Brenda Cooper: A New Generation of African Writers: Migration, Material Culture and Language. ix, 192 pp. Woodbridge: James Currey/Boydell & Brewer, 2008. £45. ISBN 978 1 84701 507 5.

2010 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 348-350
Author(s):  
Rebecca Jones
2020 ◽  
pp. 137-147
Author(s):  
Kseniya A. Zemlyanskaya ◽  

In the 19th – early 20th centuries, the Nanai were one of the largest Tungus-Manchu peoples of the Russian Far East. A close study of their traditions and customs began in the middle of the 19th century, when numerous ethnographic expeditions of researchers (L.I. Shrenk, R.K. Maak, K.I. Maksimovich) were sent to the Amur. First of all, the researchers were interested in the material culture of the Nanai, the issues of religion were touched upon in the mainstream of ethnographic research. In the last quarter of the 19th century, the attention of researchers was directed to the description of Nanai rites of passage (D. Kropotkin, P.P. Shimkevich). Scientific expeditions of the early 20th century were aimed at describing the spiritual culture of the Nanai and its reflection in material culture (I.A. Lopatin, L.Ya. Sternberg). The description of the religious beliefs of the Nanai was recorded as a result of the missionary activities of Blagoveshchensk and Vladivostok dioceses. In 1932, the former Far East writer Venedikt Mart published the story “Dere – the Water Wedding”, where he accumulates and systematizes the accumulated knowledge about the Nanai people in literary form, introducing certain elements of fiction. Despite the fact that Venedikt Mart writes about the denial of religious customs and traditions by the new generation of Nanai, nevertheless, the story itself is, in fact, clearly fixed at its core by the content of the wedding ceremony


Matatu ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-69
Author(s):  
DELE BAMIDELE ◽  
SUNDAY VICTOR AKWU

With few exceptions, African countries have suffered perennial bad governance, bloody civil wars, and coups-d’état. The continent suffocates in the grip of political elites and military juntas. Capitalism as an economic system empowers a few who lord it over the weak majority. The ruling class also contributes to the suffering of the masses by flagrantly looting the nation’s treasury and flaunting it while the majority of the populace wallow in abject poverty. African writers problematize and diagnose this scenario and the Weltschmerz bedevilling African socio-political life, in a bid to offering lasting solutions, in the process experimenting with ‘home-made’ as well as ‘imported’ ideologies in the struggle for the African utopia. Vincent Egbuson, a ‘new-generation’ African writer, is indubitably a committed writer. In confronting the African socio-political malady in Womandela, he has adopted divergent ideologies to sharpen his social vision. The purpose of this study is, accordingly, to scrutinize the ideological bent of Egbuson’s novel and to determine its efficacy against the backdrop of the socio-political reality of contemporary Africa.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. 309-318
Author(s):  
Akimou Assani ◽  

The publication of the Senegalese writer Fatou Diome’s Le Ventre de l’Atlantique (The Belly of the Atlantic) in 2003 revealed to the general public a new theme of predilection among African writers of the “new generation:” the writing of immigration and the claim of a global identity. In analogy to the movement of Negritude that fought for the affirmation and recognition of the black man and his culture, Jacques Chevrier called it “migritude.” While negritude is meant to be the affirmation of an existing identity, “migritude” instead claims the integration of that identity into the universal crucible of world citizenship. Achievable dream or chimerical delusions? Our work is aimed at seeking relevant answers to these questions.


Author(s):  
Rodney Harrison ◽  
John Schofield

How can we use the methods of archaeology to explore contemporary social phenomena? In what ways can the approaches of a discipline that has been developed to explore the distant past be used to understand the present, and should we even try? How can the ‘excavation’ of the recent past bring to light new insights into what it means to be ‘us’? These are the questions that have absorbed a new generation of scholars who seek to draw on the skills of archaeology to study an increasingly contemporary past and attempt to make the familiar past ‘unfamiliar’ (cf. Graves-Brown 2000a) by exploring its hidden, forgotten, and abject qualities and utilizing the powerful rhetoric of archaeological recovery in the retrieval of recent memories through the study of present-day material culture. This book aims to explore what happens if we take an archaeological approach to contemporary, late modern, post-industrial societies. It acts as an introduction both to the ways in which archaeologists approach the study of the recent and contemporary past, and to the interdisciplinary field of modern material culture studies more generally. We hope it will be of interest not only to students and practitioners of archaeology, but also to scholars who work within the broad interdisciplinary field of modern material culture studies— anthropologists, sociologists, historians of technology and science, and psychologists—in developing a new agenda for the study of the materiality of late modern societies. Because knowing more about our own society and how it functions is an issue of broad public concern, we have also tried to write this book in such a way that the reader who is not a specialist, but who has a casual interest in the manner in which archaeologists and others study contemporary material culture, will also be engaged by it. The book’s principal focus is the archaeology of developed, postindustrial societies during the second half of the twentieth century and the beginning of the twenty-first. Our emphasis is the period after about 1950, though the examples in Part II deliberately focus on the years after c.1970, a time which for us is literally the contemporary past, the period of our own lives and experiences.


1999 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 565-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Marples

A frequent assertion about the recent events and pervasive mood in Belarus—the apparent efforts to reunite with Russia, the virtual denial of a Belarusian identity by a Russophone president, official nostalgia for the time of the former Soviet Union— is that national consciousness is somehow retarded or delayed, and national development is lagging considerably behind that of its neighboring states, Lithuania and Ukraine. This article seeks to address the question of national self-awareness in Belarus from three angles: those of demography, culture, and language. Was development of the republic in the Soviet period different from that of the other republics, and is that development responsible for what has been described as the “national nihilism” of today? Is that mood likely to change with a new generation of Belarusians? How far is President Alyaksander Lukashenka, the first president of Belarus, who was elected in July 1994, responsible for the present situation and how far is he a symptom of the notable lack of self-assertion of Belarusians?


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document