Selection for efficient lean growth in a pig herd

1981 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 681 ◽  
Author(s):  
CP McPhee

A pig herd was selected for 6 years by using an economic index combining growth rate, food conversion efficiency and carcass leanness. These three traits were all measured in a performance test which permitted appetite variation between pigs to be expressed. Boars selected with an intensity of 118 were used for 6 months, and sows with an intensity of 114 were kept for two farrowings. An unselected control herd was maintained concurrently. To measure selection response, selected (S) and control (C) pigs were compared as they grew from 25 to 90 kg liveweight on ad lib. and restricted feeding during the last 2 years of selection. The following significant (P < 0.05) responses occurred in the selection herd: (i) A slight increase in growth rate on restricted feed, balanced by a similar decrease on ad lib, feeding. (ii) A decline in food conversion ratio of 5 % (C, 2.79; S, 2.65) due mainly to a reduction in appetite. (On ad lib. feeding, food intake per day declined by 6 % (C, 2.30 kg/d; S, 2.16 kg/d.)). (iii) A decline in average subcutaneous fat depth by 11 % (C, 27.8 mm; S, 24.7 mm) and in fat dissected from the ham by 7 % (C, 2.80 kg; S, 2.61 kg). (iv) An increase in estimated lean in the carcass by 2% (C, 30.3 kg; S, 31.0 kg). (v) A decline in dressing percentage of the carcass by 1 % (C, 77.1 %; S, 76.2 %). There was no change in eye muscle area or carcass length. The results are discussed in terms of changes in the ratio of food intake to lean growth. In the group fed ad lib., this ratio declined by 7 %, mainly because of a decline in food intake. On restricted feeding it fell by 6 %, mainly owing to an increase in lean growth. That portion of the selection effort absorbed in reducing food intake may have been more profitably directed to increasing lean growth by suppressing appetite variation during performance testing, rather than allowing it to be expressed.

1992 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. S. Haley ◽  
E. d'Agaro ◽  
M. Ellis

AbstractGenes from the Chinese Meishan pig have the potential to enhance reproductive performance of European pigs. In order to allow prediction of the impact of Meishan genes in a range of alternative improvement programmes all traits of economic importance must be evaluated and genetic crossbreeding effects estimated. Entire male and female pigs of four genotypes, purebred Meishan (MS) and Large White (LW) pigs and both reciprocal Fl crossbred genotypes (MS ♂ × LW ♀ and LW ♂ × MS ♀), were farrowed in Edinburgh and subsequently performance tested at either Edinburgh or Newcastle. In Edinburgh, animals were penned in groups of four and fed ad libitum between pen mean weights of approximately 30 and 80 kg. At the end of test fat depths at the shoulder, last rib and loin were measured ultrasonically. In Newcastle, animals were penned in groups of six and fed ad libitum between pen mean weights of approximately 30 and 70 kg. Genotypic means and genetic crossbreeding effects (additive and heterosis direct effects and additive maternal effects) were estimated using restricted maximum likelihood.When compared with the LW, the direct additive effect of genes from the MS produced increased growth rate up to the time of weaning, no change in growth rate between weaning and start of test and greatly reduced growth rate during the performance test. The maternal additive effect of genes from the MS was to reduce growth rate up to the time of weaning, with little effect thereafter. There was substantial direct heterosis for growth rate in all periods measured, but heterosis was less in males than in females during the performance test. The combined effect was such that, within sex, the LW and the two crossbred genotypes were of similar ages when they reached 70 and 80 kg, but MS pigs were 38 to 60 days older. The direct additive effect of MS genes was to increase subcutaneous fat levels and there was little evidence for the effects of maternal genes or direct heterosis on these traits. There was a direct additive effect of MS genes reducing food intake and increasing food conversion ratio and there was direct heterosis for increased food intake. There were significant interactions between genotype and sex. Male and female LW pigs had a similar performance but male MS pigs had slower growth rates on the performance test with lower food intakes, food conversion ratios and subcutaneous fat levels than the females.


1994 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. D. Cameron ◽  
M. K. Curran

AbstractGenetic and phenotypic parameters and correlated responses in performance test traits were estimated for populations of Large White (LW) and British Landrace (LR) pigs tested in Edinburgh and Wye respectively, to four generations of divergent selection for lean growth rate (LGA), lean food conversion (LFC) and daily food intake (DFI) with ad-libitum feeding.There were differences between the two populations in genetic parameters, as LW heritabilities for growth rate, daily food intake and backfat depths were higher and the correlation between growth rate and backfat was positive for LW, but negative for LR. However, heritabilities, genetic and phenotypic correlations were generally comparable between selection groups, within each population. Genetic and phenotypic correlations indicated that animals with high daily food intakes were faster growing, had positive residual food intakes (RFI), were fatter with higher food conversion ratios. RFI was highly correlated with daily food intake and food conversion ratio, but phenotypically independent of growth rate and backfat, as expected.Selection for LGA, in LW and LR populations, increased growth rate (54 and 101 g/day), but reduced backfat (−3·9 and −2·0 mm), food conversion ratio (−0·23 and −0·25) and total food intake (−11·8 and −12·6 kg). There was no change in daily food intake in LW pigs (−19 g/day), but daily food intake increased in the LR pigs (69 g/day). With selection for LFC in LW and LR populations, there was no response in groivth rate (9 and 9 g/day), but backfat (−4·1 and −2·1 mm), total (−6·6 and −11·8 kg) and daily food intake (−90 and −172 g) were reduced, as animals had lower food conversion ratios (−0·13 and −0·22). LW and LR pigs selected for DFI ate more food in total (6·8 and 5·9 kg) and on a daily basis (314 and 230 g), grew faster (94 and 51 g/day) and had higher food conversion ratios (0·12 and 0·13). Backfat was increased in LW pigs (3·7 mm), but not in the LR population.In general, efficiency of lean growth was improved by increasing groivth rate, with little change in daily food intake from selection for LGA, but was primarily due to reduced daily food intake with selection on LFC.


1995 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 347-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. D. Cameron ◽  
M. K. Curran

AbstractCarcass composition was measured after six generations of divergent selection for lean growth rate on ad-libitum and restricted feeding, lean food conversion and daily food intake in populations of Large White (LW) and Landrace (LR) pigs. There were 161 half-carcass dissections in LW pigs and for LR pigs, a double sampling procedure combined information from 53 half-carcass and 53 hand joint dissections. The performance test started at 30 kg and finished at 85 kg with ad-libitum feeding and after 84 days with restricted feeding, and pigs were slaughtered at the end of the test.In the LR population, selection for lean growth on restricted feeding increased carcass lean content (605 v. 557 (s.e.d. 19) g/kg), but there were no significant responses in carcass lean content with the selection strategies on adlibitum feeding. Selection for lean food conversion and high lean growth on restricted feeding reduced carcass fat content (201 v. 241 (s.e.d. 14) and 150 v. 218 (s.e.d. 18) g/kg), but selection for high lean growth rate with adlibitum increased carcass fat content (212 v. 185 (s.e.d. 11) g/kg). Responses in carcass composition were not significant with selection on daily food intake.In the LW population, selection for high lean food conversion or low daily food intake increased carcass lean content (539 v. 494 and 543 v. 477 (s.e.d. 11) g/kg) to a greater extent than selection on lean growth rate (509 v. 475 g/kg). Responses in carcass fat content were equal and opposite to those in carcass lean content. Selection on lean growth rate with ad-libitum feeding increased lean tissue growth rate (LTGR) (491 v. 422 (s.e.d. 23) g/day), but there was no change in fat tissue growth rate (FTGR) (206 v. 217 (s.e.d. 15) g/day). In contrast, FTGR was reduced with selection on lean food conversion (169 v. 225 g/day), but LTGR was not significantly increased (520 v. 482 g/day). Selection for lean growth rate with restricted feeding combined the desirable strategies of lean growth rate on adlibitum feeding and lean food conversion, as LTGR was increased (416 v. 359 (s.e.d. 12) g/day) and FTGR decreased (126 v. 156 (s.e.d. 7) g/day). The preferred selection strategy may be lean growth rate on restricted feeding, which simultaneously emphasizes rate and efficiency of lean growth.For ad-libitum fed LW pigs, coheritabilities for growth rate, daily food intake and backfat depth with carcass lean content were negative (-0·12, -0·22 and -0·50 (s.e. 0·05), but positive with carcass subcutaneous fat content (0·22, 0·24 and 0·50), when estimated from six generations of performance test data and carcass dissection data in generations 2, 4 and 6.


1999 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. D. Cameron ◽  
J. C. Kerr ◽  
G. B. Garth ◽  
R. L. Sloan

AbstractAges at first behavioural oestrus and at elevated plasma progesterone concentration were measured in three selection groups, after seven generations of divergent selection for lean growth rate (LGA), lean food conversion (LFC) and daily food intake (DFI) in a population of Large White pigs. First physiological oestrus was defined to have occurred when a blood plasma progesterone concentration of at least 1 μg/l was detected from weekly sampling of gilts. The study consisted of 146 gilts, which were given 0·75 , 0·81 , 0·88 , 0·94 or 1·0 g/g of daily ad-libitum food intake during performance test and then 1.9, 2.05, 2.2, 2.35 or 2.5 kg/day, respectively, until conception, to determine if there were differences between selection lines in their sensitivity to changes in nutritional inputs.Responses in oestrus and performance test traits were dependent on selection group. First physiological oestrus was later with selection for high LFC than for low LFC (234 v. 215, s.e.d. 9.1 days) but there was no significant response within each of the LG A (224 v. 226 days) and DFI (218 v. 206 days) selection groups. The probability of exhibiting oestrous behaviour signs at first physiological oestrus was significantly lower in the high LG A line (0·62 v. 0·93 or 0·5 v. 2.5, s.e.d. 0·75 on the logit scale) than in the low line but there were no responses in the LFC and DFI groups. For animals exhibiting oestrous behaviour signs at first physiological oestrus, there were no significant responses in oestrous behaviour score for the three selection groups. Live weight at first physiological oestrus in the LFC and LG A selection groups was greater in the high lines than in the low lines (120 v. 109 and 123 v. 112, s.e.d. 4.3 kg) but not in the DFI selection group (116 v. 111 kg). Responses in ultrasonic backfat (-7.3, -8.2 and 5.0, s.e.d. 1.5 mm) and muscle depth (4.9, 6.1 and -3.5, s.e.d. 1.4 mm) at first physiological oestrus were of similar magnitude in the LGA, LFC and DFI selection groups.Increasing the ration (amount of food offered) did not have a linear effect on performance test traits and reproductive development, such that ration had to be included in the model as a fixed effect, rather than a covariate. There was no significant effect of ration or of selection line with ration interaction for traits associated with first oestrus.Selection for lean growth rate had no adverse effect on reproductive development, unlike selection for lean food conversion. Detection of first oestrus with oestrous behaviour signs combined with physiological assessment may be required in genotypes selected exclusively for lean growth rate, rather than relying only on observed behavioural signs of oestrus.Ages at first behavioural oestrus and at elevated plasma progesterone concentration were measured in three selection groups, after seven generations of divergent selection for lean growth rate (LGA), lean food conversion (LFC) and daily food intake (DFI) in a population of Large White pigs. First physiological oestrus was defined to have occurred when a blood plasma progesterone concentration of at least 1 μg/l was detected from weekly sampling of gilts. The study consisted of 146 gilts, which were given 0·75 , 0·81 , 0·88 , 0·94 or 1·0 g/g of daily ad-libitum food intake during performance test and then 1.9, 2.05, 2.2, 2.35 or 2.5 kg/day, respectively, until conception, to determine if there were differences between selection lines in their sensitivity to changes in nutritional inputs.Responses in oestrus and performance test traits were dependent on selection group. First physiological oestrus was later with selection for high LFC than for low LFC (234 v. 215, s.e.d. 9.1 days) but there was no significant response within each of the LG A (224 v. 226 days) and DFI (218 v. 206 days) selection groups. The probability of exhibiting oestrous behaviour signs at first physiological oestrus was significantly lower in the high LG A line (0·62 v. 0·93 or 0·5 v. 2.5, s.e.d. 0·75 on the logit scale) than in the low line but there were no responses in the LFC and DFI groups. For animals exhibiting oestrous behaviour signs at first physiological oestrus, there were no significant responses in oestrous behaviour score for the three selection groups. Live weight at first physiological oestrus in the LFC and LG A selection groups was greater in the high lines than in the low lines (120 v. 109 and 123 v. 112, s.e.d. 4.3 kg) but not in the DFI selection group (116 v. 111 kg). Responses in ultrasonic backfat (-7.3, -8.2 and 5.0, s.e.d. 1.5 mm) and muscle depth (4.9, 6.1 and -3.5, s.e.d. 1.4 mm) at first physiological oestrus were of similar magnitude in the LGA, LFC and DFI selection groups. Increasing the ration (amount of food offered) did not have a linear effect on performance test traits and reproductive development, such that ration had to be included in the model as a fixed effect, rather than a covariate. There was no significant effect of ration or of selection line with ration interaction for traits associated with first oestrus. Selection for lean growth rate had no adverse effect on reproductive development, unlike selection for lean food conversion. Detection of first oestrus with oestrous behaviour signs combined with physiological assessment may be required in genotypes selected exclusively for lean growth rate, rather than relying only on observed behavioural signs of oestrus.


Author(s):  
N.D. Cameron ◽  
M.K. Curran

This paper examined a genotype with feeding regime interaction by performance testing pigs, selected for lean growth on ad-libitum or restricted feeding, on both the normal and the alternative feeding regime.Large White (LW) and Landrace (LR) pigs from divergent selection lines were for four generations for lean growth either on an ad-libitum (LGA) or a restricted (LGS) feeding regime. In each selection group, there were high, low and control lines, which consisted of 10 sires and 20 dams. On average, 3 boars and 3 gilts were tested per litter, with one boar and one gilt per litter tested on the alternative feeding regime. On ad-libitum feeding, there were 181 LGA and 94 LGS LW pigs and 162 LGA and 67 LGS LR pigs. On restricted feeding, 92 LGA and 212 LGS LW and 53 LGA and 135 LGS LR pigs were tested.Performance test. The performance test was over a fixed weight range of 30±3 kg to 85±5 kg for ad-libitum fed pigs and for a fixed time of 84 days for restricted fed pigs. Restricted feeding was equal to 0.75 g/g of daily food intake of ad-libitum fed pigs. All pigs were individually penned and fed a high energy (13.8 MJ DE/kg DM) and high protein (210 g/kg DM crude protein) pelleted ration.


Author(s):  
P. R. Bampton ◽  
A. J. Webb

Backfat levels in pigs have declined rapidly in the last decade and are approaching an economic optimum. As optimal levels of backfat are achieved this has two important implications for selection objectives. First, the relative emphasis of selection will shift to other traits, particularly lean growth rate. Second, there will also be a move towards ad libitum feeding on performance test to allow expression of appetite and to increase response to selection for lean growth rate. The effect of very lean pigs coupled with ad libitum feeding may result in changes in the genetic and phenotypic relationship between growth rate and fat depths. Reported genetic and phenotypic correlations between growth rate and backfat range from +0.3 on ad libitum feeding to -0.3 on restricted feeding. In most performance testing regimes the key relationship is between growth rate and ultrasonic fat depths which in contrast to other economic traits are often unfavourably correlated.


Author(s):  
M.K. Curran ◽  
N.D. Cameron ◽  
J.C. Kerr

Divergent selection lines for lean growth on a restricted feeding regime, in Large White and Landrace pigs, were established to complement the lean growth selection lines on ad-libitum feeding. This study estimated the direct and correlated responses after four generations of selection and the corresponding genetic and phenotypic parameters.The selection objective for lean growth on restricted or scale (LGS) feeding was to obtain equal correlated responses in growth rate and carcass lean content, measured in phenotypic s.d. The selection criterion included measurements of growth rate and ultrasonic backfat depth.Large White (LW) and Landrace (LR) boars and gilts were purchased from eight British nucleus herds and boars from national artificial insemination centres in 1982. Homozygous or heterozygous halothane positive pigs were not included in the experiment. The base populations consisted of 31 LW and 19 LR sires and 57 LW and 67 LR dams. Within each population, there were high and low selection lines with a control line, each consisting of 10 boars and 20 gilts, with a generation interval of 13.5 and 12 months for LW and LR pigs. Animals were performance tested in individual pens from 30±3 kg for a period of 84 days and fed a high energy (13.8 MJ DE/kg DM) and high protein (210 g/kg DM crude protein) pelleted ration. Daily food intake was equal to 0.75 g/g of the daily food intake for ad-libitum fed pigs and the total food intake was 134 kg for LW pigs and 150 kg for LR pigs. On average, 3 boars and 3 gilts were tested per litter. The total number of pigs tested per line and average inbreeding coefficients at generation four, by population are given below.


1992 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. C. Bishop ◽  
J. S. Broadbent ◽  
R. M. Kay ◽  
I. Rigby ◽  
A. V. Fisher

AbstractThe performance of Hereford × Friesian calves sired by Hereford bulls selected for either lean growth rate (LGR) or lean food conversion ratio (LFCR), or by unselected Hereford bulls, was evaluated on 327 calves on three farms over 2 years. Animals started test at 130 days of age on average and remained on test for approximately 300 days, whereupon all animals were slaughtered and carcass dissections were undertaken. Individual food intake was measured on tioo of the farms (189 animals), but only intake per pen of animals was measured on the third farm and individual food intake had to be estimated. LGR, LFCR and other traits describing performance were calculated from the growth, food intake and carcass composition data.If no breed or environment interactions exist it is expected that proportionately 0-5 of the genetic differences between selected and control line bulls would be transmitted to their offspring. For the LGR and LFCR line bulls these values were 0·38 and 0·44, respectively, however the LGR value had a much smaller confidence interval. Genetic correlations derived from regressing breeding values predicted from offspring performance on breeding values predicted from the bulk's own performance in the selection experiment were 0·62 (s.e. 0·28) and 0·96 (s.e. 0·28) for LGR and LFCR, respectively. Heritabilities were: live-weight gain on test, 0·27; daily gain, 0·48; food intake, 0·06; food conversion ratio, 0·46; predicted carcass lean content, 0·10; killing-out proportion, 0·10; LGR, 0·36 and LFCR, 0·48.


1996 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 531-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. Kerr ◽  
N. D. Cameron

AbstractGenetic and phenotypic relationships between performance test and reproduction traits were estimated, after five generations of divergent selection for components of efficient lean growth, in a population of Large Wltite pigs. On ad-libitum feeding, a total of 4334 pigs were performance tested, of which 884 selected gilts had measurements of reproduction traits. On a restricted feeding regime, 1558 pigs were tested, which included 336 selected gilts with reproduction records. For pigs given food ad libitum, genetic correlations between litter weights at birth and weaning with daily food intake (0·48 and 0·42, s.e. 0·16) and with growth rate on test (0·65 and 0·52) were positive, but correlations with backfat depths were not significantly different from zero. For pigs given food at a restricted level, litter birth weight was positively genetically correlated with growth rate (0·50, s.e. 0·18) and negatively correlated with backfat depths (-0·48, s.e. 0·16). Phenotypic and environmental correlations between performance test and reproduction traits were all less than 0·10 in magnitude, for pigs tested on either feeding regime. The variation in backfat depth enabled detection of a non-linear relationship between predicted breeding values for litter weight at birth with predicted breeding values for average backfat depth of farrowing gilts performance tested on ad-libitum feeding, but not for gilts tested on restricted feeding. The positive genetic correlations between growth rate and daily food intake with litter traits suggested that selection strategies which change growth and daily food intake may result in relatively greater genetic changes in piglet growth rate than in litter size.


1963 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. F. Buck

The following conclusions were obtained from a comparison of growth and carcass characteristics of pigs slaughtered at 150, 200 and 260 lb. liveweight.(a) The ranking of boars at the three weights, according to the quality of their progeny at each weight, was similar for the carcass characteristics, i.e. percentage of lean meat, length, backfat and eye muscle area—but was not associated for the efficiency factors, i.e. daily gain and food conversion. Results from singly-penned progeny pigs confirm that food consumed up to 150 lb. live weight is not indicative of the food consumed between 150 and 200 lb. live weight. A similar result is true for daily gain. It thus does not appear that the results obtained at 150 lb. live weight could be used to represent results at heavier weights and this is particularly true for performance testing when only one animal is concerned. Rather it would appear that if the pigs were raised to a given weight, carcass information at an earlier weight could be obtained on the live pig by ultrasonic means and by subjective estimates, whilst food conversion and daily gain could be calculated exactly at any live weight.(b) The weights of the different cuts as a percentage of the side weight does not appear to change much between slaughter weights. The carcass becomes less lean as the slaughter weight increases and this difference in leanness is more observable between the 200 and 260 lb. weights than between the 150 and 200 lb. weights. In these ranges at least as much lean as fat is put on in the shoulder and ham but more fat than lean is put on in the back and in the streak. For example, between 200 and 260 lb., 5 lb. of lean to 9 lb. of fat is added in the back cut.(c) For all cuts and for both sexes, the percentage of lean meat added in the range 200–260 lb. live weight is less than that for the range 150–200 lb. live weight. This difference is more severe for hogs, especially in the back cut. The sex difference (in favour of the leaner gilt) becomes more pronounced at the heavier weight range. This is not so obvious in the ham but is marked in the shoulder and streak and particularly in the back. 3·9 lb. of food is required to put on 1 lb. of live weight between 150 and 200 lb., whilst 4·3 lb. of food is needed for each 1 lb. gain between 200 and 260 lb. live weight.(d) Percentage of lean meat prediction equations fitted to the data at the three weights are of equal accuracy. In all cases the reduction in variance is highly significant and the percentage of lean meat of a pig can be estimated with a standard error of approximately 2% of carcass weight.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document