scholarly journals Who has a beef with reducing red and processed meat consumption? A media framing analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-32
Author(s):  
Katherine Sievert ◽  
Mark Lawrence ◽  
Christine Parker ◽  
Cherie A Russell ◽  
Phillip Baker

Abstract Objective: Diets high in red and processed meat (RPM) contribute substantially to environmental degradation, greenhouse gas emissions, and the global burden of chronic disease. High-profile reports have called for significant global RPM reduction, especially in high-income settings. Despite this, policy attention and political priority for the issue is low. Design: The study used a theoretically guided framing analysis to identify frames used by various interest groups in relation to reducing RPM in online news media articles published in the months around the release of four high-profile reports by authoritative organisations that included a focus on the impacts of high RPM production and/or consumption. Setting: Four major RPM producing and consuming countries – USA, United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand. Participants: None Results: 150 news media articles were included. Articles reported the views of academics, policymakers, industry representatives, and the article authors themselves. RPM reduction was remarkably polarising. Industry frequently framed RPM reduction as part of a ‘Vegan Agenda’ or as advocated by an elite minority. Reducing RPM was also depicted as an infringement on personal choice and traditional values. Many interest groups attempted to discredit the reports by citing a lack of consensus on the evidence, or that only certain forms of farming and processing were harmful. Academics and nutrition experts were more likely to be cited in articles that were aligned with the findings of the reports. Conclusions: The polarisation of RPM reduction has led to a binary conflict between pro- and anti-meat reduction actors. This division may diminish the extent to which political leaders will prioritise this in policy agendas. Using nuanced and context-dependent messaging could ensure the narratives around meat are less conflicting and more effective in addressing health and environmental harms associated with RPM.

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 100051
Author(s):  
Shannon R. Muir ◽  
Lynne D. Roberts ◽  
Lorraine P. Sheridan

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-170
Author(s):  
Ryan J. Phillips

This article examines the boundary work of frames and the methodological significance of understanding this work when conducting rhetorical framing analysis. While the boundary properties of frames have been theorized by scholars, there remains a lack of clear engagement with how to effectively address these discursive boundaries methodically. I argue that agenda-dismissal, which makes use of both prolepses and blind spots, ought to be addressed in addition to agenda-setting and agenda-extension when conducting rhetorical framing analysis. A case study is provided in which the rhetorical framing of vegan parenting in online news media is analyzed and critiqued for confining the issue within a dominant health-based frame. Strategies for dismantling discursive boundaries and reframing public issues are also considered within the context of the case study.


Author(s):  
Ainal Fitri ◽  
Putri Maulina

Environmental discourse is considered as one of the essential narratives since it involves the role of women. In the gender perspective, women in environmental issues are often described as a sidekick. Farwiza Farhan is one of the environmentalists who contributes to the environmental campaign effort. The study aims to focus on the framing of Farwiza Farhan’s figure against her contribution as the keeper of the Leuser Ecosystem (KEL) on online media environmental reports. This study used the Framing Analysis approach, Environmental Journalism, and Heroism concept. The researchers chose and analyzed three news from online news media: serambinews. com as a local source; and republika. co. id and bbc. com as national sources. This research was analyzed by using Zhongdang Pan and Gerald M. Kosicki’s Framing Analysis method. The finding shows that the news media frames Farwiza Farhan as an environmental activist with a heroism narrative. Farwiza is portrayed as a heroic, selfless, courageous, and intelligent personality. She is adaptive and determined to deal with conflict, and she also has initiative and leadership. Heroism is perceived as an environmental perspective-journalism strategy of online news media to deliver environmental knowledge and to raise public awareness towards the environmental issue.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 83-89
Author(s):  
Deska Rinanti Hayyattun Nuffuss ◽  
Sri Rohaningsih

The ratification of the Job Creation Law in early November 2020 created a lot of polemics in the society, this leads the news in the online media to have their own views in reviewing typos related to the content in the Job Creation Act. This study aims to unravel the results of media framing from a certain topic by reviewing news coverage by two different online news channels in the same upload period on November 3rd, 2020. The news reconstruction of journalists' points of view creates a gap between empirical truth and public awareness so readers can follow the media thought. The framing analysis was carried out on two news channels, namely CNBC Indonesia and Nasional Tempo, which reported typos in the writing of the Job Creation Law from a different point of view. The method used in this study is from Zhongdang Pan and Gerald M. Kosicki framing analysis model using four structures, namely Syntax, Script, Thematic, and Rhetorical. The results of this study indicate that media coverage of CNBC Indonesia tends to be in line with the government, while the Tempo National media constructs news coverage with a more critical tone. Additionally, other factors in the form of ownership and interests could also affect news framing. This is based on the fact that there is a trend of media conglomeration in Indonesia which can have certain implications for the news content.


2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 456
Author(s):  
Dian Purworini ◽  
Engkus Kuswarno ◽  
Purwanti Hadisiwi ◽  
Agus Rakhmat

Mediation by the government in the Royal Palace of Surakarta’s internal conflict was considered reasonable and appropriate policy by the media. The approach to the conflict did not emphasize a strong cultural aspect of that culture-based organization. This research aimed to examine how online news media reported on the Royal Palace of Surakarta’s internal conflict. Furthermore, this research used framing analysis as proposed by Stephen D Reese to analyze the news published in February 2014. The outcome indicated that there was framing construction of the government policies. The content of the news presented that framing processes occurred. Those started from the transmission of the various debated about government policy, then reinforced through elections sentence that supported certain policy and continued to the naturalization process. The final process was an important strategy to make mediation as an accepted policy that should be done by the government. In the conclusion, the perception to be formed was that government policies were appropriate, and so everyone should hold it. The conflict resolution could be achieved through the mediation as already conducted.


2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth Haller ◽  
Amy Bree Becker

<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"><span style="mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt;" lang="EN-GB">In the modern era, discerning TV viewers know the shows that trade in cheap laughs by making fun of people with disabilities are not tapping into much creativity. So it was a surprise in 2008 when the highly regarded comedy show <em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Saturday Night Live</em> (<em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">SNL</em>) stooped to that level by ridiculing the blind governor of New York, David Paterson, in a series of sketches lasting two years. </span><span lang="EN-GB">This article analyzes the way humor narratives about a high-profile blind politician on television, like those depicted in the <em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">SNL</em> skits, may have influenced larger cultural themes about blindness. <span style="color: black;">Because the East Coast news media reported on the <em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">SNL</em> skits every time an episode aired, this project undertook a textual analysis of all aspects of the controversy including the content of the <em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">SNL</em> skits, the repeated responses from Gov. Paterson and the blindness community, and the news media framing of the <em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">SNL</em>-Paterson skit story. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>T</span>his analysis examines the intertextuality of the event, revealing that the blindness community had a very different reading of the <em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">SNL</em> skits, due to concerns about continuing media narratives that devalue and stereotype them.</span></span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB">Keywords:&nbsp;blindness, disability humor, TV comedy shows, skit comedy, politicians</span></span></p>


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Bert Fraussen ◽  
Darren R. Halpin ◽  
Anthony J. Nownes

Abstract Interest groups cannot advocate on every issue they might consider relevant. They must decide what issues to prioritise and which ones to leave to one side. In this article, we examine how groups seek to balance different internal and external considerations when prioritizing issues, and which factors might explain variation in the relative strength of these drivers. We integrate data of a survey of national interest groups in Australia with findings from interviews with a cross section of high-profile groups. While the literature often suggests a clash between external political considerations and internal membership demands, we find that groups view these drivers as largely compatible. Our explanatory analysis points to the policy orientation and insider status of the group, its democratic character, and the extent to which it faces competition for membership contributions, as important factors shaping the relative strength of distinct drivers of internal agenda setting.


Author(s):  
Lauren Guggenheim ◽  
S. Mo Jang ◽  
Soo Young Bae ◽  
W. Russell Neuman

This study examines the dynamics of the framing of mass shooting incidences in the U.S. occurring in the traditional commercial online news media and Twitter. We demonstrate that there is a dynamic, reciprocal relationship between the attention paid to different aspects of mass shootings in online news and in Twitter: tweets tend to be responsive to traditional media reporting, but traditional media framing of these incidents also seems to resonate from public framing in the Twitterverse. We also explore how different frames become prominent as they compete among media as time passes after shooting events. Finally, we find that key differences emerge between norms of journalistic routine and how users rely on Twitter to express their reactions to these tragic shooting incidents.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document