Analysis of Interesting Materials in the Environmental SEM: You Put What in Your Microscope?

2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (S2) ◽  
pp. 776-777
Author(s):  
John F. Mansfield

The environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM™) and variable pressure electron microscope (VPSEM) have become accepted tools in the contemporary electron microscopy facility. Their flexibility and their ability to image almost any sample with little, and often no, specimen preparation has proved so attractive that each manufacturer of scanning electron microscopes now markets a low vacuum model.The University of Michigan Electron Microbeam Analysis Laboratory (EMAL) operates two variable pressure instruments, an ElectroScan E3 ESEM and a Hitachi S3200N VPSEM. The E3 ESEM was acquired in the early 1990s with funding from the Amoco Foundation and it has been used to examine an extremely wide variety of different materials. Since EMAL serves the entire university community, and offers support to neighboring institutions and local industry, the types of materials examined span a wide range. There are users from Materials Science & Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Nuclear Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Physics, Chemistry, Geology, Biology, Biophysics, Pharmacy and Pharmacology.

Author(s):  
P.B. Hirsch

The benefit to society arising from developments in instrumentation and computation can be judged primarily by the advances in knowledge and understanding generated by their application in different branches of science, covered in the other papers in this symposium. Without advances in instrumentation none of these advances is possible; developments in instrumentation and in image interpretation are therefore fundamental to and precede scientific advances in fields in which knowledge of structure is important. There is little doubt that the revolutionary first step was the development of the transmission electron microscope (TEM) in 1931 by Ernst Ruska; a second was the development of the scanning electron microscope (SEM); and the third the introduction of the scanning tunnelling microscope (STM) for high resolution surface imaging, by Binnig and Rohrer.The TEM and SEM have undergone continuous developments over the last 50 years or so, and have had a far-reaching impact in a wide range of disciplines; the STM is a relative newcomer but no doubt it too will have an increasing impact in furthering our understanding of solids and surfaces in particular. Once the basic instruments became available subsequent developments have been driven by the demands of the scientific disciplines in which these instruments have been applied. Many of the new developments in instrumentation and interpretation have been pioneered by the users themselves, and these in turn have led to modifications in commercial instruments to make such advances in technique available to the user community as a whole. Other developments have been initiated directly by the manufacturers as a result of a perceived need. There has been and continues to be a close interaction between the developers of hardware (not only of electron microscopes but also of ancillary equipment, e.g. microanalysis attachments, image processing equipment, specialist specimen stages, and specimen preparation facilities) and the users, leading to extensions in the range of applications and the types of information which can be obtained by electron microscopy. The following examples from the developments of electron microscopy in Materials Science illustrate these interactions and the particular advances arising from specific developments:


Author(s):  
Klaus-Ruediger Peters

Environmental scanning electron microscopes (ESEM) operate at high as well as at low vacuum (<2.5 kPa: ~20 Torr) but utilize all advantages of conventional high vacuum SEM (large specimen size, high depth of focus and specimen tilt capability, TV-rate scanning for imaging dynamic events). They have the advantage of imaging wet specimens as well as insulators without the need of any specimen preparation. Previously, environmental scanning microscopy was restricted to the BSE signal collected with BSE detectors. SE signals cannot be collected with the Everhart-Thornley detector because it cannot operate at low vacuum. Using positively biased electron collectors, it is now possible to collect an SE signal. However, the origin and quality of this signal need to be further characterized.An ElectroScan ESEM was used equipped with SE and BSE detectors and operated at 7-30 kV with partial water pressures of 0.1-2.5 kPa (∼1-20 Torr).


Author(s):  
Stuart McKeman

Several recent advances have had a major potential impact on the microscopy of ceramic materials. The ability of modern scanning electron microscopes to image uncoated materials, at low voltage for example, whilst still maintaining high resolution should make possible a wide variety of experiments that were hitherto impossible to contemplate. This ability to look at the unmodified surface of a ceramic enables iterative or dynamic experiments to be done with a lot more confidence in the results than has been possible before. A second advance has been the introduction of microscopes capable of operating at higher pressures than was previously possible. This makes possible the ability to image specimens in a variety of different environments. The environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM) exploits of both of these novel areas. The aim of this review is to highlight areas where the unique capabilities of the ESEM may be applied to advance our understanding of ceramics.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 275-278
Author(s):  
Joanna Z. Kadłubowska ◽  
Ewa Kalinowska-Kucharska

Several year long investigations of the developmental cycle of <i>Microsphaera palczewskii</i> occurring on the leaves of <i>Caragana arborescens</i> in Central Poland are reported. The material was studied with light and scanning electron microscopes. The scanning microscopy micrographs of the clistothecia and appendages presented in this report are the first micrographs of this species.


2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-31
Author(s):  
Khaled S. Hatamleh ◽  
Qais A. Khasawneh ◽  
Adnan Al-Ghasem ◽  
Mohammad A. Jaradat ◽  
Laith Sawaqed ◽  
...  

Abstract Scanning Electron Microscopes are extensively used for accurate micro/nano images exploring. Several strategies have been proposed to fine tune those microscopes in the past few years. This work presents a new fine tuning strategy of a scanning electron microscope sample table using four bar piezoelectric actuated mechanisms. The introduced paper presents an algorithm to find all possible inverse kinematics solutions of the proposed mechanism. In addition, another algorithm is presented to search for the optimal inverse kinematic solution. Both algorithms are used simultaneously by means of a simulation study to fine tune a scanning electron microscope sample table through a pre-specified circular or linear path of motion. Results of the study shows that, proposed algorithms were able to minimize the power required to drive the piezoelectric actuated mechanism by a ratio of 97.5% for all simulated paths of motion when compared to general non-optimized solution.


2002 ◽  
Vol 8 (S02) ◽  
pp. 452-453
Author(s):  
Raynald Gauvin ◽  
Hendrix Demers ◽  
Kevin Robertson ◽  
James Finch

1997 ◽  
Vol 3 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1243-1244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raynald Gauvin ◽  
Steve Yue

The observation of microstructural features smaller than 300 nm is generally performed using Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) because conventional Scanning Electron Microscopes (SEM) do not have the resolution to image such small phases. Since the early 1990’s, a new generation of microscopes is now available on the market. These are the Field Emission Gun Scanning Electron Microscope with a virtual secondary electron detector. The field emission gun gives a higher brightness than those obtained using conventional electron filaments allowing enough electrons to be collected to operate the microscope with incident electron energy, E0, below 5 keV with probe diameter smaller than 5 nm. At 1 keV, the electron range is 60 nm in aluminum and 10 nm in iron (computed using the CASINO program). Since the electron beam diameter is smaller than 5 nm at 1 keV, the resolution of these microscopes becomes closer to that of TEM.


2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (S2) ◽  
pp. 782-783
Author(s):  
C. J. Gilpin.

Of all the commercially available scanning electron microscopes which operate at “low vacuum” the ESEM is the most suitable for examining biological samples. in order to maintain samples with liquid water present the specimen chamber must be capable of operating at a pressure of at least 4.6 Torr (611 pascals) of water vapour pressure (the vapour pressure of water at 0°C). Use of lower pressures or a chamber gas other than water vapour will result in evaporation of water from the sample at a rate dependant on the partial pressure difference between the sample and its surrounding environment. Tables of relative humidity as a function of water vapour pressure and temperature are readily available to calculate desired settings for the microscope.One of the difficulties associated with examining fresh biological material is the need to have the microscope and sample available in the same location at the same time.If sample collection occurs at a site remote from the microscope inevitable necrotic changes will occur before examination can be carried out.


1979 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Marshall ◽  
J. Staubesand ◽  
H. Hese

The arteries of mini pigs which had been exposed to the local or systemic action of recognised ‘risk factors’ for arterial disease were examined with the light microscope, and the transmission and scanning electron microscopes. Initially the scanning instrument revealed adhesions of platelets in different stages of development, but showed an apparently intact endothelium. With the transmission electron microscope, however, degenerative changes in the endothelium could be observed. Increased blood platelet aggregation was also present. After a few weeks we could see a remarkable focal thickening of the intima, together with deposits on the endothelium of platelets, erythrocytes and fibrin (“mixed microparietal thrombosis”). After 6 months fully developed arteriosclerosis of the abdominal aorta had appeared.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document