poland Prepare Future Healthcare Managers for Crises and Disasters: Results of a Pilot Study

Healthcare ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrycja Misztal-Okońska ◽  
Krzysztof Goniewicz ◽  
Attila J. Hertelendy ◽  
Amir Khorram-Manesh ◽  
Ahmed Al-Wathinani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Medical Personnel ◽  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Healthcare Organizations ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Organization And Management ◽  
Proactive Management ◽  
Professional Assistance

In the event of a crisis, rapid and effective assistance for victims is essential, and in many cases, medical assistance is required. To manage the situation efficiently, it is necessary to have a proactive management system in place that ensures professional assistance to victims and the safety of medical personnel. We evaluated the perceptions of students and graduates in public health studies at the Medical University of Lublin, Poland, concerning their preparation and management skills for crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic. This pilot study was conducted in March 2020; we employed an online survey with an anonymous questionnaire that was addressed to students and graduates with an educational focus in healthcare organization and management. The study involved 55 people, including 14 men and 41 women. Among the respondents, 41.8% currently worked in a healthcare facility and only 21.7% of them had participated in training related to preparation for emergencies and disasters in their current workplace. The respondents rated their workplaces’ preparedness for the COVID-19 pandemic at four points. A significant number of respondents stated that if they had to manage a public health emergency, they would not be able to manage the situation correctly and not be able to predict its development. Managers of healthcare organizations should have the knowledge and skills to manage crises. It would be advisable for them to have been formally educated in public health or healthcare administration. In every healthcare facility, it is essential that training and practice of performing medical procedures in full personal protective equipment (PPE) be provided. Healthcare facilities must implement regular training combined with practical live scenario exercises to prepare for future crises.

scholarly journals Targeted Assessment for Prevention: A Statewide Collaborative

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s401-s401
Author(s):  
Cindy Hou ◽  
Shannon Davila ◽  
Mary Miller ◽  
Ashlee Hiester ◽  
Katherine Hosmer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Local Level ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Interdisciplinary Teams ◽  
System Level ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infection ◽  
Hospital System ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile

Background: Infection preventionists (IPs) are the backbone of the quality and safety matrix of their organizations. Tools to help locate potential gaps can provide unique viewpoints from frontline staff. The CDC provides a Targeted Assessment for Prevention (TAP) strategy that identifies vulnerabilities in the prevention of healthcare-associated infection (HAIs). Methods: A statewide quality improvement organization, partnering with the CDC TAP team, administered TAP facility assessments for catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI), central-line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) to a collaborative of 15 acute-care and 2 long-term acute hospitals. More than 800 respondents filled out surveys based on their individualized perceptions of infection prevention practices. Results: The survey results yielded the following lagging indicators: lack of awareness of nursing and physician champions, need for competency-based training of clinical equipment, and feedback on device utilization. At the hospital system level, one improvement team focused on CDI, uncovered leading and lagging areas in general infrastructure, antibiotic stewardship, early detection and appropriate testing, contact precautions, and environmental cleaning. To culminate the TAP collaborative, the cohort of organizations, supported by interdisciplinary teams, participated in a full-day TAP workshop in which they reviewed detailed analyses of their HAI data and assessment results, shared best practices for infection prevention and planned for specific improvement projects using the plan-do-study-act model. Conclusions: Results of a statewide analysis of HAI prevention data and opportunities at a local level were reviewed. The TAP strategy can be used to target opportunities for improvement, to assess gaps in practice, and to develop and implement interventions for improving outcomes. Healthcare facilities and quality improvement organizations can drive infection prevention actions.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals Public Health Oversight of Interfacility Transfers During a Candida auris Outbreak—Orange County, California, 2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s76-s77
Author(s):  
Kathleen O'Donnell ◽  
Ellora Karmarkar ◽  
Brendan R Jackson ◽  
Erin Epson ◽  
Matthew Zahn
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Orange County ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Nursing Facilities ◽  
Candida Auris ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
California Department ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Contact Precautions

Background: In February 2019, the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) identified an outbreak of Candida auris, an emerging fungus that spreads rapidly in healthcare facilities. Patients in long-term acute-care hospitals (LTACHs) and skilled nursing facilities that provide ventilator care (vSNFs) are at highest risk for C. auris colonization. With assistance from the California Department of Public Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, OCHCA instituted enhanced surveillance, communication, and screening processes for patients colonized with or exposed to C. auris. Method: OCHCA implemented enhanced surveillance by conducting point-prevalence surveys (PPSs) at all 3 LTACHs and all 14 vSNFs in the county. Colonized patients were identified through axilla/groin skin swabbing with C. auris detected by PCR and/or culture. In facilities where >1 C. auris colonized patient was found, PPSs were repeated every 2 weeks to identify ongoing transmission. Retrospective case finding was instituted at 2 LTACHs with a high burden of colonized patients; OCHCA contacted patients discharged after January 1, 2019, and offered C. auris screening. OCHCA tracked the admission or discharge of all colonized patients, and facilities with ongoing transmission were required to report transfers of any patient, regardless of colonization status. OCHCA tracked all patients discharged from facilities with ongoing transmission to ensure that accepting facilities conducted admission surveillance testing of exposed patients and implemented appropriate environmental and contact precautions. Result: From February–October 2019, 192 colonized patients were identified. All 3 LTACHs and 6 of 14 VSNFs had at least 1 C. auris–colonized patient identified on initial PPS, and 2 facilities had ongoing transmission identified on serial PPS. OCHCA followed 96 colonized patients transferred a total of 230 times (an average of 2.4 transfers per patient) (Fig. 1) and 677 exposed patients discharged from facilities with ongoing transmission (Fig. 2). Admission screening of 252 exposed patients on transfer identified 13 (5.2%) C. auris–colonized patients. As of November 1, 2019, these 13 patients were admitted 21 times to a total of 6 acute-care hospitals, 2 LTACHs, and 3 vSNFs. Transferring facilities did not consistently communicate the colonized patient’s status and the requirements for isolation and testing of exposed patients. Conclusion: OCHCA oversight of interfacility transfer, though labor-intensive, improved identification of patients colonized with C. auris and implementation of appropriate environmental and contact precautions, reducing the risk of transmission in receiving healthcare facilities.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals Using genomic epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 to support contact tracing and public health surveillance in rural Humboldt County, California

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunnar Stoddard ◽  
Allison Black ◽  
Patrick Ayscue ◽  
Dan Lu ◽  
Jack Kamm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Skilled Nursing Facility ◽  
The United States ◽  
Contact Tracing ◽  
Outbreak Response ◽  
Skilled Nursing ◽  
Local Public Health ◽  
Humboldt County ◽  
Genomic Epidemiology

ABSTRACTDuring the COVID-19 pandemic within the United States, much of the responsibility for diagnostic testing and epidemiologic response has relied on the action of county-level departments of public health. Here we describe the integration of genomic surveillance into epidemiologic response within Humboldt County, a rural county in northwest California. Through a collaborative effort, 853 whole SARS-CoV-2 genomes were generated, representing ∼58% of the 1,449 SARS-CoV-2-positive cases detected in Humboldt County as of mid-March 2021. Phylogenetic analysis of these data was used to develop a comprehensive understanding of SARS-CoV-2 introductions to the county and to support contact tracing and epidemiologic investigations of all large outbreaks in the county. In the case of an outbreak on a commercial farm, viral genomic data were used to validate reported epidemiologic links and link additional cases within the community who did not report a farm exposure to the outbreak. During a separate outbreak within a skilled nursing facility, genomic surveillance data were used to rule out the putative index case, detect the emergence of an independent Spike:N501Y substitution, and verify that the outbreak had been brought under control. These use cases demonstrate how developing genomic surveillance capacity within local public health departments can support timely and responsive deployment of genomic epidemiology for surveillance and outbreak response based on local needs and priorities.

The implementation of evidence-based infection prevention in healthcare facilities in Egypt: A systematic literature review

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 093-099
Author(s):  
Nermeen Abdel-Fattah Shehab ◽  
Ahmed Atef Faggal ◽  
Ashraf Ali Nessim
Keyword(s):  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Hospital Staff ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Surveillance Systems ◽  
Environment Design ◽  
Environmental Interventions ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
The Impact

The idea of searching: This study tends to assess the impact of implementing evidence-based infection prevention in healthcare facilities in Egypt, with the aim of improving surveillance systems and altering the facility designs according to the data acquired on HAIs patterns. Background: Hospital acquired infections (HAIs) are becoming one of the major concerns for the patients and healthcare providers leading to significant increase in mortality rates, morbidity rates and financial losses for healthcare organizations. The incidence rate of HAI in Egypt was as recorded as 3.7% recently. Certain environmental interventions, implemented during construction of the healthcare facility could lead to enhanced prevention against the transmission and spread of the HAIs. Studies revealed that the integration of Surveillance programs could provide evidence for the designers to alter the healthcare facility design with the aim of infection prevention. Therefore, EBD approach is used to potentially measure psychological and physical effects of the environment design of a health facility on the patients and hospital staff. Methodology: Previous scientific literature is assessed to collect the relevant data which is then organized and analyzed in this study. A systematic review is generated based on the analytical outcomes of the selected data. Conclusion: EBD approach has the potential to prominently decrease HAIs burden in Egyptian healthcare facilities as it provides a diverse insight into the layout, equipment, and materials that contribute in the transmission of pathogens due to faulty design. Findings and recommendations: In order to improve the poor indoor quality by MEP (mechanical, electrical, and plumbing), previous studies have also indicated certain solutions including advancements in private room, improved surface selections, isolation, integration of touchless systems, and enhanced ventilation systems that must be applied in the healthcare facilities in Egypt for infection prevention.

Building infection prevention programmes

2019 ◽  
pp. 26-51
Author(s):  
Nizam Damani
Keyword(s):  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Core Competencies ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Professional Organizations ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Prevention Programmes ◽  
Facility Level

This Chapter examines the global burden of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and its impact on healthcare facilities and on individuals. It also provides practical advice on how to successfully build an infection prevention and control (IPC) programme. It also summarizes how to provide low cost and cost-effective IPC services and lists unsafe, ritualistic, and wasteful IPC practices. The chapter examines the responsibilities both of healthcare facilities and healthcare workers in the prevention of HAIs. It also provides guidance on how to organize an IPC programme and discuss the role and responsibility of the infection control doctor and nurse/practitioner and outlines the core competencies required by the IPC team to perform their job effectively. It provides a summary of WHO core components to establish successful IPC programmes both at the national and healthcare facility level. Lists and web links to key IPC professional organizations and regulatory bodies are also provided.

scholarly journals Multistate Outbreak of Burkholderia cepacia Complex Bloodstream Infections After Exposure to Contaminated Saline Flush Syringes: United States, 2016–2017

2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 445-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard B Brooks ◽  
Patrick K Mitchell ◽  
Jeffrey R Miller ◽  
Amber M Vasquez ◽  
Jessica Havlicek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Burkholderia Cepacia ◽  
Skilled Nursing Facility ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Rapid Identification ◽  
Burkholderia Cepacia Complex ◽  
Nursing Facilities ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Health Authorities ◽  
Public Health Authorities

Abstract Background Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) has caused healthcare-associated outbreaks, often in association with contaminated products. The identification of 4 Bcc bloodstream infections in patients residing at a single skilled nursing facility (SNF) within 1 week led to an epidemiological investigation to identify additional cases and the outbreak source. Methods A case was initially defined via a blood culture yielding Bcc in a SNF resident receiving intravenous therapy after 1 August 2016. Multistate notifications were issued to identify additional cases. Public health authorities performed site visits at facilities with cases to conduct chart reviews and identify possible sources. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed on isolates from cases and suspect products. Facilities involved in manufacturing suspect products were inspected to assess possible root causes. Results An outbreak of 162 Bcc bloodstream infections across 59 nursing facilities in 5 states occurred during September 2016–January 2017. Isolates from patients and pre-filled saline flush syringes were closely related by PFGE, identifying contaminated flushes as the outbreak source and prompting a nationwide recall. Inspections of facilities at the saline flush manufacturer identified deficiencies that might have led to the failure to sterilize a specific case containing a partial lot of the product. Conclusions Communication and coordination among key stakeholders, including healthcare facilities, public health authorities, and state and federal agencies, led to the rapid identification of an outbreak source and likely prevented many additional infections. Effective processes to ensure the sterilization of injectable products are essential to prevent similar outbreaks in the future.

scholarly journals Characteristics of On-Site Infection Prevention and Control Visits for COVID-19—California, February 2020–December 2020

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
pp. s50-s50
Author(s):  
Patrick Stendel ◽  
Ellora Karmarkar ◽  
Idamae Kennedy ◽  
Hosniyeh Bagheri ◽  
Teresa Nelson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Source Control ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Local Health ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
California Department ◽  
And Control

Background: The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has caused significant morbidity and mortality in California: 2,218,000 cases and 24,598 deaths had occurred by December 31, 2020. Deaths at skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) and assisted living facilities (ALFs) comprise 26.2% of deaths in California; the fatality rate (299 per 10,000 SNF and ALF residents) in such facilities is nearly 50 times the statewide COVID-19 mortality rate (6.4 per 10,000 California residents). For healthcare facility (SNF, ALF, acute-care hospitals) and correctional facility outbreak management, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI) Program deployed trained infection preventionists (IPs) to perform on-site infection prevention and control (IPC) assessments and to provide recommendations to staff and local health departments (LHDs). We describe the number and distribution of visits across the state and common IPC challenges identified. Methods: From February 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020, CDPH IP visits were requested directly by facilities, coordinated through LHDs and other state agencies, or prompted by a facility’s increasing case count on twice weekly review of the daily California healthcare facility data survey (Survey 123). Deployed IPs evaluated facility COVID-19 IPC protocols, assessed facility staff adherence using a standardized assessment tool, and provided verbal feedback followed by written summary reports and recommendations. We categorized visits geographically into 5 California Health Officer Association regions and by month, and we reviewed visit reports for common findings. Results: In total, 623 visits were performed for 489 outbreaks at 465 distinct facilities across 46 LHDs; 71 facilities received ≥2 visits. Southern California facilities received 292 visits (46.9%), San Joaquin region facilities received 138 visits (22.2%), Bay Area facilities received 131 visits (21%), Greater Sacramento facilities received 54 visits (8.7%), and Rural North facilities received 8 visits (1.3%) (Figure 1). The highest number of visits per month occurred in December (n = 143, 22.9%), followed by July (n = 87, 13.9%), and April (n = 83, 13.3%). Common IPC challenges included inappropriate resident cohorting practices, improper use of personal protective equipment, and lapses in physical distancing, and source control in breakrooms. Conclusions: On-site visits by CDPH IPs during the COVID-19 pandemic in California, though resource-intensive, provided substantial technical support for healthcare facilities during outbreaks and identified key areas for IPC improvement. Ongoing CDPH HAI guidance and training materials for facility-based IP staff are now being informed by these IPC challenges.Funding: NoDisclosures: None

scholarly journals Assessment of Potential Clostridioides difficile Public Health Notification Thresholds in Acute-Care Hospitals

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s132-s132
Author(s):  
Ariella Dale ◽  
Meghana Parikh ◽  
Wendy Bamberg ◽  
Marion Kainer
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
The United States ◽  
Health Departments ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Public Health Departments ◽  
Threshold Levels ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Alert Threshold

Background:Clostridioides difficile remains a pervasive issue throughout healthcare facilities in the United States. Currently, no national guidelines exist for healthcare facilities to notify public health about suspected C. difficile transmission. Identification of a threshold for public health notification is needed to improve efforts to target prevention in facilities and to contain the spread of C. difficile.Methods: We analyzed C. difficile data reported by acute-care hospitals (ACHs) during October 2017–September 2018 via the CDC NHSN in Colorado and Tennessee. Threshold levels of ≥2, ≥3, and ≥4 C. difficile infections per calendar month per unit were assessed to identify ACH units that would trigger facility reporting to public health. Values meeting thresholds were defined as “alerts.” Facilities were further stratified by size and medical teaching status. Recurrent alerts were defined as meeting the threshold at least twice within 12 months. Presence and recurrence of facility alerts were compared to facility-specific standardized infection ratios (SIRs) and cumulative attributable differences (CADs). Results: Of 105 ACHs in Tennessee and 50 in Colorado, 46 in Tennessee (44%) and 28 in Colorado (56%) had alerts with a threshold of ≥2 cases per calendar month per unit; 20 in Tennessee (19%) and 19 in Colorado (38%) had ≥3 cases per calendar month per unit; and 7 in Tennessee (7%) and 10 in Colorado (20%) had ≥4 cases per calendar month per unit. Most alerts with each threshold were in facilities with ≥400 beds and in major teaching hospitals. Using a threshold of ≥2, 64% of Tennessee and 79% of Colorado alerts were associated with recurrent alerting units. Using an alert threshold of ≥3, 85% of Tennessee facilities (17 of 20) and 75% of Colorado facilities (15 of 20) with the highest CAD values had at least 1 alert. Using state-based CAD values, 79% of the CAD value for Tennessee (356 of 449) and 91% of the CAD value for Colorado (309 of 340) were attributable to facilities with at least 1 alert. Facilities above a threshold of ≥3 had a pooled SIR of 0.92 in Tennessee (range, 0.46–7.94) and 1.07 in Colorado (range, 0.74–1.74). Conclusions: Using alert threshold levels identified ACHs with higher levels of C. difficile. Recurrent alerts account for a substantial proportion of the total alerts in ACHs, even as thresholds increased. Alerts were strongly correlated with high CAD values. Because NHSN C. difficile data are not available to public health departments until several months after cases are identified, public health departments should consider working with ACHs to implement a threshold model for public health notification, enabling earlier intervention than those prompted by SIR and CAD calculations.Disclosures: NoneFunding: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document