Genetic and nutritional effects on age at first oestrus of gilts selected for components of efficient lean growth rate

1999 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. D. Cameron ◽  
J. C. Kerr ◽  
G. B. Garth ◽  
R. L. Sloan

AbstractAges at first behavioural oestrus and at elevated plasma progesterone concentration were measured in three selection groups, after seven generations of divergent selection for lean growth rate (LGA), lean food conversion (LFC) and daily food intake (DFI) in a population of Large White pigs. First physiological oestrus was defined to have occurred when a blood plasma progesterone concentration of at least 1 μg/l was detected from weekly sampling of gilts. The study consisted of 146 gilts, which were given 0·75 , 0·81 , 0·88 , 0·94 or 1·0 g/g of daily ad-libitum food intake during performance test and then 1.9, 2.05, 2.2, 2.35 or 2.5 kg/day, respectively, until conception, to determine if there were differences between selection lines in their sensitivity to changes in nutritional inputs.Responses in oestrus and performance test traits were dependent on selection group. First physiological oestrus was later with selection for high LFC than for low LFC (234 v. 215, s.e.d. 9.1 days) but there was no significant response within each of the LG A (224 v. 226 days) and DFI (218 v. 206 days) selection groups. The probability of exhibiting oestrous behaviour signs at first physiological oestrus was significantly lower in the high LG A line (0·62 v. 0·93 or 0·5 v. 2.5, s.e.d. 0·75 on the logit scale) than in the low line but there were no responses in the LFC and DFI groups. For animals exhibiting oestrous behaviour signs at first physiological oestrus, there were no significant responses in oestrous behaviour score for the three selection groups. Live weight at first physiological oestrus in the LFC and LG A selection groups was greater in the high lines than in the low lines (120 v. 109 and 123 v. 112, s.e.d. 4.3 kg) but not in the DFI selection group (116 v. 111 kg). Responses in ultrasonic backfat (-7.3, -8.2 and 5.0, s.e.d. 1.5 mm) and muscle depth (4.9, 6.1 and -3.5, s.e.d. 1.4 mm) at first physiological oestrus were of similar magnitude in the LGA, LFC and DFI selection groups.Increasing the ration (amount of food offered) did not have a linear effect on performance test traits and reproductive development, such that ration had to be included in the model as a fixed effect, rather than a covariate. There was no significant effect of ration or of selection line with ration interaction for traits associated with first oestrus.Selection for lean growth rate had no adverse effect on reproductive development, unlike selection for lean food conversion. Detection of first oestrus with oestrous behaviour signs combined with physiological assessment may be required in genotypes selected exclusively for lean growth rate, rather than relying only on observed behavioural signs of oestrus.Ages at first behavioural oestrus and at elevated plasma progesterone concentration were measured in three selection groups, after seven generations of divergent selection for lean growth rate (LGA), lean food conversion (LFC) and daily food intake (DFI) in a population of Large White pigs. First physiological oestrus was defined to have occurred when a blood plasma progesterone concentration of at least 1 μg/l was detected from weekly sampling of gilts. The study consisted of 146 gilts, which were given 0·75 , 0·81 , 0·88 , 0·94 or 1·0 g/g of daily ad-libitum food intake during performance test and then 1.9, 2.05, 2.2, 2.35 or 2.5 kg/day, respectively, until conception, to determine if there were differences between selection lines in their sensitivity to changes in nutritional inputs.Responses in oestrus and performance test traits were dependent on selection group. First physiological oestrus was later with selection for high LFC than for low LFC (234 v. 215, s.e.d. 9.1 days) but there was no significant response within each of the LG A (224 v. 226 days) and DFI (218 v. 206 days) selection groups. The probability of exhibiting oestrous behaviour signs at first physiological oestrus was significantly lower in the high LG A line (0·62 v. 0·93 or 0·5 v. 2.5, s.e.d. 0·75 on the logit scale) than in the low line but there were no responses in the LFC and DFI groups. For animals exhibiting oestrous behaviour signs at first physiological oestrus, there were no significant responses in oestrous behaviour score for the three selection groups. Live weight at first physiological oestrus in the LFC and LG A selection groups was greater in the high lines than in the low lines (120 v. 109 and 123 v. 112, s.e.d. 4.3 kg) but not in the DFI selection group (116 v. 111 kg). Responses in ultrasonic backfat (-7.3, -8.2 and 5.0, s.e.d. 1.5 mm) and muscle depth (4.9, 6.1 and -3.5, s.e.d. 1.4 mm) at first physiological oestrus were of similar magnitude in the LGA, LFC and DFI selection groups. Increasing the ration (amount of food offered) did not have a linear effect on performance test traits and reproductive development, such that ration had to be included in the model as a fixed effect, rather than a covariate. There was no significant effect of ration or of selection line with ration interaction for traits associated with first oestrus. Selection for lean growth rate had no adverse effect on reproductive development, unlike selection for lean food conversion. Detection of first oestrus with oestrous behaviour signs combined with physiological assessment may be required in genotypes selected exclusively for lean growth rate, rather than relying only on observed behavioural signs of oestrus.

1994 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. D. Cameron ◽  
M. K. Curran

AbstractGenetic and phenotypic parameters and correlated responses in performance test traits were estimated for populations of Large White (LW) and British Landrace (LR) pigs tested in Edinburgh and Wye respectively, to four generations of divergent selection for lean growth rate (LGA), lean food conversion (LFC) and daily food intake (DFI) with ad-libitum feeding.There were differences between the two populations in genetic parameters, as LW heritabilities for growth rate, daily food intake and backfat depths were higher and the correlation between growth rate and backfat was positive for LW, but negative for LR. However, heritabilities, genetic and phenotypic correlations were generally comparable between selection groups, within each population. Genetic and phenotypic correlations indicated that animals with high daily food intakes were faster growing, had positive residual food intakes (RFI), were fatter with higher food conversion ratios. RFI was highly correlated with daily food intake and food conversion ratio, but phenotypically independent of growth rate and backfat, as expected.Selection for LGA, in LW and LR populations, increased growth rate (54 and 101 g/day), but reduced backfat (−3·9 and −2·0 mm), food conversion ratio (−0·23 and −0·25) and total food intake (−11·8 and −12·6 kg). There was no change in daily food intake in LW pigs (−19 g/day), but daily food intake increased in the LR pigs (69 g/day). With selection for LFC in LW and LR populations, there was no response in groivth rate (9 and 9 g/day), but backfat (−4·1 and −2·1 mm), total (−6·6 and −11·8 kg) and daily food intake (−90 and −172 g) were reduced, as animals had lower food conversion ratios (−0·13 and −0·22). LW and LR pigs selected for DFI ate more food in total (6·8 and 5·9 kg) and on a daily basis (314 and 230 g), grew faster (94 and 51 g/day) and had higher food conversion ratios (0·12 and 0·13). Backfat was increased in LW pigs (3·7 mm), but not in the LR population.In general, efficiency of lean growth was improved by increasing groivth rate, with little change in daily food intake from selection for LGA, but was primarily due to reduced daily food intake with selection on LFC.


1981 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 681 ◽  
Author(s):  
CP McPhee

A pig herd was selected for 6 years by using an economic index combining growth rate, food conversion efficiency and carcass leanness. These three traits were all measured in a performance test which permitted appetite variation between pigs to be expressed. Boars selected with an intensity of 118 were used for 6 months, and sows with an intensity of 114 were kept for two farrowings. An unselected control herd was maintained concurrently. To measure selection response, selected (S) and control (C) pigs were compared as they grew from 25 to 90 kg liveweight on ad lib. and restricted feeding during the last 2 years of selection. The following significant (P < 0.05) responses occurred in the selection herd: (i) A slight increase in growth rate on restricted feed, balanced by a similar decrease on ad lib, feeding. (ii) A decline in food conversion ratio of 5 % (C, 2.79; S, 2.65) due mainly to a reduction in appetite. (On ad lib. feeding, food intake per day declined by 6 % (C, 2.30 kg/d; S, 2.16 kg/d.)). (iii) A decline in average subcutaneous fat depth by 11 % (C, 27.8 mm; S, 24.7 mm) and in fat dissected from the ham by 7 % (C, 2.80 kg; S, 2.61 kg). (iv) An increase in estimated lean in the carcass by 2% (C, 30.3 kg; S, 31.0 kg). (v) A decline in dressing percentage of the carcass by 1 % (C, 77.1 %; S, 76.2 %). There was no change in eye muscle area or carcass length. The results are discussed in terms of changes in the ratio of food intake to lean growth. In the group fed ad lib., this ratio declined by 7 %, mainly because of a decline in food intake. On restricted feeding it fell by 6 %, mainly owing to an increase in lean growth. That portion of the selection effort absorbed in reducing food intake may have been more profitably directed to increasing lean growth by suppressing appetite variation during performance testing, rather than allowing it to be expressed.


1995 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 347-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. D. Cameron ◽  
M. K. Curran

AbstractCarcass composition was measured after six generations of divergent selection for lean growth rate on ad-libitum and restricted feeding, lean food conversion and daily food intake in populations of Large White (LW) and Landrace (LR) pigs. There were 161 half-carcass dissections in LW pigs and for LR pigs, a double sampling procedure combined information from 53 half-carcass and 53 hand joint dissections. The performance test started at 30 kg and finished at 85 kg with ad-libitum feeding and after 84 days with restricted feeding, and pigs were slaughtered at the end of the test.In the LR population, selection for lean growth on restricted feeding increased carcass lean content (605 v. 557 (s.e.d. 19) g/kg), but there were no significant responses in carcass lean content with the selection strategies on adlibitum feeding. Selection for lean food conversion and high lean growth on restricted feeding reduced carcass fat content (201 v. 241 (s.e.d. 14) and 150 v. 218 (s.e.d. 18) g/kg), but selection for high lean growth rate with adlibitum increased carcass fat content (212 v. 185 (s.e.d. 11) g/kg). Responses in carcass composition were not significant with selection on daily food intake.In the LW population, selection for high lean food conversion or low daily food intake increased carcass lean content (539 v. 494 and 543 v. 477 (s.e.d. 11) g/kg) to a greater extent than selection on lean growth rate (509 v. 475 g/kg). Responses in carcass fat content were equal and opposite to those in carcass lean content. Selection on lean growth rate with ad-libitum feeding increased lean tissue growth rate (LTGR) (491 v. 422 (s.e.d. 23) g/day), but there was no change in fat tissue growth rate (FTGR) (206 v. 217 (s.e.d. 15) g/day). In contrast, FTGR was reduced with selection on lean food conversion (169 v. 225 g/day), but LTGR was not significantly increased (520 v. 482 g/day). Selection for lean growth rate with restricted feeding combined the desirable strategies of lean growth rate on adlibitum feeding and lean food conversion, as LTGR was increased (416 v. 359 (s.e.d. 12) g/day) and FTGR decreased (126 v. 156 (s.e.d. 7) g/day). The preferred selection strategy may be lean growth rate on restricted feeding, which simultaneously emphasizes rate and efficiency of lean growth.For ad-libitum fed LW pigs, coheritabilities for growth rate, daily food intake and backfat depth with carcass lean content were negative (-0·12, -0·22 and -0·50 (s.e. 0·05), but positive with carcass subcutaneous fat content (0·22, 0·24 and 0·50), when estimated from six generations of performance test data and carcass dissection data in generations 2, 4 and 6.


Author(s):  
M.K. Curran ◽  
N.D. Cameron

To study responses to divergent selection for lean growth rate (LGA), lean food conversion ratio (LFC) and daily food intake (DFI), an experiment was started in 1984 at Edinburgh and Wye. This paper measured the selection pressure applied, the responses in the selection criteria and estimated the genetic and phenotypic relationships between the selection criteria with ad-libitum feeding of Landrace pigs after four generations of selection.The LGA (LFC) selection objective was to obtain equal correlated responses in growth rate (food conversion ratio) and carcass lean content, measured in phenotypic s.d. The LGA, LFC and DFI selection criteria had phenotypic s.d. of 32, 29 and 270 units and results are presented in s.d. units.Boars and gilts were purchased from eight British nucleus herds and boars from national artificial insemination centres in 1982. Homozygous or heterozygous halothane positive pigs were not included in the experiment. The base population consisted of 20 sires and 89 dams. Within each of the three selection groups, there were high and low selection lines with a control line, each consisting of 10 boars and 20 gilts, with a generation interval of one year. There were two control lines, one for LGA and one for LFC and DFI, as selection groups were arrowed continuously. The total number of pigs tested per line and average inbreeding coefficient at generation 4, within selection group are given below.


1992 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. S. Haley ◽  
E. d'Agaro ◽  
M. Ellis

AbstractGenes from the Chinese Meishan pig have the potential to enhance reproductive performance of European pigs. In order to allow prediction of the impact of Meishan genes in a range of alternative improvement programmes all traits of economic importance must be evaluated and genetic crossbreeding effects estimated. Entire male and female pigs of four genotypes, purebred Meishan (MS) and Large White (LW) pigs and both reciprocal Fl crossbred genotypes (MS ♂ × LW ♀ and LW ♂ × MS ♀), were farrowed in Edinburgh and subsequently performance tested at either Edinburgh or Newcastle. In Edinburgh, animals were penned in groups of four and fed ad libitum between pen mean weights of approximately 30 and 80 kg. At the end of test fat depths at the shoulder, last rib and loin were measured ultrasonically. In Newcastle, animals were penned in groups of six and fed ad libitum between pen mean weights of approximately 30 and 70 kg. Genotypic means and genetic crossbreeding effects (additive and heterosis direct effects and additive maternal effects) were estimated using restricted maximum likelihood.When compared with the LW, the direct additive effect of genes from the MS produced increased growth rate up to the time of weaning, no change in growth rate between weaning and start of test and greatly reduced growth rate during the performance test. The maternal additive effect of genes from the MS was to reduce growth rate up to the time of weaning, with little effect thereafter. There was substantial direct heterosis for growth rate in all periods measured, but heterosis was less in males than in females during the performance test. The combined effect was such that, within sex, the LW and the two crossbred genotypes were of similar ages when they reached 70 and 80 kg, but MS pigs were 38 to 60 days older. The direct additive effect of MS genes was to increase subcutaneous fat levels and there was little evidence for the effects of maternal genes or direct heterosis on these traits. There was a direct additive effect of MS genes reducing food intake and increasing food conversion ratio and there was direct heterosis for increased food intake. There were significant interactions between genotype and sex. Male and female LW pigs had a similar performance but male MS pigs had slower growth rates on the performance test with lower food intakes, food conversion ratios and subcutaneous fat levels than the females.


1996 ◽  
Vol 1996 ◽  
pp. 17-17
Author(s):  
J. C. Kerr ◽  
N. D. Cameron

Responses in sow traits at farrowing and during lactation and in pre-weaning piglet growth rate were determined in a population of Large White pigs, after seven generations of divergent selection for components of efficient lean growth rate. Information on the factors influencing preweaning piglet growth rate is required for a comprehensive evaluation of alternative selection strategies.There were four selection groups: daily food intake (DFI), lean food conversion (LFC), lean growth rate (LGA) on ad-libitum feeding and lean growth rate on scale feeding (LGS). There were 242 gilts in the study, with 20 gilts in the high, low and control lines of each selection group. Pigs in the ad-libitum selection groups were performance tested over a fixed weight range of 30 to 85 kg. Pigs fed on scale feeding were performance tested for a fixed time period of 84 days from 30 kg with food intake equal to 0.75 g/g of daily ad-libitum food intake. Matings were unsupervised and took place in outside paddocks.


1995 ◽  
Vol 1995 ◽  
pp. 9-9
Author(s):  
J. C. Kerr ◽  
N. D. Cameron

Genetic and phenotypic relationships between performance test and reproduction traits were estimated in a population of Large White pigs, after five generations of divergent selection for components of efficient lean growth rate. The parameters are required to evaluate alternative selection strategies in pig breeding programmes.


1996 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. Kerr ◽  
N. D. Cameron

AbstractThe responses in traits measured at the start of the mating period and at farrowing were examined after seven generations of divergent selection for daily food intake (DFI), lean food conversion (LFC), lean growth rate (LGA) on ad-\ibitum feeding and lean growth on scale feeding (LGS). Weight and backfat depth at mating were measured on 330 gilts and 74 boars, which were selected on the basis of performance test traits. Farrowing information was available on 259 gilts. At the start of the mating period, gilts selected for high DFI, LGA or LGS had similar live weights (135, 137 and 137 (s.e.d. 4·5) kg) but different backfat depths (20·3, 14·0 and 11·3 (s.e.d. 1·3) mm) while the corresponding low lines had different live weights (129, 117 and 124 kg), but similar backfat depths (17·5, 17·8 and 17·8 mm). Gilts selected for high LFC had lower mean live weight and backfat depth (114 kg and 10·7 mm) than gilts in the other selection lines. Conception rates of gilts selected for low DFI or high LGS were similar (0·62 and 0·64, s.e.d. 0·12) and lower than for the alternative selection strategies (0-78), but the low DFI gilts were significantly older at farrowing than gilts selected for high LGS (424 v. 408 (s.e.d. 5·5) days). Responses in live weight, backfat depth, age at mating and particular reproduction traits were selection strategy dependent, such that identification of relationships between growth and reproduction traits will require measurement of additional growth traits at an earlier age than in the current study


Author(s):  
P. R. Bampton ◽  
A. J. Webb

Backfat levels in pigs have declined rapidly in the last decade and are approaching an economic optimum. As optimal levels of backfat are achieved this has two important implications for selection objectives. First, the relative emphasis of selection will shift to other traits, particularly lean growth rate. Second, there will also be a move towards ad libitum feeding on performance test to allow expression of appetite and to increase response to selection for lean growth rate. The effect of very lean pigs coupled with ad libitum feeding may result in changes in the genetic and phenotypic relationship between growth rate and fat depths. Reported genetic and phenotypic correlations between growth rate and backfat range from +0.3 on ad libitum feeding to -0.3 on restricted feeding. In most performance testing regimes the key relationship is between growth rate and ultrasonic fat depths which in contrast to other economic traits are often unfavourably correlated.


1992 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. C. Bishop ◽  
J. S. Broadbent ◽  
R. M. Kay ◽  
I. Rigby ◽  
A. V. Fisher

AbstractThe performance of Hereford × Friesian calves sired by Hereford bulls selected for either lean growth rate (LGR) or lean food conversion ratio (LFCR), or by unselected Hereford bulls, was evaluated on 327 calves on three farms over 2 years. Animals started test at 130 days of age on average and remained on test for approximately 300 days, whereupon all animals were slaughtered and carcass dissections were undertaken. Individual food intake was measured on tioo of the farms (189 animals), but only intake per pen of animals was measured on the third farm and individual food intake had to be estimated. LGR, LFCR and other traits describing performance were calculated from the growth, food intake and carcass composition data.If no breed or environment interactions exist it is expected that proportionately 0-5 of the genetic differences between selected and control line bulls would be transmitted to their offspring. For the LGR and LFCR line bulls these values were 0·38 and 0·44, respectively, however the LGR value had a much smaller confidence interval. Genetic correlations derived from regressing breeding values predicted from offspring performance on breeding values predicted from the bulk's own performance in the selection experiment were 0·62 (s.e. 0·28) and 0·96 (s.e. 0·28) for LGR and LFCR, respectively. Heritabilities were: live-weight gain on test, 0·27; daily gain, 0·48; food intake, 0·06; food conversion ratio, 0·46; predicted carcass lean content, 0·10; killing-out proportion, 0·10; LGR, 0·36 and LFCR, 0·48.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document