Which is bigger? An intriguing ‘double alternation’
The following three inequalities hold:The first inequality is trivial. The second one was proved without calculating aids in note [1], and the third along similar lines in note [2]. The author of note [2] also suggested an extension to the relation betweenHow best to continue the sequence of inequalities is not obvious and we return to that point shortly. Before doing so, we note that an interesting geralisation is to replace π by a variable x, and to determine the precise interval of x in which the regularity of the ‘alternation of inequality signs’ is maintained. We need no longer consider particular properties of π.
2018 ◽
Vol 97
(3)
◽
pp. 435-445
◽
Keyword(s):
1971 ◽
Vol 23
(3)
◽
pp. 445-450
◽
Keyword(s):
1967 ◽
Vol 10
(5)
◽
pp. 681-688
◽
1932 ◽
Vol 3
(1)
◽
pp. 53-55
1972 ◽
Vol 13
(2)
◽
pp. 147-152
◽
Keyword(s):
1994 ◽
Vol 36
(1)
◽
pp. 91-96
◽
Keyword(s):
1965 ◽
Vol 14
(4)
◽
pp. 269-272
◽
Keyword(s):
1930 ◽
Vol 2
(2)
◽
pp. 83-91
◽