Identifying best practices in interstage care: using a positive deviance approach within the National Pediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement Collaborative

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 398-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine E. Bates ◽  
Sunkyung Yu ◽  
Colleen Mangeot ◽  
Judy A. Shea ◽  
David W. Brown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Pediatric Cardiology ◽  
Positive Deviance ◽  
First Year ◽  
Quality Improvement Collaborative ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Control Centre ◽  
The One ◽  
And Control

AbstractIntroductionTo identify interstage best practices associated with lower mortality, we studied National Pediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement Collaborative centres registry using a positive deviance approach.MethodsPositive deviant and control centre team members were interviewed to identify potential interstage best practices. Subsequently, all collaborative centres were surveyed on the use of these practices to test their associations with centre mortality. Questionnaires were scored using Likert scales; the overall score was linearly transformed to a 0–100-point scale with higher scores indicating increased use of practices. Mortality was based on patients enrolled after a centre’s first year in the collaborative. Centre mortality rates were divided into tertiles. Survey scores for the low mortality tertile were compared with the other tertiles.ResultsFor this study, seven positive deviant and four control teams were interviewed. A total of 20 potential best practices were identified, including team composition, improvement practices, and parent involvement. Questionnaires were completed by 36/43 eligible centres, providing 1504 patients for analysis. Average survey score was 50.2 (SD 13.4). Average mortality was 6.1% (SD 4.1). There was no correlation between survey scores and mortality (r=0.14, p=0.41). The one practice associated with the low mortality tertile was frequency of discussion of interstage results: 58.3% of low mortality teams discussed results at least monthly versus 8.4% of the middle and high tertile centres (p=0.02).ConclusionsLow-mortality centres more frequently discuss interstage results than high-mortality centres. Heightened awareness of outcomes may influence practice; however, further study is needed to understand the variation in outcomes across centres.

scholarly journals IMPACT Registry and National Pediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement Collaborative: Contributions to Quality in Congenital Heart Disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerard R. Martin ◽  
Jeffrey B. Anderson ◽  
Robert N. Vincent
Keyword(s):  
Congenital Heart Disease ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Congenital Heart ◽  
Pediatric Cardiology ◽  
Device Closure ◽  
Stent Angioplasty ◽  
Quality Improvement Collaborative ◽  
The Common ◽  
The Impact

The IMproving Pediatric and Adult Congenital Treatments (IMPACT) Registry and the National Pediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement Collaborative (NPC-QIC) are two efforts initiated to improve outcomes in the congenital heart disease field. The IMPACT Registry is focused on evaluating the use, risks, adverse events (AEs), and outcomes associated with diagnostic and common interventional catheterization procedures in all children and adults with congenital heart disease. Utilizing a modular approach, the common procedures include diagnostic cardiac catheterization, atrial septal defect device closure, patent ductus arteriosus device closure, pulmonary valvuloplasty, aortic valvuloplasty, balloon and stent angioplasty of coarctation of the aorta, pulmonary artery balloon stent angioplasty, transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement, and electrophysiology procedures including radiofrequency ablation. To date, important observations on the common procedures have been made and a risk stratification methodology has been created to allow comparisons between centers in AEs and quality improvement activity. The registry is open to international participation. The NPC-QIC was developed to reduce mortality and improve the quality of life of infants with Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome (HLHS) during the interstage period between discharge from the Norwood operation and admission for the bidirectional Glenn procedure. Mortality in the interstage has been reduced by 44%. The IMPACT Registry and the NPC-QIC have demonstrated value to the congenital heart disease community. The IMPACT Registry, however, has not yet demonstrated an impact on patient outcomes. The NPC-QIC, which combines both a registry with a learning collaborative with specific aims, key drivers, and change strategies, has made more significant gains with reductions in variation, growth failures, and mortality.

scholarly journals RE-INTERVENTION DURING THE INTERSTAGE PERIOD: A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY QUALITY IMPROVEMENT COLLABORATIVE

2017 ◽  
Vol 69 (11) ◽  
pp. 559
Author(s):  
Matthew William Buelow ◽  
Nancy Rudd ◽  
Jena Tanem ◽  
Pippa Simpson ◽  
Peter Bartz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Pediatric Cardiology ◽  
Quality Improvement Collaborative

scholarly journals An innovative quality improvement approach for rapid improvement of infection prevention and control at health facilities in Sierra Leone

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilka Rondinelli ◽  
Gillian Dougherty ◽  
Caitlin A Madevu-Matson ◽  
Mame Toure ◽  
Adewale Akinjeji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Sierra Leone ◽  
Marked Improvement ◽  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Health Facilities ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Rapid Improvement ◽  
And Control

Abstract Quality challenge The Sierra Leone (SL) Ministry of Health and Sanitation’s National Infection Prevention and Control Unit (NIPCU) launched National Infection and Prevention Control (IPC) Policy and Guidelines in 2015, but a 2017 assessment found suboptimal compliance with standards on environmental cleanliness (EC), waste disposal (WD) and personal protective equipment (PPE) use. Methods ICAP at Columbia University (ICAP), NIPCU and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) designed and implemented a Rapid Improvement Model (RIM) quality improvement (QI) initiative with a compressed timeframe of 6 months to improve EC, WD and PPE at eight purposively selected health facilities (HFs). Targets were collaboratively developed, and a 37-item checklist was designed to monitor performance. HF teams received QI training and weekly coaching and convened monthly to review progress and exchange best practices. At the final learning session, a “harvest package” of the most effective ideas and tools was developed for use at additional HFs. Results The RIM resulted in marked improvement in WD and EC performance and modest improvement in PPE. Aggregate compliance for the 37 indicators increased from 67 to 96% over the course of 4 months, with all HFs showing improvement. Average PPE compliance improved from 85 to 89%, WD from 63 to 99% and EC from 51 to 99%. Lessons learned The RIM QIC approach is feasible and effective in SL’s austere health system and led to marked improvement in IPC performance. The best practices are being scaled up and the RIM QIC methodology is being applied to other domains.

scholarly journals Improving the Quality of Care in Care Homes Using the Quality Improvement Collaborative Approach: Lessons Learnt from Six Projects Conducted in the UK and The Netherlands

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (20) ◽  
pp. 7601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reena Devi ◽  
Graham Martin ◽  
Jay Banerjee ◽  
Louise Butler ◽  
Tim Pattison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Collaborative Teams ◽  
Quality Improvement Collaborative ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Job Roles ◽  
Healthcare Settings ◽  
Home Context ◽  
The Uk

The Breakthrough Series Quality Improvement Collaborative (QIC) initiative is a well-developed and widely used approach, but most of what we know about it has come from healthcare settings. In this article, those leading QICs to improve care in care homes provide detailed accounts of six QICs and share their learning of applying the QIC approach in the care home sector. Overall, five care home-specific lessons were learnt: (i) plan for the resources needed to support collaborative teams with collecting, processing, and interpreting data; (ii) create encouraging and safe working environments to help collaborative team members feel valued; (iii) recruit collaborative teams, QIC leads, and facilitators who have established relationships with care homes; (iv) regularly check project ideas are aligned with team members’ job roles, responsibilities, and priorities; and (v) work flexibly and accept that planned activities may need adapting as the project progresses. These insights are targeted at teams delivering QICs in care homes. These insights demonstrate the need to consider the care home context when applying improvement tools and techniques in this setting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document