scholarly journals Detection of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Dimers on Wet and Intact Eukaryotic Cells in an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (S2) ◽  
pp. 138-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Peckys ◽  
U. Werner ◽  
N. de Jonge

Extended abstract of a paper presented at Microscopy and Microanalysis 2013 in Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, August 4 – August 8, 2013.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 394-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Walker ◽  
Julie Rothacker ◽  
Christine Henderson ◽  
Edouard C. Nice ◽  
Bruno Catimel ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. e24739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanna Björkelund ◽  
Lars Gedda ◽  
Pavel Barta ◽  
Magnus Malmqvist ◽  
Karl Andersson

1983 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 419 ◽  
Author(s):  
DE Hollis ◽  
RE Chapman ◽  
BA Panaretto ◽  
GPM Moore

Intravenous infusion of 4�5-4�7 mg of mouse epidermal growth factor (mEGF) into nine castrated male Merino sheep for 26 h resulted in complete casting of the fleeces 6-8 days later. The morphological changes which occurred in the skin were studied in skin samples taken before infusion and at intervals between 1 hand 42 days after the infusion had begun. Wool fibres from the shed fleeces were examined with the scanning electron microscope.


Author(s):  
G.D. Danilatos

The environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM) has evolved as the natural extension of the scanning electron microscope (SEM), both historically and technologically. ESEM allows the introduction of a gaseous environment in the specimen chamber, whereas SEM operates in vacuum. One of the detection systems in ESEM, namely, the gaseous detection device (GDD) is based on the presence of gas as a detection medium. This might be interpreted as a necessary condition for the ESEM to remain operational and, hence, one might have to change instruments for operation at low or high vacuum. Initially, we may maintain the presence of a conventional secondary electron (E-T) detector in a "stand-by" position to switch on when the vacuum becomes satisfactory for its operation. However, the "rough" or "low vacuum" range of pressure may still be considered as inaccessible by both the GDD and the E-T detector, because the former has presumably very small gain and the latter still breaks down.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document