The serotype case-case design: a direct comparison of a novel methodology with a case-control study in a national Salmonella Enteritidis PT14b outbreak in England and Wales

2013 ◽  
Vol 141 (11) ◽  
pp. 2346-2353 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. ZENNER ◽  
K. JANMOHAMED ◽  
C. LANE ◽  
C. LITTLE ◽  
A. CHARLETT ◽  
...  

SUMMARYSocietal and technological changes render traditional study designs less feasible for investigation of outbreaks. We compared results obtained from case-case and case-control designs during the investigation of a Salmonella Enteritidis PT14b (SE14b) outbreak in Britain to provide support for validation of this approach. Exposures of cases were compared to concurrent non-Enteritidis Salmonella cases and population controls recruited through systematic digit phone dialling. Infection with SE14b was associated with eating in oriental restaurants [odds ratio (OR) 35·8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4·4–290·9] and consuming eggs away from home (OR 13·8, 95% CI 1·5–124·5) in the case-case study and was confirmed through a concurrent case-control study with similar effect estimates and microbiological findings of SE14b in eggs from a specific chicken flock on a Spanish farm. We found that the case-case design was feasible, quick and inexpensive, potentially minimized recall bias and made use of already interviewed cases with subtyping results. This approach has potential for use in future investigations.

2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (15) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Janmohamed ◽  
D Zenner ◽  
C Little ◽  
C Lane ◽  
J Wain ◽  
...  

Binary file ES_Abstracts_Final_ECDC.txt matches


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S536-S536
Author(s):  
V Peters ◽  
E Tigchelaar ◽  
M Campmans-Kuijpers ◽  
F Sheedfar ◽  
F Imhann ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 107 (12) ◽  
pp. 777-782 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. C. Suryadevara ◽  
V. S. K. Neela ◽  
S. Kovvali ◽  
S. S. Pydi ◽  
S. Jain ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jeremy A Labrecque ◽  
Myriam M G Hunink ◽  
M Arfan Ikram ◽  
M Kamran Ikram

Abstract Case-control studies are an important part of the epidemiologic literature, yet confusion remains about how to interpret estimates from different case-control study designs. We demonstrate that not all case-control study designs estimate odds ratios. On the contrary, case-control studies in the literature often report odds ratios as their main parameter even when using designs that do not estimate odds ratios. Only studies using specific case-control designs should report odds ratios, whereas the case-cohort and incidence-density sampled case-control studies must report risk ratio and incidence rate ratios, respectively. This also applies to case-control studies conducted in open cohorts, which often estimate incidence rate ratios. We also demonstrate the misinterpretation of case-control study estimates in a small sample of highly cited case-control studies in general epidemiologic and medical journals. We therefore suggest that greater care be taken when considering which parameter is to be reported from a case-control study.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document