Stock Return Asymmetry: Beyond Skewness

2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 357-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Jiang ◽  
Ke Wu ◽  
Guofu Zhou ◽  
Yifeng Zhu

In this article, we propose two asymmetry measures for stock returns. Unlike the popular skewness measure, our measures are based on the distribution function of the data rather than just the third central moment. We present empirical evidence that the greater upside asymmetries calculated using our new measures imply lower average returns in the cross section of stocks. In contrast, when using the skewness measure, the relationship between asymmetry and returns is inconclusive.

2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (02) ◽  
pp. 1850010
Author(s):  
SILVIA BRESSAN ◽  
ALEX WEISSENSTEINER

This paper studies to what extent bank-specific characteristics relate to stock return skewness. The main finding is that stock return skewness decreases significantly in bank size, measured in terms of total assets, i.e stocks of large banks are less skewed than those of small banks. This result holds for backward-looking skewness computed using the past stock returns, as well as for forward-looking skewness extracted from stock options. We interpret the empirical evidence by arguing that bank size increases the likelihood to have severe losses, to the point that investors expect to be compensated by receiving higher expected returns.


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Prashant Sharma ◽  
Brajesh Kumar

<p>The present study examines the cross-sectional pricing ability of idiosyncratic volatility (IV) in Indian stock market and investigates the relationship amongst expected idiosyncratic volatility (EI), unexpected idiosyncratic volatility (UI), and cross-section of stocks returns. The study uses ARIMA (2, 0, 1) model to IV into EI and UI. The stocks returns are regressed on IV, EI and UI using Newey-West (1987) corrections, in order to investigate their empirical relationship.  The study finds that IV is positively related with stock returns. Further the IV significantly explains the cross-section of stock returns in Indian context. After imposing control over UI, as it is highly correlated with unexpected returns, the inter-temporal relationship between EI and expected returns turns out to be positive.</p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 1479-1507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Jiang ◽  
Ke Wu ◽  
Guofu Zhou

We provide an entropy approach for measuring the asymmetric comovement between the return on a single asset and the market return. This approach yields a model-free test for stock return asymmetry, generalizing the correlation-based test proposed by Hong, Tu, and Zhou (2007). Based on this test, we find that asymmetry is much more pervasive than previously thought. Moreover, our approach also provides an entropy-based measure of downside asymmetric comovement. In the cross section of stock returns, we find an asymmetry premium: Higher downside asymmetric comovement with the market indicates higher expected returns.


2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 286-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Meng Li ◽  
Dharmendra Naidu ◽  
Farshid Navissi ◽  
Kumari Ranjeeni

Prior studies show that net stock issuance is negatively associated with the cross section of future stock returns, reflecting a market anomaly. Our study provides empirical evidence on whether cash flow can mitigate such anomaly. Consistent with prior research, we initially provide evidence of the anomaly in our sample and that the anomaly persists in the presence of cash flow. We then decompose net stock issuance into stock issues and stock repurchases and find that the anomaly is only driven by stock issues but not stock repurchases and that the stock issues’ anomaly persists even in the presence of cash flow. JEL Classification: G12, G14


CFA Digest ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 55-56
Author(s):  
Kathryn Dixon Jost

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document