A role for 5HT3 receptors in visual processing in the mammalian retina

1993 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 511-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. Brunken ◽  
Xiao-Tao Jin
Keyword(s):  
Visual Processing ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Cell Activity ◽  
Phosphatidyl Inositol ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Reciprocal Effect ◽  
Mammalian Retina ◽  
Messenger System

AbstractWe investigated the role of 5HT3 receptors in the mammalian retina using electrophysiological techniques to monitor ganglion cell activity. Activation of 5HT3 receptors with the selective agonist 1-phenylbiguanide (PBG) increased the ON responses of ON-center ganglion cells, while decreasing the OFF responses of OFF-center cells. The application of a selective 5HT3 antagonist had a reciprocal effect, namely it reduced the center response in ON-center cells and concomitantly increased the center responses in OFF-center cells. Since putative serotoninergic amacrine cells in the retina are connected specifically to the rod bipolar cell, these agents most likely affect the rod bipolar terminal. These data, together with previous studies, suggest that both 5HT2 and 5HT3 receptors mediate an excitatory influence which serves to facilitate the output from rod bipolar cells, the former via a phosphatidyl inositol second-messenger system, and the latter via a direction channel.

Co-stratification of GABAA receptors with the directionally selective circuitry of the rat retina

1995 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 345-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.H. Brandstätter ◽  
U. Greferath ◽  
T. Euler ◽  
H. Wässle
Keyword(s):  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Glutamate Transporter ◽  
Plexiform Layer ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Double Labelling ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
Axon Terminals ◽  
Mammalian Retina ◽  
Cholinergic Amacrine Cells

AbstractDirection-selective (DS) ganglion cells of the mammalian retina have their dendrites in the inner plexiform layer (IPL) confined to two narrow strata. The same strata are also occupied by the dendrites of cholinergic amacrine cells which are probably presynaptic to the DS ganglion cells. GABA is known to play a crucial role in creating DS responses. We examined the types of GABAA receptors expressed by the cholinergic amacrine cells and also those expressed by their presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons, by applying immunocytochemical markers to vertical sections of rat retinas. Double-labelling experiments with antibodies against choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) and specific antibodies against different GABAA receptor subunits were performed. Cholinergic amacrine cells seem to express an unusual combination of GABAA receptor subunits consisting of α2-, β1-, β2/3-, γ2-, and δ-subunits. Bipolar cells, which could provide synaptic input to the DS circuitry, were stained with antibodies against the glutamate transporter GLT-1. The axon terminals of these bipolar cells are narrowly stratified in close proximity to the dendritic plexus of displaced cholinergic amacrine cells. The retinal distribution of synaptoporin, a synaptic vesicle associated protein, was studied. Strong reduction of immunolabelling was observed in the two cholinergic strata. The anatomical findings are discussed in the context of models of the DS circuitry of the mammalian retina.

The effects of serotonin agonists and antagonists on the response properties of complex ganglion cells in the rabbit's retina

1988 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. Brunken ◽  
Nigel W. Daw
Keyword(s):  
Synaptic Transmission ◽  
Spontaneous Activity ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Orientation Selectivity ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Evoked Responses ◽  
Selective Agonists ◽  
Rod Bipolar Cells

AbstractSelective agonists and antagonists were employed to determine the role of indoleaminergic amacrine cells in the generation of the light-evoked responses and spontaneous activity of direction and orientation selective cells. Perfusion with 5-HT2 antagonists reduced the spontaneous activity and both the leading and trailing edge responses of ON/OFF direction selective cells. 5-HT1a agonists had a similar effect on this class of cell, namely, a reduction of light-evoked and spontaneous activity. Results from ON-center and OFF-center orientation selective cells were consistent with those obtained from direction selective cells in that no disruption of direction or orientation selectivity was observed during perfusion of these drugs. These data suggest that the indoleaminergic cells are not directly involved in the generation of the trigger features of complex ganglion cells, but may be facilitating synaptic transmission in the inner retina. This function is discussed relative to the connectivity of the rod bipolar cells and the putative indoleaminergic amacrine cells. The similarity of the effects of 5-HT1a agonists and 5-HT2 antagonists supports the hypothesis, developed during our prior studies of brisk ganglion cells, that these two receptor classes mediate antagonistic processes in the target neurons.

Spatiotemporal Patterns at the Retinal Output

1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 447-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam L. Jacobs ◽  
Frank S. Werblin
Keyword(s):  
Ganglion Cell ◽  
Response Pattern ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Cell Activity ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Spatiotemporal Patterns ◽  
Horizontal Cells ◽  
Aminobutyric Acid ◽  
Edge Enhancement

Jacobs, Adam L. and Frank S. Werblin. Spatiotemporal patterns at the retinal output. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 447–451, 1998. Edge enhancement in the retina is thought to be mediated by classical center-surround antagonism, first encountered as the interactions between horizontal cells and cones. But in the salamander retina these interactions do little to enhance edges. Instead, a robust dynamic interaction between amacrine and bipolar cells appears to be responsible for a sharp edge enhancement. To demonstrate this we recorded extracellularly from a single ganglion cell and moved a flashed square, 300 μm on a side, over a 1.5 × 1.0 mm2 grid at 25-μm increments. Playing back all of these recordings simultaneously simulated the pattern of responses that would have been measured from an array of ganglion cells. The emerging pattern of ganglion cell activity first faithfully represented the flashed square, but after ∼60 ms the center of the representation collapsed, leaving a representation of only the edges. We inferred that the feedback synapse from amacrine to bipolar cells at γ-aminobutyric acid-C (GABAC) receptors mediated this effect: bicuculline and strychnine were ineffective in altering the response pattern, but in picrotoxin the center of the representation did not collapse. The GABAergic amacrine cells thought to mediate this effect have quite narrow spread of processes, so the existence of this edge-enhancing effect suggests a mechanism quite different from classical lateral inhibition, namely the delayed inhibition of a spatially expanding input pattern.

Amacrine cell-mediated input to bipolar cells: Variations on a common mechanistic theme

2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
WILLIAM N. GRIMES
Keyword(s):  
Visual Processing ◽  
Amacrine Cell ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Negative Influence ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Single Class ◽  
Anatomy And Physiology ◽  
Functional Context ◽  
The Brain

AbstractFeedback is a ubiquitous feature of neural circuits in the mammalian central nervous system (CNS). Analogous to pure electronic circuits, neuronal feedback provides either a positive or negative influence on the output of upstream components/neurons. Although the particulars (i.e., connectivity, physiological encoding/processing/signaling) of circuits in higher areas of the brain are often unclear, the inner retina proves an excellent model for studying both the anatomy and physiology of feedback circuits within the functional context of visual processing. Inner retinal feedback to bipolar cells is almost entirely mediated by a single class of interneurons, the amacrine cells. Although this might sound like a simple circuit arrangement with an equally simple function, anatomical, molecular, and functional evidence suggest that amacrine cells represent an extremely diverse class of CNS interneurons that contribute to a variety of retinal processes. In this review, I classify the amacrine cells according to their anatomical output synapses and target cell(s) (i.e., bipolar cells, ganglion cells, and/or amacrine cells) and discuss specifically our current understandings of amacrine cell-mediated feedback and output to bipolar cells on the synaptic, cellular, and circuit levels, while drawing connections to visual processing.

scholarly journals Synaptic organization and ionic basis of on and off channels in mudpuppy retina. I. Intracellular analysis of chloride-sensitive electrogenic properties of receptors, horizontal cells, bipolar cells, and amacrine cells.

1976 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. 639-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
R F Miller ◽  
R F Dacheux
Keyword(s):  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Horizontal Cell ◽  
Cell Activity ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Chloride Ions ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Horizontal Cells ◽  
Synaptic Organization ◽  
Field Organization ◽  
Receptive Field Organization

Intracellular recordings from receptors, horizontal cells, bipolars, and amacrines have been carried out in the perfused mudpuppy eyecup. The introduction of a chloride-free (c-f) medium results in initial transient potential changes in many cells followed by a slow loss of light-evoked activity of the depolarizing bipolar, the horizontal cell, and the on depolarization of amacrine cells. The hyperpolarizing bipolar remains responsive to light stimulation in a c-f medium, but the antagonistic surround mechanism is abolished. These effects are reversible after returning to a normal ionic medium. The results of this study provide insight into the retinal connections which underlie ganglion cell receptive field organization. It is concluded that the depolarizing bipolar is excitatory to on ganglion cells and is also the pathway for on-excitation of on-off cells. The hyperpolarizing bipolar mediates the off discharge of off and on-off cells. Amacrine cells receive input from both depolarizing and hyperpolarizing bipolar cells. These findings raise the possibility that transmembrane movements of chloride ions are critical for the light responsiveness of horizontal and depolarizing bipolar cell activity.

scholarly journals Intrinsic properties and functional circuitry of the AII amacrine cell

2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
JONATHAN B. DEMB ◽  
JOSHUA H. SINGER
Keyword(s):  
Visual Processing ◽  
Amacrine Cell ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Retinal Neuron ◽  
Motion Sensitivity ◽  
Network Properties ◽  
Aii Amacrine

AbstractAmacrine cells represent the most diverse class of retinal neuron, comprising dozens of distinct cell types. Each type exhibits a unique morphology and generates specific visual computations through its synapses with a subset of excitatory interneurons (bipolar cells), other amacrine cells, and output neurons (ganglion cells). Here, we review the intrinsic and network properties that underlie the function of the most common amacrine cell in the mammalian retina, the AII amacrine cell. The AII connects rod and cone photoreceptor pathways, forming an essential link in the circuit for rod-mediated (scotopic) vision. As such, the AII has become known as the rod–amacrine cell. We, however, now understand that AII function extends to cone-mediated (photopic) vision, and AII function in scotopic and photopic conditions utilizes the same underlying circuit: AIIs are electrically coupled to each other and to the terminals of some types of ON cone bipolar cells. The direction of signal flow, however, varies with illumination. Under photopic conditions, the AII network constitutes a crossover inhibition pathway that allows ON signals to inhibit OFF ganglion cells and contributes to motion sensitivity in certain ganglion cell types. We discuss how the AII’s combination of intrinsic and network properties accounts for its unique role in visual processing.

scholarly journals The role of starburst amacrine cells in visual signal processing

2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.R. TAYLOR ◽  
R.G. SMITH
Keyword(s):  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Cholinergic Neurons ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Gaba Release ◽  
Reciprocal Inhibition ◽  
Visual Signal ◽  
Cholinergic Transmission ◽  
Mammalian Retina ◽  
Starburst Amacrine Cells

AbstractStarburst amacrine cells (SBACs) within the adult mammalian retina provide the critical inhibition that underlies the receptive field properties of direction-selective ganglion cells (DSGCs). The SBACs generate direction-selective output of GABA that differentially inhibits the DSGCs. We review the biophysical mechanisms that produce directional GABA release from SBACs and test a network model that predicts the effects of reciprocal inhibition between adjacent SBACs. The results of the model simulations suggest that reciprocal inhibitory connections between closely spaced SBACs should be spatially selective, while connections between more widely spaced cells could be indiscriminate. SBACs were initially identified as cholinergic neurons and were subsequently shown to contain release both acetylcholine and GABA. While the role of the GABAergic transmission is well established, the role of the cholinergic transmission remains unclear.

Evidence for a potential role of glucagon during eye growth regulation in chicks

2002 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 755-766 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARITA P. FELDKAEMPER ◽  
FRANK SCHAEFFEL
Keyword(s):  
Visual Processing ◽  
Growth Regulation ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Early Gene ◽  
Eye Growth ◽  
Dose Dependent Fashion ◽  
High Concentrations ◽  
Dose Dependent ◽  
Glucagon Antagonist

Eye growth and refraction are regulated by visual processing in the retina. Until now, the messengers released by the retina to induce these changes are largely unknown. Previously, it was found that glucagon amacrine cells respond to defocus in the retinal image and even to its sign. The expression of the immediate-early gene product ZENK increased in this cell population in eyes wearing plus lenses and decreased in minus lens-treated chicks. Moreover, it was shown that the amount of retinal glucagon mRNA increased during treatment with positive lenses. Therefore, it seems likely that these cells contribute to the visual regulation of ocular growth and that glucagon may act as a stop signal for eye growth. The purpose of the present study was to accumulate further evidence for a role of glucagon in the visual control of eye growth. Chicks were treated with plus and minus lenses after injection of different amounts of the glucagon antagonist des-His1-Glu9-glucagon-amide or the agonist Lys17,18,Glu21-glucagon, respectively. Refractive development and eye growth were recorded by automated infrared photorefraction and A-scan ultrasound, respectively. The glucagon antagonist inhibited hyperopia development, albeit only in a narrow concentration range, and at most by 50%, but not myopia development. In contrast, the agonist inhibited myopia development in a dose-dependent fashion. At high concentrations, it also prevented hyperopia development.

The number and distribution of bipolar to ganglion cell synapses in the inner plexiform layer of the anuran retina

1996 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1099-1107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Péter Buzás ◽  
Sára Jeges ◽  
Robert Gábriel
Keyword(s):  
Ganglion Cell ◽  
Cross Sections ◽  
Information Transfer ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Plexiform Layer ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
Flow Through

AbstractThe main route of information flow through the vertebrate retina is from the photoreceptors towards the ganglion cells whose axons form the optic nerve. Bipolar cells of the frog have been so far reported to contact mostly amacrine cells and the majority of input to ganglion cells comes from the amacrines. In this study, ganglion cells of frogs from two species (Bufo marinus, Xenopus laevis) were filled retrogradely with horseradish peroxidase. After visualization of the tracer, light-microscopic cross sections showed massive labeling of the somata in the ganglion cell layer as well as their dendrites in the inner plexiform layer. In cross sections, bipolar output and ganglion cell input synapses were counted in the electron microscope. Each synapse was assigned to one of the five equal sublayers (SLs) of the inner plexiform layer. In both species, bipolar cells were most often seen to form their characteristic synaptic dyads with two amacrine cells. In some cases, however, the dyads were directed to one amacrine and one ganglion cell dendrite. This type of synapse was unevenly distributed within the inner plexiform layer with the highest occurrence in SL2 both in Bufo and Xenopus. In addition, SL4 contained also a high number of this type of synapse in Xenopus. In both species, we found no or few bipolar to ganglion cell synapses in the marginal sublayers (SLs 1 and 5). In Xenopus, 22% of the bipolar cell output synapses went onto ganglion cells, whereas in Bufo this was only 10%. We conclude that direct bipolar to ganglion cell information transfer exists also in frogs although its occurrence is not as obvious and regular as in mammals. The characteristic distribution of these synapses, however, suggests that specific type of the bipolar and ganglion cells participate in this process. These contacts may play a role in the formation of simple ganglion cell receptive fields.

Glycine receptor immunoreactivity is localized at amacrine synapses in cat retina

1991 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 611-618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberta G. Pourcho ◽  
Michael T. Owczarzak
Keyword(s):  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Glycine Receptor ◽  
Plexiform Layer ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Electron Microscopic Level ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
Glycine Receptors ◽  
Electron Microscopic ◽  
Cat Retina

AbstractImmunocytochemical techniques were used to localize strychnine-sensitive glycine receptors in cat retina. Light microscopy showed staining in processes ramifying throughout the inner plexiform layer and in cell bodies of both amacrine and ganglion cells. At the electron-microscopic level, receptor immunoreactivity was seen to be clustered at sites postsynaptic to amacrine cells. In contrast, bipolar cells were neither presynaptic nor postsynaptic elements at sites of glycine receptor staining. Double-label studies verified the presence of glycine immunoreactivity in amacrine terminals presynaptic to glycine receptors. These findings support a role for glycine as an inhibitory neurotransmitter in amacrine cells.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document