scholarly journals Neurolinguistics

2006 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 234-238

06–609Ávila, cesar (U Jaime I, Spain), Julio González, María-antonia Parcet & Vicente Belloch, Selective alteration of native but not second language articulation in a patient with Foreign Accent Syndrome. NeuroReport (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins) 15.14 (2004), 2267–2270.06–610Conboy, Barbara T. (U Washington, USA; [email protected]) & Debra L. Mills, Two languages, one developing brain: Event-related potentials to words in bilingual toddlers. Developmental Science (Blackwell) 9.1 (2006), 1–12.06–611Elston-Guettler, Kerrie E. (Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Germany; [email protected]), Thomas C. Gunter & Sonja A. Kotz, Zooming into L2: Global language context and adjustment affect processing of interlingual homographs in sentences. Cognitive Brain Research (Elsevier) 25.1 (2005), 57–70.06–612Frenck-Mestre, Cheryl (Centre National de Recherche Scientifique, France), Jean-Luc Antón, Muriel Roth, Jyotsna Vaid & Francois Viallet, Articulation in early and late bilinguals' two languages: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. NeuroReport (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins) 16.7 (2005), 761–765.06–613Hahne, Anja (Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Germany; [email protected]), Jutta L. Mueller & Harald Clahsen, Morphological processing in a second language: Behavioral and event-related brain potential evidence for storage and decomposition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (MIT Press) 18.1 (2006), 121–134.06–614Ihara, Aya (National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Japan; [email protected]) & Ryusuke Kakigi, Oscillatory activity in the occipitotemporal area related to the visual perception of letters of a first/second language and pseudoletters. NeuroImage (Elsevier) 29.3 (2006), 789–796.06–615Lee, Susan S. & Mirella Dapretto (U California at Los Angeles, USA; [email protected]), Metaphorical vs. literal word meanings: fMRI evidence against a selective role of the right hemisphere. NeuroImage (Elsevier) 29.2 (2006), 536–544.06–616Lehtonen, Minna H. (Abo Akademi University, Turku, Finland), Matti Laine, Jussi Neimi, Tormod thomsen, Victor vorobyev & Kenneth Hugdahl, Brain correlates of sentence translation in Finnish–Norwegian bilinguals. NeuroReport (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins) 16.6 (2005), 601–610.06–617Meschyan, Gayane (U Houston, USA; [email protected]) & Arturo E. Hernandez, Impact of language proficiency and orthographic transparency on bilingual word reading: An fMRI investigation. NeuroImage (Elsevier) 29.4 (2006), 1135–1140.06–618Papafragou, Anna (U Delaware, USA; [email protected]), Christine Massey & Lila Gleitman, When English proposes what Greek presupposes: The cross-linguistic encoding of motion events. Cognition (Elsevier) 98.3 (2006), B75–B87.06–619Pylkkaenen, Linna (New York U, USA; [email protected]), Rodolfo Llinás & Gregory L. Murphy, The representation of polysemy: MEG evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (MIT Press) 18.1 (2006), 97–109.06–620Tatsuno, Yoshinori & Kuniyoshi L. Sakai (U Tokyo, Japan;[email protected],) Language-related activations in the left prefrontal regions are differentially modulated by age, proficiency, and task demands. The Journal of Neuroscience (Society for Neuroscience) 25.7 (2005), 1637–1644.06–621Venkatraman, Vinod (SingHealth, Singapore; [email protected]), Soon Chun Siong, Michael W. L. Chee & Daniel Ansari, Effects of language switching on arithmetic: A bilingual fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (MIT Press) 18.1 (2006), 64–74.

2006 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-158

06–416Ding, Guosheng (Beijing Normal U, China), Perry Conrad, Peng Danling, Ma Lin, Li Dejun, Shu Shiyong, Luo Qian, Xu Duo & Yang Jing, Neural mechanisms underlying semantic and orthographic processing in Chinese–English bilinguals. NeuroReport (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins) 14.12 (2003), 1557–1562.06–417Elston-Güttler, Kerrie E. (Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany; [email protected]), Silke Paulmann & Sonja A. Kotz, Who's in control? Proficiency and L1 influence on L2 processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (MIT Press) 17.10 (2005), 1593–1610.06–418Gollan, Tamar H. (U Califonia, San Diego, USA; [email protected]), Marina P. Bonanni & Rosa I. Montoya, Proper names get stuck on bilingual and monolingual speakers' tip of the tongue equally often. Neuropsychology (American Psychological Association) 19.3 (2005), 278–287.06–419Hernandez, Arturo (U Houston, USA), Ping Li & Brian MacWhinney, The emergence of competing modules in bilingualism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences (Elsevier) 9.5 (2005), 220–225.06–420Mahendra Nidhi, Elena Plante (U Arizona, USA; [email protected]), Joel Magloire, Lisa Milman & Theodore P. Trouard, fMRI variability and the localization of languages in the bilingual brain. NeuroReport (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins) 14.9 (2003), 1225–1228.06–421Mildner, Vesna (U Zagreb, Croatia; [email protected]), Davor Stanković & Marina Petković, The relationship between active hand and ear advantage in the native and foreign language. Brain and Cognition (Elsevier) 57.2 (2005), 158–161.06–422Minagawa-Kawai, Yasuyo (National Institute for Japanese Language, Tokyo, Japan), Koichi Mori, Yataka Sato & Toshizo Koizumi, Differential cortical responses in second language learners to different vowel contrasts. NeuroReport (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins) 15.5 (2004), 899–903.06–423Mueller, Jutta L. (Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany; [email protected]), Anja Hahne, Yugo Fujii & Angela D. Friederici, Native and non-native speakers' processing of a miniature version of Japanese as revealed by ERPs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (MIT Press) 17.8 (2005), 1229–1244.06–424Ojima, Shiro (U Essex, UK; [email protected]), Hiroki Nakata & Ryusuke Kakigi, An ERP study of second language learning after childhood: Effects of proficiency. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (MIT Press) 17.8 (2005), 1212–1228.06–425Oran, Revital (U Haifa, Israel; [email protected]) &Zvia Breznitz, Reading processes in L1 and L2 among dyslexic as compared to regular bilingual readers: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Neurolinguistics (Elsevier) 18.2 (2005), 127–151.06–426Peltola, Maija S. (U Turku, Finland; [email protected]), Minna Kuntola, Henna Tamminen, Heikki Hämäläinen & Olli Aaltonen, Early exposure to non-native language alters preattentive vowel discrimination. Neuroscience Letters (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) 388.3 (2005), 121–125.06–427Perani, Daniela (Vita Salute San Raffaele U, Milan, Italy; [email protected]) & Jubin Abutalebi, The neural basis of first and second language processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology (Elsevier) 15.2 (2005), 202–206.06–428Rodríguez-Fornells, Antoni (Otto-von-Guericke U, Magdeburg, Germany), Arie van der Lugt, Michael Rotte, Belinda Britti, Hans-Jochen Heinze & Thomas F. Münte, Second language interferes with word production in fluent bilinguals: Brain potential and functional imaging evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (MIT Press) 17.3 (2005), 422–433.06–429Thierry, Guillaume (U Wales, Bangor, UK) & Jing Yan Wu, Electrophysiological evidence for language interference in late bilinguals. NeuroReport (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins) 15.10 (2004), 1555–1558.06–430Van Borsel, John (Gent U Hospital, Belgium; [email protected]), Reinilde Sunaert & Sophie Engelen, Speech disruption under delayed auditory feedback in multilingual speakers. Journal of Fluency Disorders (Elsevier) 30.3 (2005), 201–217.06–431Xue, Gui, Qi Dong (Beijing Normal U, China), Zhen Jin, Lei Zhang & Yue Wang, An fMRI study with semantic access in low proficiency second language learners. NeuroReport (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins) 15.5 (2004), 791–796.06–432Zhang, Yang (U Washington, USA; [email protected]), Patricia K. Kuhl, Toshiaki Imada, Makoto Kotani & Yoh' ichi Tohkura, Effects of language experience: Neural commitment to language-specific auditory patterns. NeuroImage (Elsevier) 26.3 (2005), 703–720.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-83
Author(s):  
Qian Wang

AbstractBrain mechanism of metaphor processing has always been a focus in Neurolinguistics. This study approaches bilinguals’ metaphor semantic representation mechanism with Chinese bilinguals with different levels of second language proficiency by means of ERP (Event-related Potentials) technology. The experiment results showed that: 1) Both hemispheres collaborate in metaphor processing with the left hemisphere serving a leading semantic recognition role. The left hemisphere is more sensitive to first language input, while the right hemisphere is more active to second language input. 2) Compared with Chinese learners of higher proficiency in L2, learners of lower proficiency tend to adopt more Chinese neural mechanism in processing English metaphors. 3) When learners process metaphors, the neural mechanism difference of learners of higher proficiency is smaller than that of those of lower proficiency. The higher the second language proficiency, the higher the degree of common representation of Chinese and English metaphor.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 399-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Zhang ◽  
Chenggang Wu ◽  
Zhen Yuan ◽  
Yaxuan Meng

Although increasing literature has suggested that emotion-label words (e.g., anger, delight) and emotion-laden words (e.g., thief, bride) were processed differently in native language (L1), there was a lack of neuroimaging evidence showing such differences in second language (L2). The current study compared the cortical responses to emotion-label words and emotion-laden words in L2 using event-related potentials (ERPs) technique. Sixteen Chinese–English bilingual college students were asked to finish a lexical decision task with their brain activations recorded. Overall, emotion-label words and emotion-laden words showed diverse processing characteristics. Specifically, such differences were evidenced by the results that (1) larger N170 was elicited by negative emotion-label words than by negative emotion-laden words while positive emotion-laden words evoked larger N170 than positive emotion-label words at occipito-temporal sites, and (2) emotion-laden words evoked larger Late Positive Complex (LPC) than emotion-label words at parietal sites over the right hemisphere. The implication of the current findings was also discussed.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily S Nichols ◽  
Marc F Joanisse

We investigated the extent to which second-language (L2) learning is influenced by the similarity of grammatical features in one’s first language (L1). We used event-related potentials to identify neural signatures of a novel grammatical rule - grammatical gender - in L1 English speakers. Of interest was whether individual differences in L2 proficiency and age of acquisition (AoA) influenced these effects. L2 and native speakers of French read French sentences that were grammatically correct, or contained either a grammatical gender or word order violation. Proficiency and AoA predicted Left Anterior Negativity amplitude, with structure violations driving the proficiency effect and gender violations driving the AoA effect. Proficiency, group, and AoA predicted P600 amplitude for gender violations but not structure violations. Different effects of grammatical gender and structure violations indicate that L2 speakers engage novel grammatical processes differently from L1 speakers and that this varies appreciably based on both AoA and proficiency.


2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (01) ◽  
pp. 001-013 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Jerger ◽  
Rebecca Estes

We studied auditory evoked responses to the apparent movement of a burst of noise in the horizontal plane. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were measured in three groups of participants: children in the age range from 9 to 12 years, young adults in the age range from 18 to 34 years, and seniors in the age range from 65 to 80 years. The topographic distribution of grand-averaged ERP activity was substantially greater over the right hemisphere in children and seniors but slightly greater over the left hemisphere in young adults. This finding may be related to age-related differences in the extent to which judgments of sound movement are based on displacement versus velocity information.


2019 ◽  
Vol 136 ◽  
pp. 103589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Chor Ming Lo ◽  
Catherine McBride ◽  
Connie Suk-han Ho ◽  
Urs Maurer

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (04) ◽  
pp. 802-825 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANNIKA ANDERSSON ◽  
SUSAN SAYEHLI ◽  
MARIANNE GULLBERG

This study examines possible crosslinguistic influence on basic word order processing in a second language (L2). Targeting Swedish V2 word order we investigate adult German learners (+V2 in the L1) and English learners (-V2 in the L1) of Swedish who are matched for proficiency. We report results from two offline behavioural tasks (written production, metalinguistic judgements), and online processing as measured by event-related potentials (ERPs). All groups showed sensitivity to word order violations behaviourally and neurocognitively. Behaviourally, the learners differed from the native speakers only on judgements. Crucially, they did not differ from each other. Neurocognitively, all groups showed a similar increased centro-parietal P600 ERP-effect, but German learners (+V2) displayed more nativelike anterior ERP-effects than English learners (-V2). The results suggest crosslinguistic influence in that the presence of a similar word order in the L1 can facilitate online processing in an L2 – even if no offline behavioural effects are discerned.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chenglong Cao ◽  
Jian Song ◽  
Binbin Liu ◽  
Jianren Yue ◽  
Yuzhao Lu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Cognitive impairments have been reported in patients with pituitary adenoma; however, there is a lack of knowledge of investigating the emotional stimuli processing in pituitary patients. Thus, we aimed to investigate whether there is emotional processing dysfunction in pituitary patients by recording and analyzing the late positive potential (LPP) elicited by affective stimuli.Methods: Evaluation of emotional stimuli processing by LPP Event related potentials (ERPs) was carried out through central- parietal electrode sites (C3, Cz, C4, P3, Pz, P4) on the head of the patients and healthy controls (HCs).Results: In the negative stimuli, the amplitude of LPP was 2.435 ± 0.419μV for HCs and 0.656 ± 0.427μV for patient group respectively ( p = 0.005). In the positive stimuli, the elicited electric potential 1.450 ± 0.316μV for HCs and 0.495 ± 0.322μV for patient group respectively ( p = 0.040). Moreover, the most obvious difference of LPP amplitude between the two groups existed in the right parietal region. On the right hemisphere (at the P4 site), the elicited electric potential was 1.993 ± 0.299μV for HCs and 0.269 ± 0.305μV for patient group respectively( p = 0.001).Conclusion: There are functional dysfunction of emotional stimuli processing in pituitary adenoma patients. Our research provides the electrophysiological evidence for the presence of cognitive dysfunction which need to be intervened in the pituitary adenoma patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document