Two definitions of fractional dimension

1982 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claude Tricot
Keyword(s):  
Hausdorff Dimension ◽  
Fractional Dimension ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Image Position

The main properties of the Hausdorff dimension, here denoted by dim, areIn ℝp, in variance under a group Н of homeomorphisms: ∀HεH, dim О H = dim. The definition of H, introduced in (15) and (16), is recalled in § 2.

scholarly journals A Perfect Set of Reals with Finite Self-Information

2013 ◽  
Vol 78 (4) ◽  
pp. 1229-1246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Herbert
Keyword(s):  
Hausdorff Dimension ◽  
Mutual Information ◽  
Kolmogorov Complexity ◽  
Packing Dimension ◽  
Specific Choice ◽  
Open Questions ◽  
Perfect Set ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Image Position

AbstractWe examine a definition of the mutual information of two reals proposed by Levin in [5]. The mutual information iswhereK(·) is the prefix-free Kolmogorov complexity. A realAis said to have finite self-information ifI (A : A)is finite. We give a construction for a perfect Π10class of reals with this property, which settles some open questions posed by Hirschfeldt and Weber. The construction produces a perfect set of reals withK(σ)≤+KA(σ)+f (σ)for any given Δ20fwith a particularly nice approximation and for a specific choice of f it can also be used to produce a perfect Π10set of reals that are low for effective Hausdorff dimension and effective packing dimension. The construction can be further adapted to produce a single perfect set of reals that satisfyK(σ)≤+KA(σ)+f (σ)for allfin a ‘nice’ class of Δ20functions which includes all Δ20orders.

scholarly journals A Generalization of the Hausdorff Dimension Theorem for Deterministic Fractals

Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (13) ◽  
pp. 1546
Author(s):  
Mohsen Soltanifar
Keyword(s):  
Hausdorff Dimension ◽  
Lebesgue Measure ◽  
Virtual World ◽  
Fractal Dimensions ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Given

How many fractals exist in nature or the virtual world? In this paper, we partially answer the second question using Mandelbrot’s fundamental definition of fractals and their quantities of the Hausdorff dimension and Lebesgue measure. We prove the existence of aleph-two of virtual fractals with a Hausdorff dimension of a bi-variate function of them and the given Lebesgue measure. The question remains unanswered for other fractal dimensions.

Pascal's Prism

2012 ◽  
Vol 96 (536) ◽  
pp. 213-220
Author(s):  
Harlan J. Brothers
Keyword(s):  
Probability Theory ◽  
Fractal Geometry ◽  
Euclidean Geometry ◽  
Fibonacci Series ◽  
Pascal’S Triangle ◽  
Number Sequences ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Pascal's Triangle

Pascal's triangle is well known for its numerous connections to probability theory [1], combinatorics, Euclidean geometry, fractal geometry, and many number sequences including the Fibonacci series [2,3,4]. It also has a deep connection to the base of natural logarithms, e [5]. This link to e can be used as a springboard for generating a family of related triangles that together create a rich combinatoric object.2. From Pascal to LeibnizIn Brothers [5], the author shows that the growth of Pascal's triangle is related to the limit definition of e.Specifically, we define the sequence sn; as follows [6]:

Falconer's formula for the Hausdorff dimension of a self-affine set in R2

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Hueter ◽  
Steven P. Lalley
Keyword(s):  
Hausdorff Dimension ◽  
Dimensional Hausdorff Measure ◽  
Similarity Transformations ◽  
Affine Mappings ◽  
Finite Set ◽  
Self Similar ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Affine Set ◽  
Small Overlap ◽  
Box Dimensions

Let A1, A2,…,Ak be a finite set of contractive, affine, invertible self-mappings of R2. A compact subset Λ of R2 is said to be self-affine with affinitiesA1, A2,…,Ak ifIt is known [8] that for any such set of contractive affine mappings there is a unique (compact) SA set with these affinities. When the affine mappings A1, A2,…,Ak are similarity transformations, the set Λ is said to be self-similar. Self-similar sets are well understood, at least when the images Ai(Λ) have ‘small’ overlap: there is a simple and explicit formula for the Hausdorff and box dimensions [12, 10]; these are always equal; and the δ-dimensional Hausdorff measure of such a set (where δ is the Hausdorff dimension) is always positive and finite.

The Static Aeroelasticity of Slender Configurations

1963 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. J. Hancock
Keyword(s):  
Static Stability ◽  
Aerodynamic Forces ◽  
Flexible Aircraft ◽  
The Past ◽  
Plate Models ◽  
Non Linear ◽  
The Future ◽  
Static Aeroelasticity ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Image Position

SummaryThe validity and applicability of the static margin (stick fixed) Kn,where as defined by Gates and Lyon is shown to be restricted to the conventional flexible aircraft. Alternative suggestions for the definition of static margin are put forward which can be equally applied to the conventional flexible aircraft of the past and the integrated flexible aircraft of the future. Calculations have been carried out on simple slender plate models with both linear and non-linear aerodynamic forces to assess their static stability characteristics.

The Multiplicative Groups of Quasifields

1987 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 784-793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Kallaher
Keyword(s):  
Zero Element ◽  
Binary Operations ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Multiplicative Groups ◽  
Multiplicative Mapping

Let (Q, +, ·) be a finite quasifield of dimension d over its kernel K = GF(q), where q = pk with p a prime and k ≧ 1. (See p. 18-22 and p. 74 of [7] or Section 5 of [9] for the definition of quasifield.) For the remainder of this article we will follow standard conventions and omit, whenever possible, the binary operations + and · in discussing a quasifield. For example, the notation Q will be used in place of the triple (Q, +, ·) and Q* will be used to represent the multiplicative loop (Q − {0}, ·).Let m be a non-zero element of the quasifield Q; the right multiplicative mapping ρm:Q → Q is defined by1

scholarly journals On the Inversion of the Gauss Transformation

1957 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 459-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. G. Rooney
Keyword(s):  
Differential Operator ◽  
Recent Work ◽  
Suitable Definition ◽  
Inversion Theory ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Gauss Transformation ◽  
Operational Methods

The inversion theory of the Gauss transformation has been the subject of recent work by several authors. If the transformation is defined by1.1,then operational methods indicate that,under a suitable definition of the differential operator.

On the Definition of C*-Algebras II

1985 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 664-681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoltán Magyar ◽  
Zoltán Sebestyén
Keyword(s):  
Hilbert Space ◽  
Banach Algebra ◽  
Representation Theorem ◽  
Banach Algebras ◽  
Bounded Operators ◽  
Fundamental Representation ◽  
C Algebras ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Image Position

The theory of noncommutative involutive Banach algebras (briefly Banach *-algebras) owes its origin to Gelfand and Naimark, who proved in 1943 the fundamental representation theorem that a Banach *-algebra with C*-condition(C*)is *-isomorphic and isometric to a norm-closed self-adjoint subalgebra of all bounded operators on a suitable Hilbert space.At the same time they conjectured that the C*-condition can be replaced by the B*-condition.(B*)In other words any B*-algebra is actually a C*-algebra. This was shown by Glimm and Kadison [5] in 1960.

On the “Third Definition” of the Topology on the Spectrum of a C*-Algebra

1971 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 445-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Terrell Gardner
Keyword(s):  
Hilbert Space ◽  
Quotient Space ◽  
Principal Result ◽  
Irreducible Representations ◽  
C Algebra ◽  
Fell Topology ◽  
The Third ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Image Position

0. In [3], Fell introduced a topology on Rep (A,H), the collection of all non-null but possibly degenerate *-representations of the C*-algebra A on the Hilbert space H. This topology, which we will call the Fell topology, can be described by giving, as basic open neighbourhoods of π0 ∈ Rep(A, H), sets of the formwhere the ai ∈ A, and the ξj ∈ H(π0), the essential space of π0 [4].A principal result of [3, Theorem 3.1] is that if the Hilbert dimension of H is large enough to admit all irreducible representations of A, then the quotient space Irr(A, H)/∼ can be identified with the spectrum (or “dual“) Â of A, in its hull-kernel topology.

CHAITIN’S Ω AS A CONTINUOUS FUNCTION

2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 486-510
Author(s):  
RUPERT HÖLZL ◽  
WOLFGANG MERKLE ◽  
JOSEPH MILLER ◽  
FRANK STEPHAN ◽  
LIANG YU
Keyword(s):  
Continuous Function ◽  
Hausdorff Dimension ◽  
Universal Machine ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Turing Complete ◽  
Random Reals

AbstractWe prove that the continuous function${\rm{\hat \Omega }}:2^\omega \to $ that is defined via$X \mapsto \mathop \sum \limits_n 2^{ - K\left( {Xn} \right)} $ for all $X \in {2^\omega }$ is differentiable exactly at the Martin-Löf random reals with the derivative having value 0; that it is nowhere monotonic; and that $\mathop \smallint \nolimits _0^1{\rm{\hat{\Omega }}}\left( X \right)\,{\rm{d}}X$ is a left-c.e. $wtt$-complete real having effective Hausdorff dimension ${1 / 2}$.We further investigate the algorithmic properties of ${\rm{\hat{\Omega }}}$. For example, we show that the maximal value of ${\rm{\hat{\Omega }}}$ must be random, the minimal value must be Turing complete, and that ${\rm{\hat{\Omega }}}\left( X \right) \oplus X{ \ge _T}\emptyset \prime$ for every X. We also obtain some machine-dependent results, including that for every $\varepsilon > 0$, there is a universal machine V such that ${{\rm{\hat{\Omega }}}_V}$ maps every real X having effective Hausdorff dimension greater than ε to a real of effective Hausdorff dimension 0 with the property that $X{ \le _{tt}}{{\rm{\hat{\Omega }}}_V}\left( X \right)$; and that there is a real X and a universal machine V such that ${{\rm{\Omega }}_V}\left( X \right)$ is rational.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document