Recoverin immunoreactivity in mammalian cone bipolar cells

1993 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann H. Milam ◽  
Dennis M. Dacey ◽  
Alexander M. Dizhoor
Keyword(s):  
Calcium Binding ◽  
Bipolar Cell ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Dendritic Morphology ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Field Size ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
Antibody Preparation ◽  
Axonal Arbors ◽  
Cone Bipolar Cells

AbstractHuman, macaque monkey, and rat retinas were immunostained with a polyclonal antibody preparation against purified recoverin, a 23-kD calcium-binding protein isolated from bovine retina that localizes to rods and cones (Dizhoor et al., 1991). In addition to immunoreactive photoreceptors, we have identified subpopulations of recoverin-positive bipolar cells in all three species. Results from immunostaining with progressive dilutions of anti-recoverin and preadsorption of the antibody with a dilution series of purified recoverin showed that photoreceptors and bipolar cells had similar affinities for the antibody and suggested that the molecule recognized by the antibody in both cell types is recoverin. Immunoreactivity for recoverin and protein kinase C, a selective marker for all rod bipolar cells, was found in separate bipolar cell populations. Recoverin immunoreactivity is therefore a characteristic of certain cone bipolar cell types.In rat retina, anti-recoverin labeled two morphologically distinct subpopulations of cone bipolar cells whose axonal arbors stratified at different depths in the inner plexiform layer (IPL). The bipolar cells labeled with anti-recoverin did not correspond to those that were reactive for calbindin, another cone bipolar cell marker.Human and monkey retinas also had two populations of cone bipolar cells that were recoverin-positive. One population showed a distinct pattern of narrow bistratification at the outer border of the IPL and a regular mosaic arrangement of its axonal arbors, suggesting that the entire population of a single cone bipolar type was labeled. Cell density, dendritic morphology, and axonal-field size and stratification indicate that anti-recoverin selectively stains the flat midget (presumed OFF-center) cone bipolar cell type observed previously in Golgi preparations. By contrast the second bipolar cell population had axonal stratification in the inner half of the IPL and showed an unusual but consistent morphology and spatial distribution. Individual cells were intensely stained but were present at an extremely low density (~2−5 cells/mm2). These cells had multibranched dendritic trees characteristic of the diffuse bipolar cell class, but very small axonal fields in the size range of the midget bipolar class. Neither of the two recoverin-positive bipolar cell types in monkey was labeled with anti-calbindin or anti-cholecystokinin. An antibody preparation against bovine pineal hydroxyindole-O-methyltransferase (HIOMT) labeled photoreceptors and bipolar cells that closely resembled the recoverin-positive bipolar cells in human and rat retinas. Preadsorption of this antibody preparation with purified recoverin abolished immunostaining of the bipolar cells, suggesting that the anti-HIOMT preparation contains antibodies against recoverin, which is known to be present in the bovine pineal gland.

Unusual coupling patterns of a cone bipolar cell in the rabbit retina

1999 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 1029-1035 ◽  
Author(s):  
STEPHEN L. MILLS
Keyword(s):  
Gap Junctions ◽  
Bipolar Cell ◽  
Plexiform Layer ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
Rabbit Retina ◽  
Retinal Bipolar Cells ◽  
Different Cell Types ◽  
Cone Bipolar Cells

In mammals, gap junctions between retinal bipolar cells are generally small and tracer coupling has not been previously demonstrated. In this study, Neurobiotin was injected into the Ba3-type cone bipolar cell, a medium-field cone bipolar cell that ramifies in sublamina a of the rabbit retina. Tracer spread to many other Ba3 bipolar cells, presumably through gap junctions. It also spread to a smaller field bipolar cell called the Ba1 that ramifies at the same depth of the inner plexiform layer. Injection of Neurobiotin into Ba1 bipolar cells did not produce staining beyond the injected cell. Tracer coupling from the Ba3 was therefore both heterologous, in that different cell types were stained, and asymmetric. The unusual properties of this bipolar cell suggest that its function may differ from that of most cone bipolar cells, which are narrow-field, do not overlap, and are poorly coupled to one another.

scholarly journals Characterization of a novel large-field cone bipolar cell type in the primate retina: Evidence for selective cone connections

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
HANNAH R. JOO ◽  
BETH B. PETERSON ◽  
TONI J. HAUN ◽  
DENNIS M. DACEY
Keyword(s):  
Giant Cell ◽  
Bipolar Cell ◽  
Visual Information ◽  
Dendritic Tree ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Giant Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Large Field ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
Dendritic Field

AbstractParallel processing of visual information begins at the first synapse in the retina between the photoreceptors and bipolar cells. Ten bipolar cell types have been previously described in the primate retina: one rod and nine cone bipolar types. In this paper, we describe an 11th type of bipolar cell identified in Golgi-stained macaque retinal whole mount and vertical section. Axonal stratification depth, in addition to dendritic and axonal morphology, distinguished the “giant” cell from all previously well-recognized bipolar cell types. The giant bipolar cell had a very large and sparsely branched dendritic tree and a relatively large axonal arbor that costratified with the DB4 bipolar cell near the center of the inner plexiform layer. The sparseness of the giant bipolar’s dendritic arbor indicates that, like the blue cone bipolar, it does not contact all the cones in its dendritic field. Giant cells contacting the same cones as midget bipolar cells, which are known to contact single long-wavelength (L) or medium-wavelength (M) cones, demonstrate that the giant cell does not exclusively contact short-wavelength (S) cones and, therefore, is not a variant of the previously described blue cone bipolar. This conclusion is further supported by measurement of the cone contact spacing for the giant bipolar. The giant cell contacts an average of about half the cones in its dendritic field (mean ± s.d. = 52 ± 17.6%; n = 6), with a range of 27–82%. The dendrites from single or neighboring giant cells that converge onto the same cones suggest that the giant cell may selectively target a subset of cones with a highly variable local density, such as the L or M cones.

Rod signals are routed through specific Off cone bipolar cells in primate retina

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda J. McLaughlin ◽  
Kumiko A. Percival ◽  
Jacqueline Gayet-Primo ◽  
Teresa Puthussery
Keyword(s):  
Bipolar Cell ◽  
Amacrine Cell ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Visual Signals ◽  
Night Time ◽  
Pass Through ◽  
Aii Amacrine ◽  
Cone Bipolar Cells

AbstractAdapting between scotopic and photopic illumination involves switching the routing of retinal signals between rod and cone-dominated circuits. In the daytime, cone signals pass through parallel On and Off cone bipolar cells, that are sensitive to increments and decrements in luminance, respectively. At night, rod signals are routed into these cone-pathways via a key glycinergic interneuron, the AII amacrine cell (AII-AC). In primates, it is not known whether AII-ACs contact all Off-bipolar cell types indiscriminately, or whether their outputs are biased towards specific Off-bipolar cell types. Here, we show that the rod-driven glycinergic output of AII-ACs is strongly biased towards a subset of macaque Off-cone bipolar cells. The Off-bipolar types that receive this glycinergic input have sustained physiological properties and include the Off-midget bipolar cells, which provide excitatory input to the Off-midget ganglion cells (parvocellular pathway). The kinetics of the glycinergic events are consistent with the involvement of the α1 glycine receptor subunit. Taken together with results in mouse retina, our findings point towards a conserved motif whereby rod signals are preferentially routed into sustained Off signaling pathways.Significance StatementVisual signals pass through different retinal neurons depending on the prevailing level of illumination. Under night-time light levels, signals from rods pass through the AII amacrine cell, an inhibitory interneuron that routes rod signals into On and Off bipolar cells to detect increments and decrements in light intensity, respectively. Here, we show in primate retina that the output of AII amacrine cells is strongly biased towards specific Off bipolar cell types, which suggests that rod signals reach the brain via specific neural channels. Our results further our understanding of how visual signals are routed through visual circuits during night-time vision.

ON cone bipolar cells in rat express the metabotropic receptor mGluR6

1997 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 789-794 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noga Vardi ◽  
Katsuko Morigiwa
Keyword(s):  
Bipolar Cell ◽  
Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Ribbon Synapse ◽  
Metabotropic Receptor ◽  
Metabotropic Glutamate ◽  
Ultrathin Sections ◽  
Rod Bipolar Cells ◽  
Cone Bipolar Cells

AbstractThe rod bipolar cell and about five types of ON cone bipolar cells depolarize to light by employing a sign-reversing metabotropic glutamate receptor. Glutamate responses are similar in both rod bipolar and cone bipolar cells, but the receptor mediating this response (mGluRo) was so far demonstrated only in rod bipolar cells. To test if ON cone bipolar cells also express mGluR6, we immunoreacted rat retina with an antibody specific for mGluRo, and studied the staining from serial ultrathin sections. We demonstrate that mGluR6 is indeed expressed in the dendritic tips of cone bipolar cells, the majority of which receive a ribbon synapse, and thus probably are ON cone bipolar cells. We further show that half of the dendritic tips contacting the cones stain for mGluR6, thus implying that all ON cone bipolar cell types express mGluR6.

A comparison of immunocytochemical markers to identify bipolar cell types in human and monkey retina

2003 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 589-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
SILKE HAVERKAMP ◽  
FRANCOISE HAESELEER ◽  
ANITA HENDRICKSON
Keyword(s):  
Bipolar Cell ◽  
Horizontal Cell ◽  
Outer Part ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Macaque Monkey ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
Double Labeling ◽  
Wide Range

As more human retinas affected with genetic or immune-based diseases become available for morphological analysis, it is important to identify immunocytochemical markers for specific subtypes of retinal neurons. In this study, we have focused on bipolar cell markers in central retina. We have done single and double labeling using several antisera previously utilized in macaque monkey or human retinal studies and two new antisera (1) to correlate combinations of antisera labeling with morphological types of bipolar cells in human retina, and (2) to compare human labeling patterns with those in monkey retina. Human bipolar cells showed a wide range of labeling patterns with at least ten different bipolar cell types identified from their anatomy and marker content. Many bipolar cell bodies in the outer part of the inner nuclear layer contained combinations of protein kinase C alpha (PKCα), Islet-1, glycine, and Goα. Bipolar cells labeled with these markers had axons terminating in the inner half of the inner plexiform layer (IPL), consistent with ON bipolar cells. Bipolar cell bodies adjacent to the amacrine cells and with axons in the outer half of the IPL contained combinations of recoverin, glutamate transporter-1, and PKCβ, or CD15 and calbindin. Bipolar cells labeled with these markers were presumed OFF bipolar cells. Calcium-binding protein 5 (CaB5) labeled both putative ON and OFF bipolar cells. Using this cell labeling as a criteria, most cell bodies close to the horizontal cells were ON bipolar cells and almost all bipolar cells adjacent to the amacrine cells were OFF with a band in the middle 2–3 cell bodies thick containing intermixed ON and OFF bipolar cells. Differences were found between human and monkey bipolar cell types labeled by calbindin, CaB5, and CD15. Two new types were identified. One was morphologically similar to the DB3, but labeled for CD15 and CaB5. The other had a calbindin-labeled cell body adjacent to the horizontal cell bodies, but did not contain any accepted ON markers. These results support the use of macaque monkey retina as a model for human, but caution against the assumption that all labeling patterns are identical in the two primates.

scholarly journals Random spatial patterning of cone bipolar cell mosaics in the mouse retina

2017 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
Author(s):  
PATRICK W. KEELEY ◽  
JASON J. KIM ◽  
SAMMY C.S. LEE ◽  
SILKE HAVERKAMP ◽  
BENJAMIN E. REESE
Keyword(s):  
Bipolar Cell ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Statistical Properties ◽  
Horizontal Cells ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Dendritic Arbors ◽  
Cone Bipolar Cells ◽  
Cholinergic Amacrine Cells

AbstractRetinal bipolar cells spread their dendritic arbors to tile the retinal surface, extending them to the tips of the dendritic fields of their homotypic neighbors, minimizing dendritic overlap. Such uniform nonredundant dendritic coverage of these populations would suggest a degree of spatial order in the properties of their somal distributions, yet few studies have examined the patterning in retinal bipolar cell mosaics. The present study examined the organization of two types of cone bipolar cells in the mouse retina, the Type 2 cells and the Type 4 cells, and compared their spatial statistical properties with those of the horizontal cells and the cholinergic amacrine cells, as well as to random simulations of cells matched in density and constrained by soma size. The Delauney tessellation of each field was computed, from which nearest neighbor distances and Voronoi domain areas were extracted, permitting a calculation of their respective regularity indexes (RIs). The spatial autocorrelation of the field was also computed, from which the effective radius and packing factor (PF) were determined. Both cone bipolar cell types were found to be less regular and less efficiently packed than either the horizontal cells or cholinergic amacrine cells. Furthermore, while the latter two cell types had RIs and PFs in excess of those for their matched random simulations, the two types of cone bipolar cells had spatial statistical properties comparable to random distributions. An analysis of single labeled cone bipolar cells revealed dendritic arbors frequently skewed to one side of the soma, as would be expected from a randomly distributed population of cells with dendrites that tile. Taken together, these results suggest that, unlike the horizontal cells or cholinergic amacrine cells which minimize proximity to one another, cone bipolar cell types are constrained only by their physical size.

The topographical relationship between two neuronal mosaics in the short wavelength-sensitive system of the primate retina

1997 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuo Kouyama ◽  
David W. Marshak
Keyword(s):  
Bipolar Cell ◽  
Short Wavelength ◽  
Local Density ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Synaptic Connections ◽  
Recovery Profile ◽  
Nonrandom Distribution ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Cone Bipolar Cells

AbstractThe short wavelength-sensitive (blue) cone bipolar cells was found to have a nonrandom distribution by analyzing the nearest neighbors and by calculating the density recovery profile (DRP). Blue cones had been shown previously to have a nonrandom distribution (Curcio et al., 1991). The relationship between the two arrays was then analyzed by calculating the cross-correlational density recovery profile (cDRP), which indicates the local density of blue cones around each blue cone bipolar cell. Although both cell types appeared to be distributed uniformly at the macroscopic level, the cDRP was 1.7 times higher within 15 μm of each bipolar cell perikaryon than in the surrounding area. The area of higher density was approximately the same as that in which the blue cone bipolar cells made synaptic contacts with blue cones. The finding that the blue cones and the blue cone bipolar cells were closer together than expected suggests that the positions of the perikarya of these neurons were influenced by their synaptic connections or other developmental interactions.

Analysis of two types of cone bipolar cells in the retina of a New World monkey, the marmoset, Callithrix jacchus

1999 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 707-719 ◽  
Author(s):  
XUEGANG LUO ◽  
KRISHNA K. GHOSH ◽  
PAUL R. MARTIN ◽  
ULRIKE GRÜNERT
Keyword(s):  
Bipolar Cell ◽  
New World ◽  
Random Distribution ◽  
World Monkey ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
New World Primates ◽  
New World Monkey ◽  
Cone Bipolar Cells

Two types of cone bipolar cells, the blue cone bipolar cell and the diffuse bipolar cell (DB3), were labelled immunohistochemically and investigated in the retina of a New World monkey, the marmoset. Blue cone bipolar cells were labelled with an antiserum against cholecystokinin. Short-wavelength-sensitive (SWS) cones were labelled with an antiserum against the SWS cone opsin. The DB3 cells were labelled with antibodies to calbindin. Blue cone bipolar cells in marmoset do not form a regular mosaic but instead follow the random distribution of the SWS cones. Nevertheless, the SWS cone to blue cone bipolar cell connectivity in marmoset is very similar to that previously described for macaque. In contrast to the blue cone bipolar cells, the DB3 cells form a regular mosaic. The synaptic connectivity of DB3 cells in the inner plexiform layer was analyzed. They make output synapses onto ganglion cells and amacrine cells, and gap junctions with each other. Our results provide further evidence for the existence of parallel bipolar cell pathways in the primate retina and support the view that the retinae of Old World and New World primates have common neuronal connectivity. The random distribution of SWS cones and blue cone bipolar cells is an exception to the general rule of a regular mosaic distribution of cell populations in the retina.

A coupled network for parasol but not midget ganglion cells in the primate retina

1992 ◽  
Vol 9 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 279-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis M. Dacey ◽  
Sarah Brace
Keyword(s):  
Nearest Neighbor ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Plexiform Layer ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Distinct Pattern ◽  
Field Size ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
Dendritic Field

AbstractIntracellular injections of Neurobiotin were used to determine whether the major ganglion cell classes of the macaque monkey retina, the magnocellular-projecting parasol, and the parvocellular-projecting midget cells showed evidence of cellular coupling similar to that recently described for cat retinal ganglion cells. Ganglion cells were labeled with the fluorescent dye acridine orange in an in vitro, isolated retina preparation and were selectively targeted for intracellular injection under direct microscopic control. The macaque midget cells, like the beta cells of the cat's retina, showed no evidence of tracer coupling when injected with Neurobiotin. By contrast, Neurobiotin-filled parasol cells, like cat alpha cells, showed a distinct pattern of tracer coupling to each other (homotypic coupling) and to amacrine cells (heterotypic coupling).In instances of homotypic coupling, the injected parasol cell was surrounded by a regular array of 3–6 neighboring parasol cells. The somata and proximal dendrites of these tracer-coupled cells were lightly labeled and appeared to costratify with the injected cell. Analysis of the nearest-neighbor distances for the parasol cell clusters showed that dendritic-field overlap remained constant as dendritic-field size increased from 100–400 μm in diameter.At least two amacrine cell types showed tracer coupling to parasol cells. One amacrine type had a small soma and thin, sparsely branching dendrites that extended for 1–2 mm in the inner plexiform layer. A second amacrine type had a relatively large soma, thick main dendrites, and distinct, axon-like processes that extended for at least 2–3 mm in the inner plexiform layer. The main dendrites of the large amacrine cells were closely apposed to the dendrites of parasol cells and may be the site of Neurobiotin transfer between the two cell types. We suggest that the tracer coupling between neighboring parasol cells takes place indirectly via the dendrites of the large amacrine cells and provides a mechanism, absent in midget cells, for increasing parasol cell receptive-field size and luminance contrast sensitivity.

In vivo development of retinal ON-bipolar cell axonal terminals visualized in nyx::MYFP transgenic zebrafish

2006 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 833-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
ERIC H. SCHROETER ◽  
RACHEL O.L. WONG ◽  
RONALD G. GREGG
Keyword(s):  
Bipolar Cell ◽  
Plexiform Layer ◽  
Transgenic Fish ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Regulatory Sequences ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
Fixed Tissue ◽  
Different Ages ◽  
Retinal Bipolar Cells

Axonal differentiation of retinal bipolar cells has largely been studied by comparing the morphology of these interneurons in fixed tissue at different ages. To better understand how bipolar axonal terminals develop in vivo, we imaged fluorescently labeled cells in the zebrafish retina using time-lapse confocal and two photon microscopy. Using the upstream regulatory sequences from the nyx gene that encodes nyctalopin, we constructed a transgenic fish in which a subset of retinal bipolar cells express membrane targeted yellow fluorescent protein (MYFP). Axonal terminals of these YFP-labeled bipolar cells laminated primarily in the inner half of the inner plexiform layer, suggesting that they are likely to be ON-bipolar cells. Transient expression of MYFP in isolated bipolar cells indicates that two or more subsets of bipolar cells, with one or two terminal boutons, are labeled. Live imaging of YFP-expressing bipolar cells in the nyx::MYFP transgenic fish at different ages showed that initially, filopodial-like structures extend and retract from their primary axonal process throughout the inner plexiform layer (IPL). Over time, filopodial exploration becomes concentrated at discrete foci prior to the establishment of large terminal boutons, characteristic of the mature form. This sequence of axonal differentiation suggests that synaptic targeting by bipolar cell axons may involve an early process of trial and error, rather than a process of directed outgrowth and contact. Our observations represent the first in vivo visualization of axonal development of bipolar cells in a vertebrate retina.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document