scholarly journals Gut rest strategy and trophic feeding in the acute phase of critical illness with acute gastrointestinal injury

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Zhang ◽  
Hongxiang Li ◽  
Yuting Li ◽  
Lai Qu

AbstractCritically ill patients frequently suffer from gastrointestinal dysfunction as the intestine is a vulnerable organ. In critically ill patients who require nutritional support, the current guidelines recommend the use of enteral nutrition within 24–48 h and advancing towards optimal nutritional goals over the next 48–72 h; however, this may be contraindicated in patients with acute gastrointestinal injury because overuse of the gut in the acute phase of critical illness may have an adverse effect on the prognosis. We propose that trophic feeding after 72 h, as a partial gut rest strategy, should be provided to critically ill patients during the acute phase of illness as an organ-protective strategy, especially for those with acute gastrointestinal injury.

Critical Care ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Gao ◽  
Min-Hua Cheng ◽  
Feng-Chan Xi ◽  
Yan Chen ◽  
Chun Cao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background This study examined the feasibility of transabdominal intestinal ultrasonography in evaluating acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI). Methods A total of 116 patients were included. Intestinal ultrasonography was conducted daily within 1 week after admission to the intensive care unit. Ultrasonography indicators including intestinal diameter, changes in the intestinal folds, thickness of the intestinal wall, stratification of the intestinal wall, and intestinal peristalsis (movement of the intestinal contents) were observed to determine the acute gastrointestinal injury ultrasonography (AGIUS) score. The gastrointestinal and urinary tract sonography ultrasound (GUTS) protocol score was also calculated. During the first week of the study, the gastrointestinal failure (GIF) score was determined daily. The correlations between transabdominal intestinal scores (AGIUS and GUTS) and the GIF score were analyzed to clarify the feasibility of evaluating AGI through observation of the intestine. The utility of intestinal ultrasonography indicators in predicting feeding intolerance was investigated to improve the ability of clinicians to manage AGI. Results A total of 751 ultrasonic examinations were performed with 511 images (68%) considered to be of “good quality.” AGIUS and GUTS scores differed significantly between AGI patients (GIF score 0–2) and non-AGI patients (GIF score 3–4) (p < 0.001). Both scores correlated positively with GIF score (r = 0.54, p < 0.001; r = 0.66, p < 0.001). These ultrasonography indicators could predict feeding intolerance, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.60 (0.48–0.71; intestinal diameter), 0.76 (0.67–0.85; intestinal folds), 0.71 (0.62–0.80; wall thickness), 0.77 (0.69–0.86; wall stratification), and 0.78 (0.68–0.88; intestinal peristalsis). Compared to patients with a normal rate of peristalsis (5–10/min), patients with abnormal peristalsis rates (< 5/min or > 10/min) have increased risk for feeding intolerance (16/83 vs. 25/33, p < 0.001). Conclusions The transabdominal intestinal ultrasonography represents an effective means for assessing gastrointestinal injury in critically ill patients. Intestinal ultrasonography indicators, especially the degree of intestinal peristalsis, may be used to predict feeding intolerance. Trial registration ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT03589248. Registered 04 July 2018—retrospectively registered.


2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 217-221
Author(s):  
Hongxiang Li ◽  
Junying Lu ◽  
Hongyan Li ◽  
Aosong Duan ◽  
Yushan Wang ◽  
...  

Medicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (43) ◽  
pp. e12970 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Zhang ◽  
Yuting Li ◽  
Lili Ding ◽  
Yao Fu ◽  
Xuechao Dong ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jia-Kui Sun ◽  
Lei Zou ◽  
Ying Liu ◽  
Wen-Hao Zhang ◽  
Jing-Jing Li ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundTo investigate the prevalence and outcomes of acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).MethodsIn this clinical retrospective study, demographic data, laboratory parameters, AGI grades, clinical severity and outcomes were collected. The primary endpoints were AGI incidence and 28-day mortality, the secondary endpoints were organ dysfunction and septic shock incidence.ResultsFrom February 10 to March 10 2020, 83 critically ill patients of 1314 patients with COVID-19 were enrolled. Seventy-two (86.7%) patients had AGI during hospital stay, of them, 30 had AGI grade I, 35 had AGI grade II, 5 had AGI grade III, and 2 had AGI grade IV. The incidence of AGI grade II and above was 50.6%. As of March 16, 40 (48.2%) patients died within 28 days of admission, the median hospital stay was 12.0 days, ranging from 3 days to 27 days. Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome developed in 58 (69.9%) patients, septic shock in 16 (19.3%) patients. Patients with worse AGI grades had worse clinical variables, higher septic shock incidence and 28-day mortality. Sequential organ failure assessment scores (SOFA) (95% CI, 1.374-2.860; P <0.001), white blood cell (WBC) counts (95% CI, 1.037-1.379; P =0.014), duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) (95% CI, 1.020-1.340; P =0.025) were risk factors for the development of AGI grade II and above. Non-survivors were accompanied by higher incidence of AGI grade III to IV than survivors (17.5% vs. 0.0%, P =0.004).ConclusionsThe AGI incidence was 86.7%, and hospital mortality was 48.2% in critically ill patients with COVID-19. SOFA scores, WBC counts, and duration of MV were risk factors for the development of AGI grade II and above. Patients with worse AGI grades had worse clinical severity variables, higher septic shock incidence and 28-day mortality.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (39) ◽  
pp. 6087-6097
Author(s):  
Jia-Kui Sun ◽  
Ying Liu ◽  
Lei Zou ◽  
Wen-Hao Zhang ◽  
Jing-Jing Li ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document