Memory impairment in chronic pain patients and the related neuropsychological mechanisms: a review

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 195-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xianhua Liu ◽  
Li Li ◽  
Fanggui Tang ◽  
Siwei Wu ◽  
Yiqiu Hu

ObjectiveThis study provides a comprehensive review of the literature on memory impairment and the potential effective factors in patients with chronic pain.MethodsA literature search of databases PubMed, EMBASE, SpringerLink, and PsycINFO until September 2012 was conducted using the keywords ‘memory’ and ‘chronic pain’. The study emphasises on publications over the past 20 years.ResultsMemory impairment in chronic pain patients is substantial, but the aspects of memory (e.g. working memory, long-term memory, and autobiographical memory) in chronic pain patients and the potentially related factors (e.g. age, level of education, pain conditions, emotion, neural network, and use of analgesics) are modest. Memory impairment is interpreted with the attention-narrowing hypothesis and the capacity-reduction hypothesis.ConclusionsThe currently available data and theory have explained memory impairment in chronic pain patients, but many controversies remain. Future research should focus on the subclinical characteristics of chronic pain, enlarging the sample size, and emphasise on the experimental intervention method and the cognitive neuroscience method.

Author(s):  
Kelly K. Dineen

There is no question that a lack of careful decision-making around opioid prescribing in the past contributed to the current opioid-related harms. Yet opioids—usually in combination with other treatments—are sometimes the only effective therapies for certain chronic pain patients, in whom the benefits of opioids outweigh the risks of a substance use disorder. This chapter examines special populations such as those with sickle cell disease or those experiencing pain in end-of-life care. Caring for chronic pain patients can be challenging, especially now that the use of opioids for long-term pain control has been called into question. This chapter draws attention to attitudes and biases that may contribute to decision-making errors on the part of providers who are trying to balance the benefits and harms of opioids when treating these particularly vulnerable groups.


2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 248-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatriz Planelles ◽  
César Margarit ◽  
Raquel Ajo ◽  
Yolanda Sastre ◽  
Javier Muriel ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Simon Egli ◽  
Mirjam Pfister ◽  
Sabina M. Ludin ◽  
Katia Puente de la Vega ◽  
André Busato ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven D. Passik, PhD ◽  
Kenneth L. Kirsh, PhD ◽  
Laurie Whitcomb, MA ◽  
Jeffrey R. Schein, PhD, MPH ◽  
Mitchell A. Kaplan, PhD ◽  
...  

The increasingly common practice of long-term opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain must be guided by ongoing assessment of four types of outcomes: pain relief, function, side effects, and drug-related behaviors. Our objective was to gather initial pilot data on the clinical application of a specialized chart note, the Pain Assessment and Documentation Tool (PADT), which was developed and tested with 27 physicians. This pilot test provided the means to collect cross-sectional outcome data on a large sample of opioid-treated chronic pain patients. Each of the physician volunteers (located in a variety of settings across the United States) completed the PADT for a convenience sample of personally treated chronic pain patients who had received at least three months of opioid therapy. Completion of the PADT required a clinical interview, review of the medical chart, and direct clinical observation. Data from the PADTs were collated and analyzed. The results suggested that the majority of patients with chronic pain achieve relatively positive outcomes in the eyes of their prescribing physicians in all four relevant domains with opioid therapy. Analgesia was modest but meaningful, functionality was generally stabilized or improved, and side effects were tolerable. Potentially aberrant behaviors were common but viewed as an indicator of a problem (i.e., addiction or diversion) in only approximately 10 percent of cases. Using the PADT, physician ratings can be developed in four domains. In this sample, outcomes suggested that opioid therapy provided meaningful analgesia.


2015 ◽  
Vol 122 (3) ◽  
pp. 677-685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathaniel P. Katz ◽  
Florence C. Paillard ◽  
Robert R. Edwards

Abstract Background: Opioid-induced hyperalgesia is a clinical syndrome whereby patients on long-term opioids become more sensitive to pain while taking opioids. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia is characterized by increased pain intensity over time, spreading of pain to other locations, and increased pain sensation to external stimuli. To characterize opioid-induced hyperalgesia, laboratory methods to measure hyperalgesia have been developed. To determine the performance of these methods, the authors conducted a systematic review of clinical studies that incorporate measures of hyperalgesia in chronic pain patients on long-term opioids. Methods: PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched (terms: opioid induced hyperalgesia, study or trial, and long-term or chronic). Studies published in English were selected if they were conducted in chronic pain patients on long-term opioids and incorporated measures of hyperalgesia; acute/single-dose studies and/or conducted in healthy volunteers were excluded. Results: Fourteen articles made the final selection (11 were selected from the search and 3 others were found from additional sources); there was one randomized controlled trial, one prospective controlled study, three prospective uncontrolled studies, and nine cross-sectional observation studies. Hyperalgesia measurement paradigms used included cold pain, heat pain, pressure pain, electrical pain, ischemic pain, and injection pain. Although none of the stimuli were capable of detecting patients’ hyperalgesia, heat pain sensitivity showed some promising results. Conclusions: None of the measures reviewed herein met the criteria of a definitive standard for the measurement of hyperalgesia. Additional studies that use improved study design should be conducted.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 857-857 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camila Albo ◽  
Sanjiv Kumar ◽  
Michael Pope ◽  
Kyle Michael Kidwell ◽  
Niren Patel ◽  
...  

Abstract A paradigm shift is occurring in our understanding of pain in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). Vaso-occlusive episodes (VOEs) are crises of acute nociceptive pain, and have long been recognized as a hallmark of SCD (Brandow et al., 2017). While patients with SCD are traditionally considered to be at "steady state" and pain free between VOEs, recent studies have shown that a significant number of adults with SCD (~30%) experience daily chronic pain (>50% of the time in the past 6 months) (Smith et al., 2008). Although the precise mechanisms underlying this evolution from acute episodic to chronic pain are not well known, some contributing factors include age, chronic inflammation, organ damage, and opioid induced hyperalgesia (Stoicea et al., 2015; Rees et al., 2010). A recent study in a mouse model of SCD showed that mast cell activation was an important contributor to neurogenic inflammation and chronic pain (Vincent et al., 2013). We previously reported that SCD patients with chronic pain were older and had higher levels of mast cell activation markers, plasma tryptase and substance P, compared to those without chronic pain (Kuei et al., 2015). Recently, nerve growth factor (NGF) has been implicated in pathogenesis of some chronic pain syndromes (osteoarthritis), and clinical trials with anti-NGF monoclonal antibodies have been shown to result in superior pain control compared to placebo, opioids and NSAIDs. Here we report the results of our extended study of the evolution of chronic pain in SCD. A total of 72 subjects (age 15-66) were enrolled: 10 in the 15-19 age group, 19 in 20-29, 21 in 30-39, and 22 in ≥ 40. Patients transfused within the past 3 months and those who had an ED visit or hospitalization within the past 2 weeks were excluded. Information on the frequency of VOEs, presence or absence of chronic pain, HU therapy, opioid use (as mg morphine equivalents within the past 6 months), other medications and routine laboratory data (CBC, retics, chemistry panel, HbF) were collected. 4 mL of EDTA blood was collected at steady state and the plasma was separated by centrifugation and kept at -80 C. Plasma tryptase, substance P, and NGF levels were assayed by ELISA using kits from Biomatik inc (catalog# EKU07922), Enzo Life Sciences (catalog# ADI-900-018), and R&D Systems (catalog# DY256), respectively. Pressure pain threshold (PPTh) was measured using a hand-held digital algometer (AlgoMed, Medoc, Israel) four times at each of the following anatomic muscle groups on the left side of the body and then averaged for analysis: masseter, trapezius, and ulna in this consecutive order. Cutaneous mechanical pain was assessed using a Von Frey monofilament on the back of the subject's left hand. A baseline of one stimulus and then two separate series of 10 repeated stimuli each were conducted. The subject was asked to rate the pain on a scale of 0 to 10 (MFB, MF1 and MF2). Overall, 34 patients had chronic pain and 38 did not; there was an age dependent increase in the frequency of chronic pain, VOE frequency, opioid use and Von Frey MF values. Similarly, QST showed significantly lower pressure pain thresholds in subjects with chronic pain at ulna and trapezius (p=0.026 and 0.024 respectively). As expected, opioid use (daily morphine equivalents) was significantly higher in the chronic pain patients (52.8 mg vs 6.94 mg, p=0.009), suggesting a correlation between opioid use and hyperalgesia. Tryptase and substance P levels were higher in chronic pain patients, though the difference did not reach statistical significance. NGF levels were significantly higher in the chronic pain group (1126 pg/ml vs 473 pg/ml, p=0.051). Our results confirm previous observations that there is an age dependent increase in the proportion of patients with chronic pain (Table 1, Fig. 1-3). The trend towards higher levels of tryptase and substance P is in support of mast cell activation and neurogenic inflammation as a contributing factor to chronic pain (Vincent et al., 2013). To our knowledge, this is the first study of NGF as a possible contributing factor to chronic pain in SCD. If confirmed in larger multi-center studies, these observations could provide a rationale for novel interventions for chronic pain in SCD, via inhibition of mast cell activation/c-kit (tyrosine kinase inhibitors) or via repurposing of existing anti-NGF monoclonal antibodies as an alternative to opioids, whose inefficacy in chronic pain is well documented. Disclosures Kutlar: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Other: DSMB Member; Sancilio: Other: DSMB Chair.


2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 1101-1110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric L. Garland ◽  
Sarah E. Reese ◽  
Carter E. Bedford ◽  
Anne K. Baker

AbstractThrough autonomic and affective mechanisms, adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) may disrupt the capacity to regulate negative emotions, increasing craving and exacerbating risk for opioid use disorder (OUD) among individuals with chronic pain who are receiving long-term opioid analgesic pharmacotherapy. This study examined associations between ACEs, heart rate variability (HRV) during emotion regulation, and negative emotional cue-elicited craving among a sample of female opioid-treated chronic pain patients at risk for OUD. A sample of women (N= 36, mean age = 51.2 ± 9.5) with chronic pain receiving long-term opioid analgesic pharmacotherapy (mean morphine equivalent daily dose = 87.1 ± 106.9 mg) were recruited from primary care and pain clinics to complete a randomized task in which they viewed and reappraised negative affective stimuli while HRV and craving were assessed. Both ACEs and duration of opioid use significantly predicted blunted HRV during negative emotion regulation and increased negative emotional cue-elicited craving. Analysis of study findings from a multiple-levels-of-analysis approach suggest that exposure to childhood abuse occasions later emotion dysregulation and appetitive responding toward opioids in negative affective contexts among adult women with chronic pain, and thus this vulnerable clinical population should be assessed for OUD risk when initiating a course of extended, high-dose opioids for pain management.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document