A randomised controlled trial of coblation, diode laser and cold dissection in paediatric tonsillectomy

2015 ◽  
Vol 129 (11) ◽  
pp. 1058-1063 ◽  
Author(s):  
M R Elbadawey ◽  
H M Hegazy ◽  
A E Eltahan ◽  
J Powell
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Diode Laser ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Pain Scale ◽  
Recurrent Tonsillitis ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Cold Dissection

AbstractObjective:This study aimed to compare the efficacy of diode laser, coblation and cold dissection tonsillectomy in paediatric patients.Methods:A total of 120 patients aged 10–15 years with recurrent tonsillitis were recruited. Participants were prospectively randomised to diode laser, coblation or cold dissection tonsillectomy. Operative time and blood loss were recorded. Pain was recorded on a Wong–Baker FACES®pain scale.Results:The operative time (10 ± 0.99 minutes), blood loss (20 ± 0.85 ml) and pain were significantly lower with coblation tonsillectomy than with cold dissection tonsillectomy (20 ± 1.0 minutes and 30 ± 1.0 ml;p= 0.0001) and diode laser tonsillectomy (15 ± 0.83 minutes and 25 ± 0.83 ml;p= 0.0001). Diode laser tonsillectomy had a shorter operative time (p= 0.0001) and less blood loss (p= 0.001) compared with cold dissection tonsillectomy. However, at post-operative day seven, the diode laser tonsillectomy group had significantly higher pain scores compared with the cold dissection (p= 0.042) and coblation (p= 0.04) tonsillectomy groups.Conclusion:Both coblation and diode laser tonsillectomy are associated with significantly reduced blood loss and shorter operative times compared with cold dissection tonsillectomy. However, we advocate coblation tonsillectomy because of the lower post-operative pain scores compared with diode laser and cold dissection tonsillectomy.

scholarly journals Coblation versus Diode Laser Tonsillectomy in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-145
Author(s):  
MA Matin ◽  
MA Sabur ◽  
MAK Azad ◽  
MN Islam
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Diode Laser ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Sleep Apnoea ◽  
Normal Diet ◽  
Recurrent Tonsillitis ◽  
Soft Diet ◽  
Laser Group ◽  
Early Returns

Objective: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of diode laser and coblation tonsillectomy in paediatric patients in relation to operative time, amount of blood loss, post operative pain, healing of tonsillar fossa and returns to normal diet. Methods: A total of 200 patients ,100 for coblaton and 100 for diode laser, aged 3-12 years with recurrent tonsillitis with or without snoring and sleep apnoea were recruited. Participants were prospectively randomised to diode laser and coblation tonsillectomy. Operative time and blood loss were recorded. Pain was recorded by VAS or assessed by using analgesic. Results: The operative time were recorded 07-15 minutes,mean 10 minutes in coblation group and 12-20 minutes ,mean 14 minutes in laser group., Blood loss was recorded 0-15 ml mean 8 ml in coblation group and 10-25 ml mean 13.5 ml in diode laser group . However, at post-operative day seven, the diode laser tonsillectomy group had significantly higher pain scores compared with coblationtonsillectomy groups.Coblation group started normal soft diet on day 5 whereas diode laser started on day 8 Conclusion: Coblation tonsillectomy is associated with less operative time and blood loss, early returns to normal diet and less pain score in comparison to Diode laser tonsillectomy Bangladesh J Otorhinolaryngol; October 2017; 23(2): 140-145

Six years of evidence-based adult dissection tonsillectomy with ultrasonic scalpel, bipolar electrocautery, bipolar radiofrequency or ‘cold steel’ dissection

2012 ◽  
Vol 126 (10) ◽  
pp. 1056-1062 ◽  
Author(s):  
S M Ragab
Keyword(s):  
Operative Time ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Ultrasonic Scalpel ◽  
Tonsillar Fossa ◽  
Bipolar Radiofrequency ◽  
Full Diet ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Cold Steel Dissection ◽  
Cold Dissection

AbstractObjective:To conduct an adequately powered, prospective, randomised, controlled trial comparing adult dissection tonsillectomy using either ultrasonic scalpel, bipolar electrocautery, bipolar radiofrequency or ‘cold steel’ dissection.Methods:Three hundred patients were randomised into four tonsillectomy technique groups. The operative time, intra-operative bleeding, post-operative pain, tonsillar fossa healing, return to full diet, return to work and post-operative complications were recorded.Results:The bipolar radiofrequency group had a shorter mean operative time. The mean intra-operative blood loss during bipolar radiofrequency tonsillectomy was significantly less compared with cold dissection and ultrasonic scalpel tonsillectomy. Pain scores were significantly higher after bipolar electrocautery tonsillectomy. Patients undergoing bipolar electrocautery tonsillectomy required significantly more days to return to full diet and work. The bipolar electrocautery group showed significantly reduced tonsillar fossa healing during the first and second post-operative weeks.Conclusion:In this adult series, bipolar radiofrequency tonsillectomy was superior to ultrasonic, bipolar electrocautery and cold dissection tonsillectomies. This method combines the advantages of ‘hot’ and ‘cold’ tonsillectomy.

scholarly journals Guillotine versus dissection tonsillectomy: randomised, controlled trial

2012 ◽  
Vol 126 (11) ◽  
pp. 1142-1149 ◽  
Author(s):  
S J Frampton ◽  
M J A Ward ◽  
V S Sunkaraneni ◽  
H Ismail-Koch ◽  
Z A Sheppard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Operative Blood Loss ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Secondary Haemorrhage ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Cold Steel Dissection

AbstractObjective:This trial aimed to compare the guillotine technique of tonsillectomy with ‘cold steel’ dissection, the current ‘gold standard’.Design:A single centre, randomised, controlled trial.Methods:One hundred children aged 3 to 11 years who were listed for bilateral tonsillectomy were recruited. Patients had one tonsil removed by each technique, and were blinded to the side. The operative time, intra-operative blood loss, haemostasis requirement and post-operative pain scores were recorded and compared.Results:Operative time and intra-operative blood loss were both significantly less for the guillotine technique (p < 0.001) and there was a significantly reduced haemostasis requirement (p < 0.001). Pain was also less on the guillotine side (p < 0.001). There were no tonsillar remnants or palatal trauma for either technique. There was no significant difference between techniques in the frequency of secondary haemorrhage.Conclusion:This study provides level Ib evidence that guillotine tonsillectomy in children with mobile tonsils is an effective and time-efficient procedure which produces less intra-operative blood loss and post-operative pain than cold steel dissection.

scholarly journals TONSILLECTOMY IN PAEDIATRIC POPULATION

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (04) ◽  
pp. 499-503
Author(s):  
Raheel Ahmad ◽  
Farhan Salam ◽  
Abdul Saeed Khan ◽  
Faisal Bashir ◽  
Atif Rafique
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Cold Steel Dissection ◽  
Cold Dissection ◽  
Dissection Method

Objectives: To compare mean operative time and Intra operative blood lossbetween bipolar electro dissection and cold dissection tonsillectomy in paediatric population.Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Place and Duration: Department of ENT and Headand Neck Surgery, Continental Medical College, Hospital Lahore, from 1 January 2015 to 30September 2015. Materials and Methods: This study included 164 patients of age group 4 to12 years of either gender undergoing tonsillectomy. The patients were divided into two equalgroups designated as A and B each having 82 patients using simple random sampling. Patientsin group A were operated for tonsillectomy by bipolar electrocautry while group B underwenttonsillectomy by cold steel dissection method. All patients in both groups were assessed foroperating time and intra-operative blood loss. Results: Out of 82 cases of Bipolar DissectionGroup 49(60%) patients were male and 33(40%) patients were female. Whereas in 82 casesof Cold Dissection Group 51(62%) patients were male and 31(38%) patients were female.Mean age of patients was 7.2(SD ± 1.97) years. Mean operation time was 15 minutes withstandard deviation ± 1.21 in group A as compared to group B where mean operation time was20 minutes with standard deviation ± 1.87. Mean blood loss was 7 ml with standard deviation± 2.53 in patients of group A as compared to Patients in group B who mean blood loss of 30ml with standard deviation ± 3.46. Group A had statistically significant lower operative time andblood loss than group B. Conclusion: Tonsillectomy with bipolar electro dissection method ismuch better than cold steel dissection method. It has an advantage of less blood loss duringsurgery. It significantly reduces intra operative time.

Pilot comparison between potassium titanyl phosphate laser and bipolar radiofrequency in paediatric tonsillectomy

2008 ◽  
Vol 122 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
H M Hegazy ◽  
O A Albirmawy ◽  
A H Kaka ◽  
A S Behiry
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Potassium Titanyl Phosphate ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Operative Blood Loss ◽  
Bipolar Radiofrequency ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Laser Group ◽  
Potassium Titanyl Phosphate Laser

AbstractObjectives:To compare the advantages and disadvantages of potassium titanyl phosphate laser with those of bipolar radiofrequency techniques, in paediatric tonsillectomy.Study design:Prospective, randomised, clinical study.Patients and methods:From July 2004 to April 2006, 80 patients aged between 10 and 15 years, with tonsillectomy planned for chronic tonsillitis, were included in the study. Children were prospectively randomised into two equal groups: potassium titanyl phosphate laser tonsillectomy and bipolar radiofrequency tonsillectomy. Operative time and intra-operative blood loss were recorded. Patients were scheduled for follow up during the first, second and fourth post-operative weeks. They were asked to record their pain and discomfort on a standardised visual analogue scale, from zero (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). Post-operative complications were also recorded and managed.Results:The potassium titanyl phosphate laser group showed a slightly longer operative time (mean 12 minutes) than the bipolar radiofrequency group (mean 10 minutes). Intra-operative blood loss was significantly less in the potassium titanyl phosphate laser group (mean 21 cm3) than in the bipolar radiofrequency group (mean 30 cm3). In the first week, post-operative pain scores were less in the potassium titanyl phosphate laser group than in the bipolar radiofrequency group (means 7.5 and 8.5, respectively). However, in the second week pain scores increased more in the potassium titanyl phosphate laser group than in the bipolar radiofrequency group (means 8.5 and 6, respectively). In the fourth week, both groups showed equal and nearly normal pain scores. No case of reactionary post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage was recorded in either group. Only one case of secondary post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage was recorded, in the potassium titanyl phosphate laser group (2.5 per cent), managed conservatively.Conclusion:Both the potassium titanyl phosphate and the bipolar radiofrequency techniques were safe and easy to use for tonsillectomy, with reduced operative time, blood loss and complication rates and better post-operative general patient condition. Potassium titanyl phosphate laser resulted in reduced operative bleeding and immediate post-operative pain, compared with the bipolar radiofrequency technique. However, potassium titanyl phosphate laser required slightly more operative time and caused more late post-operative pain than the bipolar radiofrequency technique. The low rate of recorded complications showed that both techniques cause little damage to the tonsillar bed during dissection, thus minimising complications.

scholarly journals Comparison of post operative pain in tonsillectomy: a three year prospective study

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 2189
Author(s):  
Akshay Jain ◽  
Smruti Milan Tripathy
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Pain Scale ◽  
Visual Analogue Pain Scale ◽  
Bipolar Cautery ◽  
Visual Analogue Pain ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Post Operative Period ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cold Dissection

<p><strong>Background:</strong> Tonsillectomy is the oldest surgery performed by otorhinolaryngologists worldwide. Through ages different techniques have been tried to improve the post surgical outcome and reduce morbidity among patients. Aim of the current study was to compare the post-operative pain among the patients undergoing tonsillectomy by cold dissection, bipolar cautery dissection and coblation dissection.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> 142 Patients undergoing tonsillectomy in ENT department of TMMC during the period of 3 year were included in the study. Patients were randomly distributed to undergo different techniques of tonsillectomy. The post-operative pain in patients was assessed using the pre-standardized visual analogue pain scale and results were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> No statistically significant difference was found among the groups undergoing tonsillectomy by cold dissection, bipolar dissection and coblator dissection as the p&gt;0.05. The immediate post-operative pain was found to be slightly higher among the group undergoing tonsillectomy by coblator dissection and the analgesics dose needed in the post-operative period remained the same for all for patients of all the three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> No statistically significant difference was found in the post-operative pain scores of patients undergoing tonsillectomy by CD, BD and CBD techniques.</p>

scholarly journals Diode laser versus blunt dissection tonsillectomy

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
MA Matin ◽  
M Alamgir Chowdhury
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Diode Laser ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Blunt Dissection ◽  
Tonsillar Fossa ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Laser Group ◽  
Dissection Method

Introduction: Tonsillectomy is the commonest operation performed in Ear, Nose and Throat Department. Various methods of tonsillectomy have been practiced over the century aimed at  reducing or eliminating intra-operative and postoperative morbidity.Aim: This prospective study is aimed at evaluation of advantages and disadvantages of laser tonsillectomy over blunt dissection tonsillectomy in respect of operative time, intra-operative blood loss, postoperative pain, rate of healing of tonsillar fossa and other postoperative complications.Method: This prospective randomized study was done for 18 months from April 2010 to September 2011.One hundred patients were divided into two groups of equal number. In one group, the tonsillectomy performed by Diode laser and in the other group the tonsillectomy performed by conventional dissection technique.Results: Age ranged from 5 - 34 years with mean age 15.4 in laser group and 4-35 years with mean age 15.98 in dissection group. Operative time and amount of blood loss is significantly reduced in the laser group (10-25 min, mean 12 min in laser group, 15-45 min, and mean 25 min in dissection group). Tonsillectomy by using laser has shown less intra-operative bleeding (5ml-20 ml, mean 10 ml compared with 45-250 ml, mean 70 ml in dissection method). Patients experienced mild to moderate pain in laser group and moderate to severe pain in dissection group in first 24-48 hours. Pain increased in intensity after 5-6 days in laser group. On 8th post operative day thin to thick white coating is observed with smooth tonsillar fossa in laser group whereas granulation tissue is observed in dissection group.Conclusion: In conclusion laser tonsillectomy has some advantages over dissection method.  There is less operative time and intra-operative bleeding and less immediate post operative pain. Disadvantage of laser tonsillectomy is that there is more pain in 5th to 6th post operative period this may be due to thick slough formation. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjo.v18i2.11983 Bangladesh J Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 18(2): 114-118

scholarly journals A comparison of the Thunderbeat and standard electrocautery devices in head and neck surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. C. Kuipers ◽  
B. J. de Kleijn ◽  
J. Wedman ◽  
B. F. A. M. van der Laan ◽  
B. E. C. Plaat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck Surgery ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Standard Instrumentation

Abstract Purpose New energy-based sutureless vessel ligation devices, such as the Thunderbeat (Olympus Medical Systems Corp., Tokyo, Japan), could reduce operative time and limit blood loss in head and neck surgery; however, efficacy and safety in major head and neck surgery have not been investigated in a prospective, randomized study. Methods This prospective, double-arm, randomized controlled trial consisted of two parts: total laryngectomy (TL) and neck dissection (ND). Thirty patients planned for TL were randomized in two groups. For the ND part, forty-two operative sides were likewise randomized. In both parts, Thunderbeat was used in addition to the standard instrumentation in the intervention groups, while only standard instrumentation was used in the control groups. Primary outcome values were blood loss, operative time and complication rate. Results For the TL part there was no difference in mean blood loss (p = 0.062), operative time (p = 0.512) and complications (p = 0.662) between both hemostatic techniques. For the neck dissection part, there was a reduction in blood loss (mean 210 mL versus 431 mL, p = 0.046) and in operative time (median 101 (IQR 85–130) minutes versus 150 (IQR 130–199) minutes, p = 0.014) when Thunderbeat was used. There was no difference in complication rate between both hemostatic systems (p = 0.261). Conclusion The Thunderbeat hemostatic device significantly reduces operative blood loss and operative time for neck dissections, without increase in complications. In TL, blood loss using Thunderbeat was comparable with the standard technique, but the operative time tended to be shorter. Trial registration UMCG Research Register, Reg. no. 201700041, date of registration: 18/1/2017

scholarly journals A Comparative Analysis of Outcomes of Conventional Cold Dissection Versus Laser Tonsillectomy in Pediatric Cases in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Haryana

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit Kumar ◽  
Surender Kumar ◽  
Anand Krishnan ◽  
Manish Verma ◽  
Uma Garg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Operative Time ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Paediatric Population ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Secondary Complications ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Secondary Bleeding ◽  
Paediatric Age ◽  
Cold Dissection

AbstractTonsillectomy is one of the commonest ENT procedures done in paediatric population, the technique of which has evolved over years to decrease the morbidity associated with the surgery. This prospective randomized comparative study is done to evaluate the efficacy of two different techniques of this surgery, conventional cold dissection and laser tonsillectomy based on operative time, blood loss, post-operative pain and occurrence of secondary complications. The study was done in 68 patients of paediatric age group, 34 in each group underwent cold dissection and laser tonsillectomy. Operative time and bleeding were significantly low for laser group. Pain score was comparable in early post-operatives days, but was high towards the end of first week. Our study reported only one incidence of complication in the form of a secondary bleeding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document