Weaning mass and the future survival of juvenile southern elephant seals, Mirounga leonina, at Macquarie Island

2000 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clive R. McMahon ◽  
Harry R. Burton ◽  
Marthán N. Bester
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rates ◽  
First Year ◽  
Mirounga Leonina ◽  
Elephant Seals ◽  
Macquarie Island ◽  
Fat Reserves ◽  
The Future ◽  
Southern Elephant Seals

Seals that survived their first year were on average 2% and 4% heavier at birth and at weaning than the “non-survivors”. First year survival rates calculated for weaners over 135 kg weaning masses showed these weaners had higher survival rates than those less than 95 kg at weaning (71.55% and 54.15% respectively). Heavy weaners had greater fat reserves than light weaners and gained relatively more mass during lactation. Size, and therefore condition at weaning, influences first year survival.

First-year survival of southern elephant seals, Mirounga leonina , at sub-Antarctic Macquarie Island

Polar Biology ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 279-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clive R. McMahon ◽  
Harry R. Burton ◽  
Marthan N. Bester
Keyword(s):  
First Year ◽  
Mirounga Leonina ◽  
Elephant Seals ◽  
Macquarie Island ◽  
Southern Elephant Seals

Growth of Southern Elephant Seals, Mirounga leonina, during their First Foraging Trip

1997 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cameron M. Bell ◽  
Harry R. Burton ◽  
Mark A. Hindell
Keyword(s):  
Body Composition ◽  
Body Size ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
First Year ◽  
Mirounga Angustirostris ◽  
Mirounga Leonina ◽  
Elephant Seals ◽  
Southern Elephant Seals ◽  
First Year Of Life ◽  
Foraging Skills

A longitudinal study of growth of southern elephant seals, Mirounga leonina, during their first foraging trip was undertaken at Macquarie Island. On average, body mass increased by 75% while foraging at sea, with individuals growing at 0.34 ± 0.12 (s.d.) kg day-1 (n = 64), and spending 182 ± 51 days (n = 64) at sea. Relatively smaller changes in body length were recorded during the same period, suggesting that growth was composed primarily of adjustments to body composition, rather than increases in gross body size. This may be in response to the functional demands of pelagic life. Body size established early in life (birth mass and departure mass) positively influenced body mass upon return from the first foraging trip. Growth rate, however, was negatively related to departure mass for females, and this is hypothesised to be related to sex differences in body composition, as well as intrasex differences in foraging skills, diving ability and food- conversion efficiency. Despite this, there was no detectable age-specific sexual dimorphism in the first year of life. Animals that were at sea longer tended to return in better body condition. Interspecific comparison suggests that southern elephant seals grow more than do northern elephant seals, Mirounga angustirostris, and this difference may be related to prey abundance and distribution.

The diet of southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina) from Heard Island

1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (8) ◽  
pp. 1519-1528 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Slip
Keyword(s):  
Stomach Contents ◽  
First Year ◽  
Mirounga Leonina ◽  
Elephant Seals ◽  
Important Prey ◽  
Heard Island ◽  
Southern Elephant Seals ◽  
Beaked Whales ◽  
Fish Remains ◽  
Dissostichus Eleginoides

Stomach contents were lavaged from 76 southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina) at Heard Island between July 1992 and March 1993. Eighty-six percent of stomachs contained cephalopods of 17 species. Numerically the most important was Psychroteuthis glacialis (21.1%), and from estimated biomass the most important was Kondakovia longimana (40.4%). Three other species were also common prey: Moroteuthis knipovitchi (19.4% by estimated biomass), Moroteuthis ingens (13.0%), and Alluroteuthis antarcticus (10.2%). Sixty-six percent of stomachs contained fish remains, and four species, Dissostichus eleginoides, Electrona carlsbergi, E. antarctica, and Gymnoscopelus nicholsi, were identified from otoliths. The diet of adults differed from that of juveniles, particularly pups in their first year. Martialia hyadesi was the most important prey of juveniles and represented 57.1% of estimated biomass consumed. Furthermore, smaller seals ate smaller squid. The species and size of cephalopods eaten by southern elephant seals are similar to those of other Southern Ocean predators, particularly some beaked whales.

Growth of female southern elephant seals Mirounga leonina at Macquarie Island

Polar Biology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 395-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cameron M. Bell ◽  
Harry R. Burton ◽  
Mary-Anne Lea ◽  
Mark A. Hindell
Keyword(s):  
Mirounga Leonina ◽  
Elephant Seals ◽  
Macquarie Island ◽  
Southern Elephant Seals

Migrations and foraging of juvenile southern elephant seals from Macquarie Island within CCAMLR managed areas

2002 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
John van den Hoff ◽  
Harry R. Burton ◽  
Mark A. Hindell ◽  
Michael D. Sumner ◽  
Clive R. McMahon
Keyword(s):  
Foraging Ecology ◽  
Polar Front ◽  
Commercial Fishing ◽  
Antarctic Polar Front ◽  
Mirounga Leonina ◽  
Elephant Seals ◽  
Macquarie Island ◽  
Location Data ◽  
Southern Elephant Seals ◽  
The Antarctic

Twenty-three juvenile (8–14 months of age) southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina L.) from Macquarie Island were tracked during 1993 and 1995. Migratory tracks and ocean areas with concentrated activity, presumed to be foraging grounds, were established from location data gathered by attached geolocation-time depth recorders. The seals ranged widely (811–3258 km) and foraging activity centred on oceanographic frontal systems, especially the Antarctic Polar Front and bathymetric features such as the Campbell Plateau region. The seals spent 58.6% of their sea time within managed fishery areas while the remainder was spent on the high seas, an area of unregulated fishing. The Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) areas 58.4.1, 88.2 and especially 88.1 were important and distant foraging areas for these juvenile elephant seals. From fisheries records, diet and the foraging ecology studies of the seals there appears to be little, if any, overlap or conflict between the seals and commercial fishing operations within the regulated commercial areas. However, attention is drawn to the possibility of future interactions if Southern Ocean fisheries expand or new ones commence.

Dispersal of southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina L.) marked at Macquarie Island

2001 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 413 ◽  
Author(s):  
John van den Hoff
Keyword(s):  
Island Population ◽  
Mirounga Leonina ◽  
Elephant Seals ◽  
Macquarie Island ◽  
North East ◽  
The North ◽  
Southern Elephant Seals ◽  
Juvenile Population ◽  
Maximum Proportion ◽  
Campbell Island

Southern elephant seals marked at Macquarie Island disperse to distant locations where they are sometimes seen during their moult and, for juveniles, a mid-year haul-out period (July–August). Most (87%) of these resighted seals were within 1000 km of Macquarie Island, and most commonly at Campbell Island (700 km to the north-east). The sex and age classes most likely to disperse there were males less than two years old. Male elephant seals of all ages were resighted significantly more often than females, the ratio being 2 : 1 (P > 0.05). Migration duration tended to increase with the seals’ age but migration distance was underestimated from resight observations when compared with known telemetry records. Emigration from the Macquarie Island population appears limited. From the resight effort at Campbell Island during 1995 the maximum proportion of the juvenile population from Macquarie Island to haul-out at Campbell Island was in the order of 0.0053.

Ultrasonic Measurement of Blubber Thickness of the Southern Elephant Seal, Mirounga-Leonina (Linn)

1987 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 207 ◽  
Author(s):  
NJ Gales ◽  
HR Burton
Keyword(s):  
Subcutaneous Fat ◽  
Elephant Seal ◽  
Ultrasonic Measurement ◽  
Southern Elephant Seal ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Mirounga Leonina ◽  
Elephant Seals ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Fat Reserves ◽  
Southern Elephant Seals

Ultrasound measurements of subcutaneous fat at 18 body sites on each of 23 southern elephant seals Mirounga leonina (Linn.), together with circumference and length measurements, were used to estimate the total subcutaneous blubber weight on each animal. Twelve cows (including animals that were pregnant and others at early, mid-, late and post-lactation), 10 males and one male pup were anaesthetised for these measurements, made at Heard I. (53�01'S.,73�23'E.) on various dates in October and November 1985. Comparison of the estimates of blubber weight from cows at various stages of lactation allowed a mean blubber loss of 62.8 kg per cow per lactation to be calculated. It is suggested that measuring variations in the subcutaneous fat reserves of cows coming ashore to pup at Heard I. may be one relevant approach in any future research that attempts to explain the 60% drop in pup production at that island between 1949 and 1985. The use of ultrasound to estimate the subcutaneous fat reserves of seals was shown to be a safe, non-invasive and logistically practical technique.

Age in relation to Breeding to Status of the Male Southern Elephant Seal, Mirounga leonina (L.), at Macquarie Island

1981 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 327 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Jones
Keyword(s):  
Elephant Seal ◽  
Progressive Increase ◽  
Southern Elephant Seal ◽  
Mirounga Leonina ◽  
Elephant Seals ◽  
Macquarie Island ◽  
Southern Elephant Seals ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Breeding Seasons ◽  
Breeding Status

Records of the breeding status of known-age male southern elephant seals at Macquarie I. were kept during five breeding seasons between 1969 and 1976. The seven status categories used were: beachmaster, secure assistant, medium harem owner, insecure assistant, small harem owner, attending bachelor, avoiding bachelor. There was a progressive increase in breeding status with age; none younger than 10-y-old bred: 16% of 10-y-olds, 30% of 11-y-olds and 55% of 12-y-olds did so; none younger than 12-y-old attained secure assistant status. At the earliest, beachmaster status may be attained at 14 y old, but no beachmasters of known age were recorded. Due to mortality and competition, most males do not breed and few breed for more than two seasons. Problems associated with the precise definition of status categories are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document