OP272 Two-Year Within-Trial And Estimated Lifetime Cost Effectiveness Of The Weight Management Program In The Diabetes REmission Clinical Trial (DiRECT)

Author(s):  
Yiqiao Xin ◽  
Andrew Davies ◽  
Andrew Briggs ◽  
Louise McCombie ◽  
C. Martina Messow ◽  
...  

IntroductionType 2 diabetes results mainly from weight gain in adult life and affects one in twelve people worldwide. In the Diabetes REmission Clinical Trial (DiRECT), the primary care-led Counterweight-Plus weight management program achieved remission of type 2 diabetes (for up to six years) for forty-six percent of patients after one year and thirty-six percent after two years. The objective of this study was to estimate the implementation costs of the program, as well as its two-year within-trial cost effectiveness and lifetime cost effectiveness.MethodsWithin-trial cost effectiveness included the Counterweight-Plus costs (including training, practitioner appointments, and low-energy diet), medications, and all routine healthcare contacts, combined with achieved remission rates. Lifetime cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) was estimated according to projected durations of remissions, assuming continued relapse rates as seen in year two of DiRECT and the consequent life expectancy, quality of life and healthcare costs.ResultsThe two-year intervention cost was EUR 1,580 per participant, with over eighty percent of the costs incurred in year one. Compared with the control group, medication savings were EUR 259 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 166–352) for anti-diabetes drugs and EUR 29 (95% CI: 12–47) for anti-hypertensive medications. The intervention was modeled with a lifetime horizon to achieve a mean 0.06 (95% CI: 0.04–0.09) gain in QALYs for the DiRECT population and a mean total lifetime cost saving per participant of EUR 1,497 (95% CI: 755–2,331), with the intervention becoming cost-saving within six years.ConclusionsThe intensive weight loss and maintenance program reduced the cost of anti-diabetes drugs through improved metabolic control, achieved diabetes remission in over one-third of participants, and reduced total healthcare contacts and costs over two years. A substantial lifetime healthcare cost saving is anticipated from periods of diabetes remission and delaying complications. Healthcare resources could be shifted cost effectively to establish diabetes remission services, using the existing DiRECT intervention, even if remissions are only maintained for limited durations. However, more research investment is needed to further improve weight-loss maintenance and extend remissions.

Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1834-P
Author(s):  
SVIATLANA V. ZHYZHNEUSKAYA ◽  
AHMAD AL-MRABEH ◽  
CARL PETERS ◽  
ALISON C. BARNES ◽  
KIEREN G. HOLLINGSWORTH ◽  
...  

Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 66-OR
Author(s):  
SVIATLANA V. ZHYZHNEUSKAYA ◽  
AHMAD AL-MRABEH ◽  
ALISON C. BARNES ◽  
BENJAMIN ARIBISALA ◽  
KIEREN G. HOLLINGSWORTH ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 2257-2266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathias Ried‐Larsen ◽  
Mette Y. Johansen ◽  
Christopher S. MacDonald ◽  
Katrine B. Hansen ◽  
Robin Christensen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shihchen Kuo ◽  
Wen Ye ◽  
Mary de Groot ◽  
Chandan Saha ◽  
Jay H. Shubrook ◽  
...  

<b>Objective: </b>We estimated the cost-effectiveness of the Program ACTIVE II community-based exercise (EXER), cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and EXER+CBT interventions in adults with type 2 diabetes and depression relative to UC and each other. <p><b>Research Design and Methods: </b>Data were integrated into the Michigan Model for Diabetes to estimate cost and health outcomes over a 10-year simulation time horizon from the healthcare sector and societal perspectives, discounting costs and benefits at 3% annually. Primary outcome was cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained.</p> <p><b>Results</b>: From the healthcare sector perspective, the EXER intervention strategy saved $313 per patient and produced 0.38 more QALY (cost-saving), the CBT intervention strategy cost $596 more and gained 0.29 more QALY ($2,058/QALY), and the EXER+CBT intervention strategy cost $403 more and gained 0.69 more QALY ($585/QALY) compared to UC. Both EXER and EXER+CBT interventions dominated the CBT intervention. Compared to EXER, the EXER+CBT intervention strategy cost $716 more and gained 0.31 more QALY ($2,323/QALY). From the societal perspective, compared to UC, the EXER intervention strategy saved $126 (cost-saving), the CBT intervention strategy cost $2,838/QALY, and the EXER+CBT intervention strategy cost $1,167/QALY. Both EXER and EXER+CBT interventions still dominated the CBT intervention. Compared to EXER, the EXER+CBT intervention strategy cost $3,021/QALY. Results were robust in sensitivity analyses.</p> <p><b>Conclusions: </b>All three Program ACTIVE II interventions represented a good value for money compared to UC. The EXER+CBT intervention was highly cost-effective or cost-saving compared to the CBT or EXER interventions.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document