Outcome of Conventional Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Cardiac Arrest Following Drowning

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua M. Tobin ◽  
William D. Ramos ◽  
Joel Greenshields ◽  
Stephanie Dickinson ◽  
Joseph W. Rossano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Cerebral Performance Category ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Performance Category ◽  
Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Group Survival ◽  
Bystander Cpr

AbstractIntroduction:The concept of compressions only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CO-CPR) evolved from a perception that lay rescuers may be less likely to perform mouth-to-mouth ventilations during an emergency. This study hopes to describe the efficacy of bystander compressions and ventilations cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CV-CPR) in cardiac arrest following drowning.Hypothesis/Problem:The aim of this investigation is to test the hypothesis that bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) utilizing compressions and ventilations results in improved survival for cases of cardiac arrest following drowning compared to CPR involving compressions only.Methods:The Cardiac Arrest Registry for Enhanced Survival (CARES) was queried for patients who suffered cardiac arrest following drowning from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2017, and in whom data were available on type of bystander CPR delivered (ie, CV-CPR CO-CPR). The primary outcome of interest was neurologically favorable survival, as defined by cerebral performance category (CPC).Results:Neurologically favorable survival was statistically significantly associated with CV-CPR in pediatric patients aged five to 15 years (aOR = 2.68; 95% CI, 1.10–6.77; P = .03), as well as all age group survival to hospital discharge (aOR = 1.54; 95% CI, 1.01–2.36; P = .046). There was a trend with CV-CPR toward neurologically favorable survival in all age groups (aOR = 1.35; 95% CI, 0.86–2.10; P = .19) and all age group survival to hospital admission (aOR = 1.29; 95% CI, 0.91–1.84; P = .157).Conclusion:In cases of cardiac arrest following drowning, bystander CV-CPR was statistically significantly associated with neurologically favorable survival in children aged five to 15 years and survival to hospital discharge.

Abstract 22: When Laws Save Lives: Impact of Legislation Requiring Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Education in High Schools on Survival After Sudden Cardiac Arrest

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria L Vetter ◽  
Katherine F Dalldorf ◽  
Joseph Rossano ◽  
Maryam Y Naim ◽  
Andrew C Glatz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Cerebral Performance Category ◽  
School Education ◽  
High School Education ◽  
School Students ◽  
Bystander Cpr

Introduction: Thirty eight states have laws requiring education of high school students on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and the use of automated external defibrillators (AED). No study has measured the association of these laws and outcomes. Hypothesis: Out of hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) occurring in states with CPR high school education laws will have higher bystander CPR, survival, and favorable neurological survival than states without such laws. Methods: We conducted an analysis of the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival database and included all nontraumatic OHCAs with at least 50% population catchment from 1/2013-12/2017 in all ages. We excluded OHCAs witnessed by 911 responders, in healthcare facilities, or nursing homes. Outcomes were bystander CPR, survival to hospital discharge and neurologically favorable survival (Cerebral Performance Category score of 1 or 2 at hospital discharge). Chi-square tests were used to assess associations. Results: The 110,902 subjects with OHCA included Male, 64.0%; <18 yrs., 3.2%; <35 yrs., 10.7%; <50 yrs., 23.9%; White, 49.3%; Black, 19.1%; Hispanic, 2.3%; Other, 2.9%; Unknown, 26.5%. Most OHCAs occurred at home, 81.4%. 44.4% were witnessed by bystanders. 75.5% occurred in states with CPR high school education laws. A higher percent of OHCAs received bystander CPR prior to emergency medical services (EMS) arrival in states with CPR high school education laws (40.1%) compared to states without laws (37.0%) (p<0.001). Bystander CPR was less common in males (40.3% vs. 37.7% for females), those >50 yrs. (38.9% vs. 40.7% for ≤50 yrs.), Black and Hispanic subjects (25.7% and 34.9%, respectively, vs. 42.4% for Whites) (p<0.001 for all). Overall survival to hospital discharge was 10.4%; 8.8% had a favorable neurological outcome. A higher percent survived to hospital discharge in states with CPR high school education laws (11.0%) compared to states without laws (8.7%) (p<0.001). Neurologically favorable survival was more likely in states with CPR high school education laws, (9.3%) compared to states without laws (7.5%) (p<0.001). Conclusions: Bystander CPR, survival to hospital discharge, and neurologically favorable survival was higher in states that had CPR high school education laws.

scholarly journals (A152) Comparison of Load Distributing Band and Standard Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Patients Presenting with Cardiac Arrest to Emergency Department

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S1) ◽  
pp. s43-s43
Author(s):  
M.E. Ong ◽  
P. Sultana ◽  
S. Fook-Chong ◽  
A. Annitha ◽  
S.H. Ang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Cerebral Performance Category ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Number Needed To Treat ◽  
Performance Category ◽  
Traumatic Cardiac Arrest

ObjectiveTo compare resuscitation outcomes before and after switching from manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to load-distributing band (LDB) CPR in a multi-center Emergency Departments (ED) trial.MethodsThis is a phased, prospective cohort evaluation with intention-to-treat analysis of adults with non-traumatic cardiac arrest. The intervention is change in the system from manual CPR to LDB-CPR at two Urban EDs. The main outcome measure is survival to hospital discharge, with secondary outcome measures of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to hospital admission and neurological outcome at discharge.ResultsA total of 1,011 patients were included in the study, with 459 in the manual CPR phase (January 01, 2004, to August 24, 2007) and 552 patients in the LDB-CPR phase (August 16, 2007, to December 31, 2009). In the LDB phase, the LDB device was applied in 454 patients (82.3%). Patients in the manual CPR and LDB-CPR phases were comparable for mean age, gender and ethnicity. Rates for ROSC were comparable with LDB-CPR (manual 22.4% vs. LDB 35.3%; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-1.83). Survival to hospital admission was increased, Manual 14.2% vs. LDB 19.7%; adjusted OR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.05-6.00. Survival to hospital discharge was increased Manual 1.3% vs. LDB 3.3%; adjusted OR, 3.99; 95% CI, 1.06-15.02. The number of survivors with Cerebral Performance Category 1 (good) (Manual 1 vs. LDB 12, p < 0.01) and Overall Performance Category 1 (good) (Manual 1 vs. LDB 10, p < 0.01) was also increased. The Number Needed to Treat (NNT) for 1 survivor was 52 (95% CI, 26-1000).ConclusionA resuscitation strategy using LDB-CPR in an ED environment was associated with improved survival to admission and discharge in adults with non-traumatic cardiac arrest.

scholarly journals Association between prehospital prognostic factors on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in different age groups

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jyun-Bin Huang ◽  
Kuo-Hsin Lee ◽  
Yu-Ni Ho ◽  
Ming-Ta Tsai ◽  
Wei-Ting Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Response Time ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background The prognosis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is very poor. While several prehospital factors are known to be associated with improved survival, the impact of prehospital factors on different age groups is unclear. The objective of the study was to access the impact of prehospital factors and pre-existing comorbidities on OHCA outcomes in different age groups. Methods A retrospective observational analysis was conducted using the emergency medical service (EMS) database from January 2015 to December 2019. We collected information on prehospital factors, underlying diseases, and outcome of OHCAs in different age groups. Kaplan-Meier type survival curves and multivariable logistic regression were used to analyze the association between modifiable pre-hospital factors and outcomes. Results A total of 4188 witnessed adult OHCAs were analyzed. For the age group 1 (age ≦75 years old), after adjustment for confounding factors, EMS response time (odds ratio [OR] = 0.860, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.811–0.909, p < 0.001), public location (OR = 1.843, 95% CI: 1.179–1.761, p < 0.001), bystander CPR (OR = 1.329, 95% CI: 1.007–1.750, p = 0.045), attendance by an EMT-Paramedic (OR = 1.666, 95% CI: 1.277–2.168, p < 0.001), and prehospital defibrillation by automated external defibrillator (AED)(OR = 1.666, 95% CI: 1.277–2.168, p < 0.001) were prognostic factors for survival to hospital discharge in OHCA patients. For the age group 2 (age > 75 years old), age (OR = 0.924, CI:0.880–0.966, p = 0.001), EMS response time (OR = 0.833, 95% CI: 0.742–0.928, p = 0.001), public location (OR = 4.290, 95% CI: 2.450–7.343, p < 0.001), and attendance by an EMT-Paramedic (OR = 2.702, 95% CI: 1.704–4.279, p < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors for survival to hospital discharge in OHCA patients. Conclusions There were variations between younger and older OHCA patients. We found that bystander CPR and prehospital defibrillation by AED were independent prognostic factors for younger OHCA patients but not for the older group.

Abstract MP73: Emergency Call First Strategy versus Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation First Strategy for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 137 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuma Fukuda ◽  
Naoko Ohashi-Fukuda ◽  
Yutaka Kondo ◽  
Kei Hayashida ◽  
Ichiro Kukita
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Cerebral Performance Category ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Emergency Call ◽  
Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: Lay rescuers have a crucial role in successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), specifically the first three links in the chain of survival, for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, randomized controlled trials on the priority of emergency call (Call first) versus bystander CPR (CPR first) do not exist, and comparative data are very limited. We aimed to assess the association between the priority of bystander’s action (Call first vs. CPR first) and neurologic outcome after OHCA. Methods: This nationwide population-based study of patients who experienced OHCA from January 2005 to December 2014 was based on the data from the Japanese government-managed registry of OHCA. Patients provided bystander’s action (both emergency call and bystander CPR) within 1 minute of witness were included, and Call first strategy was compared with CPR first strategy. The primary outcome was one-month neurologically favorable survival, defined as a Glasgow-Pittsburgh cerebral performance category (CPC) score of 1(good performance) or 2(moderate disability). The secondary outcomes were prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and one-month overall survival. Results: A total of 25,840 patients were included; 4,430 (17.1%) were treated with Call first approach, and 21,410 (82.9%) were treated with CPR first approach. Among total cohort, 2,696 (10.4%) survived with neurologically favorable status one month after OHCA. In the propensity score-matched cohort, one-month neurologically favorable survival was lower among Call first group compared with CPR first group: 364 of 4,430 patients (8.2%) vs. 457 of 4,430 patients (10.3%), respectively (Risk ratio [RR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.91). Similar associations were observed for one-month overall survival (RR, 0.90; 95%CI, 0.82-0.99), although there were no significant differences in prehospital ROSC (RR, 0.94; 95%CI, 0.86-1.02) between the Call first and CPR first groups. In subgroup analyses, the association between delayed bystander CPR and worse neurological outcome did not change regardless of subgroup characteristics. Conclusions: In witnessed OHCA, Call first approach was associated with a decreased chance of one-month neurologically favorable survival compared with CPR first approach. These observational findings warrant a randomized clinical trial to determine the priority of emergency call or bystander CPR for OHCA.

scholarly journals Impact of the cardiopulmonary resuscitation-related injuries on the prognosis after cardiac arrest

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Merino Argos ◽  
I Marco Clement ◽  
S.O Rosillo Rodriguez ◽  
L Martin Polo ◽  
E Arbas Redondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Cerebral Performance Category ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Temperature Management ◽  
Performance Category ◽  
Neurological Outcomes ◽  
Cardiac Care Unit ◽  
Sternal Fractures

Abstract Background Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) manoeuvres involve vigorous compressions with the proper depth and rate in order to keep sufficient perfusion to organs, especially the brain. Accordingly, high incidences of CPR-related injuries (CPR-RI) have been observed in survivors after cardiac arrest (CA). Purpose To analyse whether CPR-related injuries have an impact on the survival and neurological outcomes of comatose survivors after CA. Methods Observational prospective database of consecutive patients (pts) admitted to the acute cardiac care unit of a tertiary university hospital after in-hospital and out-of-hospital CA (IHCA and OHCA) treated with targeted temperature management (TTM 32–34°) from August 2006 to December 2019. CPR-RI were diagnosed by reviewing medical records and analysing image studies during hospitalization. Results A total of 498 pts were included; mean age was 62.7±14.5 years and 393 (78.9%) were men. We found a total of 145 CPR-RI in 109 (21.9%) pts: 79 rib fractures, 20 sternal fractures, 5 hepatic, 5 gastrointestinal, 3 spleen, 1 kidney, 26 lung and 6 heart injuries. Demographic characteristics and cardiovascular risk factors did not differ between the non-CPR-RI group and CPR-RI group. Also, we did not find differences in CA features (Table 1). Survival at discharge was higher in the CPR-RI group [74 (67.8%) vs 188 (48.3%); p&lt;0.001]. Moreover, Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1–2 within a 3-month follow-up was significantly higher in the CPR-RI group [(71 (65.1%) vs 168 (43.2%); p&lt;0.001; Figure 1]. Finally, pts who recieved blood transfusions were proportionally higher in the CPR-RI group [34 (32.1%) vs 65 (16.7%)]; p=0.004). Conclusions In our cohort, the presence of CPR-RI was associated with higher survival at discharge and better neurological outcomes during follow-up. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: Potential for Improvements in Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Chocron ◽  
Julia Jobe ◽  
Sally Guan ◽  
Madeleine Kim ◽  
Mia Shigemura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Performance Metrics ◽  
Medical System ◽  
Emergency Medical System ◽  
Compression Rate ◽  
Emergency Medical ◽  
Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a critical intervention to improve survival following out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest. We evaluated the quality of bystander CPR and whether performance varied according to the number of bystanders or provision of telecommunicator CPR (TCPR). Methods and Results We investigated non‐traumatic out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest occurring in a large metropolitan emergency medical system during a 6‐month period. Information about bystander care was ascertained through review of the 9‐1‐1 recordings in addition to emergency medical system and hospital records to determine bystander CPR status (none versus TCPR versus unassisted), the number of bystanders on‐scene, and CPR performance metrics of compression fraction and compression rate. Of the 428 eligible out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest, 76.4% received bystander CPR including 43.7% unassisted CPR and 56.3% TCPR; 35.2% had one bystander, 33.3% had 2 bystanders, and 31.5% had ≥3 bystanders. Overall compression fraction was 59% with a compression rate of 88 per minute. CPR differed according to TCPR status (fraction=52%, rate=87 per minute for TCPR versus fraction=69%, rate=102 for unassisted CPR, P <0.05 for each comparison) and the number of bystanders (fraction=55%, rate=87 per minute for 1 bystander, fraction=59%, rate=89 for 2 bystanders, fraction=65%, rate=97 for ≥3 bystanders, test for trend P <0.05 for each metric). Additional bystander actions were uncommon to include rotation of compressors (3.1%) or application of an automated external defibrillator (8.0%). Conclusions Bystander CPR quality as gauged by compression fraction and rate approached guideline goals though performance depended upon the type of CPR and number of bystanders.

Abstract 19427: Epidemiology and Outcomes of Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest in Qatar

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Furqan B Irfan ◽  
Zain A Bhutta ◽  
Tooba Tariq ◽  
Loua A Shaikh ◽  
Pregalathan Govender ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Incidence Rate ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Middle Eastern ◽  
Cerebral Performance Category ◽  
Pulseless Electrical Activity ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
National Registry ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Aim: There is a scarcity of population based studies on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in the Middle East and the wider Asian region. This study describes the Epidemiology and outcomes of OHCA in Qatar, a Middle Eastern country. Methods: Data was extracted retrospectively from a national registry on all adult cardiac origin OHCA patients attended by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in Qatar, from June 2012 - May 2013. Results: The annual crude incidence rate of cardiac origin OHCA attended by EMS was 23.5 per 100,000. The age-sex standardized incidence rate was 87.83 per 100,000 population. The annual sex-standardized incidence rate for males and females was 91.5 and 84.25 per 100,000 population respectively. Of 447 adult, cardiac origin OHCA patients included in the final analysis, most were male (n=360, 80.5%) with median age of 51 years (IQR = 39-66). Frequently observed nationalities of OHCA cases were Qatari (n=89, 19.9%), Indian (n=74, 16.6%) and Nepalese (n=52, 11.6%). Common initial cardiac arrest rhythms were asystole (n=301, 67.3%), ventricular fibrillation (n=82, 18.3%) and pulseless electrical activity (n=49, 11%). OHCA was unwitnessed (n=220, 49%) in nearly half of the cases while bystanders witnessed it in 170 (38%) patients. Bystander CPR was carried out in 92 (20.6%) of the cases. Of 187 (41.8%) patients who were given shocks, bystander defibrillation was delivered to 12 (2.7%) patients. Prehospital outcomes; 332 (74.3%) patients did not achieve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 40 (8.9%) patients achieved unsustainable ROSC, 58 (13%) achieved ROSC till Emergency department (ED) handover and 5 patients achieved ROSC but rearrested again before reaching ED. Survival to hospital discharge occurred in 38 (8.5%) patients. Neurological outcomes were assessed utilizing Cerebral Performance Category [CPC] scores with a favorable CPC score of 1-2 at discharge in 27 (6%) patients, while 11 (2.5%) patients had a poor CPC score of 3-4. Of those with CPC score 1-2 at hospital discharge, 59% and 26% had CPC score 1-2, at 1 and 3 years follow-up respectively. Overall survival was 9.7%. Conclusion: Standardized rates are comparable to western countries, there are significant opportunities to improve outcomes, including better bystander CPR.

scholarly journals Insights From the Ventricular Fibrillation Waveform Into the Mechanism of Survival Benefit From Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (19) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brooke Bessen ◽  
Jason Coult ◽  
Jennifer Blackwood ◽  
Cindy H. Hsu ◽  
Peter Kudenchuk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Ventricular Fibrillation ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Amplitude Spectrum ◽  
Peak Frequency ◽  
Spectrum Area ◽  
Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background The mechanism by which bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improves survival following out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest is unclear. We hypothesized that ventricular fibrillation (VF) waveform measures, as surrogates of myocardial physiology, mediate the relationship between bystander CPR and survival. Methods and Results We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult, bystander‐witnessed patients with out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest with an initial rhythm of VF who were treated by a metropolitan emergency medical services system from 2005 to 2018. Patient, resuscitation, and outcome variables were extracted from emergency medical services and hospital records. A total of 3 VF waveform measures (amplitude spectrum area, peak frequency, and median peak amplitude) were computed from a 3‐second ECG segment before the initial shock. Multivariable logistic regression estimated the association between bystander CPR and survival to hospital discharge adjusted for Utstein elements. Causal mediation analysis quantified the proportion of survival benefit that was mediated by each VF waveform measure. Of 1069 patients, survival to hospital discharge was significantly higher among the 814 patients who received bystander CPR than those who did not (0.52 versus 0.43, respectively; P <0.01). The multivariable‐adjusted odds ratio for bystander CPR and survival was 1.6 (95% CI, 1.2, 2.1), and each VF waveform measure attenuated this association. Depending on the specific waveform measure, the proportion of mediation varied: 53% for amplitude spectrum area, 31% for peak frequency, and 29% for median peak amplitude. Conclusions Bystander CPR correlated with more robust initial VF waveform measures, which in turn mediated up to one‐half of the survival benefit associated with bystander CPR. These results provide insight into the biological mechanism of bystander CPR in VF out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest.

scholarly journals Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm could be candidates for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a retrospective study.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsunori Tanimoto ◽  
Kazuhiro Sugiyama ◽  
Maki Tanabe ◽  
Kanta Kitagawa ◽  
Ayumi Kawakami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Cerebral Performance Category ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Emergency Medical Service Personnel ◽  
Good Outcome ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is a promising treatment for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Most studies evaluating the effectiveness of ECPR include patients with an initial shockable rhythm. However, the effectiveness of ECPR for patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm remains unknown. This retrospective single-center study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ECPR for patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm, with reference to the outcomes of OHCA patients with an initial shockable rhythm. Methods Adult OHCA patients treated with ECPR at our center during 2011–2018 were included in the study. Patients were classified into the initial shockable rhythm group and the non-shockable rhythm group. The primary outcome was the cerebral performance category (CPC) scale score at hospital discharge. A CPC score of 1 or 2 was defined as a good outcome. Results In total, 186 patients were eligible. Among them, 124 had an initial shockable rhythm and 62 had an initial non-shockable rhythm. Among all patients, 158 (85%) were male, with a median age of 59 (interquartile range [IQR], 48–65) years, and the median low flow time was 41 (IQR, 33–48) min. Collapse was witnessed in 169 (91%) patients, and 36 (19%) achieved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) transiently. Proportion of female patients, presence of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and collapse after the arrival of emergency medical service personnel were significantly higher in the non-shockable rhythm group. The rate of good outcomes at hospital discharge was not significantly different between the shockable and non-shockable groups (19% vs. 16%, p=0.69). Initial shockable rhythm was not significantly associated with good outcome after controlling for potential confounders (adjusted odds ratio 1.58, 95% confidence interval: 0.66–3.81, p=0.31). In the non-shockable group, patients with good outcomes had a higher rate of transient ROSC, and pulmonary embolism was the leading etiology. Conclusions The outcomes of patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm are comparable with those having an initial shockable rhythm. OHCA patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm could be candidates for ECPR, if they are presumed to have reversible etiology and potential for good neurological recovery.

scholarly journals Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm could be candidates for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a retrospective study

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsunori Tanimoto ◽  
Kazuhiro Sugiyama ◽  
Maki Tanabe ◽  
Kanta Kitagawa ◽  
Ayumi Kawakami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Cerebral Performance Category ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Emergency Medical Service Personnel ◽  
Good Outcome ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is a promising treatment for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Most studies evaluating the effectiveness of ECPR include patients with an initial shockable rhythm. However, the effectiveness of ECPR for patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm remains unknown. This retrospective single-center study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ECPR for patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm, with reference to the outcomes of OHCA patients with an initial shockable rhythm. Methods Adult OHCA patients treated with ECPR at our center during 2011–2018 were included in the study. Patients were classified into the initial shockable rhythm group and the non-shockable rhythm group. The primary outcome was the cerebral performance category (CPC) scale score at hospital discharge. A CPC score of 1 or 2 was defined as a good outcome. Results In total, 186 patients were eligible. Among them, 124 had an initial shockable rhythm and 62 had an initial non-shockable rhythm. Among all patients, 158 (85%) were male, with a median age of 59 (interquartile range [IQR], 48–65) years, and the median low flow time was 41 (IQR, 33–48) min. Collapse was witnessed in 169 (91%) patients, and 36 (19%) achieved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) transiently. Proportion of female patients, presence of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and collapse after the arrival of emergency medical service personnel were significantly higher in the non-shockable rhythm group. The rate of good outcomes at hospital discharge was not significantly different between the shockable and non-shockable groups (19% vs. 16%, p = 0.69). Initial shockable rhythm was not significantly associated with good outcome after controlling for potential confounders (adjusted odds ratio 1.58, 95% confidence interval: 0.66–3.81, p = 0.31). In the non-shockable group, patients with good outcomes had a higher rate of transient ROSC, and pulmonary embolism was the leading etiology. Conclusions The outcomes of patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm are comparable with those having an initial shockable rhythm. OHCA patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm could be candidates for ECPR, if they are presumed to have reversible etiology and potential for good neurological recovery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document