Quantum modeling of common sense

2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 302-302
Author(s):  
Hamid R. Noori ◽  
Rainer Spanagel

AbstractQuantum theory is a powerful framework for probabilistic modeling of cognition. Strong empirical evidence suggests the context- and order-dependent representation of human judgment and decision-making processes, which falls beyond the scope of classical Bayesian probability theories. However, considering behavior as the output of underlying neurobiological processes, a fundamental question remains unanswered: Is cognition a probabilistic process at all?

1982 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 110
Author(s):  
Thomas Garwin ◽  
Kenneth R. Hammond ◽  
Gary H. McClelland ◽  
Jeryl Mumpower

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. e83528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Kaufmann ◽  
Ulf-Dietrich Reips ◽  
Werner W. Wittmann

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lewend Mayiwar ◽  
Fredrik Björklund

A growing line of research has shown that individuals can regulate emotional biases in risky judgment and decision-making processes through cognitive reappraisal. In the present study, we focus on a specific tactic of reappraisal known as distancing. Drawing on appraisal theories of emotion and the emotion regulation literature, we examine how distancing moderates the relationship between fear and risk taking and anger and risk taking. In three pre-registered studies (Ntotal = 1,483), participants completed various risky judgment and decision-making tasks. Replicating previous results, Study 1 revealed a negative relationship between fear and risk taking and a positive relationship between anger and risk taking at low levels of distancing. Study 2 replicated the interaction between fear and distancing but found no interaction between anger and distancing. Interestingly, at high levels of distancing, we observed a reversal of the relationship between fear and risk taking in both Study 1 and 2. Study 3 manipulated emotion and distancing by asking participants to reflect on current fear-related and anger-related stressors from an immersed or distanced perspective. Study 3 found no main effect of emotion nor any evidence of a moderating role of distancing. However, exploratory analysis revealed a main effect of distancing on optimistic risk estimation, which was mediated by a reduction in self-reported fear. Overall, the findings suggest that distancing can help regulate the influence of incidental fear on risk taking and risk estimation. We discuss implications and suggestions for future research.


2019 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerome R. Busemeyer ◽  
Zheng Wang

Abstract Quantum cognition is a new field in psychology, which is characterized by the application of quantum probability theory to human judgment and decision making behavior. This article provides an introduction that presents several examples to illustrate in a simple and concrete manner how to apply these principles to interesting psychological phenomena. Following each simple example, we present the general mathematical derivations and new predictions related to these applications.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lewend Mayiwar ◽  
Fredrik Björklund

A growing line of research has shown that individuals can regulate emotional biases in risky judgment and decision-making processes through cognitive reappraisal. In the present study, we focus on a specific tactic of reappraisal known as distancing. Drawing on appraisal theories of emotion and the emotion regulation literature, we examine how distancing moderates the relationship between fear and risk taking and anger and risk taking. In three pre-registered studies (Ntotal = 1,483), participants completed various risky judgment and decision-making tasks. Replicating previous results, Study 1 revealed a negative relationship between fear and risk taking and a positive relationship between anger and risk taking at low levels of distancing. Study 2 replicated the interaction between fear and distancing but found no interaction between anger and distancing. Interestingly, at high levels of distancing, we observed a reversal of the relationship between fear and risk taking in both Study 1 and 2. Study 3 manipulated emotion and distancing by asking participants to reflect on current fear-related and anger-related stressors from an immersed or distanced perspective. Study 3 found no main effect of emotion nor any evidence of a moderating role of distancing. However, exploratory analysis revealed a main effect of distancing on optimistic risk estimation, which was mediated by a reduction in self-reported fear. Overall, the findings suggest that distancing can help regulate the influence of incidental fear on risk taking and risk estimation. We discuss implications and suggestions for future research.


Author(s):  
Mary E Marshall

This study examines the effect of the reviewer role on tax professionals' advocacy bias. Prior research establishes the prevalence of advocacy bias and focuses on whether reviewers can detect preparers' advocacy bias; however, this study examines whether the reviewer role influences tax professionals' judgment and decision-making processes. In an experiment randomly assigning 75 tax professionals to the reviewer and preparer roles, I find professionals who occupy the reviewer role report similar advocacy attitudes to preparers but are significantly less likely to exhibit advocacy bias than preparers. Reviewers also employ a more consistent decision process than those in a preparer role. Results highlight the reviewer role as a moderator of advocacy bias, demonstrating the importance of the reviewer role for firms and clients. Understanding the effects of review responsibilities on professionals at all levels is increasingly important as firms leverage emerging technology to complete tasks traditionally assigned to less experienced professionals.


2004 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 145 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Robertson ◽  
Q. J. Wang

Farmers are under continual pressure from Government and industry to change farm practices to meet productivity and environmental targets. In response to these pressures, farmers will make decisions to adopt practices that reflect their motivations and priorities. However, where the changes of practice are major, there may be considerable uncertainty associated with the decision-making process. Decision support tools are one method that may assist in reducing the uncertainty associated with decisions about changes in farm practices.Bayesian networks provide a useful tool to assist in the structuring and analysis of decision problems. A Bayesian network is a decision analysis framework, based on Bayesian probability theory, which allows the integration of scientific and experiential knowledge, and the uncertainty associated with this knowledge. The approach involves describing a system in terms of variables and linkages, or relationships between variables, at a level appropriate to the decision making. This is achieved through representing linkages as conditional probability tables and propagating probabilities through the network to give the likelihood of variable outcomes. Therefore, the approach ensures that treatment of risks and uncertainties is an intrinsic part of the decision-making processes. The Bayesian network is dynamic and interactive, and hence if a network previously developed does not fit a user's conceptual understanding of the system, it can be adapted quickly and simply to the cognitive understanding of the user.A case study Bayesian network has been developed for decisions associated with the selection of irrigation systems for irrigated dairy farms in Northern Victoria. This case study demonstrates that the most appropriate irrigation system for a dairy farm is dependent on factors including the amount of irrigation water available and soil types. Analysis of the Bayesian network indicates that the appropriate irrigation system is more sensitive to the income generated from pasture than to the price of water. The Bayesian network can demonstrate the impacts of decisions on the farmer's system and can allow the farmer to evaluate these impacts according to their own priorities and criteria. This information can then be used by the natural resource manager to assess the appropriate level of incentive or penalty required if the farmer is to adopt the preferred option that will also achieve preferable outcomes from a natural resource management perspective.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman Fenton ◽  
Graham A Hitman ◽  
Martin Neil ◽  
Magda Osman ◽  
Scott McLachlan

A person is labelled as having COVID-19 infection either from a positive PCR-based diagnostic test, or by a health professional’s assessment of the clinical picture in a process described by some as symptom screening. There is considerable fragility in the resulting data as both of these methods are susceptible to human biases in judgment and decision-making. In this article we show the value of a casual representation that maps out the relations between observed and inferred evidence of contamination, in order to expose what is lacking and what is needed to reduce the uncertainty in classifying an individual as infected with COVID-19.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document