scholarly journals COVID-19 convalescent children – outcomes after congenital heart surgery

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Shreedhar S. Joshi ◽  
Manaswini Keshava ◽  
Keshava S. Murthy ◽  
Ganesh Sambandamoorthy ◽  
Riyan Shetty ◽  
...  

Abstract Background – Children with exposure to COVID-19 in recent times (asymptomatic or symptomatic infection) approaching congenital heart surgery (CHS) program are in increasing numbers. Understanding outcomes of such children will help risk-stratify and guide optimization prior to CHS. Objective: The objective of the present study was to determine whether convalescent COVID-19 children undergoing congenital heart surgery have any worse mortality or postoperative outcomes. Design: Consecutive children undergoing CHS from Oct 2020 to May 2021 were enrolled after testing for RT-PCR (Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase chain test) or rapid antigen test (RAT) and IgG antibody prior to surgery. Convalescent COVID-19 was defined in any asymptomatic patient positive for IgG antibodies and negative for RT-PCR or RAT anytime 6 weeks prior to surgery. Control patients were negative for any of the three tests. Mortality and postoperative outcomes were compared among the groups. Results: 1129 consecutive CHS were stratified as convalescence and control. COVID-19 Convalescent (n=349) and COVID-19 control (n=780) groups were comparable for all demographic and clinical factors except younger and smaller kids in control. Convalescent children had no higher mortality, ventilation duration, ICU and hospital stay, no higher support with ECMO, HFNC, no higher need for re-intubations, re-admissions, and no higher infections as CLABSI, SSI, and VAP on comparison with COVID-19 control children. Conclusions: Convalescent COVID-19 do not have any unfavorable outcomes as compared to COVID-19 control children. Positive IgG antibody screening prior to surgery is suggestive of convalescence and supports comparable outcomes on par with control peers.

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (11) ◽  
pp. 617
Author(s):  
Jaime Silva-Gburek ◽  
Andrea Marroquin ◽  
Saul Flores ◽  
Dantin Roddy ◽  
Nancy Ghanayem ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Borhan Moradveisi ◽  
Shirin Behzadi ◽  
Farima Zakaryaei ◽  
Ali Jalili ◽  
Khaled Rahmani ◽  
...  

Background: The knowledge of antibody’s significance and frequency in patients cured of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is extremely limited. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in patients exposed to SARS-CoV-2. Methods: Healthcare professionals infected with SARS-CoV-2 were enrolled in this study. The levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies were detected 15 days after the onset of symptoms and five months later. Results: A total of 167 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were evaluated, including 119 (71.3%) females and 48 (28.7%) males. Of the 88 polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive patients, 55 (62.5%) had IgG-positive antibodies, and of the 79 reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR-negative patients, 12 (16.9%) had IgG-positive antibodies. Out of 23 anosmia cases, 19 (82.6%) had positive antibodies. There was a significant relationship between anosmia and positive antibody (P  =  0.001), but there was no correlation between antibody titers and gender and other disease symptoms. Immortally, 63 (94%) cases demonstrated high levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies after five months of infection. Moreover, 6.5% (N  =  11) of the total population were re-infected with COVID-19 six months later. Conclusions: Overall, anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies detection may be an appropriate method to identify suspected patients with a negative RT-PCR test. Antibodies can remain high in most infected patients for up to five months after infection. Moreover, anosmia seems to be a valuable diagnostic factor, and the healthcare system should implement isolation measures for patients with anosmia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document