Predicting the accuracy of mineral phase analysis by X-ray diffraction using Monte Carlo modelling

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (S1) ◽  
pp. S102-S106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel N. O'Dwyer ◽  
James R. Tickner ◽  
Greg J. Roach

Rapid, on-line measurement of feedstock mineralogy is a highly attractive technology for the mineral processing industry. A Monte Carlo particle transport-based modelling technique has been developed to help design and predict the measurement performance of on-line energy-dispersive X-ray diffraction (EDXRD) analysers. The accuracy of the technique was evaluated by performing quantitative phase analysis on a suite of fifteen synthetic potash ore samples. The diffraction profile of each sample was measured with a laboratory EDXRD analyser and an equivalent profile was simulated in the Monte Carlo package. Linear regression analysis was used to determine the mineral abundances in each sample from both the measured and modelled profiles. Comparison of the results showed that the diffraction profiles and measurement accuracies obtained by simulation agree very well with the measured data.

1966 ◽  
Vol 38 (12) ◽  
pp. 1741-1745 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. F. Karlak ◽  
D. S. Burnett

1957 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 39-58
Author(s):  
Ralph H. Hiltz ◽  
Stanley L. Lopata

AbstractIn view of present difficulties encountered in met alio graphic methods of phase analysis of titanium and its alloys, the possibility of utilizing integrated X-ray intensities for phase analysis was investigated. Power Formula variables were calculated for titanium, and relative areas of three alpha and one beta peak were determined. Recorded X-ray intensities were obtained from a large number of titanium specimens. The recorded intensities were analyzed and the results compared with those from metallographic analysis. The errors in the method arising from the nature of titanium, texture and peak overlapping, were studied and where possible, compensated for by adjusting the method of measurement and calculation.


1982 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 119-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald C. Gehringer ◽  
Gregory J. McCarthy ◽  
R.G. Garvey ◽  
Deane K. Smith

Solid solutions are pervasive in minerals and in industrial inorganic materials. The analyst is often called upon to provide qualitative and quantitative X-ray phase analysis for specimens containing solid solutions when all that is available are Powder Diffraction File (PDF) data or commercial standards for the end members. In an earlier paper (1) we presented several examples of substantial errors in accuracy of quantitative analysis that can arise when the crystallinity and composition of the analyte standard do not match those of the analyte in the sample of interest. We recommended that to obtain more accurate quantitative analyses, one should determine the analyte composition (e.g., from XRF on grains seen in a SEM or from comparison of cell parameters with those of the end members) and synthesize an analyte standard with this composition and with a crystallinity approximating that of the analyte (e.g., as determined from peak breadth or α1/ α2 splitting).


2007 ◽  
Vol 57 (12) ◽  
pp. 1145-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
LaReine A. Yeoh ◽  
Klaus-Dieter Liss ◽  
Arno Bartels ◽  
Harald Chladil ◽  
Maxim Avdeev ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document