Biogenic Mineral Formation by Iron Reducing Bacteria

2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (S2) ◽  
pp. 756-757
Author(s):  
Alice C. Dohnalkova ◽  
Yuri A. Gorby ◽  
Jeff McLean ◽  
Jim K. Fredrickson ◽  
David W. Kennedy

Dissimilatory iron reducing bacteria have been extensively studied for their ability to reduce ferric iron Fe(III) to ferrous iron Fe(II), as well as several multivalent heavy metals and radionuclides as a mode of energy-yielding respiration. Shewanella putrefaciens strain CN32 was used to investigate the mechanism of biogenic metal reduction in systems simulating conditions of natural anaerobic iron reducing environments in the subsurface contaminated with U and Tc as a possible strategy for bioremediation of soils containing these contaminants. As previously reviewed, U(VI) is soluble in most groundwaters, while U(VI) generally precipitates as the insoluble mineral uraninite. Formation of bioreduced minerals can lead to immobilization of these contaminants in the subsurface, which might be a very useful strategy for in situ bioremediation.To determine the metal reduction and the formation of biogenic Fe(II), U(IV) and Tc(IV) minerals, experiments with CN32 exposed to well-defined aqueous solutions were conducted. Metal reduction was measured with time, and the resulting solids were analyzed by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energydispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS).

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-Yu Lin ◽  
Yen-Hua Chen ◽  
Jey-Jau Lee ◽  
Hwo-Shuenn Sheu

Minerals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 149
Author(s):  
Edward J. O’Loughlin ◽  
Maxim I. Boyanov ◽  
Christopher A. Gorski ◽  
Michelle M. Scherer ◽  
Kenneth M. Kemner

The bioreduction of Fe(III) oxides by dissimilatory iron-reducing bacteria may result in the formation of a suite of Fe(II)-bearing secondary minerals, including magnetite (a mixed Fe(II)/Fe(III) oxide), siderite (Fe(II) carbonate), vivianite (Fe(II) phosphate), chukanovite (ferrous hydroxy carbonate), and green rusts (mixed Fe(II)/Fe(III) hydroxides). In an effort to better understand the factors controlling the formation of specific Fe(II)-bearing secondary minerals, we examined the effects of Fe(III) oxide mineralogy, phosphate concentration, and the availability of an electron shuttle (9,10-anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonate, AQDS) on the bioreduction of a series of Fe(III) oxides (akaganeite, feroxyhyte, ferric green rust, ferrihydrite, goethite, hematite, and lepidocrocite) by Shewanella putrefaciens CN32, and the resulting formation of secondary minerals, as determined by X-ray diffraction, Mössbauer spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. The overall extent of Fe(II) production was highly dependent on the type of Fe(III) oxide provided. With the exception of hematite, AQDS enhanced the rate of Fe(II) production; however, the presence of AQDS did not always lead to an increase in the overall extent of Fe(II) production and did not affect the types of Fe(II)-bearing secondary minerals that formed. The effects of the presence of phosphate on the rate and extent of Fe(II) production were variable among the Fe(III) oxides, but in general, the highest loadings of phosphate resulted in decreased rates of Fe(II) production, but ultimately higher levels of Fe(II) than in the absence of phosphate. In addition, phosphate concentration had a pronounced effect on the types of secondary minerals that formed; magnetite and chukanovite formed at phosphate concentrations of ≤1 mM (ferrihydrite), <~100 µM (lepidocrocite), 500 µM (feroxyhyte and ferric green rust), while green rust, or green rust and vivianite, formed at phosphate concentrations of 10 mM (ferrihydrite), ≥100 µM (lepidocrocite), and 5 mM (feroxyhyte and ferric green rust). These results further demonstrate that the bioreduction of Fe(III) oxides, and accompanying Fe(II)-bearing secondary mineral formation, is controlled by a complex interplay of mineralogical, geochemical, and microbiological factors.


Author(s):  
R. E. Herfert

Studies of the nature of a surface, either metallic or nonmetallic, in the past, have been limited to the instrumentation available for these measurements. In the past, optical microscopy, replica transmission electron microscopy, electron or X-ray diffraction and optical or X-ray spectroscopy have provided the means of surface characterization. Actually, some of these techniques are not purely surface; the depth of penetration may be a few thousands of an inch. Within the last five years, instrumentation has been made available which now makes it practical for use to study the outer few 100A of layers and characterize it completely from a chemical, physical, and crystallographic standpoint. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) provides a means of viewing the surface of a material in situ to magnifications as high as 250,000X.


2017 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 355-364
Author(s):  
A. Kopp ◽  
T. Bernthaler ◽  
D. Schmid ◽  
G. Ketzer-Raichle ◽  
G. Schneider

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi-Toan Nguyen ◽  
Alistair Garner ◽  
Javier Romero ◽  
Antoine Ambard ◽  
Michael Preuss ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Si Athena Chen ◽  
◽  
Peter Heaney ◽  
Jeffrey E. Post ◽  
Peter J. Eng ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 47 (19) ◽  
pp. 3137-3149 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Morcrette ◽  
Y. Chabre ◽  
G. Vaughan ◽  
G. Amatucci ◽  
J.-B. Leriche ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ogün Baris Tapar ◽  
Jérémy Epp ◽  
Matthias Steinbacher ◽  
Jens Gibmeier

AbstractAn experimental heat treatment chamber and control system were developed to perform in-situ X-ray diffraction experiments during low-pressure carburizing (LPC) processes. Results from the experimental chamber and industrial furnace were compared, and it was proven that the built system is reliable for LPC experiments. In-situ X-ray diffraction investigations during LPC treatment were conducted at the German Electron Synchrotron Facility in Hamburg Germany. During the boost steps, carbon accumulation and carbide formation was observed at the surface. These accumulation and carbide formation decelerated the further carbon diffusion from atmosphere to the sample. In the early minutes of the diffusion steps, it is observed that cementite content continue to increase although there is no presence of gas. This effect is attributed to the high carbon accumulation at the surface during boost steps which acts as a carbon supply. During quenching, martensite at higher temperature had a lower c/a ratio than later formed ones. This difference is credited to the early transformation of austenite regions having lower carbon content. Also, it was noticed that the final carbon content dissolved in martensite reduced compared to carbon in austenite before quenching. This reduction was attributed to the auto-tempering effect.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document