scholarly journals Effects of scheme default insurance on decisions and financial outcomes in defined benefit pension schemes

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 288-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Butt
Keyword(s):  
Indirect Effect ◽  
Pension Scheme ◽  
Defined Benefit ◽  
Financial Outcomes ◽  
Pension Schemes ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
New Framework

AbstractA simulation investigation of the effect of default insurance on the optimal equity allocation and deficit spread period of a model defined benefit pension scheme is performed, using the old and new frameworks of the Pension Protection Fund in the U.K. as a starting point. The old default insurance levy framework encourages an increase in the allocation to equities, creating an indirect effect of increased deficits. The new framework reverses the effect to a reduction in the allocation to equities, thus reducing deficits. In addition the gaming element of default insurance is investigated and found to significantly increase optimal equity allocation and deficit spread period, leading to a significant increase in deficits.

Objectives and methods of funding defined benefit pension schemes

1987 ◽  
Vol 114 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. D. McLeish ◽  
C. M. Stewart
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
Pension Scheme ◽  
Occupational Pension ◽  
Defined Benefit ◽  
Pension Schemes ◽  
The Future ◽  
State Pension

The Objective of Funding1.1. As every actuarial student is taught:‘Pay-as-you-go is acceptable for a State pension scheme because the State is, for practical purposes, assured of a continuing existence.’However:‘The position is quite different in the case of an occupational scheme, since an employer's business may cease to exist.’1.2. It seems to us to follow, therefore, that the prime purpose of funding an occupational pension scheme must be to secure the accrued benefits, whatever they might be, in the event of the employer being unable or unwilling to continue to pay at some time in the future. To that end, the contributions would have to be sufficient both to pay the benefits as they fell due for as long as the scheme continued, and also to establish and maintain a fund which would be sufficient to secure the accrued benefits in the event of contributions ceasing and the scheme being discontinued, whenever that might occur.

scholarly journals Integrated risk management for defined benefit pension schemes: a practical guide

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. N. Hitchcox ◽  
C. Patel ◽  
C. J. Ramsey ◽  
E. L. Studd ◽  
L. T. Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Risk Management ◽  
Continuous Process ◽  
Working Party ◽  
Investment Strategy ◽  
Pension Scheme ◽  
Defined Benefit ◽  
Pension Schemes ◽  
Integrated Risk ◽  
Integrated Risk Management

AbstractThe Working Party has developed some practical hints and tips for those developing integrated risk management (IRM) plans for UK defined benefit pension schemes in the context of the requirements of the Pensions Regulator. Four case studies are presented to illustrate its conclusions, which are encapsulated in the ten commandments for effective IRM. IRM is the consideration of investment, funding and covenant issues, and how these interact. Its purpose should be to aid decision making and so should have a clear outcome in mind. It should be a continuous process and should form part of everyday trustee governance – it is not simply a one-off exercise. Whilst most Trustees and advisors consider funding issues when setting their investment strategy and vice versa, fewer fully integrate covenant into their decision-making process. However, covenant underpins all risk taken in a pension scheme and so needs to form a regular part of trustee discussions and analysis by advisors.

scholarly journals Stochastic Actuarial Modelling of a Defined-Benefit Social Security Pension Scheme: An Analytical Approach

2008 ◽  
Vol 3 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 127-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subramaniam Iyer
Keyword(s):  
Social Security ◽  
Social Insurance ◽  
Stochastic Methods ◽  
Pension Scheme ◽  
Defined Benefit ◽  
Defined Contribution ◽  
Stochastic Variation ◽  
Simplified Approach ◽  
Pension Schemes ◽  
Social Security Reforms

ABSTRACTAmong the systems in place in different countries for the protection of the population against the long-term contingencies of old-age (or retirement), disability and death (or survivorship), defined-benefit social security pension schemes, i.e. social insurance pension schemes, by far predominate, despite the recent trend towards defined-contribution arrangements in social security reforms. Actuarial valuations of these schemes, unlike other branches of insurance, continue to be carried out almost exclusively on traditional, deterministic lines. Stochastic applications in this area, which have been restricted mainly to occasional special studies, have relied on the simulation technique. This paper develops an analytical model for the stochastic actuarial valuation of a social insurance pension scheme. Formulae are developed for the expected values, variances and covariances of and among the benefit expenditure and salary bill projections and their discounted values, allowing for stochastic variation in three key input factors, i.e., mortality, new entrant intake, and interest (net of salary escalation). Each deterministic output of the valuation is thus supplemented with a confidence interval, that is, a range with an attached probability. The treatment covers the premiums under the different possible financial systems for these schemes, which differ from the funding methods of private pensions, as well as the testing of the level of the Fund ratio when the future contributions schedule is pre-determined. Although it is based on a relatively simplified approach and refers only to retirement pensions, with full adjustment in line with salary escalation, the paper brings out the stochastic features of pension scheme projections and illustrates a comprehensive stochastic valuation. It is hoped that the paper will stimulate interest in further research, both of a theoretical and a practical nature, and lead to progressively increasing recourse to stochastic methods in social insurance pension scheme valuations.

Merging Schemes: An Economic Analysis of Defined Benefit Pension Scheme Merger Criteria

2006 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. M. S. Sutcliffe
Keyword(s):  
Economic Analysis ◽  
Financial Markets ◽  
Balance Of Power ◽  
The State ◽  
Pension Scheme ◽  
Defined Benefit ◽  
Pension Schemes

ABSTRACTThe conditions under which pension schemes merge is an important issue which has been under-researched. Mergers can affect the strength of the sponsor's covenant and the balance of power between the trustees and the sponsor, as well as the deficit or the surplus of the receiving scheme and its funding ratio. This paper sets out two financial criteria to be met by any pension scheme merger: no profit or loss on merging with another scheme; and no dilution of the funding ratio. After defining a merger basis for valuing the assets and liabilities, and allowing for adjustments to the funding ratio via side receipts and payments; it is shown that, whether or not these criteria are met, depends on the state of the financial markets.

Objectives and Methods of Funding Defined Benefit Pension Schemes

1985 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 338-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. D. McLeish ◽  
C. M. Stewart
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
Pension Scheme ◽  
Defined Benefit ◽  
Pension Schemes ◽  
State Pension

1.1. As every actuarial student is taught:“Pay-as-you-go is acceptable for a State pension scheme because the State is, for practical purposes, assured of a continuing existence”.However:“The position is quite different in the case of an occupational scheme, since an employer's business may cease to exist”.

Financial Management of the UK Pension Protection Fund

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 345-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
J-P. Charmaille ◽  
M.G. Clarke ◽  
J. Harding ◽  
C. Hildebrand ◽  
I.W. Mckinlay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Financial Management ◽  
Enterprise Risk Management ◽  
Pension Scheme ◽  
Defined Benefit ◽  
Corporate Sponsor ◽  
Stakeholder Groups ◽  
Pension Schemes ◽  
Enterprise Risk ◽  
The Uk

AbstractThe UK Pension Protection Fund (PPF) was established in April 2005 to protect the pensions of members of UK private sector defined benefit pension schemes which have insufficient assets and whose corporate sponsor fails. The Fund takes over the pension scheme assets and assumes responsibility for the payment of compensation to the former members of the scheme. The PPF is funded by a levy on the population of eligible schemes. This paper discusses the application of Enterprise Risk Management principles and techniques to the unique situation of the PPF. The elements of the financial management of the Fund have been developed by reference to practice within proprietary insurance institutions and within pension funds. The paper will be of interest and, we hope, of some value to students, researchers and analysts and also to the PPF's own stakeholder groups that have a stake in an effective pension protection regime.

scholarly journals Who wins? Evaluating the impact of UK public sector pension scheme reforms

2016 ◽  
Vol 237 ◽  
pp. R38-R46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander M. Danzer ◽  
Peter Dolton ◽  
Chiara Rosazza Bondibene
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Local Government ◽  
Civil Service ◽  
Pension Scheme ◽  
Defined Benefit ◽  
Level Of Education ◽  
Fire Services ◽  
Pension Schemes ◽  
The Uk ◽  
The Impact

Radical changes have been implemented to pension schemes across the UK public sector from April 2015. This paper simulates how these changes will affect the lifetime pension and how the negotiated pension changes compare across six public sector schemes by level of education. Specifically, we simulate the occupation specific Defined Benefit (DB) pension wealth accumulated for a representative employee over the lifecycle by factoring in the recent changes to pension conditions. We find that less educated workers with low or moderate earnings in the NHS, Local Government and Civil Service schemes are the winners having secured an increase in the value of their pension of between 10–20 per cent. Graduate workers with faster wage growth in the Civil Service, Teachers and Local Government schemes lose between 3 per cent and 5 per cent. This is in sharp contrast with the Police and Fire services who have lost around 40 per cent irrespective of their education.

scholarly journals Valuation of defined benefit pension schemes in IAS 19 employee benefits - true and fair?

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-42
Author(s):  
Bridget McNally ◽  
Anne M. Garvey ◽  
Thomas O’Connor
Keyword(s):  
Design Methodology ◽  
Pension Fund ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Employee Benefits ◽  
Pension Scheme ◽  
Portfolio Investment ◽  
Defined Benefit ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Pension Schemes ◽  
The Impact

PurposeThis paper aims to argue that the accounting standards’ requirements for the valuation of defined benefit pension schemes in the financial statements of scheme sponsoring companies potentially produce an artificial result which is at odds with the “faithful representation” and “relevance” objectives of these standards.Design/methodology/approachThe approach is a theoretical analysis of the relevant reporting standards with the use of a practical example to demonstrate the impact where trustees adopt a hedged approach to portfolio investment.FindingsWhere a pension fund engages in asset liability matching and invests in “risk-free” assets, the term, quantity and duration/maturity of which is intended to match some or all of its scheme liabilities, the required accounting treatment potentially results in the sponsoring company’s financial statements reporting fluctuating surpluses or deficits each year which are potentially ill informed and misleading.Originality/valuePension scheme surpluses or deficits reported in the financial statements of listed companies are potentially very significant numbers; however, the dangers posed by theoretical nature of the calculation have largely gone unreported.

scholarly journals Sustaining the unsustainable? The political sustainability of pensions in Finland and the Netherlands

2021 ◽  
pp. 095892872110356
Author(s):  
Ville-Pekka Sorsa ◽  
Natascha van der Zwan
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
Pension Scheme ◽  
The Political ◽  
Defined Benefit ◽  
Defined Contribution ◽  
Power Resources ◽  
Pension Schemes ◽  
Political Sustainability ◽  
Sustainability Challenges ◽  
Parametric Adjustment

What makes a pension scheme sustainable? Most answers to this question have revolved around expert assessments of pension schemes’ affordability or adequacy. This study shifts focus from the financial or social sustainability of pension scheme designs to their political sustainability. Political sustainability refers to policymakers’ ability and willingness to sustain pension schemes in the face of perceived challenges. We seek to fill a key research gap concerning the political sustainability of pensions by highlighting the processes of parametric adjustment through which pension schemes are sustained. We show how capital, labour and state actors have been able to actively sustain collective defined benefit (DB) pension schemes in two coordinated market economies, Finland and the Netherlands. The two countries have managed to sustain their DB pensions for relatively long periods of time despite facing the same sustainability challenges that have motivated paradigmatic shifts in other pension systems. We find that sustaining has been successful thanks to a governance culture in which policymakers have been willing to keep all pension scheme parameters open for negotiation and an institutional context that made policymakers able to turn parametric pension reforms into power resources for further reforms. Our findings also explain recent changes in the Netherlands, which moved the Dutch system towards collective defined contribution pensions.

scholarly journals Economic capital for defined benefit pension schemes: An application to the UK Universities Superannuation Scheme

2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 471-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
BRUCE T PORTEOUS ◽  
PRADIP TAPADAR ◽  
WEI YANG
Keyword(s):  
European Commission ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Economic Capital ◽  
Green Paper ◽  
Pension Scheme ◽  
Defined Benefit ◽  
Pension Schemes ◽  
The Future ◽  
Regulatory Regimes ◽  
The Uk

AbstractThis article considers the amount of economic capital that defined benefit (DB) pension schemes potentially need to cover the risks they are running. A real open scheme, the Universities Superannuation Scheme, is modelled and used to illustrate our results and, as expected, economic capital requirements are large. We discuss the appropriateness of these results and what they mean for the DB pension scheme industry and their sponsors. The article is particularly pertinent following the recent European Commission Green Paper on the future of European pensions systems, its call for advice on reviewing the Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provision Directive and the introduction of the Basel 2 and Solvency 2 risk-based regulatory regimes for banking and insurance, respectively.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document