Electronic medical orders for life-sustaining treatment in New York State: Length of stay, direct costs in an ICU setting

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 584-589
Author(s):  
Denise Serrano-Eanelli ◽  
Emma Fattakhov ◽  
Murali Krishna ◽  
Jill Embler ◽  
Steven Byrne ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectiveIn the United States, approximately 20% patients die annually during a hospitalization with an intensive care unit (ICU) stay. Each year, critical care costs exceed $82 billion, accounting for 13% of all inpatient hospital costs. Treatment of sepsis is listed as the most expensive condition in US hospitals, costing more than $20 billion annually. Electronic Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (eMOLST) is a standardized documentation process used in New York State to convey patients’ wishes regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation and other life-sustaining treatments. No study to date has looked at the effect of eMOLST as an advance care planning tool on ICU and hospital costs using estimates of direct costs. The objective of our study was to investigate whether signing of eMOLST results in any reduction in length of stay and direct costs for a community-based hospital in New York State.MethodA retrospective chart review was conducted between July 2016 and July 2017. Primary outcome measures included length of hospital stay, ICU length of stay, total direct costs, and ICU costs. Inclusion criteria were patients ≥65 years of age and admitted into the ICU with a diagnosis of sepsis. An independent samples t test was used to test for significant differences between those who had or had not completed the eMOLST form.ResultThere were no statistical differences for patients who completed or did not complete the eMOLST form on hospital's total direct cost, ICU cost, total length of hospital stay, and total hours spent in the ICU.Significance of resultsCompleting an eMOLST form did not have any effect on reducing total direct cost, ICU cost, total length of hospital stay, and total hours spent in the ICU.

BMJ ◽  
2015 ◽  
pp. h6246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas E Nikkel ◽  
Stephen L Kates ◽  
Michael Schreck ◽  
Michael Maceroli ◽  
Bilal Mahmood ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 335-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Teres ◽  
Keith Boyd ◽  
John Rapoport ◽  
Martin Strosberg ◽  
Robert Baker ◽  
...  

Decisions to place limitations on the care of patients are complex, and they often involve physicians, other medical professionals, patients, or a surrogate decision-maker, family members, and others. In 1988, the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations (JCAHO) and the New York State government adopted two different approaches to this complex issue of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders: one involved professional self-regulation, whereas the other mandated a standardized procedure requiring completion of legal documents. This study examines the impact of these two different approaches to writing of DNR orders for adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients on utilization and resulting length of stay. The study used three data bases. One is from a larger study designed to update the Mortality Probability Model (MPM), a measure of severity of illness for ICU patients. This data base includes consecutive admissions to the adult ICUs of four hospitals in the northeastern United States. The second is a similar data base from the European-North American Study of Severity Systems (ENAS), and it includes 20 hospitals. The third data base, a 1991 national survey of ICUs by the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), lists characteristics of patients in ICUs in the United States on a specific day. Logistic regression was used to analyze the first two data bases; the percentage of patients in New York with DNR orders was calculated for each of the three data bases and compared with patients in neighboring states. Length of ICU and hospital stay was measured in the first two data sets. In the MPM data, 14.4% of medical patients in New York had a DNR order written at the time of ICU discharge, compared with 198% of medical patients in Massachusetts; and 4.3% of New York surgical patients had a DNR order written at the time of ICU discharge, compared with 8.3% of surgical patients in Massachusetts. In the ENAS data, 7.4% of New York nonoperative patients has a DNR order in place within 24 hours, compared with 8.4% of such patients in the other states; and 1.0% of New York operative patients had DNR orders, compared with 3–5% of operative patients from other states. Logistic regression revealed that a New York patient was less likely to have a DNR order written than a patient located in one of the other states studied. Data from the SCCM survey demonstrated that the New York percentage of patients with “no CPR” orders was 5.50%, compared with a percentage of 6.87% in other states. With few exceptions, these differences between New York and surrounding states did not have an impact on hospital length of stay. During the period studied following implementation of New York's DNR Law, utilization of DNR orders in New York State was significantly lower than neighboring states. This decreased utilization, however, did not effect hospital utilization as measured through length of stay and ICU admissions.


1973 ◽  
Vol 130 (8) ◽  
pp. 904-909 ◽  
Author(s):  
ABBOTT S. WEINSTEIN ◽  
DIANE DIPASQUALE ◽  
FREDERICK WINSOR

1988 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 561-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Winick

Some lessons can be learned from an analysis of the experience of New York State's civil commitment program, which was operating from 1966 through 1979, and was the largest and most expensive in the country. Judges need to be carefully selected and trained and assigned to relevant cases: staff must be selected in terms of specific criteria and trained and supervised, clients have to be assigned to particular facilities in accordance with their needs; referral procedures ought to be established in advance of operations; the civil commitment must differ from a court sending someone to a facility; networks with other programs have to be articulated; formal and reliable procedures for absconding clients are necessary; length of stay has to be critically examined; and formal evaluation is a necessity. The New York State program suffered because of problems in all of these areas.


Author(s):  
William B Borden ◽  
Thomas H Dennison ◽  
Deborah A Freund ◽  
Allison Marier ◽  
Kevin Cook ◽  
...  

Background: Given the rising costs of medical care in the US, efforts at improving quality of care seek also to control expenditures with high-value healthcare - better quality and lower cost. Prior studies have used variations in Medicare reimbursements at the regional level, rather than individual hospital costs, to account for the unique patient case-mix of individual hospitals. To date, higher expenditures have been unrelated to clinical outcomes. We sought to explore variation using costs, rather than payment, and to study the links between inpatient hospital Medicare expenditures, hospital costs, and Medicare's quality indicators. Methods: In New York State, we analyzed hospital discharges in 2008 for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the New York State Planning and Resource Cooperative System (SPARCS) database. Using SPARCS reported hospital charges and the Medicare cost-to-charge ratio we calculated, at the individual hospital level, the total costs and departmental-level ancillary costs (costs of specific hospital services) for patients discharged with a primary diagnosis of AMI. We compared total inpatient cost to Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care Medicare inpatient reimbursements, analyzed variation in ancillary costs by hospital cardiac program peer groups (based on highest-level capability), and related total costs to Medicare AMI quality scores. Results: The study analyzed data that represented 56,000 AMI cases in 150 hospitals. When comparing total costs to Medicare inpatient reimbursements, there was high correlation with an R-squared of 0.84. The mean ancillary costs per AMI discharge were $12,006 [standard deviation (SD) $4,301, coefficient of variation (COV) 0.358] for cardiac surgery-capable, $6,452 [SD $1,732, COV 0.268] for percutaneous coronary intervention-capable, $5,104 [SD $2,548, COV 0.499] for diagnostic catheterization-capable, and $4,167 [SD $2,756, COV 0.661] for non-invasive hospitals. There was no overall correlation between AMI total costs and Medicare composite AMI quality scores, yet 19.7% (28 out of 142 hospitals with AMI quality score reporting in 2008) of hospitals had above average quality scores, with lower than average total costs. Conclusions: In AMI hospitalizations, regional Medicare reimbursements have a strong correlation with total hospital costs. Hospitals vary greatly in their costs of caring for AMI patients. Though there is no overall association between the level of costs and performance on standardized quality scores, high-value healthcare in AMI does exist with numerous high-quality, low-cost hospitals. Examining the expenditures of these hospitals may be useful in identifying patterns of quality and cost-effective patient care. These findings support that high-spending is not necessary for high-quality, and that high-value healthcare can be realized.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document