The Zhuang Minority Peoples of the Sino-Vietnamese Frontier in the Song Period

1987 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 250-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey G. Barlow

The Zhuang of south China are the most numerous of the Chinese minority peoples. In Vietnam the Zhuang were identified historically as the Nung, and more recently as the combined Tay-Nung minority, the largest of Vietnam's 36 minority peoples. One of the most critical points in Zhuang history occurred in the Song era [960–1126 A.D.], when the expanding Han Chinese and the Vietnamese began to make a sustained impact in the Zhuang heartlands. Many Zhuang resisted foreign control, striving for continued independence. Their subsequent defeat meant that the Zhuang were never again to have an opportunity for autonomous development.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guanglin He

Southern China was a region with mixed rice-millet farming during the Middle Neolithic period and also suggested to be the homeland of Tai-Kadai-speaking (TK) people. The archaeological evidence of animal and plant domestication has demonstrated that southern Chinese rice agriculturalists dispersed from the Yangtze River basin with the dissemination of TK, Austroasiatic (AA), Austronesian (AN) and Hmong-Mien (HM) languages. However, the formations of the inland TK-speaking people, central/southern Han Chinese and their relationships with Neolithic farmers from the Yangtze and Yellow Rivers (YR) basins are far from clear due to the limited sampling of South China. Here, we revealed the spatiotemporal demographic history of southern China by analyzing newly generated genome-wide data of 70 southeastern mainland TK speakers including Dong, Gelao and Bouyei and 45 southwestern Han Chinese together with comprehensive modern/ancient reference datasets. Southwest Han Chinese and Gelao demonstrated a closer genomic affinity to Neolithic YR farmers, while inland TKs (Dong and Bouyei) demonstrated a closer genomic affinity to coastal TK/AN-speaking islanders and Neolithic Yangtze farmers and their descendants. The shared genetic drift between inland TK/AN speaker highlighted a common origin of AN/TK groups, which may be descended from Tanshishan people or their predecessors (Xitoucun). Additionally, we found that inland TK/Sinitic could be modelled as an admixture of ancestral northern East Asian (ANEA) and ancestral southern East Asian (ASEA) sources with different proportions, in which the ANEA was phylogenetically closer to Neolithic millet farmers deriving from the YR Basin and the ASEA was phylogenetically closer to Coastal Neolithic-to-modern southern East Asians. Finally, we discovered genetic differentiation among TK people from southern China and Southeast Asia and obvious substructures between northern and southern inland Chinese TK people. The observed patterns of the spatiotemporal distribution of the northern and southern East Asian lineages in Central/southern China were also compatible with the scenario of bi-directional gene flow events from ANEA and ASEA. Conclusively, multiple lines of genomic evidence indicated millet farmers deriving from the YR basin and rice farmers deriving from the Yangtze River basin substantially contributed to the present-day mainland TK speakers and Central/southern Han Chinese, and formed the modern dual genetic admixture profile.


2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Wang ◽  
Deng-Feng Zhang ◽  
Jia-Qi Feng ◽  
Guo-Dong Li ◽  
Xiao-An Li ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 4330-4341 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.-Y. Sun ◽  
X.-X. Yang ◽  
W.-W. Xu ◽  
G.-Y. Yao ◽  
H.-Z. Pan ◽  
...  

Paleobiology ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 6 (02) ◽  
pp. 146-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
William A. Oliver

The Mesozoic-Cenozoic coral Order Scleractinia has been suggested to have originated or evolved (1) by direct descent from the Paleozoic Order Rugosa or (2) by the development of a skeleton in members of one of the anemone groups that probably have existed throughout Phanerozoic time. In spite of much work on the subject, advocates of the direct descent hypothesis have failed to find convincing evidence of this relationship. Critical points are:(1) Rugosan septal insertion is serial; Scleractinian insertion is cyclic; no intermediate stages have been demonstrated. Apparent intermediates are Scleractinia having bilateral cyclic insertion or teratological Rugosa.(2) There is convincing evidence that the skeletons of many Rugosa were calcitic and none are known to be or to have been aragonitic. In contrast, the skeletons of all living Scleractinia are aragonitic and there is evidence that fossil Scleractinia were aragonitic also. The mineralogic difference is almost certainly due to intrinsic biologic factors.(3) No early Triassic corals of either group are known. This fact is not compelling (by itself) but is important in connection with points 1 and 2, because, given direct descent, both changes took place during this only stage in the history of the two groups in which there are no known corals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document