Genetic association of G896A polymorphism of TLR4 gene in leprosy through family-based and case-control study designs

2013 ◽  
Vol 107 (12) ◽  
pp. 777-782 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. C. Suryadevara ◽  
V. S. K. Neela ◽  
S. Kovvali ◽  
S. S. Pydi ◽  
S. Jain ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai-Sheng Hsieh ◽  
Tsung-Jen Lai ◽  
Yu-Tung Hwang ◽  
Ming-Wei Lin ◽  
Ken-Pen Weng ◽  
...  

Kawasaki disease (KD) is the most common cause of pediatric acquired heart disease. KD patients have spontaneously high plasma/serum levels of IL-10 during the acute phase. Therefore, two independent studies were carried out to investigate the association between genetic variants in IL-10 promoter (−1082, −819, and −592) and risk of KD. A total of 134 trios were included for the family-based association study. A significantly preferential transmission of the C allele at loci −819 T > C and −592 A > C for KD cases was observed (Ppermutation= 0.029 and Ppermutation= 0.034, respectively). There was a significant increase in the transmission of haplotype CC (p= 0.016) at the above two loci (OR, 1.632; 95% CI, 1.090–2.443; Ppermutation= 0.019). We also carried out a follow-up case-control study that included 146 KD cases and 315 unrelated healthy children. {The haplotype CC (−819, −592) showed an increased risk of KD (but statistically non-significant; OR, 1.332; 95% CI, 0.987–1.797;p= 0.061). In diplotype analysis, a trend was found between number of CC haplotype and risk of KD (but non-significant,p= 0.061). In conclusion, CC genotype and CC/CC diplotype at IL-10-819T > C and −592A > C were significantly associated with risk of KD in case-parent trio study, which were replicated partially in our follow-up case-control study.


2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 2763-2768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pawel Niemiec ◽  
Anna Balcerzyk ◽  
Tomasz Iwanicki ◽  
Ewa Emich-Widera ◽  
Ilona Kopyta ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jeremy A Labrecque ◽  
Myriam M G Hunink ◽  
M Arfan Ikram ◽  
M Kamran Ikram

Abstract Case-control studies are an important part of the epidemiologic literature, yet confusion remains about how to interpret estimates from different case-control study designs. We demonstrate that not all case-control study designs estimate odds ratios. On the contrary, case-control studies in the literature often report odds ratios as their main parameter even when using designs that do not estimate odds ratios. Only studies using specific case-control designs should report odds ratios, whereas the case-cohort and incidence-density sampled case-control studies must report risk ratio and incidence rate ratios, respectively. This also applies to case-control studies conducted in open cohorts, which often estimate incidence rate ratios. We also demonstrate the misinterpretation of case-control study estimates in a small sample of highly cited case-control studies in general epidemiologic and medical journals. We therefore suggest that greater care be taken when considering which parameter is to be reported from a case-control study.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document