Low Salinity Polymer Flooding: Effect on Polymer Rheology, Injectivity, Retention, and Oil Recovery Efficiency

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 5715-5732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhijit Kakati ◽  
Ganesh Kumar ◽  
Jitendra S. Sangwai
2019 ◽  
Vol 181 ◽  
pp. 106211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeonkyeong Lee ◽  
Wonsuk Lee ◽  
Youngho Jang ◽  
Wonmo Sung

SPE Journal ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Yang Zhao ◽  
Shize Yin ◽  
Randall S. Seright ◽  
Samson Ning ◽  
Yin Zhang ◽  
...  

Summary Combining low-salinity-water (LSW) and polymer flooding was proposed to unlock the tremendous heavy-oil resources on the Alaska North Slope (ANS). The synergy of LSW and polymer flooding was demonstrated through coreflooding experiments at various conditions. The results indicate that the high-salinity polymer (HSP) (salinity = 27,500 ppm) requires nearly two-thirds more polymer than the low-salinity polymer (LSP) (salinity = 2,500 ppm) to achieve the target viscosity at the condition of this study. Additional oil was recovered from LSW flooding after extensive high-salinity-water (HSW) flooding [3 to 9% of original oil in place (OOIP)]. LSW flooding performed in secondary mode achieved higher recovery than that in tertiary mode. Also, the occurrence of water breakthrough can be delayed in the LSW flooding compared with the HSW flooding. Strikingly, after extensive LSW flooding and HSP flooding, incremental oil recovery (approximately 8% of OOIP) was still achieved by LSP flooding with the same viscosity as the HSP. The pH increase of the effluent during LSW/LSP flooding was significantly greater than that during HSW/HSP flooding, indicating the presence of the low-salinity effect (LSE). The residual-oil-saturation (Sor) reduction induced by the LSE in the area unswept during the LSW flooding (mainly smaller pores) would contribute to the increased oil recovery. LSP flooding performed directly after waterflooding recovered more incremental oil (approximately 10% of OOIP) compared with HSP flooding performed in the same scheme. Apart from the improved sweep efficiency by polymer, the low-salinity-induced Sor reduction also would contribute to the increased oil recovery by the LSP. A nearly 2-year pilot test in the Milne Point Field on the ANS has shown impressive success of the proposed hybrid enhanced-oil-recovery (EOR) process: water-cut reduction (70 to less than 15%), increasing oil rate, and no polymer breakthrough so far. This work has demonstrated the remarkable economical and technical benefits of combining LSW and polymer flooding in enhancing heavy-oil recovery.


SPE Journal ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (02) ◽  
pp. 417-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saeid Khorsandi ◽  
Changhe Qiao ◽  
Russell T. Johns

Summary Polymer flooding can significantly improve sweep and delay breakthrough of injected water, thereby increasing oil recovery. Polymer viscosity degrades in reservoirs with high-salinity brines, so it is advantageous to inject low-salinity water as a preflush. Low-salinity waterflooding (LSW) can also improve local-displacement efficiency by changing the wettability of the reservoir rock from oil-wet to more water-wet. The mechanism for wettability alteration for LSW in sandstones is not very well-understood; however, experiments and field studies strongly support that cation-exchange (CE) reactions are the key elements in wettability alteration. The complex coupled effects of CE reactions, polymer properties, and multiphase flow and transport have not been explained to date. This paper presents the first analytical solutions for the coupled synergistic behavior of LSW and polymer flooding considering CE reactions, wettability alteration, adsorption, inaccessible pore volume (IPV), and salinity effects on polymer viscosity. A mechanistic approach that includes the CE of Ca2+, Mg2+, and Na+ is used to model the wettability alteration. The aqueous phase viscosity is a function of polymer and salt concentrations. Then, the coupled multiphase-flow and reactive-transport model is decoupled into three simpler subproblems—the first in which CE reactions are solved, the second in which a variable polymer concentration can be added to the reaction path, and the third in which fractional flows can be mapped onto the fixed cation and polymer-concentration paths. The solutions are used to develop a front-tracking algorithm, which can solve the slug-injection problem of low-salinity water as a preflush followed by polymer. The results are verified with experimental data and PennSim (2013), a general-purpose compositional simulator. The analytical solutions show that decoupling allows for estimation of key modeling parameters from experimental data, without considering the chemical reactions. Recovery can be significantly enhanced by a low-salinity preflush before polymer injection. For the cases studied, the improved oil recovery (IOR) for a chemically tuned low-salinity polymer (LSP) flood can be as much as 10% original oil in place (OOIP) greater than with considering polymer alone. The results show the structure of the solutions, and, in particular, the velocity of multiple shocks that develop. These shocks can interact, changing recovery. For example, poor recoveries obtained in corefloods for small-slug sizes of low salinity are explained by the intersection of shocks without considering mixing. The solutions can also be used to benchmark numerical solutions and for experimental design. We demonstrate the potential of LSP flooding as a less-expensive and more-effective way for performing polymer flooding when the reservoir wettability can be altered with chemically tuned low-salinity brine.


2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 392-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pi Yanfu ◽  
Guo Xiaosai ◽  
Pi Yanming ◽  
Wu Peng

Aim at the reservoir characteristics of Suizhong 36-1 Oil Field, this paper has developed typical two-dimensional physical model in parallel between the layers and studied the macroscopic displacement effect of polymer flooding and binary compound flooding, and studied the interlayer spread law and oil displacement efficiency of polymer flooding and binary combination flooding by using saturation monitoring system deeply. The results show that: when the multiples of pore volume injected for polymer was 0.3 after water flooding, the recovery efficiency increased by 10.3%, and when the multiples of pore volume injected for binary combination flooding was 0.3 after polymer flooding and the recovery efficiency could also increase by 19.3%, and the effect of enhanced oil recovery was obvious during the binary combination flooding and polymer flooding; Saturation monitoring data showed that there formed oil wall and increased the flow resistance and expanded the swept volume during the stage of polymer flooding and binary combination flooding, effective use of low-permeability layer was the key to improve oil recovery.


Processes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Santoso ◽  
Victor Torrealba ◽  
Hussein Hoteit

Polymer flooding is an effective enhanced oil recovery technology used to reduce the mobility ratio and improve sweep efficiency. A new polymer injection scheme is investigated that relies on the cyclical injection of low-salinity, low-concentration polymer slugs chased by high-salinity, high-concentration polymer slugs. The effectiveness of the process is a function of several reservoir and design parameters related to polymer type, concentration, salinity, and reservoir heterogeneity. We use reservoir simulations and design-of-experiments (DoE) to investigate the effectiveness of the proposed polymer injection scheme. We show how key objective functions, such as recovery factor and injectivity, are impacted by the reservoir and design parameters. In this study, simulations showed that the new slug-based process was always superior to the reference polymer injection scheme using the traditional continuous injection scheme. Our results show that the process is most effective when the polymer weight is high, corresponding to large inaccessible pore-volumes, which enhances polymer acceleration. High vertical heterogeneity typically reduces the process performance because of increased mixing in the reservoir. The significance of this process is that it allows for increased polymer solution viscosity in the reservoir without increasing the total mass of polymer, and without impairing polymer injectivity at the well.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document